User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 6/29/2016 1:07:10 AM EDT
[#1]
They both have the friction lock.
I can compare and contrast in a few days. SL on gun at work, SL-K coming for me from AIM in a few days. Edited my post after reading below. He's right. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/29/2016 8:11:29 AM EDT
[#2]
The SL-K does not use the same friction lock as the SL. It does not lock up as tight as the slightly larger SL. I prefer the SL stock in general compared to all other stocks. The SL-K does not come with any QD mounts, you have to add them.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/4/2016 5:32:19 AM EDT
[#3]
I like the K. It's small, gets the job done. No frills.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/11/2016 7:34:26 AM EDT
[#4]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
The SL-K does not use the same friction lock as the SL. It does not lock up as tight as the slightly larger SL. I prefer the SL stock in general compared to all other stocks. The SL-K does not come with any QD mounts, you have to add them. +1 I've tried a lot of stocks and the MOE SL is the best IMO (weight, lock up, cheek weld, price, QD/sling options, durability). This coming from a longtime SOPMOD user. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/11/2016 12:14:21 PM EDT
[#5]
I think the SL-K is for people with no necks. That short toe just doesn't work for me.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/11/2016 4:53:11 PM EDT
[#6]
The SL-K does not fully collapse on a couple of REs that I tried it with... Which sort of defeats the purpose of it (for my purposes).
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/28/2016 9:59:55 PM EDT
[#7]
I'm a huge fan of the SL-K for sbr. Very compact and aesthetically pleasing with a short rifle. Wouldn't use it on a full size. Lock up is fine idk what everyone's issue is on that.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/11/2016 2:25:37 PM EDT
[#8]
I love the SL-K stock. My second one arrived today. Here is one next to a CTR. For size reference. It does not have the SL tension spring but has very little play. It's much tighter than my MOE stock.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/11/2016 10:03:47 PM EDT
[#9]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
The SL-K does not fully collapse on a couple of REs that I tried it with... Which sort of defeats the purpose of it (for my purposes). It collapses on all of mine. It's about a half inch shorter forward of the locking pin so there will be a gap in front of the stock compared to a milspec or full size magpul stock.  |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/21/2016 8:12:48 AM EDT
[#10]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
The SL-K does not use the same friction lock as the SL. It does not lock up as tight as the slightly larger SL. I prefer the SL stock in general compared to all other stocks. The SL-K does not come with any QD mounts, you have to add them. +1 I run an SL-K on my SBR, but for all other uses I think the SL is fantastic. Such a good stock. |
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
