User Panel
Posted: 7/9/2016 4:20:31 PM EDT
I'm wondering what the high speed folks are using for steel mags these days in 2016? I want to buy a rig's worth of steel 30 round mags (AR obviously) I currently have a few C Products mags new in bag, and I haven't had time to test them. (they look extremely well made) I know Mako makes steel mags. HK. I have one no brand steel mag made in the USA and it's been a champ. Been using aluminum and pmags. I don't like the idea of a polymer mag with steel feed lips. I can envision the steel shattering when I drop it in the winter at -20 degrees.
Advice appreciated! |
|
Quoted:
I'm wondering what the high speed folks are using for steel mags these days in 2016? I want to buy a rig's worth of steel 30 round mags (AR obviously) I currently have a few C Products mags new in bag, and I haven't had time to test them. (they look extremely well made) I know Mako makes steel mags. HK. I have one no brand steel mag made in the USA and it's been a champ. Been using aluminum and pmags. I don't like the idea of a polymer mag with steel feed lips. I can envision the steel shattering when I drop it in the winter at -20 degrees. Advice appreciated! View Quote The truth? NONE! There is a major reason the U.S. Military doesn't use steel magazines. |
|
Quoted:
The truth? NONE! There is a major reason the U.S. Military doesn't use steel magazines. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
I'm wondering what the high speed folks are using for steel mags these days in 2016? I want to buy a rig's worth of steel 30 round mags (AR obviously) I currently have a few C Products mags new in bag, and I haven't had time to test them. (they look extremely well made) I know Mako makes steel mags. HK. I have one no brand steel mag made in the USA and it's been a champ. Been using aluminum and pmags. I don't like the idea of a polymer mag with steel feed lips. I can envision the steel shattering when I drop it in the winter at -20 degrees. Advice appreciated! The truth? NONE! There is a major reason the U.S. Military doesn't use steel magazines. I agree with this but if I had to use steel mags I would use the ones from Beretta. Best aluminum mags are made by Okay. |
|
Okay or Center or Brownells g.i. mags are better than any steel mag I've seen. If you want something hard to tear up, Pmags are tough.
|
|
Quoted:
The truth? NONE! There is a major reason the U.S. Military doesn't use steel magazines. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
I'm wondering what the high speed folks are using for steel mags these days in 2016? I want to buy a rig's worth of steel 30 round mags (AR obviously) I currently have a few C Products mags new in bag, and I haven't had time to test them. (they look extremely well made) I know Mako makes steel mags. HK. I have one no brand steel mag made in the USA and it's been a champ. Been using aluminum and pmags. I don't like the idea of a polymer mag with steel feed lips. I can envision the steel shattering when I drop it in the winter at -20 degrees. Advice appreciated! The truth? NONE! There is a major reason the U.S. Military doesn't use steel magazines. Do tell. What is the major reason the U.S. Military doesn't use steel magazines? I've never heard of them being interested in anything but aluminum magazines for the m16 but am unaware that anything else has ever been tested by them. The M14 seemed to do pretty well with steel magazines (as did the Thompson, the m3, and The m1 carbine) |
|
They used those H&K steel mags quite a bit for awhile right before the Pmag came out. The main problem was weak springs, but they would also crack, rust, bend, and generally last for about a week of hard use.
|
|
|
I've had good luck w/ the Cammengas, but I've not used them hard @ all.
|
|
Quoted:
I've had good luck w/ the Cammengas, but I've not used them hard @ all. View Quote I was a Cammenga Distributor, I truly believed in them. Back in the day we had a member who was torture testing a lot of mags (87GN). I sent him an EasyMag, he found that it held up better than other steel mags but it still wasn't as durable as a G.I. Aluminum mag. |
|
2 ounce weight penalty and less reliable. I'd skip the steel mags.
