User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 11/25/2014 12:12:23 AM EDT
[#1]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Where did you get that piece of information from? Sig lists 4.5" semi-auto models in their IOP program. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
With the CZ at $850 I'll wait for the 4.5" K-version of the MPX to be released. I'm not going to pay a premium just so I could toss the longer barrel and hand guard that I don't want. The CZ should hold me over while I wait for the form 1 to come back.  Good luck on that. The MPX with 4.5" barrel is going to be select fire only. Like I have been saying, your going to have to buy the barrel kit. Where did you get that piece of information from? Sig lists 4.5" semi-auto models in their IOP program. That's funny because I was told no IOP pricing on the semi only MPX and now you say there is. Maybe the 4.5" then will just by LEO only because nowhere else is the 4.5" listed even in the 2014 Sig Sauer catalog. Only listed the 8" pistol, 8" pistol with arm brace and 8" SBR. No 4.5" listed anywhere. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/25/2014 12:14:35 AM EDT
[#2]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
That's funny because I was told no IOP pricing on the semi only MPX and now you say there is. Maybe the 4.5" then will just by LEO only because nowhere else is the 4.5" listed even in the 2014 Sig Sauer catalog. Only listed the 8" pistol, 8" pistol with arm brace and 8" SBR. No 4.5" listed anywhere. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
With the CZ at $850 I'll wait for the 4.5" K-version of the MPX to be released. I'm not going to pay a premium just so I could toss the longer barrel and hand guard that I don't want. The CZ should hold me over while I wait for the form 1 to come back. Good luck on that. The MPX with 4.5" barrel is going to be select fire only. Like I have been saying, your going to have to buy the barrel kit. Where did you get that piece of information from? Sig lists 4.5" semi-auto models in their IOP program. That's funny because I was told no IOP pricing on the semi only MPX and now you say there is. Maybe the 4.5" then will just by LEO only because nowhere else is the 4.5" listed even in the 2014 Sig Sauer catalog. Only listed the 8" pistol, 8" pistol with arm brace and 8" SBR. No 4.5" listed anywhere. http://www.sigsauer.com/upFiles/CmsContent/documents/2014-LE-GOV-Price%20List.pdf |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/25/2014 12:20:02 AM EDT
[#3]
 |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/25/2014 12:29:35 AM EDT
[#4]
Quote HistoryGranted that info is several months old, but I don't see any reason why they would drop the 4.5" models, just that they wouldn't be part of the initial run. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/25/2014 12:34:06 AM EDT
[#5]
Quote HistoryQuote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
With the CZ at $850 I'll wait for the 4.5" K-version of the MPX to be released. I'm not going to pay a premium just so I could toss the longer barrel and hand guard that I don't want. The CZ should hold me over while I wait for the form 1 to come back. Good luck on that. The MPX with 4.5" barrel is going to be select fire only. Like I have been saying, your going to have to buy the barrel kit. Where did you get that piece of information from? Sig lists 4.5" semi-auto models in their IOP program. That's funny because I was told no IOP pricing on the semi only MPX and now you say there is. Maybe the 4.5" then will just by LEO only because nowhere else is the 4.5" listed even in the 2014 Sig Sauer catalog. Only listed the 8" pistol, 8" pistol with arm brace and 8" SBR. No 4.5" listed anywhere. http://www.sigsauer.com/upFiles/CmsContent/documents/2014-LE-GOV-Price%20List.pdf I guess I am paying 1307.00 for the 8" pistol which I will SBR. Not a bad price. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/25/2014 1:29:49 AM EDT
[#6]
I dont understand how anyone can comment on which models will be available when not a single production gun has hit the street. Sometimes these threads just get silly. Even their own price lists frequently change down the road.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/25/2014 2:41:21 AM EDT
[#7]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I dont understand how anyone can comment on which models will be available when not a single production gun has hit the street. Sometimes these threads just get silly. Even their own price lists frequently change down the road. I guess it's called "faith" |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/25/2014 8:33:48 PM EDT
[#8]
Just checking in so you guys have someone to bash besides Sig
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/26/2014 4:37:41 AM EDT
[#9]
bash sig never
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/26/2014 11:29:08 PM EDT
[#10]
This was just posted on the Sig forum.
