Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel

Log In

A valid email is required.
Password is required.
Posted: 12/2/2001 7:40:14 AM EST
Check out the following link for the overview of the topic. CLINTON refused Intel. on our enemies. WHY?

http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/20011130/ts/attack_article_dc_1.html

This is a story that may have an interesting twist. How did Bin Laden get away from the Clinton Administration? Why didn’t he feel the burn for his actions, especially after Clinton said he would go after those responsible for the attacks in Saudi Arabia, Africa, and Yemen? Lets consider the track records of the mentioned government officials, Bill Clinton and his administration.

In 1996 The Sudan offered to arrest Bin Laden. Clinton said NO

In May 1996 White house asked Sudan to allow Bin Laden to leave the country.
after many more attempts to give the US the edge, the Whitehouse refused.

There was no response to an extradition offer in 2000, AFTER the embassay bombings. What the heck was the Whitehouse doing?

Here is a guess. Could it be possible that Clinton took a dive on the issue? Clinton took money to free Mark Rich. Proof is out there that many cash exchanges were made for pardons, which falls into line with the Clinton version of democracy. How much did the Clintons take from the Bin Ladens to allow him and his cronies to continue?
If this were true, then there would be one more arrest to be made before all of this is over, along with 6000 murder charges to be added to the 20-some that are up in the air in Arkansas. This is a story that should be investigated before there is another banquet or awards ceremony to honor this traitor and his buddies.

The following is a great forum on the subject
http://www.lucianne.com/threads2.asp?artnum=156137

Link Posted: 12/2/2001 10:31:20 AM EST
Link Posted: 12/3/2001 8:37:47 AM EST
I believe that once the media gets started on this, Clinton will have his longed for legacy.
Link Posted: 12/4/2001 5:18:46 AM EST
Hell have his legacy but I don't think it's the one he is longing for.
Link Posted: 12/4/2001 6:37:54 AM EST
History is going to reflect very poorly on Bill Clinton. He screwed up the CIA and the US military. The news media is not coming down on him too hard at the moment because their views is pretty much reflected his views. But overtime, that will change as more facts become known.
Link Posted: 12/4/2001 10:52:33 AM EST
[Last Edit: 12/4/2001 11:53:22 AM EST by Goad]
Hello theprofessor:

There is plenty of reason to believe that bin Laden has been fighting a war against USA since the earliest days of the Clinton era. His agents may have been in Somalia. Clinton did not want to fight bin Laden and 9-11 is one result.

During Clinton's era we lost a STEALTH PLANE in Eastern Europe. Has this been reverse engineered YET?

It has been reported many CRUISE MISSLES he shot into the Sudan desert didn't explode and were sold to China. Has this been reverse engineered YET?

Consider the long term effects of the technology we GAVE to China:

-ROCKETRY
-SATELLITES

And what about the apparently stolen and still missing computer storage media that contain the very latest data on:

-FUSION WEAPONRY

We need a missile shield and soon, IMHO.
Top Top