Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Page AR-15 » Ammunition
AR Sponsor: bravocompany
Site Notices
Posted: 12/17/2014 9:14:57 PM EDT
Am sure it's been beat to death but i remember reading an article stating that 62 Grain ammunition was originally designed for use in a 1/9 twist but the only reason they chose 1/7 for milspec was because it would also shoot the tracer ammunition with good accuracy which leads me to believe a 1/9 twist barrel is best suited with 62 Grain ammunition, is there any truth to it..
Link Posted: 12/17/2014 9:27:16 PM EDT
[#1]
I don't know if that is the truth or not but the 69gr stuff shoots fine in the one 1/9 twist gun I have.
Link Posted: 12/17/2014 10:13:27 PM EDT
[#2]
http://www.americanrifleman.org/article.php?id=33727&cat=27&sub=28&q=1






In the early 1980s the M855’s 62-grain bullet was developed for the
M249 Squad Automatic Weapon (SAW). For purposes of interoperability, the
same load was adopted as the M16A2 rifle’s standard ball as well. A
February 1986 U.S. Army study noted that the M855’s bullet required a
"1:9 twist [which] would be more appropriate for the M16A2 rifle,
improving accuracy and reliability.” Multiple studies confirmed the
1:9-inch twist requirement.
   
But then a problem arose. The U.S. military’s standard M856 5.56 mm
tracer round was longer, heavier (63.7 grains) and slower than the M855
ball, and simply would not stabilize with a 1:9-inch twist barrel. Thus,
despite it doubling M855 group sizes, the M16A2 (and later, the M4)
specified a 1:7-inch rate-of-twist barrel to stabilize the tracer round.
It remains so to this day.
View Quote





Link Posted: 12/18/2014 12:28:34 AM EDT
[#3]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
http://www.americanrifleman.org/article.php?id=33727&cat=27&sub=28&q=1


In the early 1980s the M855’s 62-grain bullet was developed for the M249 Squad Automatic Weapon (SAW). For purposes of interoperability, the same load was adopted as the M16A2 rifle’s standard ball as well. A February 1986 U.S. Army study noted that the M855’s bullet required a "1:9 twist [which] would be more appropriate for the M16A2 rifle, improving accuracy and reliability.” Multiple studies confirmed the 1:9-inch twist requirement.     But then a problem arose. The U.S. military’s standard M856 5.56 mm tracer round was longer, heavier (63.7 grains) and slower than the M855 ball, and simply would not stabilize with a 1:9-inch twist barrel. Thus, despite it doubling M855 group sizes, the M16A2 (and later, the M4) specified a 1:7-inch rate-of-twist barrel to stabilize the tracer round. It remains so to this day.




And so many people here will argue that this never happened and that 1/7 was chosen because its "best".... On top of that slower twist barrels last longer too.  Unless you want to shoot 75+ all day, 1/9 is definitely a better twist rate.
Link Posted: 12/18/2014 2:22:24 AM EDT
[#4]
Found this great review on the MMR which has a 1/9 twist and they used 40 55 and 69 grain ammunition and the tightest groups were found using the heaviest 69 grain load, i do wish they would have included common 62 grain ammunition as well.
http://www.shootingillustrated.com/index.php/24420/mossberg-mmr-2/
Link Posted: 12/18/2014 11:15:46 AM EDT
[#5]
Please read the FAQs.  
Page AR-15 » Ammunition
AR Sponsor: bravocompany
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top