Quoted:
Do most of you replace your plastic parts?
Has anyone had a plastic part fail? Does the M9 use plastic parts too?
When did beretta start using plastic?
View Quote
To expand some on what others have said.
It depends on the person. Some people it bothers them that they have plastic/plastic coated parts. But other, like myself, it doesn't bother. And most of the parts that are plastic. Are actually plastic coated metal parts. Beretta went to these parts for cost savings as well as durability. The polymer coated parts are just as good, if not better for durability and reliability. The safety decocker for instance. Doesn't wear nearly as much in general being plastic coated. Beretta used to use a steel guide rod. Which is generally fine. But (bent, the ones that did) steel guide rods need lubrication and a bent guide rod could cause malfunctions. The plastic are self lubricating and less likely to cause issues. Even if bent. And yes, the military contract M9 and M9A1 use the plastic/plastic coated parts now. Have for several years. Not sure that anyone knows exactly when. But they use them just the same. The commercial M9 (as well as the 92 in general) are pretty much exactly the same as the contract M9. Minus different markings. Read this for more information: http://berettaforum.net/vb/showpost.php?p=911418&postcount=4
Beretta started using the plastic/plastic coated parts (not including the grips) on the commercial guns sometime in 2002/03. Not sure when the contract M9 started using them. But they do indeed use them. I've heard it could be around the same time Beretta started producing said parts. Regardless, in layman's terms. If Beretta has an idea for the M9 that they believe to be beneficial. They call up the military and tell them the idea. If it's approved. The idea is incorporated in the M9.