Hey guys, I tried googling but I'm coming up short.

Does anyone have pics of M&P full size vs 320 full size and compact vs compact?

Thanks!

V

This is all I have
M&P 2.0 and P320 Compact

cp

Both are nice guns. The P320 pictured above was my first. Within a couple weeks I had already traded my way into a Full Size RX and a Standard Full size.
I only wish I would have discovered the P320 sooner because of the craze at the moment. But as with all crazes this too will pass and SIG will catch up.


That's at 25 Yards, and I am a Bullseye Shooter (One Hand) for an out of the Box, No mods (except the grip, my personal touch) these things literally drive tacks.
cp

Eaglecp,

Do you have any insight into "I like the M&P over the 320 because" and/or "I like the 320 over the M&P because"

Thanks

  I've had both, still have the P320 and just got the 45 one as well. I wasn't a fan of the M&P because of the ergo on the grip, the backstraps on it always made it feel triangular to me and it just didn't sit very well. Then if I went down to the small one it was too thin.
  So there's that and the auto forward on the slide. Apparently it's designed to slide forward and chamber a round if you slam the mag in. Again, just a personal thing, but I didn't like that it would do stuff that I didn't tell it to do. All in all though, went off every time I pulled the trigger and was more accurate than I was.

Hope that helps.

Honestly, Both guns are fantastic. I went to the M&P years ago because of the preferred Ergo's over the Glock for me personally. I went to the P320 from the M&P for the same reason. It boiled down to personal preference for me.
cp