User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 2/12/2017 9:19:29 PM EDT
[#1]
I own both. I still prefer my glock over the 320.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2017 9:42:48 PM EDT
[#2]
Glock19
When the 320s first came out there triggers were nice. Last few we got into the store have had shit triggers. Worse than a stock Glock. Even with the nicer original triggers I'd prefer the Glock with $20 worth of parts. Plus cheaper mags |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2017 9:55:37 PM EDT
[#3]
Had both. Sold the Sig.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2017 10:05:11 PM EDT
[#4]
The glock is better if you are really being objective.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2017 10:24:20 PM EDT
[#5]
Just bone stock glock but with the 320 having a non seralized grip it's nice that you can get extras cheaply and just drop in the seralized part to the grip. I think it has a lot of potential because of that but the glock is iconic for a reason.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2017 10:30:02 PM EDT
[#6]
Have both. Sig has better ergo's, better trigger, better sights, better shooter. Never see threads about "my 320 shoots low and left". Glock is good, sig is better, just being objective.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2017 10:51:20 PM EDT
[#7]
Owned many 19s, a 320C, and a 320 full-size slide.
I hate the grip on Glocks, and the "small" frame for the 320 fit perfectly--especially after I stippled it a bit and did an undercut. The trigger on the 320 was better, shooting it was just as easy despite the "higher bore axis", etc. If I had one today, I'd put the Bruce Gray trigger kit in it. -- But the SIG felt a lot bulkier and heavier and top-front heavy. I never had an issue, but from following a lot of competition and big local shooters, I suspect we'll see ANOTHER extractor fix in the future--I'm not convinced it's 100% up into 5K or 10K territory. In the end, it just didn't carry as easily as the G19, and I wanted to sell one to try out the VP9. I MAY come back to the 320 after I try out the CZ P1C. If so, I'll have to find the holster that works just right for me (I bought a cheap one on eBay for the VP9, but it felt great and carried easily as well as my -9 despite being bigger and heavier). -- For a newbie who isn't going to shoot more than 6-8 times a year, I thInk the 320 is a better value out of the box. But if I could only have one, it'd be the G19 for sure: |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2017 10:53:37 PM EDT
[#8]
Glock.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2017 11:17:20 PM EDT
[#9]
Owned and carried both. Still carrying the Sig. I've sold both of the Glocks I've owned, and kept both Sigs.
Nate |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/13/2017 1:08:35 AM EDT
[#10]
Glock 19 is still king for a pistol of this size IMO.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/13/2017 2:00:35 AM EDT
[#11]
Had both, both good guns. Sold the Sig, though.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/13/2017 5:17:58 AM EDT
[#12]
Glock 19 no doubt.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/13/2017 8:05:32 AM EDT
[#13]
I compete with a glock. My buddy with a new p320. Last Saturday's match 2x during a mag change the slide did not pick up a new round from his p320. Good news for me because without those screw ups he might have beat me it was close.
I'll be sticking to my glocks. Almost 10,000 rds and not a single failure of any kind in my g34! the same no malfunctions from my g19 and my g17 although they have a few less rds through them. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/13/2017 8:19:34 AM EDT
[#14]
Glock. The 320 is an okay pistol however.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/13/2017 8:32:25 AM EDT
[#15]
I can't get over the fact that the 320 slide is 1.4" wide. That is ridiculous. The trend is to make the slide as thin as possible. I think G19 is only 1.2". People go all the way down to single stack just to get down to 1" wide, so we know damn well that .2" is important. Yet no one ever brings this up about the 320. It simply is not a good concealed carry gun because of the width alone, and that is the main role people buy pistols to fill. The 320 I tried out at the LGS had an amazing trigger like none I've ever felt, so I do see some attraction there as a target pistol.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/13/2017 8:43:18 AM EDT
[#16]
19 all day long sigs are over priced crap.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/13/2017 9:08:32 AM EDT
[#17]
Handled and shot both.
G19 is a better pistol. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/13/2017 9:29:45 AM EDT
[#18]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I can't get over the fact that the 320 slide is 1.4" wide. That is ridiculous. The trend is to make the slide as thin as possible. I think G19 is only 1.2". People go all the way down to single stack just to get down to 1" wide, so we know damn well that .2" is important. Yet no one ever brings this up about the 320. It simply is not a good concealed carry gun because of the width alone, and that is the main role people buy pistols to fill. The 320 I tried out at the LGS had an amazing trigger like none I've ever felt, so I do see some attraction there as a target pistol. This was my issue. The thing in general was like a brick. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/13/2017 9:57:35 AM EDT
[#19]
This is a hard question because for me the Glock is my go to. I would have no issue with carrying a P320 if I was given one as a sidearm at all because they are good pistols. Really it comes down to what pistol fits the shooter best because we can sit here and have a pissing contest which is better and argue the merits of this and that. I will be frank though they both can sling little copper coating lead candies and they both can do it reliably so it really comes down to what is best for the shooter not which is better.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/13/2017 10:34:34 AM EDT
[#20]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
This is a hard question because for me the Glock is my go to. I would have no issue with carrying a P320 if I was given one as a sidearm at all because they are good pistols. Really it comes down to what pistol fits the shooter best because we can sit here and have a pissing contest which is better and argue the merits of this and that. I will be frank though they both can sling little copper coating lead candies and they both can do it reliably so it really comes down to what is best for the shooter not which is better. I agree but the op did ask what we like better, not which is better. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/13/2017 10:40:17 AM EDT
[#21]
I was really excited about the P320.