quote: Quoted: quote: Quoted: There are some A-holes on ar15 saying Kevin Brittingham said there will be a 10mm version. Roll Eyes We will see. Razz my fingers are crossed. I can confirm that there are no plans for a .45 or 10mm MPX at this time. Kevin was joking. I did receive notification that SIG will be shipping demo MPXs to media reps. I'll be doing an in-depth review once I get my T&E sample. The media getting some production copies should be considered a good sign for those who want their own personal copies. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/27/2014 1:45:30 AM EDT
[#11]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
This was just posted on the Sig forum. quote: Quoted: quote: Quoted: There are some A-holes on ar15 saying Kevin Brittingham said there will be a 10mm version. Roll Eyes We will see. Razz my fingers are crossed. I can confirm that there are no plans for a .45 or 10mm MPX at this time. Kevin was joking. I did receive notification that SIG will be shipping demo MPXs to media reps. I'll be doing an in-depth review once I get my T&E sample. The media getting some production copies should be considered a good sign for those who want their own personal copies. Wait, I thought they were shipping to distributors.......in two weeks.......like two weeks ago. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/27/2014 11:46:55 AM EDT
[#12]
Lol. The MPX is never gonna come out at this rate.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/27/2014 12:48:59 PM EDT
[#13]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Lol. The MPX is never gonna come out at this rate. I bet the 10mm MPX ships before the 9mm.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/27/2014 3:04:22 PM EDT
[#14]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I bet the 10mm MPX ships before the 9mm. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Lol. The MPX is never gonna come out at this rate. I bet the 10mm MPX ships before the 9mm. It's quiet entertaining watching the whole MPX thing pan out..........we keep hearing "two more weeks", but I lost interest in buying an MPX for now, due to hearing "two more weeks" for the past 2 months..........I just bought $1700 worth of suppressors, so my MPX money is gone until next year.
I'm honestly betting that the CZ EVO is out before the MPX, however I could be mistaken. I'm very interested in the MPX......but not if it keeps getting pushed back over and over and over again. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/27/2014 3:37:05 PM EDT
[#15]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
It's quiet entertaining watching the whole MPX thing pan out..........we keep hearing "two more weeks", but I lost interest in buying an MPX for now, due to hearing "two more weeks" for the past 2 months..........I just bought $1700 worth of suppressors, so my MPX money is gone until next year.
I'm honestly betting that the CZ EVO is out before the MPX, however I could be mistaken. I'm very interested in the MPX......but not if it keeps getting pushed back over and over and over again. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Lol. The MPX is never gonna come out at this rate. I bet the 10mm MPX ships before the 9mm. It's quiet entertaining watching the whole MPX thing pan out..........we keep hearing "two more weeks", but I lost interest in buying an MPX for now, due to hearing "two more weeks" for the past 2 months..........I just bought $1700 worth of suppressors, so my MPX money is gone until next year.
I'm honestly betting that the CZ EVO is out before the MPX, however I could be mistaken. I'm very interested in the MPX......but not if it keeps getting pushed back over and over and over again. I am curious about the CZ Evo. I had no idea about it until this thread, can it be SBR'd? |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/27/2014 4:23:16 PM EDT
[#16]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I am curious about the CZ Evo. I had no idea about it until this thread, can it be SBR'd? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Lol. The MPX is never gonna come out at this rate. I bet the 10mm MPX ships before the 9mm. It's quiet entertaining watching the whole MPX thing pan out..........we keep hearing "two more weeks", but I lost interest in buying an MPX for now, due to hearing "two more weeks" for the past 2 months..........I just bought $1700 worth of suppressors, so my MPX money is gone until next year.
