Today I shot the rifle I just completed building earlier this week. I am using a red dot (Vortex SPARC II) on this rifle, its the first time I have used a red dot as a primary optic. Initial impressions are, disappointed. I dont think that I chose the right type of optic for my uses. I chose the red dot because its lightweight, fast target acquisition. These areas it succeeds in very well. What I dont like is that its not really (IMO) a precision type optic. I shoot mostly at paper, shooting at 100 yards the 2 MOA dot (even when turned down low) obstructs much of the target. At 50yrds it more than less covers the entire thing. I knew that this was a possibility, but I did not expect target shooting with the red dot to be as boring as it is. I guess I did not think it through.
I can see how the RD would be great for a combat situation, or for defensive purposes, man sized moving targets but for me I think that I might be happier with a different type of optic. What dose the community have to say about this? Do you feel that a 1-4 powered scope would be a better option? Or perhaps a 3x or 5x fixed power like those offered by primary arms, or Vortex spitfire? I believe these are called prism scopes.
I do want to keep weight down although I am not a gram counter. This rifle is to be used for close-mid range. Mostly target, some varmint. If I was to replace this scope, I expect to get near $200 value for it, could invest another $100 for the right optic, so overall budget for replacement would be about $300, might be convinced to go to $400. Any advice or suggestions is greatly appreciated.