I shot my coworker's P320 Compact this weekend. I'll stick to my Glock, thanks. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/13/2017 10:49:43 AM EDT
[#22]
Have both. The SIG is a recent addition. So far I like both and am not ready to pick one over the other. My initial impression of the 320 (I have a 9mm Carry) has been extremely positive. I'm especially impressed with its accuracy.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/13/2017 11:16:00 AM EDT
[#23]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I agree but the op did ask what we like better, not which is better. My first line was Glock is my go to. But I cannot take a dogmatic view that the Glock is the end all or the Sig is the grail gun. Neither is that much better than the other that it is an end all gun. Plus what works for me may not work for someone else that is the fact of the matter. I cannot bring myself to like a Springfield XD but it is still a good pistol even though it has Grip Zone. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/13/2017 11:24:55 AM EDT
[#24]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Glock19 When the 320s first came out there triggers were nice. Last few we got into the store have had shit triggers. Worse than a stock Glock. Even with the nicer original triggers I'd prefer the Glock with $20 worth of parts. Plus cheaper mags This doesn't really surprise me. I thought the trigger was great on the P320, but it sounds like once again, Sig has outkicked it's coverage as far as manufacturing capability/QC. Rumors are that Sig is going to pick up another large federal agency, which will only increase demand on their production ability, something's got to give. Let us know if this trend continues please. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/13/2017 11:44:59 AM EDT
[#25]
Was just out this last Friday to shoot the 19, P320, VP9 and PPQ side by side. From a shooting perspective for us, liked the P320 more than the 19, but really the VP9 came out on top as the clear winner among the 4 for shooting (PPQ might just need some more breaking in, but was close to the VP9).
On the other hand, if one factors in the availability of stuff to go with, in or on the gun, the Glock is hard not to like since it has been around so long and there are so many options. Still wouldn't carry it personally, but fine for range time. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/13/2017 11:56:23 AM EDT
[#26]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
19 all day long sigs are over priced crap. Both models are with in a couple dollars of each other... |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/13/2017 12:25:28 PM EDT
[#27]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I can't get over the fact that the 320 slide is 1.4" wide. That is ridiculous. The trend is to make the slide as thin as possible. I think G19 is only 1.2". People go all the way down to single stack just to get down to 1" wide, so we know damn well that .2" is important. Yet no one ever brings this up about the 320. It simply is not a good concealed carry gun because of the width alone, and that is the main role people buy pistols to fill. The 320 I tried out at the LGS had an amazing trigger like none I've ever felt, so I do see some attraction there as a target pistol. Uhhh are you sure the slide is 1.4" wide? I'm seeing different numbers (around 1.1") |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/13/2017 12:31:06 PM EDT
[#28]
The Glock 19 is a well proven pistol. The P320 compact, however, does not have finger grooves on the grip and has a better trigger. For me, the compact Glocks do not fit my hand well at all and the P320 does. Overall, in a compact pistol, I prefer the P320. In fullsize configuration they are pretty much equal for me so far.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/13/2017 12:46:48 PM EDT
[#29]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Uhhh are you sure the slide is 1.4" wide? I'm seeing different numbers (around 1.1") Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
I can't get over the fact that the 320 slide is 1.4" wide. That is ridiculous. The trend is to make the slide as thin as possible. I think G19 is only 1.2". People go all the way down to single stack just to get down to 1" wide, so we know damn well that .2" is important. Yet no one ever brings this up about the 320. It simply is not a good concealed carry gun because of the width alone, and that is the main role people buy pistols to fill. The 320 I tried out at the LGS had an amazing trigger like none I've ever felt, so I do see some attraction there as a target pistol. Uhhh are you sure the slide is 1.4" wide? I'm seeing different numbers (around 1.1") I don't have a p320 on hand, but measuring mold guns (used to make holsters) the Glock slide is just under an inch (.99") where the Sig slide is about 1.03". The Sig is about a quarter inch taller than the Glock (compact vs 19). The real kicker is the grip width - the G19 is about 1.15" where the P320 with medium grip module is about 1.32". The P320 compact has a shorter slide front to back than the G19 but is overall about an eighth of an inch longer than a gen 3 19 due to its beaver tail. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/13/2017 12:58:19 PM EDT
[#30]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Have both. Sig has better ergo's, better trigger, better sights, better shooter. Never see threads about "my 320 shoots low and left". Glock is good, sig is better, just being objective. This. Own both. 320 is better than overrated Glock. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/13/2017 1:45:07 PM EDT