I'm honestly betting that the CZ EVO is out before the MPX, however I could be mistaken. I'm very interested in the MPX......but not if it keeps getting pushed back over and over and over again. I am curious about the CZ Evo. I had no idea about it until this thread, can it be SBR'd? All that's ever been shown in the EVO is a short barrel. It'll ship as a pistol, which you can then SBR to put the stock on. Unlike the typical get the long barrel and then cut it down. Yes, it should be possible to SBR it, although we don't know if the stocks will be available or if there will be a modification or block that needs to be altered in order to fit it on. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/27/2014 5:28:33 PM EDT
[#17]
Quote HistoryQuoted: All that's ever been shown in the EVO is a short barrel. It'll ship as a pistol, which you can then SBR to put the stock on. Unlike the typical get the long barrel and then cut it down. Yes, it should be possible to SBR it, although we don't know if the stocks will be available or if there will be a modification or block that needs to be altered in order to fit it on. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Lol. The MPX is never gonna come out at this rate. I bet the 10mm MPX ships before the 9mm. It's quiet entertaining watching the whole MPX thing pan out..........we keep hearing "two more weeks", but I lost interest in buying an MPX for now, due to hearing "two more weeks" for the past 2 months..........I just bought $1700 worth of suppressors, so my MPX money is gone until next year. I'm honestly betting that the CZ EVO is out before the MPX, however I could be mistaken. I'm very interested in the MPX......but not if it keeps getting pushed back over and over and over again. I am curious about the CZ Evo. I had no idea about it until this thread, can it be SBR'd? All that's ever been shown in the EVO is a short barrel. It'll ship as a pistol, which you can then SBR to put the stock on. Unlike the typical get the long barrel and then cut it down. Yes, it should be possible to SBR it, although we don't know if the stocks will be available or if there will be a modification or block that needs to be altered in order to fit it on. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/27/2014 5:34:59 PM EDT
[#18]
2 more weeks Turkish.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/27/2014 6:48:11 PM EDT
[#19]
Once you SBR a weapon and it falls under NFA, 922 no longer applies, no gray area to it. As far as folding stocks for the EVO pistol is concerened, you just remove the back plate and attach the folding stock, to easy. Problem is, where to find the stocks. I have not seen them available or for sale anywhere. I am sure they will be available in the future.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/27/2014 6:58:27 PM EDT
[#20]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Once you SBR a weapon and it falls under NFA, 922 no longer applies, no gray area to it. As far as folding stocks for the EVO pistol is concerened, you just remove the back plate and attach the folding stock, to easy. Problem is, where to find the stocks. I have not seen them available or for sale anywhere. I am sure they will be available in the future. This was my understanding of 922 as well but I am no expert. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/27/2014 7:37:30 PM EDT
[#21]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
2 more weeks Turkish. It was 2 more weeks 5 weeks ago! Bollocks, I'm out of here. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/27/2014 7:42:47 PM EDT
[#22]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
It was 2 more weeks 5 weeks ago! Bollocks, I'm out of here. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
2 more weeks Turkish. It was 2 more weeks 5 weeks ago! Bollocks, I'm out of here. Shit, I was told 2 weeks back at the Shot Show. It is what it is. However with the Jan release of the CZ EVO and the low MSRP, I think since SIg took their sweet ass time trying to get the MPX out, it's going to really hurt their sales. I have been reading on other boards that people are going to buy the CZ EVO and saying screw it to the Sig MPX. Hope you read these threads Sig because I think you are going to miss the boat on this one. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/29/2014 3:00:25 AM EDT
[#23]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Shit, I was told 2 weeks back at the Shot Show. It is what it is. However with the Jan release of the CZ EVO and the low MSRP, I think since SIg took their sweet ass time trying to get the MPX out, it's going to really hurt their sales. I have been reading on other boards that people are going to buy the CZ EVO and saying screw it to the Sig MPX. Hope you read these threads Sig because I think you are going to miss the boat on this one. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
2 more weeks Turkish. It was 2 more weeks 5 weeks ago! Bollocks, I'm out of here. Shit, I was told 2 weeks back at the Shot Show. It is what it is. However with the Jan release of the CZ EVO and the low MSRP, I think since SIg took their sweet ass time trying to get the MPX out, it's going to really hurt their sales. I have been reading on other boards that people are going to buy the CZ EVO and saying screw it to the Sig MPX. Hope you read these threads Sig because I think you are going to miss the boat on this one. I've actually gone the other direction, which is strange as I have liked the Evo for a long time. If SIG makes a factory SBR available, I'm in. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/29/2014 3:32:55 AM EDT
