Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel

Log In

A valid email is required.
Password is required.
Site Notices
Basic
  • Joined Apr 2007
  • Posts 971
  • Location USA MA, USA
Offline Positive Feedback
Basic
  • Joined Apr 2007
  • Posts 971
  • Location USA MA, USA
Offline Positive Feedback
Posted: 9/3/2012 9:12:08 AM EST
[Last Edit: 9/3/2012 11:29:06 AM EST by USMC223]
Of the three scopes listed , what would run on top of your AR?

Or would you sugest another scope that is under $500 that falls in this style of scope?
Basic
  • Joined Aug 2012
  • Posts 4
  • Location USA OH, USA
Offline Neutral Feedback
Basic
  • Joined Aug 2012
  • Posts 4
  • Location USA OH, USA
Offline Neutral Feedback
Posted: 9/3/2012 9:32:50 AM EST
Save your money. Leupold VX-Hog 1x4. Rugged, reticle is quick to acquire, great eye relief and is half the price. I went to the shop w cash to buy either a mark AR 1x4 or a m223 1x4. I saw this VX hog and decided to give it a shot. It's got the VX glass and leupolds reputation. It's mounted on my BCM AR with a Nikon m223 1 piece mount and I'm very happy with it. No reason to spend twice the ammount on the other choices. I would truly prefer it over the mark AR or the m223 with price out of the picture.
Basic
  • Joined Jul 2006
  • Posts 974
  • Location USA VA, USA
Offline Positive Feedback
Basic
  • Joined Jul 2006
  • Posts 974
  • Location USA VA, USA
Offline Positive Feedback
Posted: 9/3/2012 11:40:44 AM EST
What dmcginnis said, but I like the Firedot circle version instead. I wish they didn't put "pig plex" in the reticle. Leupold VX-R is hard to beat for the price. David
Basic
  • Joined Aug 2004
  • Posts 979
  • Location USA OR, USA
Offline Positive Feedback
Basic
  • Joined Aug 2004
  • Posts 979
  • Location USA OR, USA
Offline Positive Feedback
Posted: 9/4/2012 12:00:28 PM EST
Originally Posted By dmcginnis:
Save your money. Leupold VX-Hog 1x4. Rugged, reticle is quick to acquire, great eye relief and is half the price. I went to the shop w cash to buy either a mark AR 1x4 or a m223 1x4. I saw this VX hog and decided to give it a shot. It's got the VX glass and leupolds reputation. It's mounted on my BCM AR with a Nikon m223 1 piece mount and I'm very happy with it. No reason to spend twice the ammount on the other choices. I would truly prefer it over the mark AR or the m223 with price out of the picture.



Have you zeroed it yet ? I'm interested in reading how the holdover works with lighter grain ammunition.
is all f'ed in the head
Avatar
Bronze
  • Joined Jan 2002
  • Posts 7275
  • Location USA USA
Offline Positive Feedback
Bronze
  • Joined Jan 2002
  • Posts 7275
  • Location USA USA
Offline Positive Feedback
Posted: 9/4/2012 12:58:37 PM EST
Voted for the MTAC, but I would be pefertly happy with the $300 TAC30 1-4x24.

Pretty sure the Leupold is not a true 1x and the Nikon does not offer illumination.
NRA Lifetime Member
Basic
  • Joined Apr 2011
  • Posts 381
  • Location USA TX, USA
Offline Positive Feedback
Basic
  • Joined Apr 2011
  • Posts 381
  • Location USA TX, USA
Offline Positive Feedback
Posted: 9/4/2012 5:38:21 PM EST
I'm not personally a huge fan of the Nikon reticle, and as already mentioned, the Leuy is NOT a true 1x, so that leaves the Burris.

Listen....you smell something?
Avatar
Bronze
  • Joined Apr 2001
  • Posts 2073
  • Location USA CA, USA
Offline Neutral Feedback
Bronze
  • Joined Apr 2001
  • Posts 2073
  • Location USA CA, USA
Offline Neutral Feedback
Posted: 9/4/2012 6:46:49 PM EST
Voted for the MTAC.

I own an MTAC and a Vortex PST 1-4 MOA, and I prefer the Vortex reticle, just wish the Vortex got a little brighter.

Glass on both is very close in clarity and light transmission.
"Walk away"

"Tofu. I've, I've never actually had it, but I think maybe this is what it would feel like to walk on it. "
Basic
  • Joined Aug 2012
  • Posts 1
  • Location USA MD, USA
Offline Neutral Feedback
Basic
  • Joined Aug 2012
  • Posts 1
  • Location USA MD, USA
Offline Neutral Feedback
Posted: 9/4/2012 9:00:05 PM EST
I am asking myself the same, or at least close question. Shooting a stag flat top. Not a holo sight fan. I shoot out to abt 250 yards or so. I have back up folding sights. Burris AR-332, Burris MTAC 1-4 or Burris MTAC 1.5-6? Latter can't cowitness, but I am ok with that. Have not shot any of these optics. I like the burris reticle a lot. Need some magnification for old retired army eyes. Any advice? Thanks for any thoughts.
Basic
  • Joined May 2007
  • Posts 412
  • Location USA USA
Offline Positive Feedback
Basic
  • Joined May 2007
  • Posts 412
  • Location USA USA
Offline Positive Feedback
Posted: 9/5/2012 5:15:10 AM EST
Well I compared the

VX-R Hog 1.25-4

Burris Tac30 1-4

Trijicon TR24

Nikon m-223 1-4

and for my money I would only spend it on the Burris Tac30 1-4

why?

