All AK's will exhibit trunnion strike to some degree or another, there I said it. For those that want to argue the point go watch some slo-mo videos of the AK cycling without the topcover...
Comm-bloc ammo is NOT loaded to Match ammo. specs so on occasion YOU WILL GET A ROUND WITH A BIT MORE PRESSURE. This along with the AK being what it is will allow the BCG to hit the rear trunnion leaving that telltale little mark. A weak recoil spring can contribute to this as well, However I've seen NIB PRE-BAN FACTORY MADE IN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN rifles do it right out of the box.
So either the factories that have built them for decades in com-bloc countries have no fucking clue as to how to build an AK (not likely), or it's just one of those things peculiar to the AK design. You can put a more powerful recoil spring in it (which it wasn't designed for either), replace your existing spring with a factory new one, or add a buffer if it doesn't cause cycling issues. Your rifle, your call...
I've just chalked it up to an AK being an AK ...This was after trying out the remedies listed above. Some rifles had cycling issues with buffers, some I replaced the recoil spring with known factory new springs. After touch-up bluing the marks on the trunnions I noticed they would reappear at some point (??). So either new springs were junk (doubt it), or ammo varied a bit from lot-to-lot with a couple rounds being a little hotter causing the recoil impulse to be a bit stronger and therefore the BCG sometimes has enough momentum to hit the rear trunnion. Watched the slo-mo vids. a bunch and noticed that the carrier wasn't always consistent as to where it stopped during the recoil cycle and started forward again. Sometimes the carrier got closer to the rear trunnion, sometimes was nowhere near it (relatively speaking), other times it hit the trunnion.
Thought about going extra power spring but since there is no free lunch...i.e. you increase spring rate making it harder to compress, it unloads harder as well, so now you have more force going into the front trunnion, so no free lunch and you haven't solved the supposed problem just switched ends where the force is being directed. Personally, I think I'll just leave it the way MTK intended, since probably he designed the rear trunnion to take the occasional hit, since he put those two LONG RIVETS thru there. Just my opinion based on personal research s take it for what it's worth, or don't. Like I said ...Your rifle, your call.