Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Site Notices
Posted: 10/25/2016 1:09:22 PM EDT
I found this one in a local shop. I usually pass on the (R-Guns/CAI) billboard on the receiver Mosins but they made me a offer I could not refuse and it was a 1943 dated carbine so......

1943 Izhevsk M44, so marked on the barrel shank and tang. Strong bore but counter bored.

Typical refurb.....Bolt/magazine/butt-plate scrubbed and EPed to match barrel shank, laminated stock, all parts are Izhevsk marked.






Link Posted: 10/25/2016 1:17:06 PM EDT
[#1]
What was the offer you could not would not refuse
Link Posted: 10/25/2016 1:42:11 PM EDT
[#2]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

What was the offer you could not would not refuse
View Quote


$250.00 with a 91/30 sling and a factory Glock G17/19 32 round mag tossed in.

They had it priced at $299.00 which was not all that bad a price in today's market.




Link Posted: 10/25/2016 1:45:25 PM EDT
[#3]

Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
$250.00 with a 91/30 sling and a factory Glock G17/19 32 round mag tossed in.



They had it priced at $299.00 which was not all that bad a price in today's market.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:



Quoted:



What was the offer you could not would not refuse




$250.00 with a 91/30 sling and a factory Glock G17/19 32 round mag tossed in.



They had it priced at $299.00 which was not all that bad a price in today's market.
$250 isn't bad.  Even with the counterbore, as long as the rifling is good it will be a good shooter.



 
Link Posted: 10/25/2016 2:49:13 PM EDT
[#4]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
$250 isn't bad.  Even with the counterbore, as long as the rifling is good it will be a good shooter.
 
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:

What was the offer you could not would not refuse


$250.00 with a 91/30 sling and a factory Glock G17/19 32 round mag tossed in.

They had it priced at $299.00 which was not all that bad a price in today's market.




$250 isn't bad.  Even with the counterbore, as long as the rifling is good it will be a good shooter.
 


Had it not been a 1943 dated carbine I would not have messed with it.
Link Posted: 10/25/2016 2:50:19 PM EDT
[#5]
Nice, I also have a 1943 Izzy, but it's the full size 91/30, not the M44.  Got it for $160 including shipping, but that was over 2 years ago.  It's one ugly beast, but I love it anyways.

Link Posted: 10/26/2016 1:31:29 PM EDT
[#6]
It's in a laminated stock which is a plus not to mention the fact only 50,000 were made in 1943 as "trials" rifles. These were sent into combat to test the M44 configuration. I sold my '43 M44 this spring.
Link Posted: 10/27/2016 6:47:21 AM EDT
[#7]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

It's in a laminated stock which is a plus not to mention the fact only 50,000 were made in 1943 as "trials" rifles. These were sent into combat to test the M44 configuration. I sold my '43 M44 this spring.
View Quote


To be honest I would have rather it had a wartime stock instead of the late/post war laminate stock.

Sucks for me as I thought I had a wartime M44 stock/HG in my "stock-pile" I had pulled off a M38 and replaced with a M38 stock but it was a just a post war stock set.
Link Posted: 11/6/2016 10:58:31 PM EDT
[#8]
Another nice find . I am going to look at a few Mosins this week
Link Posted: 11/7/2016 12:22:07 PM EDT
[#9]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
It's in a laminated stock which is a plus not to mention the fact only 50,000 were made in 1943 as "trials" rifles. These were sent into combat to test the M44 configuration. I sold my '43 M44 this spring.
View Quote


I was wondering what was special about '43.

I have a '43 Izzy Ex Sniper 91/30, I like the old thing.
Link Posted: 11/7/2016 10:18:31 PM EDT
[#10]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


I was wondering what was special about '43.

I have a '43 Izzy Ex Sniper 91/30, I like the old thing.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
It's in a laminated stock which is a plus not to mention the fact only 50,000 were made in 1943 as "trials" rifles. These were sent into combat to test the M44 configuration. I sold my '43 M44 this spring.


I was wondering what was special about '43.

I have a '43 Izzy Ex Sniper 91/30, I like the old thing.


I read this over on 7.62x54r  DOT  net and seems to be well documented. Makes sense too as we know it commonly as an M44, 44 being the year it was accepted into service, but barrel shanks dated 1943.

Link Posted: 11/8/2016 12:16:41 AM EDT
[#11]
The much rarer ones are the 38 carbines, correct?  Was there a 1940?  Or just '38's made in 40?
Link Posted: 11/8/2016 1:08:35 PM EDT
[#12]

Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


The much rarer ones are the 38 carbines, correct?  Was there a 1940?  Or just '38's made in 40?
View Quote




 
I think you're thinking of the M91/38s




They were cut down from 91/30s, like the M91/59s were, but are more uncommon.



Link Posted: 11/8/2016 2:08:51 PM EDT
[#13]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


  I think you're thinking of the M91/38s

They were cut down from 91/30s, like the M91/59s were, but are more uncommon.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:  The much rarer ones are the 38 carbines, correct?  Was there a 1940?  Or just '38's made in 40?


  I think you're thinking of the M91/38s

They were cut down from 91/30s, like the M91/59s were, but are more uncommon.


No, I was thinking of the M38.  Some M38s were produced on reused hex receivers, but not apparently cut down from 91/30's.  I'm not aware of a 91/38.
Link Posted: 11/8/2016 3:36:29 PM EDT
[#14]
I'm still kicking my own ass for selling the one I had. Good catch!
Link Posted: 11/11/2016 1:27:13 PM EDT
[#15]

Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
No, I was thinking of the M38.  Some M38s were produced on reused hex receivers, but not apparently cut down from 91/30's.  I'm not aware of a 91/38.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:



Quoted:


Quoted:  The much rarer ones are the 38 carbines, correct?  Was there a 1940?  Or just '38's made in 40?




  I think you're thinking of the M91/38s



They were cut down from 91/30s, like the M91/59s were, but are more uncommon.




No, I was thinking of the M38.  Some M38s were produced on reused hex receivers, but not apparently cut down from 91/30's.  I'm not aware of a 91/38.




 
The 91/38s and 91/59s are fairly uncommon. The M38 is more common than either of those. I don't think they are considered particularly less common than the M44, unless you're talking specific years. (Tula, mostly.)




They generally are more sought after than the M44 because many don't like the bayonet and the weight it adds to the front of the carbine. (I do, but I'm in the minority here.)









Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top