[#24]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Once you SBR a weapon and it falls under NFA, 922 no longer applies, no gray area to it. As far as folding stocks for the EVO pistol is concerened, you just remove the back plate and attach the folding stock, to easy. Problem is, where to find the stocks. I have not seen them available or for sale anywhere. I am sure they will be available in the future. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/29/2014 5:47:38 PM EDT
[#25]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
ATF has written letters both ways... Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Once you SBR a weapon and it falls under NFA, 922 no longer applies, no gray area to it. As far as folding stocks for the EVO pistol is concerened, you just remove the back plate and attach the folding stock, to easy. Problem is, where to find the stocks. I have not seen them available or for sale anywhere. I am sure they will be available in the future. Well since ATF/NFA Branch is approving your form 1 and if they approve it for the CZ EVO, I assume your GTG. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/29/2014 5:51:24 PM EDT
[#26]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Well since ATF/NFA Branch is approving your form 1 and if they approve it for the CZ EVO, I assume your GTG. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Once you SBR a weapon and it falls under NFA, 922 no longer applies, no gray area to it. As far as folding stocks for the EVO pistol is concerened, you just remove the back plate and attach the folding stock, to easy. Problem is, where to find the stocks. I have not seen them available or for sale anywhere. I am sure they will be available in the future. Well since ATF/NFA Branch is approving your form 1 and if they approve it for the CZ EVO, I assume your GTG. Once again them approving the form has nothing to do with the legalities of your build. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/29/2014 9:29:00 PM EDT
[#27]
Meh.... I spent my MPX money on a 7.62 can and a 8.5" .300BLK SBR, going to build a Leonidas clone. If the MPX ever does come out and proves a good weapon... I'll buy one when all the barrel kits are available. I'll check back in about a year
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/29/2014 9:36:29 PM EDT
[#28]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Once again them approving the form has nothing to do with the legalities of your build. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Once you SBR a weapon and it falls under NFA, 922 no longer applies, no gray area to it. As far as folding stocks for the EVO pistol is concerened, you just remove the back plate and attach the folding stock, to easy. Problem is, where to find the stocks. I have not seen them available or for sale anywhere. I am sure they will be available in the future. Well since ATF/NFA Branch is approving your form 1 and if they approve it for the CZ EVO, I assume your GTG. Once again them approving the form has nothing to do with the legalities of your build. Of course it does. They aren't going to approve something that is illegal. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/29/2014 10:56:20 PM EDT
[#29]
Have you ever done a form 1
 none of that is discussed or mentioned on the form.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/29/2014 11:03:08 PM EDT
[#30]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Of course it does. They aren't going to approve something that is illegal. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Once you SBR a weapon and it falls under NFA, 922 no longer applies, no gray area to it. As far as folding stocks for the EVO pistol is concerened, you just remove the back plate and attach the folding stock, to easy. Problem is, where to find the stocks. I have not seen them available or for sale anywhere. I am sure they will be available in the future. Well since ATF/NFA Branch is approving your form 1 and if they approve it for the CZ EVO, I assume your GTG. Once again them approving the form has nothing to do with the legalities of your build. Of course it does. They aren't going to approve something that is illegal. It would be 922r compliant if you put enough U.S. made parts in it so why would they disapprove the Form 1? It's your responsibility to make it legal. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/29/2014 11:25:54 PM EDT
[#31]
Yes I have done a form 1 and the NFA branch isn't goin to approve anything that would make possession illegal. 922 does not apply if you make your CZ EVO for example into an SBR. If 922 did apply then your from 1 would be denied. There are currently no after market US made parts that I am aware of so the NFA branch knows this and would not approve it if required. Trust me, most of these examiners are up on the current weapon trends out there and when they see a rash of form 1's come in, they would know if US parts were available, but since making a import weapon an SBR, 922 does not apply so it's a mute point.