Because it was the 2nd best on true 1x (Trijicon was the best but the price made me sick), 1st in reticle design (although a smaller center dot would be cool), 3rd in illumination (Leupold and Trijicon were better), Tied 2nd with leupold for clarity, 1st in best bang for your buck.

The biggest thing I didn't like about the leupold was the 1.25x. For me it was a deal breaker. It messed with my eyes and wasn't as nice as the Burris.

I would recommend checking them out in person and seeing what works for you!

I thought the 1.25 wouldn't bother me but it really does. If Leupold comes out with a true 1x on there 1-4 for the same price then I think you will have a winner
Basic
  • Joined Apr 2007
  • Posts 976
  • Location USA MA, USA
Offline Positive Feedback
Basic
  • Joined Apr 2007
  • Posts 976
  • Location USA MA, USA
Offline Positive Feedback
Posted: 9/5/2012 11:57:12 AM EST
Thanks so far.

Any input from the 3 gunner croud?
boss king ninja
Avatar
Bronze
  • Joined Jun 2006
  • Posts 422
  • Location USA NE, USA
Offline Positive Feedback
Bronze
  • Joined Jun 2006
  • Posts 422
  • Location USA NE, USA
Offline Positive Feedback
Posted: 9/5/2012 12:54:34 PM EST
MTAC until i can afford a Bushnell, Vortex, or Swaro 1-6, if you are .mil PM me
Basic
  • Joined Aug 2012
  • Posts 2
  • Location USA MD, USA
Offline Neutral Feedback
Basic
  • Joined Aug 2012
  • Posts 2
  • Location USA MD, USA
Offline Neutral Feedback
Posted: 9/6/2012 12:20:14 PM EST
I think I am going MTAC. Will the 1x4 cowitness with iron sights? Wondering if the nonilluminated reticle will just confuse the issue trying. I presume the 1.5 will not. The current deal seems to be a few spots selling the 1x4 MTAC with mount and fastfire 2 as a set for about $599. It is going on a stag M3 flat top.
thanks for any thoughts
pablopac
Member
Avatar
Bronze
  • Joined Jul 2011
  • Posts 710
  • Location USA MS, USA
Offline Positive Feedback
Bronze
  • Joined Jul 2011
  • Posts 710
  • Location USA MS, USA
Offline Positive Feedback
Posted: 9/6/2012 1:00:56 PM EST
Originally Posted By pablopac:
I think I am going MTAC. Will the 1x4 cowitness with iron sights? Wondering if the nonilluminated reticle will just confuse the issue trying. I presume the 1.5 will not. The current deal seems to be a few spots selling the 1x4 MTAC with mount and fastfire 2 as a set for about $599. It is going on a stag M3 flat top.
thanks for any thoughts
pablopac


No co-witness with scope. I don't care if it says it's 1x. It is not. No such thing.

My opinion. Could be wrong. Been wrong before. YMMV.
Member
Avatar
Bronze
  • Joined Jan 2001
  • Posts 749
  • Location USA TX, USA
Offline Positive Feedback
Bronze
  • Joined Jan 2001
  • Posts 749
  • Location USA TX, USA
Offline Positive Feedback
Posted: 9/6/2012 2:37:31 PM EST
[Last Edit: 9/6/2012 2:41:34 PM EST by Lmccrock]
Originally Posted By USMC223:
Thanks so far.

Any input from the 3 gunner croud?

Vortex and Burris in that price range. I just got a Vortex, but a Razor, NOT in the same price range.


Originally Posted By pablopac:
I think I am going MTAC. Will the 1x4 cowitness with iron sights? Wondering if the nonilluminated reticle will just confuse the issue trying. I presume the 1.5 will not. The current deal seems to be a few spots selling the 1x4 MTAC with mount and fastfire 2 as a set for about $599.
thanks for any thoughts
pablopac

