Quoted:
Hi all
I am looking for the best of all worlds (yeah right).
I run 147 over 3.2 of titegroup in my g34.
I would like to use the same in the carbine( and i do and it works great)
I want to use the carbine (16 inch) out to 125yards on steel. I would like to use one load in both platforms.
Am i gaining anything running 115 grain as far as drop/holdover? I would like to go as flat as possible.
I have heard that the 9mm uses all its powder/energy in like 8-9 inches of barrel. Is this true? Is there a benefit of running hotter 115?
It is all running good now using my current load info. I was just windering what other people's experience is.
Thx
View Quote
Work up some ladders with both 115 & 147. That's the only way to know what will work in your gun. I have 2 16" AR's using the same powder and bullet TAC, Hornady 55gr btfmj.
IF i wanted more than plinking / steel plate accuracy i'd have to do different powder charges for them. The 16" carbine gas system likes 25.4 for in the xring @ 100yds. The mid length gas system, 24.2 for on the money performance. Unfortunately there is no set boiler plate data for ALL guns.
My 147's drop way before the 124's do. Regarding 115's. I like the overall performance of the 124's better. Bullet design and who made them, play a part in the big picture. You'll get better performance from a known manfacturer then using pulled and or seconds / blems. YMMV