Hopefully I explained that right. I once converted a Benelli M4 shotgun into a 14" short barreled shotgun and when I did my Form 1, I did not need any US made parts to make it legal under NFA. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/29/2014 11:55:54 PM EDT
[#32]
Aftermarket parts availability has nothing to do with it. I'm a machinist with an assoc. degree in gunsmithing. Every custom gun part I make from scratch is 922r compliant.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/30/2014 12:10:07 AM EDT
[#33]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Aftermarket parts availability has nothing to do with it. I'm a machinist with an assoc. degree in gunsmithing. Every custom gun part I make from scratch is 922r compliant. Your not getting what I am trying to say. 922(r) does not apply after you have made a registered SBR. But you go ahead and make all the parts you want. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/30/2014 12:25:46 AM EDT
[#34]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Once again them approving the form has nothing to do with the legalities of your build. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Once you SBR a weapon and it falls under NFA, 922 no longer applies, no gray area to it. As far as folding stocks for the EVO pistol is concerened, you just remove the back plate and attach the folding stock, to easy. Problem is, where to find the stocks. I have not seen them available or for sale anywhere. I am sure they will be available in the future. Well since ATF/NFA Branch is approving your form 1 and if they approve it for the CZ EVO, I assume your GTG. Once again them approving the form has nothing to do with the legalities of your build. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/30/2014 12:35:56 AM EDT
[#35]
I guess you have the letter that requires even NFA weapons to comply with 922(r). I guess if that letter (2009) still holds true, I will not be purchasing a CZ EVO. I would only want one if I could SBR it. Oh well, still planned on purchasing an MPX and going the SBR route.
Thanks for the info and who has the other letter contradicting this one? |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/30/2014 1:06:54 AM EDT
[#36]
Holy shit. Some of you guys have no idea when to leave well enough alone. Just on here bullshitting and posting just to do it.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/30/2014 5:14:06 AM EDT
[#37]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Holy shit. Some of you guys have no idea when to leave well enough alone. Just on here bullshitting and posting just to do it. What do you mean By "bullshitting". Someone starting talking about 922 and some on here were trying to clarify it. I for one was told by the NFA branch when I did my form 1 on the Benelli M4 that 922 did not apply. So as far as "bullshitting" on here I am not. It was a fact. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/30/2014 10:13:15 AM EDT
[#38]
It seems that if lawfully imported as a complete pistol and the registrant simply registers the firearm as a SBR and adds a stock, that 922(r) does not apply. Amazingly the 2010 letter specifically asks this question and ATF does not directly answer the question.
The 1994 letter: 
The 2006 letter: 
The 2010 letter: 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/30/2014 10:19:18 AM EDT
[#39]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
It seems that if lawfully imported as a complete pistol and the registrant simply registers the firearm as a SBR and adds a stock, that 922(r) does not apply. Amazingly the 2010 letter specifically asks this question and ATF does not directly answer the question. The 1994 letter: http://i57.tinypic.com/8x5yqb.jpg The 2006 letter: http://i62.tinypic.com/jsdi1l.jpg http://i58.tinypic.com/mkdqf8.jpg The 2010 letter: http://i62.tinypic.com/35ltbop.jpg http://i62.tinypic.com/2vcbxqq.jpg http://i61.tinypic.com/vu7lv.jpg maybe someone some take these letters and write a new one to the atf asking for definite clarification. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/30/2014 1:09:11 PM EDT
[#40]
I also know that you could ask 10 NFA examiners the same question and get 10 different answers. So just take the answer that best suits your needs lol.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/30/2014 3:30:53 PM EDT
[#41]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
maybe someone some take these letters and write a new one to the atf asking for definite clarification. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
It seems that if lawfully imported as a complete pistol and the registrant simply registers the firearm as a SBR and adds a stock, that 922(r) does not apply. Amazingly the 2010 letter specifically asks this question and ATF does not directly answer the question. The 1994 letter: http://i57.tinypic.com/8x5yqb.jpg The 2006 letter: http://i62.tinypic.com/jsdi1l.jpg http://i58.tinypic.com/mkdqf8.jpg The 2010 letter: http://i62.tinypic.com/35ltbop.jpg http://i62.tinypic.com/2vcbxqq.jpg http://i61.tinypic.com/vu7lv.jpg maybe someone some take these letters and write a new one to the atf asking for definite clarification. And the more people write and ask for clarification, the more likely the ATF is to arbitrarily say no. There is a pretty strongly established precedent. why fuck with it? |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/30/2014 3:47:23 PM EDT
