So, finally decided to try out wet tumbling - looked at the Rebel package bit figured i would start with the Frankford to see how I liked it. Ordered up the FART and a separator from Amazon which arrived today - so I headed up publix to pick up some Dawn and Lemishine and ran a few loads tonight.
First batch was 223 and I was a bit underwhelmed - this was a processed batch with primers removed, and while it didn't really make them any shinier (they had already been dry tumbled prior to processing on the 1050), it did clean up the primer pockets nice. Now since my first time my "recipe' could have been off - I did three small squirts of dawn and a couple shakes of lemishine - yeah not very scientific - I know. Next batch was some 45ACP that did not have the primer pockets removed, but had also been dry tumbled. Same amount of dawn, but a couple more shakes of lemishine this time. They definitely came out shinier. Two hours on each run. I guess I just need to tweak the measurements - or maybe the open primer pockets and bottleneck brass just take longer...
Anyway, the interesting part - the 223 had all been processed on the 1050, so decaped, swaged, sized/trimmed with the RT-1550 and neck tension opened back up to 224 with an M expander die. However, after wet tumbling and some drying time at 170* in the oven, the neck tension has dropped back down a full line on the neck tension gauge (from Ballistic Tools) which puts it around 221. I checked quite a few rounds all all measured out the same at 221. And I know they were all 224 beforehand as I was checking them pretty regular coming off the press. Not sure if it was the hot water, tumbling, or heating/cooling but the neck diameter definitely got smaller.
In the end, it's not a major issue I suppose as I'll just move the M die to the loading TH in the #2 position - I had been using a Univ. Decap die there just to clean up the flash holes and punch out any straggling media, but if wet tumbling I suppose I won't need to worry about that anymore so will expand on the loading TH vs the processing TH.