|
|
Quoted:
I was a Cammenga Distributor, I truly believed in them. Back in the day we had a member who was torture testing a lot of mags (87GN). I sent him an EasyMag, he found that it held up better than other steel mags but it still wasn't as durable as a G.I. Aluminum mag. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted: I've had good luck w/ the Cammengas, but I've not used them hard @ all. I was a Cammenga Distributor, I truly believed in them. Back in the day we had a member who was torture testing a lot of mags (87GN). I sent him an EasyMag, he found that it held up better than other steel mags but it still wasn't as durable as a G.I. Aluminum mag. The next mags I try will be the UniMag. |
|
I've got a mix of Pmag 20s & 30s, aluminum GI straight 20s and Mako steel 20s & 30s. All of them have run reliably, but the steel Makos are my favorite. Overall best fit in all my ARs.
I've handled the ASC steel mags, the steel bodies don't seem to be much heavier than their aluminum versions, vs the Makos which are heavy. If I go for a steel body, I want a heavy gauge stock. Also, I think Mako is the only source for a steel body 20 round mag, which is the main reason I have so many. I've gotten them from various places over the years and have paid around $10 a pop for both 20s & 30s, which is way less than their list price. Makos don't have a great rep on this forum which may be why they're marked down. My next mag purchase will either be a transparent/smoked Lancer or a Unimag. I shoot ARs in 5.56, 7.62x39 & 5.45x39 so one mag for all is something I'd like to see. |
|
Quoted:
I've got a mix of Pmag 20s & 30s, aluminum GI straight 20s and Mako steel 20s & 30s. All of them have run reliably, but the steel Makos are my favorite. Overall best fit in all my ARs. I've handled the ASC steel mags, the steel bodies don't seem to be much heavier than their aluminum versions, vs the Makos which are heavy. If I go for a steel body, I want a heavy gauge stock. Also, I think Mako is the only source for a steel body 20 round mag, which is the main reason I have so many. I've gotten them from various places over the years and have paid around $10 a pop for both 20s & 30s, which is way less than their list price. Makos don't have a great rep on this forum which may be why they're marked down. My next mag purchase will either be a transparent/smoked Lancer or a Unimag. I shoot ARs in 5.56, 7.62x39 & 5.45x39 so one mag for all is something I'd like to see. View Quote There is a DAMN GOOD reason they don't have a good reputation here. They screwed quite a few people by putting out defective magazines and then trying to claim that the Colt, FN, BCM, Spike's, Daniel Defence, etc., etc., receivers they were attempted to be used in were ALL out of spec. They refused to stand by their products and warranty them. Link to 16 page thread on them screwing customers |
|
Quoted: I've got a mix of Pmag 20s & 30s, aluminum GI straight 20s and Mako steel 20s & 30s. All of them have run reliably, but the steel Makos are my favorite. Overall best fit in all my ARs.
I've handled the ASC steel mags, the steel bodies don't seem to be much heavier than their aluminum versions, vs the Makos which are heavy. If I go for a steel body, I want a heavy gauge stock. Also, I think Mako is the only source for a steel body 20 round mag, which is the main reason I have so many. I've gotten them from various places over the years and have paid around $10 a pop for both 20s & 30s, which is way less than their list price. Makos don't have a great rep on this forum which may be why they're marked down. My next mag purchase will either be a transparent/smoked Lancer or a Unimag. I shoot ARs in 5.56, 7.62x39 & 5.45x39 so one mag for all is something I'd like to see. View Quote Cammenga makes a curved steel 20. |
|
I have a 30-round SCAR-16 mag made in the USA by FN. You can get then in tan or black.It fits my Knights Stoner SR-15 just fine. I've only used it a couple times but it hasn't malfunctioned yet and the spring is quite strong. Excellent build quality; the steel is MUCH thicker than my C-Products stainless mags.