[#42]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
And the more people write and ask for clarification, the more likely the ATF is to arbitrarily say no. There is a pretty strongly established precedent. why fuck with it? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
It seems that if lawfully imported as a complete pistol and the registrant simply registers the firearm as a SBR and adds a stock, that 922(r) does not apply. Amazingly the 2010 letter specifically asks this question and ATF does not directly answer the question. The 1994 letter: http://i57.tinypic.com/8x5yqb.jpg The 2006 letter: http://i62.tinypic.com/jsdi1l.jpg http://i58.tinypic.com/mkdqf8.jpg The 2010 letter: http://i62.tinypic.com/35ltbop.jpg http://i62.tinypic.com/2vcbxqq.jpg http://i61.tinypic.com/vu7lv.jpg maybe someone some take these letters and write a new one to the atf asking for definite clarification. And the more people write and ask for clarification, the more likely the ATF is to arbitrarily say no. There is a pretty strongly established precedent. why fuck with it? Um lets see, 10 years confinement and or $10,000.00 fine  I would hate to be the first and made an example of. Lose my job, gun rights and holy crap the attorney fees that I would have to pay even if I came out the victor. Better safe than sorry.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/30/2014 3:54:38 PM EDT
[#43]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Um lets see, 10 years confinement and or $10,000.00 fine I would hate to be the first and made an example of. Lose my job, gun rights and holy crap the attorney fees that I would have to pay even if I came out the victor. Better safe than sorry.Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
It seems that if lawfully imported as a complete pistol and the registrant simply registers the firearm as a SBR and adds a stock, that 922(r) does not apply. Amazingly the 2010 letter specifically asks this question and ATF does not directly answer the question. The 1994 letter: http://i57.tinypic.com/8x5yqb.jpg The 2006 letter: http://i62.tinypic.com/jsdi1l.jpg http://i58.tinypic.com/mkdqf8.jpg The 2010 letter: http://i62.tinypic.com/35ltbop.jpg http://i62.tinypic.com/2vcbxqq.jpg http://i61.tinypic.com/vu7lv.jpg maybe someone some take these letters and write a new one to the atf asking for definite clarification. And the more people write and ask for clarification, the more likely the ATF is to arbitrarily say no. There is a pretty strongly established precedent. why fuck with it? Um lets see, 10 years confinement and or $10,000.00 fine I would hate to be the first and made an example of. Lose my job, gun rights and holy crap the attorney fees that I would have to pay even if I came out the victor. Better safe than sorry.Thats why I said someone... as in singular - one person. Yes, no one has ever been prosecuted for 922(r) violation that I am aware of, but I would hate to be that person that is made an example of. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/30/2014 7:50:53 PM EDT
[#44]
Would be better for someone in the industry to write such a letter. Individuals with the desire to write letters need to step back, take deep breath and STOP writing letters.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/2/2014 2:03:32 AM EDT
[#45]
How did this thread go from when is the Sig MPX coming out to 922r/ATF letters? Maybe you guys arguing those points should start another thread
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/2/2014 2:36:19 AM EDT
[#46]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
How did this thread go from when is the Sig MPX coming out to 922r/ATF letters? Maybe you guys arguing those points should start another thread We'll have 922 figured out before this gun hits the shelves
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/2/2014 11:40:10 AM EDT
[#47]
Quote HistoryQuoted: We'll have 922 figured out before this gun hits the shelves Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: How did this thread go from when is the Sig MPX coming out to 922r/ATF letters? Maybe you guys arguing those points should start another thread We'll have 922 figured out before this gun hits the shelves Well, you've got two weeks to get it figured out then.  |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/2/2014 11:42:24 AM EDT
[#48]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
How did this thread go from when is the Sig MPX coming out to 922r/ATF letters? Maybe you guys arguing those points should start another thread It started with the CZ EVO vs the MPX and release dates and then talk about making the CZ EVO an SBR. Then would it violate 922(r). That is how this came to be. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/3/2014 7:50:04 AM EDT
[#49]
isn't the mpx made in usa?? then why the 922r? plus I bet the internals are made in usa so no 922r ?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/3/2014 8:27:01 AM EDT
[#50]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
isn't the mpx made in usa?? then why the 922r? plus I bet the internals are made in usa so no 922r ? Moot point. The MPX won't ever be released at this rate..... Two more weeks...
|
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
