Quote History Quoted:
Destroy the lines and function of a rifle in a few easy steps. - buy a poorly designed 10 rd extension to a mag that was meant for 5 and make you rifle look like it has a tumor growing out of its side and destroy the rifles handling characteristics. Not even getting started with that break.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Quote History Quoted:
Destroy the lines and function of a rifle in a few easy steps. - buy a poorly designed 10 rd extension to a mag that was meant for 5 and make you rifle look like it has a tumor growing out of its side and destroy the rifles handling characteristics. Not even getting started with that break.
Again, couldn't care less about opinion, being last time I checked... my rifle, my money, which equates to I do what I desire. It is in the C&R section, being the rifle doesn't fall out of that category with that extension. Just like people that scope their rifles by swapping the rear sight for those mounts. With the idea of what people put out on their high horses with not modifying these rifles, the magazine extension does not do a thing to the rifle. If you don't like it, I respect that, but how about we knock the soap-boxing off in here...
For the main reason I'm quoting this, I wanted to speak on the underlined part of that quote. If you are so against the extension, how exactly can you deem it is poorly designed? From someone that has one in hand, it was very well made and feeds ten rounds just the same as the standard setup fed five. Steel box, stainless steel hardware, and what I liked better, no aluminum or polymer. No defects in any part of my kit. If someone does watches the first video, the designer shows the progression of the extension for the year it took him to get it to production. Making his own release instead of trying to make it work with the standard one also shows there was thought put into it (same goes for that little tab, so you don't have to readjust the release each time you put the extension on). If it were such a poor design, don't you think it would have been out a lot sooner?
Quoted:
I like it. Especially since it didn't permanently change the rifle. The price though
, a little too high for me.
It reminds me of an Air Service 03.
That was my main reason for buying it. Price was high, but not something you see a lot. Makes my collection unique... just like my Beretta 92 SGS compensator reproduction, 10/22 Takedown with Green Mountain Laminate stock, and I'm sure it will piss a lot of people off, but my M1903 USMC sniper reproduction. I like having things that not everyone has.