No need to cowitness with the Fastfire. Learn to use it when you want fast/close. Also, mounting rear irons with a typical 1-4 is tricky because the scopes tend to be kindof long. BTW, you were not asking, but if you use this for 3-gun, you will be in Open Division because it is 2 optical/electronic sights.
Beer drinking, gun toting, libertarian simian.
Avatar
Bronze
  • Joined Feb 2010
  • Posts 1769
  • Location USA NE, USA
Online Positive Feedback
Bronze
  • Joined Feb 2010
  • Posts 1769
  • Location USA NE, USA
Online Positive Feedback
Posted: 9/6/2012 3:00:27 PM EST
I own the Mark AR and am fairly happy with it, but I've looked through the Burris and liked it a lot better.
Join the Nebraska Firearms Owners Association: http://www.nebraskafirearms.org
"A man can never have too much red wine, too many books, or too much ammunition."  - Rudyard Kipling
Who is John Galt?
Basic
  • Joined Feb 2011
  • Posts 24
  • Location USA TX, USA
Offline Positive Feedback
Basic
  • Joined Feb 2011
  • Posts 24
  • Location USA TX, USA
Offline Positive Feedback
Posted: 9/6/2012 3:50:10 PM EST
I recently ordered a Burris tac30 to "play with" until I save up for a swfa 1-6 or splurge on a NF. I think Burris in general makes a great optic for the money, and the features on the tac30(arguably better on the mtac) made me choose it in the sub $400 price range.
Member
Avatar
Bronze
  • Joined Jun 2002
  • Posts 3391
  • Location USA TX, USA
Offline Positive Feedback
Bronze
  • Joined Jun 2002
  • Posts 3391
  • Location USA TX, USA
Offline Positive Feedback
NRA
Posted: 9/12/2012 9:42:35 AM EST
I just ordered a MTAC for my new Predatar this morning. I have running a TAC30 on my frankengun SPR in three gun for a couple seasons and like it really well. I am anxious to see if the MTAC glass is even better.
Unrepentant Hobbyist
NRA Endowment Member

RIP: United States of America, Born July 4th, 1776, Died Nov 4th, 2008- SUICIDE
Basic
  • Joined Jan 2009
  • Posts 1405
  • Location USA NJ, USA
Offline Positive Feedback
Basic
  • Joined Jan 2009
  • Posts 1405
  • Location USA NJ, USA
Offline Positive Feedback
Posted: 9/12/2012 10:16:41 AM EST
I voted mtac cause you didn't have viper pst
Basic
  • Joined May 2010
  • Posts 883
  • Location USA FL, USA
Offline Positive Feedback
Basic
  • Joined May 2010
  • Posts 883
  • Location USA FL, USA
Offline Positive Feedback
Posted: 9/12/2012 10:17:14 AM EST
How about the Weaver Classic 1-3x. I think that it is shorter and lighter than all in your list. Inexpensive for Japanese glass.
Get off my lawn!
Avatar
Platinum
  • Joined Jun 2003
  • Posts 27605
  • Location USA AZ, USA
Offline Positive Feedback
Platinum
  • Joined Jun 2003
  • Posts 27605
  • Location USA AZ, USA
Offline Positive Feedback
NRAMilitary
Posted: 9/12/2012 10:21:34 AM EST
I tend to go with Leupold, but haven't looked through their lower powered glass. I was shopping for a Millet in that power range and picked up the Burris to compare. The Burris glass was much clearer than the Millet, and very acceptable. Don't know if this helps you.....
Simple Solutions to Complex problems.
SEMPER FI, DO OR DIE!
Basic
  • Joined Mar 2001
  • Posts 141
  • Location USA MO, USA
Offline Positive Feedback
Basic
  • Joined Mar 2001
  • Posts 141
  • Location USA MO, USA
Offline Positive Feedback
Posted: 9/13/2012 8:32:33 AM EST
Letherwood CMR 1-4x24 just got one and am loving it sofar. You can pick up the scope with a mount for a good price on swfa.com.

Member
Avatar
Bronze
  • Joined Mar 2002
  • Posts 1796
  • Location USA AZ, USA
Offline Positive Feedback
Bronze
  • Joined Mar 2002
  • Posts 1796
  • Location USA AZ, USA
Offline Positive Feedback
Posted: 9/14/2012 9:51:45 AM EST
The Weaver 1-3x is an excellent value for the money. The scope is small, lightweight and inexpensive. It really feels like it is half the size of a Millet DMS-1 1-4x scope. The glass is very impressive for the money and better than many that cost twice as much. The downside is it only has a very simple cross hair reticle and no illumination. But, if you consider a 5.56 carbine a 0-300 yard gun like I do, it works very well. Weaver really, really, really needs to add a slightly better reticle to this optic. If they did and kept it at the current price range, it would dominate the entry level market.

With that said, I love my Trijicon TR24 Accupoint with the post reticle. It is the perfect optic for my general purpose 5.56 rig and I run one on my go-to rig. It is fast on 1x and the reticle is big as well as bright. It works better than an Aimpoint for me as I have a bad astigmatism, which causes an Aimpoint to be very blurry at times. on 4x, 100 yard targets are cake. Again, I consider my 5.56 carbines a 0-300 yard rig. So the reticle doesn't get in it's own way for me. I go to my Nitrex (re branded Weaver Super Slam) 2-10x or SWFA SS 3-9x for anything longer. So the 1-4x Accupoint works very well for me, particularly on my MSAR STG-556 & AR SBR.

I ran a Burris 1-4X XTR and really liked it. But I traded it for my TR24 Accupoint as that is the scope I love. I would not hessitate to get another Burris and am considering a Burris TAC30 1-4x in FDE to put on my tan MSAR STG rifle.
Top