User Panel
Neither sell both and get something better with a good optic.
|
|
You can get 762 at wally world. Good luck finding 6.8 anywhere.
|
|
|
I'm not knocking Aimpoints i use their Micros on all my go-to's . But he is going for a jack of all trades type of rifle an the aimpoint may not be ideal ,also the Ak doesn't even have a side mount. So in terms of a do it all rifle a 5.56 platform with a good 1-4 or 1-6 scope would be my choice for ammo/parts availability. The 5.56 if more versatile than x39 and 6.8 isn't prolific enough.
Quoted:
I see an aimpoint on the 6.8. How are you defining "good"? Is ammo a factor? I say Arsenal 762x39 I guess View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Neither sell both and get something better with a good optic. I see an aimpoint on the 6.8. How are you defining "good"? Is ammo a factor? I say Arsenal 762x39 I guess |
|
In general, I prefer ARs over AKs. In this specific instance however, I would pick the AK.
|
|
|
Not understanding the aversion to 6.8 spc, even in it's standard loadings it blows away both 7.62x39 and 5.56. Ammo is available and not any more expensive than other commercially available hunting ammo.
http://www.gunbot.net/ammo/rifle/68spc/ |
|
Personally, I'd take the AR.
Yeah, the ammo is more expensive, but it's also more accurate. |
|
|
In this case, I'd take the AR, mainly because the Aimpoint would allow me to engage targets in lower-light conditions and with greater speed, plus it has BUIS in case the optic fails. It also has a flash suppressor, which I prefer to a muzzle brake, especially in low-light conditions.
If the AK had a similar optic and flash suppressor, then it would just come down to ammo and mag availability (which favors the AK), although personally I'd prefer a stamped receiver AK to a milled receiver, due to weight savings. |
|
|
|
AK..........6.8 is out there but not as readily available as x39
If the AR was 5.56 i would say AR |
|
^I agree with him.
IF I could get the AR in 5.56, that would be my choice. But if I had to choose between those two... I'd take the AK. |
|
Those choices blow. If I was saddled one with either, I'd sell it right quick and put that coin to good use. For a general-purpose defensive rifle, I'll take a 5.56 AR.
|
|
Quoted:
You can get 762 at wally world. Good luck finding 6.8 anywhere. View Quote Everyone I have been to in MD and VA has this stuff Fusion |
|
Our walmart always has 6.8 fusion, always, not much else except 5.56 and 7.62x 39 but 6.8 is there, Dunhams has it, fleetfarm has it,
|
|
I love and have 5 AK's and 9 AR's. That said I would keep the AR and buy another upper later when you have the $$. 5.56 upper for ease of ammo.
|
|
I thought cheap imported 7.62 was gone now.
I personally don't like AK's that much. I like certain things about them, but I'd choose the AR. |
|
Choose one for what?
Plinking at the range self defense war SHTF range....cqb medium long??? |
|
I'd take an AR-15 in 5.56mm over an AK. But I don't care for expensive ammo like 6.8mm. So I'd take the AK-47 over the 6.8mm AR-15.
|
|
If I had to choose between those two, I'd put the aimpoint on the AK and use it. A gun is no good if you dont shoot it alot, and AK ammo is cheaper unless you reload and have a bunch of brass. I like 20 round Ak mags. They make the gun more nimble in the hands for me. I dont care much for milled receivers because they are heavy.
|
|
Given the choice above, and those two specific rifles in those two specific calibers, I'd take the AK any day. Some folks here can find 6.8 SPC; it might as well not exist for me in regards to local availability.
The sights really don't matter to me at all, as I grew up on irons, and I'm not going to be taking long-range precision shots at night anyway. Stick a light on the AK, and if you do have to use it at night, either make sure the target's close enough to not need the light, or shoot and move. As for accuracy, well, he posted what looks like an Arsenal, and mine's plenty accurate to the limits of the cartridge. If he'd posted a 5.56 AR, I'd leave the AK behind, though. |
|
I would take the 6.8 SPC, no contest, I already reload for 6.8 SPC, so that's a no brainer. I would also install a quality hand guard and buttstock to improve the overall ergonomics, I really don't like the Magpul MOE accessories. Maybe something along the lines of the Magpul UBR or Vltor EMOD buttstock along with a Vltor VIS-KM upper receiver.
|
|
Of those two...AK in 7.62 not even a shadow of a doubt in my mind.
|
|
Sticking to question I'd take the AK between those exact two as they are. In real life if I could have only one a very light weight 16" with a 1-6 optic
|
|
I would take the 6.8.
