Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Site Notices
Posted: 10/17/2014 2:48:12 PM EDT
https://www.atf.gov/firearms/faq/curios-relics.html#modifications

Q: What modifications can be made on C&R firearms without changing their C&R classification?

   The definition for curio or relic (“C & R”) firearms found in 18 U.S.C. 27 CFR § 478.11 does not specifically state that a firearm must be in its original condition to be classified as a C&R firearm. However, ATF Ruling 85-10, which discusses the importation of military C&R firearms, notes that they must be in original configuration and adds that a receiver is not a C&R item. Combining this ruling and the definition of C&R firearms, the Firearms Technology Branch (FTB) has concluded that a firearm must be in its original condition to be considered a C&R weapon.

   It is also the opinion of FTB, however, that a minor change such as the addition of scope mounts, non-original sights, or sling swivels would not remove a firearm from its original condition. Moreover, we have determined that replacing particular firearms parts with new parts that are made to the original design would also be acceptable-for example, replacing a cracked M1 Grand stock with a new wooden stock of the same design, but replacing the original firearm stock with a plastic stock would change its classification as a C&R item.
View Quote


In this post, Mike Searson posted some beautiful revolvers in his collection, including this pretty Colt 1917:



In the last few years, I sold a duffle cut Japanese 99 rifle to a Texas C&R collector, who entered it in his bound book.

So, does a duffle cut leave a firearm with C&R eligibility?  Does replacing a revolver's grips?  Clearly, BATFE says you can scope a C&R eligible firearm, change the sights, and add sling swivels.  What else can be done, or is that the limit?
Link Posted: 10/17/2014 3:16:27 PM EDT
[#1]
Unfortunately the answer to this question is "The law says one thing and ATF says another, sometimes even contradicting itself. Good luck in court."


On the duffle cut, probably not. On the grips, citing the M1 example given, probably so. Then you can get into modifications that were done way back when.
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top