Quote History Quoted:
It's more or less a $550 price tag to simply say you have one.
As noted in other threads and Glock themselves, the polymer DOES get a bit brittle over time, so I wouldn't consider it a shooter.
If you have cash to burn and a desire to say "yea, I got one", then go for it.
View Quote
x2....I totally agree here.
i have a G19 from very early 1989 (barrel is date coded Jan 1989 and serial numbers all match).
The polymer frame on that gun IS indeed, harder, than a new gen 4 G19. However, it does shoot
fine without issue. But, the issue is this:
When you go paying more money for a used Glock for a collection (has makers mark), and the
frame ends up cracking; then, what do you have? A old plastic framed gun that's either:
A) unsafe to fire because of cracked frame -or-
B) send the frame to Glock and they replace it with a new gen 3 frame.
You then have a older MIS-matched serial numbered gun along with
loosing up to half it's value, depending on what you paid for it.
So, rationally and financially, the old Glock goes to collection -or-
I make it a shooter, not worrying whether the frame cracks.
And, if that's the case, I should NOT pay more than 400-450 for the used Glock.
But, I wouldn't want a gen 1 as my only shooter.
The "only" Glock I have that I would not want to shoot any longer is my old G19.
As I stated, it shoots fine, but, I had to pay near 500 to get my hands on it. I cannot replace
it's frame with a like frame; that is serial number and makers mark. I carry G26. So, it sits in the safe along with
it's (9) sibling G19's. The other (3) have guard duty.....
I do keep three (19's) hidden around the house. Call me paranoid.....or prepared????