Beretta also makes a 30-round steel mag. I don't own one, nor have I ever shot one, but I handled one at the NRA convention and it seemed solidly built. I believe it too is made in the USA. Both have a floorplate design that is significantly different than typical aluminum mags both in terms of design, appearance, and disassembly. I consider the floorplates better than aluminum mags in that disassembly doesn't require bending them. The spring keeps them in place. |
|
Wow great info on steel, I appreciate everyones input. I have mostly PMags and Okays. I like the Okay mags the most and the Colt mags made by Okay I believe. I didn't know HK mags had issues, I was told they were gold standard. I have to check out unimag, and Lancers have always looked cool but they have had issues not including my fear that the metal on polymer will potentially break in extreme cold. I have handled the FNH steel mags, they are super heavy, you could use them as a blunt force object.. I like the old US steel I have but wont use it for anything but the range, and it's been boxed for a while now. The CProducts I have seem really rugged. The only reason I'm looking into steel is that I came across an NSN for sopmod steel mags, and I'm wondering which ones they use and why? I also recently came across a new stainless steel mag thats lighter than the standard steel mags, and I'm wondering if this is the next step in metal mags? I can't remember manufacturer, but theyre made in Israel I think, and not Mako, if I remember correctly. Picked up two elander mags to test out.
|
|
Quoted: Wow great info on steel, I appreciate everyones input. I have mostly PMags and Okays. I like the Okay mags the most and the Colt mags made by Okay I believe. I didn't know HK mags had issues, I was told they were gold standard. I have to check out unimag, and Lancers have always looked cool but they have had issues not including my fear that the metal on polymer will potentially break in extreme cold. I have handled the FNH steel mags, they are super heavy, you could use them as a blunt force object.. I like the old US steel I have but wont use it for anything but the range, and it's been boxed for a while now. The CProducts I have seem really rugged. The only reason I'm looking into steel is that I came across an NSN for sopmod steel mags, and I'm wondering which ones they use and why? I also recently came across a new stainless steel mag thats lighter than the standard steel mags, and I'm wondering if this is the next step in metal mags? I can't remember manufacturer, but theyre made in Israel I think, and not Mako, if I remember correctly. Picked up two elander mags to test out. View Quote UniMag is only useful if you're running multiple calibers. They're brand new - we don't know their longevity yet. |
|
Quoted:
I'm wondering what the high speed folks are using for steel mags these days in 2016? I want to buy a rig's worth of steel 30 round mags (AR obviously) I currently have a few C Products mags new in bag, and I haven't had time to test them. (they look extremely well made) I know Mako makes steel mags. HK. I have one no brand steel mag made in the USA and it's been a champ. Been using aluminum and pmags. I don't like the idea of a polymer mag with steel feed lips. I can envision the steel shattering when I drop it in the winter at -20 degrees. Advice appreciated! View Quote I read an online top 5 list of mags (I forgot where), but it listed FNH SCAR16 steel mags in the top 5. It looks like they are $30 everywhere I look. That's kind of expensive. Anyone else have FNH steel mag experience to add? |
|
I was browsing at Weaponcraft and unboxed a Scar mag and it was really heavy, I had to double check it. lol. It feels like three times heavier than a Pmag.
|
|
The Gen 3 Elander 30's have done a good job for me, I think I've got 9 or 10 of them in my range bag. The only problem I had with them was when I tried using them in a Tavor. They are real good mags in my AR-15's.
|
|
Quoted: The Gen 3 Elander 30's have done a good job for me, I think I've got 9 or 10 of them in my range bag. The only problem I had with them was when I tried using them in a Tavor. They are real good mags in my AR-15's. View Quote <edited.......dpmmn> After the SCREWING that Mako pulled for years on the defective magazines they sold, no one should give them one red cent. |
|
Quoted:
<edited.......dpmmn> After the SCREWING that Mako pulled for years on the defective magazines they sold, no one should give them one red cent. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
The Gen 3 Elander 30's have done a good job for me, I think I've got 9 or 10 of them in my range bag. The only problem I had with them was when I tried using them in a Tavor. They are real good mags in my AR-15's. <edited.......dpmmn> After the SCREWING that Mako pulled for years on the defective magazines they sold, no one should give them one red cent. Yeah, I get that. At the time I bought mine they were getting good reviews and I went for it. I've been super happy with them all the way around but I get some folks haven't had the same experience. |
|
After newton when mags were horded I remember some Israeli mags that were steel that came out. A ex coworker bought them, but I never saw them 1st hand. I believe they were recommended here at the time because no one had any mags in stock. Can't remember what they were...