[#31]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I can't get over the fact that the 320 slide is 1.4" wide. That is ridiculous. The trend is to make the slide as thin as possible. I think G19 is only 1.2". People go all the way down to single stack just to get down to 1" wide, so we know damn well that .2" is important. Yet no one ever brings this up about the 320. It simply is not a good concealed carry gun because of the width alone, and that is the main role people buy pistols to fill. The 320 I tried out at the LGS had an amazing trigger like none I've ever felt, so I do see some attraction there as a target pistol. Thanks for your rant. Hopefully noobs don't get misled, since you got the numbers wrong. I just measured the width of both slides. Glock G19 ... 1.005" Sig P320 ..... 1.055" .050" is negligible as far as concealability is concerned. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/13/2017 1:45:48 PM EDT
[#32]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Had both. Sold the Sig. This. Got another 19 |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/13/2017 1:51:07 PM EDT
[#33]
I bought a 45 320 a few weeks ago and only shot it once. The trigger is WAAAY better than a Glock. If I didn't own a pistol I'd buy the 9mm 320, although the x change kits are kind of pricey you can buy them cheaper than an additional pistol and can swap from 19/26 size. But I haven't carried mine and didn't shoot it that much so who knows. I wouldn't bother buying one if I was broke or had police dept or whatever that already had glocks
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/13/2017 1:59:16 PM EDT
[#34]
Own a Glock 19. A friend has a P320 with an aftermarket trigger (Not sure which) I shot the P320 better. Will end up buying a P320 eventually.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/13/2017 6:11:42 PM EDT
[#35]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Have both. The SIG is a recent addition. So far I like both and am not ready to pick one over the other. My initial impression of the 320 (I have a 9mm Carry) has been extremely positive. I'm especially impressed with its accuracy. What he said................ Guess I'm just not an either/or guy, and have always had a variety of guns at the same time. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/13/2017 7:29:24 PM EDT
[#36]
Own and carry both.
Stock for stock, the sig is the better gun, IMO. To the guy saying the Sig is overpriced crap, I paid almost the same amount for both the sig and the glock. So go be a misinformed jag somewhere else. Sure appears that you have no experience. My g19 is now a roland special and it is a better shooter than the sig, but there is good money in it. I wouldn't mind picking up another g19 and keeping it mostly stock for CC. Per arfcom's usual, get both |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/13/2017 7:45:38 PM EDT
[#37]
I also own both. Enjoy shooting both but my Glock still shoots better. I think they are about equal . go with the one you shoot better
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/13/2017 8:03:08 PM EDT
[#38]
One is now the side arm of the US ARMY...
The other.. 
Well... 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/13/2017 9:55:38 PM EDT
[#39]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
One is now the side arm of the US ARMY... The other.. Well...Well, not quite. It still has to pass field trials. The other is the sidearm of the Navy SEALs and USMC MARSOC |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/13/2017 10:19:54 PM EDT
[#40]
I really love the P320 Compact
BUT It is a single win in the field. In other words, if I were only shooting/competing/carrying one gun it's very possible I'd go 320. But as it stands I'm sticking with Glock as I carry a G42, use the G19 for general shooting and home defense and a tricked out G17 for competition. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/13/2017 10:21:34 PM EDT
[#41]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
The other is the sidearm of the Navy SEALs and USMC MARSOC And I believe the FBI |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/14/2017 12:38:37 AM EDT
[#42]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
One is now the side arm of the US ARMY... The other.. Well...Lol the other was chosen by the special forces. And you have special forces guys saying the p320 is a POS and you'll never see them using them. So let's not leave info out. The p320 is nice but it's not a glock. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/14/2017 3:53:32 PM EDT
[#43]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Lol the other was chosen by the special forces. And you have special forces guys saying the p320 is a POS and you'll never see them using them. So let's not leave info out. The p320 is nice but it's not a glock. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
One is now the side arm of the US ARMY... The other.. Well...Lol the other was chosen by the special forces. And you have special forces guys saying the p320 is a POS and you'll never see them using them. So let's not leave info out. The p320 is nice but it's not a glock. Fact =Sig is a well made handgun. Fact =Sig met the specific terms of the contract. Fact = Sig bid each unit at $207. An excellent low price for our country. Fact = SOCOM could have P320 if they wanted. Fact = SOCOM went with Glock. I prefer Glock. I like Sigs just fine. Financially I think we did just fine with the Sigs. It's to bad we can't train out standard troops to safely be issued the P320 without the idiot switch. This is my safety sir. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/14/2017 4:00:36 PM EDT
[#44]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Fact =Sig is a well made handgun. Fact =Sig met the specific terms of the contract. Fact = Sig bid each unit at $207. An excellent low price for our country. Fact = SOCOM could have P320 if they wanted. Fact = SOCOM went with Glock. I prefer Glock. I like Sigs just fine. Financially I think we did just fine with the Sigs. It's to bad we can't train out standard troops to safely be issued the P320 without the idiot switch. This is my safety sir. You all realize that the 320s are going to go on to Army Socom units MTOE? If they choose to continue to use unit funds to buy glocks is to be seen. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/14/2017 5:46:55 PM EDT
[#45]
I like them both. If I could only have one gun however it would be the Glock 19. 10k and counting on my 19rtf2 with only changing a recoil spring and proper lubrication.