With that said, I would not paint myself into such a corner. I would rock a Colt Ar-15 in .223 and a nice bolt gun in .308. |
|
|
|
|
5.56 nato ammo is cheap and plentiful, 7.62x39mm ammo is cheap and plentiful that's the fodder that will be available in a SHIF situation
so pick your platform, a decent AR or AK will fill the need, the most COMMON pistol ammo is .40 S&W and 9mm A Glock w/ a conversion barrel , and you can shoot both |
|
Quoted:
5.56 nato ammo is cheap and plentiful, 7.62x39mm ammo is cheap and plentiful that's the fodder that will be available in a SHIF situation so pick your platform, a decent AR or AK will fill the need, the most COMMON pistol ammo is .40 S&W and 9mm A Glock w/ a conversion barrel , and you can shoot both View Quote You know, I think I've asked this a few times on here and didn't get an answer. I thought there was a ban on imported russian stuff. I see far less 7.62 x 39 on shelves than I used to. I have not looked a TON, but at Wal Mart last night there definitely was way more .223 than 7.62 x 39. And most of the 7.62 x39 I see is like Tula or american stuff. I think. What is the deal with this? Am I right about the ban. Furthermore I don't think I've ever actually seen a 5.45 x 39 round, other than when somebody let me shot his krink a few years ago at the range. Which I thought was a fricking sweet gun. It had the little wire hanger stock and it was pretty handy and easy to shoot. Anyways..... As I see it, .223 is way more common and plentiful than just about anything else. 5.56 is common too. But I think I see more .223. But you add the two together and in my experience it's about the most plentiful round there is. In the little bit that I look. |
|
|
Quoted:
You know, I think I've asked this a few times on here and didn't get an answer. I thought there was a ban on imported russian stuff. I see far less 7.62 x 39 on shelves than I used to. I have not looked a TON, but at Wal Mart last night there definitely was way more .223 than 7.62 x 39. And most of the 7.62 x39 I see is like Tula or american stuff. I think. What is the deal with this? Am I right about the ban. Furthermore I don't think I've ever actually seen a 5.45 x 39 round, other than when somebody let me shot his krink a few years ago at the range. Which I thought was a fricking sweet gun. It had the little wire hanger stock and it was pretty handy and easy to shoot. Anyways..... As I see it, .223 is way more common and plentiful than just about anything else. 5.56 is common too. But I think I see more .223. But you add the two together and in my experience it's about the most plentiful round there is. In the little bit that I look. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
5.56 nato ammo is cheap and plentiful, 7.62x39mm ammo is cheap and plentiful that's the fodder that will be available in a SHIF situation so pick your platform, a decent AR or AK will fill the need, the most COMMON pistol ammo is .40 S&W and 9mm A Glock w/ a conversion barrel , and you can shoot both You know, I think I've asked this a few times on here and didn't get an answer. I thought there was a ban on imported russian stuff. I see far less 7.62 x 39 on shelves than I used to. I have not looked a TON, but at Wal Mart last night there definitely was way more .223 than 7.62 x 39. And most of the 7.62 x39 I see is like Tula or american stuff. I think. What is the deal with this? Am I right about the ban. Furthermore I don't think I've ever actually seen a 5.45 x 39 round, other than when somebody let me shot his krink a few years ago at the range. Which I thought was a fricking sweet gun. It had the little wire hanger stock and it was pretty handy and easy to shoot. Anyways..... As I see it, .223 is way more common and plentiful than just about anything else. 5.56 is common too. But I think I see more .223. But you add the two together and in my experience it's about the most plentiful round there is. In the little bit that I look. No ban on Russian ammo. What was banned was the 7N6 steel-core 5.45x39 surplus ammo. It came in from Russia, Bulgaria, and Poland. |
|
So that's it? For some reason I thought it was more in depth than that.
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.