|
|
CProducts Defense stainless mag with stainless spring. Noticeable difference from other metal mags.
|
|
|
I asked Mako a few questions on their optics line and they never took the time to reply. Screw them, They wont get my business.
|
|
Quoted:
Do tell. What is the major reason the U.S. Military doesn't use steel magazines? I've never heard of them being interested in anything but aluminum magazines for the m16 but am unaware that anything else has ever been tested by them. The M14 seemed to do pretty well with steel magazines (as did the Thompson, the m3, and The m1 carbine) View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I'm wondering what the high speed folks are using for steel mags these days in 2016? I want to buy a rig's worth of steel 30 round mags (AR obviously) I currently have a few C Products mags new in bag, and I haven't had time to test them. (they look extremely well made) I know Mako makes steel mags. HK. I have one no brand steel mag made in the USA and it's been a champ. Been using aluminum and pmags. I don't like the idea of a polymer mag with steel feed lips. I can envision the steel shattering when I drop it in the winter at -20 degrees. Advice appreciated! The truth? NONE! There is a major reason the U.S. Military doesn't use steel magazines. Do tell. What is the major reason the U.S. Military doesn't use steel magazines? I've never heard of them being interested in anything but aluminum magazines for the m16 but am unaware that anything else has ever been tested by them. The M14 seemed to do pretty well with steel magazines (as did the Thompson, the m3, and The m1 carbine) Before we get too far off topic this question hasn't yet been answered. What is the major reason the US military doesn't use steel magazines? There are TSMG and BAR magazines still around from the 20s, M1 carbine magazines around since the 40s. There is nothing inherently bad with steel. I assume the original specs called for aluminum for the 16 and nothing else has since been considered. |
|
Quoted:
Before we get too far off topic this question hasn't yet been answered. What is the major reason the US military doesn't use steel magazines? There are TSMG and BAR magazines still around from the 20s, M1 carbine magazines around since the 40s. There is nothing inherently bad with steel. I assume the original specs called for aluminum for the 16 and nothing else has since been considered. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I'm wondering what the high speed folks are using for steel mags these days in 2016? I want to buy a rig's worth of steel 30 round mags (AR obviously) I currently have a few C Products mags new in bag, and I haven't had time to test them. (they look extremely well made) I know Mako makes steel mags. HK. I have one no brand steel mag made in the USA and it's been a champ. Been using aluminum and pmags. I don't like the idea of a polymer mag with steel feed lips. I can envision the steel shattering when I drop it in the winter at -20 degrees. Advice appreciated! The truth? NONE! There is a major reason the U.S. Military doesn't use steel magazines. Do tell. What is the major reason the U.S. Military doesn't use steel magazines? I've never heard of them being interested in anything but aluminum magazines for the m16 but am unaware that anything else has ever been tested by them. The M14 seemed to do pretty well with steel magazines (as did the Thompson, the m3, and The m1 carbine) Before we get too far off topic this question hasn't yet been answered. What is the major reason the US military doesn't use steel magazines? There are TSMG and BAR magazines still around from the 20s, M1 carbine magazines around since the 40s. There is nothing inherently bad with steel. I assume the original specs called for aluminum for the 16 and nothing else has since been considered. I NEVER stated that they didn't use steel for other weapons! Being this forum when you click on it is clearly labeled AR-15 >> Magazines I was referring to AR-15's In addition threads pertaining to other weapons magazines have been locked/moved. Other than a very few exceptions, almost all pistol mags are steel. |
|
I've been using C-Prod steel mags for years now without any major issues. I do have one where the body is a little deformed, but other than that, they all run without issue.