I simply have more experience with the 19 and prefer it's trigger and low bore axis but I don't think either one is actually better than the other. Edit to add: just for the record, plenty of SEALs are continuing to use their 226s cause it's the Indian not the arrow. FWIW that's from a very credible source who stated they asked if he wanted a Glock too and he said yeah as long as you don't take my 226 away. He said they can and will still continue to support the 226. But that is SEALs and we all know they can get away with more so I'm not sure if that's the case for everyone. I haven't asked if they will be using the 320 as well but I can find out. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/14/2017 7:05:15 PM EDT
[#46]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Fact =Sig is a well made handgun. Fact =Sig met the specific terms of the contract. Fact = Sig bid each unit at $207. An excellent low price for our country. Fact = SOCOM could have P320 if they wanted. Fact = SOCOM went with Glock. I prefer Glock. I like Sigs just fine. Financially I think we did just fine with the Sigs. It's to bad we can't train out standard troops to safely be issued the P320 without the idiot switch. This is my safety sir. Fact most sidearms go unused except in practice and range day. Fact most special ops guys buy their own or have choice of what pistol they want and the issue pistol sits in a armory room never used. Fact Glock has majority of LEO and Sig has Army but guess what they are both good handguns and do exactly the same thing. Why do these threads always turn into penis measuring contest or who can pee further than who? |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/14/2017 7:19:04 PM EDT
[#47]
I was considering a 19 and had almost resigned myself to one, then the guy behind the counter handed me a 320c. I fell in love; it fit my hand perfectly and it shoots great.
My wife, OTOH, seems to like the 19 better, and will probably end up buying one this week after she test fires the pistols she looked at last weekend. I say, go with what works best for you. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/16/2017 1:24:58 AM EDT
[#48]
I swear CNN has taken this site over with all the Fake News type of statements.
Have a 19. Wanted the 320 since I handled the first one the LGS got in. It's an amazing piece. Think of this. In America, we have beautiful women on different hair color and skin color. It's a buyers market and you can have whatever you prefer. In Austria they have beautiful blondes with milk toned skin and you can have any beautiful blonde with milk tone skin you want. Table pepper burns their bland tongues. Glock polymers hasn't felt robust since the HK USP showed everyone how a tank should be built. Glocks are sensitive to American rounds and the 40 beats them to death. Isn't that kinda sad? I can't think of another company that has that wide spread of a known factor with 40. The Steyr M40 feels like a porn star on prom night. It makes everything so easy and exciting. I love my Glock 19 but I'm a realist too. The Sigs ability to swap frames is a future proof design.In a couple of years everyone will have 3D printers and be able to scan their hand in 3D and have a grip module made custom for you. And finally, Glocks customer service makes HK look like your best friend. Now I'm not talking about having a problem with a Glock and having them help you. I'm talking about a company that doesn't listen to it's customers. Glock carbine anyone? How about a single stack, OK after 15 years here it is in a caliber and size no one asked for! I bet SHOT 2017 was awesome with all the Gen 5 FBI models huh? Glocks are the Chrysler minivan of guns. They work, they do a lot better than you ever want to admit. But at the end of the day you are the guy driving a mini van. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/16/2017 6:17:20 AM EDT
[#49]
Everyone that says SOCOM chose the G19 over the P320 should realize that they went with the Glock before the SIG even existed. Thus, you can't claim they chose one over the other.
The only reason you've been hearing about the Glock 19 lately, is because some hold outs (SEALs) are finally joining the rest of SOCOM and adopting it |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/16/2017 6:53:18 AM EDT
[#50]
Grips suck ass on the glock.........320 hands down
|
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