|
|
I have a really nice steel mag that says USA on it. I have never had feeding issues with it but I don't use it anymore. It was a gift. I also have a steel 40 round mag that works great with no feed issues.
|
|
|
bummer to hear what Mako did. I have a BUNCH of their 40's and 20's. Never a problem with either and they have some of the smoothest followers of any mag I have ever used. Was gonna buy a bunch of their 30's but now I will not after reading the info posted here on them. Why not just own up to the problem and move forward. makes no damned sense to me. They could own the steel mag market, imho, based on their follower alone. Not a smart business move to piss off the largest AR forum on the net.
|
|
I would avoid ASC mags. I would say that their customer service is terrible, but that would imply that they actually have customer service. Some of their mags work very well but if you get bad ones they won't fix or replace them.
|
|
I have about 40 of the old Charter England/Singapore steel magazines. These came with the black followers. I swapped them out with Magpul followers. Other than one or two needing a little file work on the mag catches, they work great. They are a tough mags, the feed lips are nearly indestructible. I didn't have any problems with them feeding with the black followers, but I swapped them just for reliability sake.
I bought these before the 1994 ban expired. I don't know if they are for sale any more. I think I paid around $75 for 5 from SOG back then? |
|
After newton when mags were horded I remember some Israeli mags that were steel that came out.
A ex coworker bought them, but I never saw them 1st hand. I believe they were recommended here at the time because no one had any mags in stock. Can't remember what they were... View Quote These were the so-called "Elander" steel mags... made by Mako. I bought five at the time b/c everyone was either out-of-stock, or price gouging. (I personally have a screenshot of "Cheaper than Dirt" offering a 30-rd used Colt mag for $100). But I digress... I personally had trouble with Elanders inserting/locking up when they were full and the bolt was closed... and this was on a high-end LMT rifle, mind you... many similar stories, YouTube videos, etc., showing this. These problems may or may not be fixed, but there are Soooo many proven choices now for cheap, readily available, & reliable M16/AR15 mags, why take a risk? I do get the attraction of steel mags, with the political winds blowing the way that they are, but you can IMO address this [theoretical long-term durability issues] with a few extra/polymer mags, that you know work. If you haven't seen it, here's a poll I ran in the M16 forum a couple of months back... steel mags aren't terribly popular over there, either... http://www.ar15.com/forums/t_6_23/464921_M16_Magazine_Recommendations.html |
|
Quoted:
I have about 40 of the old Charter England/Singapore steel magazines. These came with the black followers. I swapped them out with Magpul followers. Other than one or two needing a little file work on the mag catches, they work great. They are a tough mags, the feed lips are nearly indestructible. I didn't have any problems with them feeding with the black followers, but I swapped them just for reliability sake. I bought these before the 1994 ban expired. I don't know if they are for sale any more. I think I paid around $75 for 5 from SOG back then? View Quote You could really help out the Massachusetts folks with those, they're the only ones who still need the pre-ban mags. Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile |
|
Quoted: You could really help out the Massachusetts folks with those, they're the only ones who still need the pre-ban mags. Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: I have about 40 of the old Charter England/Singapore steel magazines. These came with the black followers. I swapped them out with Magpul followers. Other than one or two needing a little file work on the mag catches, they work great. They are a tough mags, the feed lips are nearly indestructible. I didn't have any problems with them feeding with the black followers, but I swapped them just for reliability sake. I bought these before the 1994 ban expired. I don't know if they are for sale any more. I think I paid around $75 for 5 from SOG back then? You could really help out the Massachusetts folks with those, they're the only ones who still need the pre-ban mags. Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile I think with Massachusetts's current legislation in the works that is all done with now Someone correct me if I am wrong |
|
Quoted:
I think with Massachusetts's current legislation in the works that is all done with now Someone correct me if I am wrong View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted: You could really help out the Massachusetts folks with those, they're the only ones who still need the pre-ban mags.
Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile I think with Massachusetts's current legislation in the works that is all done with now Someone correct me if I am wrong What's coming down the pike? Their AG just unilaterally rewrote the enforcement of their law, but I'm not tracking she banned pre-ban magazines. |
|
|
Quoted:
It doesn't get any better than Okay Industries magazines. They are the largest supplier of U.S.G.I. magazines. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
What's up with the USGI mags? Worthy or not? It doesn't get any better than Okay Industries magazines. They are the largest supplier of U.S.G.I. magazines. They have the contract because they are the lowest bidder that meets the minimum standard, not because they are the highest quality. That said, Okay mags are definitely a good option. |
|
They are probably the best mags overall but they have a lifespan like anything else. My intent to open this post was to see if a worthy 30rd steel option was available, to get a loadout that has a longer lifespan than aluminum. I think so far the only steel option for military use is FNH mags, even though others are available that are good quality like HK. If you look at the recommended magazine inspection protocols used by the various branches there are several components that when damaged can be replaced to get a magazine back operational. Of those items, the body itself cannot be replaced, and anything that effects the path of the follower or the ability to lock open an empty mag calls to discard the mag. Dents, corroded, and overly pitted mag bodies etc. So far I have found some information on newer steel magazines made out of better grades of stainless which apprently keep the mag lighter and less prone to denting. But so far I haven't been able to confirm which exact magazine is usgi steel in 30 rd config. I believe it's the FNH mag, and Okay makes a usgi steel mag according to their website, but I can't confirm it.
|
|
Quoted:
So far the only steel option for military use is FNH mags, even though others are available that are good quality like HK. So far I haven't been able to confirm which exact magazine is usgi steel in 30 rd config. I believe it's the FNH mag, and Okay makes a usgi steel mag according to their website, but I can't confirm it. View Quote The only U.S.G.I. STEEL M-16 magazine was the HK, it turned out to be a turd. Improper heat treating of the feed lips resulting in the feed lips spreading. Weak magazine springs. There is a reason the current magazine is aluminum. |
|
What about Fusil steel magazines? I vaguely remember hearing about them 5 or so years ago but don't know anything about them. They were mig welded spring steel, a complete magazine made from the stuff lancer uses for its feed lips. There is one and only one reason the military doesn't use steel magazines which is the same reason they don't use polymer mags: they are satisfied with aluminum magazines. If they wanted a steel magazine they would have a steel magazine...
|
|
We were ussued HK steel mags for a while. They were the most troublesome magazine we had ever used. Steel is an awnser to a non-existent problem. I like our current issue gi mags and pmags. Out of all the gi mags we've been issued, colt mags have been the worst, but not by a lot.
|
|
|
You can call BS all you want but it is how I see it as the guy who is a FI, runs the armory. This is based on my personal experiences, but like I said not by a whole lot. Could be a coincidence, who knows, but this is based on hundreds of mags in just the last few years. But then we are actually using our magazines in the field not playing with them on the couch, lol. Don't have a clue why they fail more often as I usually mark them as bad and throw them in the trash when we come in from the field. They also don't work in my personal RDB for some reason, they lock in place will strip a round but when you fire them they fall out, lol, weirdest thing, I only have two Colt mags in my bag and they both do it but they work OK in my M-4. Just looked through a stack of mags and besides Colt we have parsens, adventure line, okay, and Brownell's, they all work great in service use, I think all gov't issued aluminum mags are pretty much equivalent and all the brand preference is perpetuated by couch jockey's. As long as they are GI they tend to work pretty well, I think used and after market mags are where you have to look closely. Just my opinion, take it for what it's worth.
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.