User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 1/6/2010 2:37:56 PM EDT
[#1]
They are to me.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/6/2010 2:50:07 PM EDT
[#2]
Quoted:
They are to me. http://i672.photobucket.com/albums/vv81/gocartmozart2/magpulms2insinglepointconfiguration.jpg +1 |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/6/2010 4:37:29 PM EDT
[#3]
They are. I've used standard M4 stock (old and new style), CTR, SOPMOD, and MOE. I settled on the UBR as it balances a long railed, 16" rifle very well. Even though the overall weight is heavier, the better balance makes the rifle handle much better. The preset feature is pretty cool.
Pics: 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/6/2010 5:24:37 PM EDT
[#4]
It's vewy vewy heavy.
If you're not looking to add weight to balance a heavy rifle, seek something else. The CTR is a medium weight stock, and the new ACS I think is in between. So evaluate your needs. I've got an 18 LaRue Stealth with a full length rail. It balances perfectly, but it's not handy. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/6/2010 5:54:08 PM EDT
[#5]
Quoted:
It's vewy vewy heavy. If you're not looking to add weight to balance a heavy rifle, seek something else. The CTR is a medium weight stock, and the new ACS I think is in between. So evaluate your needs. I've got an 18 LaRue Stealth with a full length rail. It balances perfectly, but it's not handy. Are they as heavy as a PRS? |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/6/2010 5:58:28 PM EDT
[#6]
Quoted:
It's vewy vewy heavy. If you're not looking to add weight to balance a heavy rifle, seek something else. The CTR is a medium weight stock, and the new ACS I think is in between. So evaluate your needs. I've got an 18 LaRue Stealth with a full length rail. It balances perfectly, but it's not handy. It's interesting how perceptions can vary. My first battle rifle was a FN FAL. ARs feel too light to me and I like the UBRs extra weight so it feels like I'm actually shooting a gun... i.e. ARs are too LIGHT for my tastes. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/6/2010 7:02:43 PM EDT
[#7]
These are my last 2 builds...as you can see with UBRs. I would imagine the next, then the next and so forth will have an UBR on it as well. They would be worth $350 imho, what else comes close to locking up like a A2 fixed stock all the while being perhaps more adjustable than any other adjustable stock out there. Lastly for me and perhaps the clincher is the looks....sexy!!!! CHEEK WELD for me at least is like butter. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/6/2010 7:10:23 PM EDT
[#8]
I like the feel of a heavier feeling gun, I like to know its there you know what I mean?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/7/2010 12:43:51 PM EDT
[#9]
Quoted:
I like the way they look, but im having problems justifying the price, are they really worth it? At least you can find them reasonably cheap unlike last year. I think it's the best stock I've ever used (not that I'm some expert) given that it fits the balance of your rifle properly. Jay |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/7/2010 12:57:27 PM EDT
[#10]
I'm lovin the UBR so far, rock solid and comfortable as all git out. Worth every penny to me.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/7/2010 2:43:59 PM EDT
[#11]
Heavy and expensive, but if they fit your need, they are well worth both costs.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/8/2010 1:35:54 PM EDT
[#12]
Weight comparisons between different stocks and some food for thought on stock selection:
03designgroup | AR15 Buttstock Considerations 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/8/2010 2:23:45 PM EDT
[#13]
Quoted:
They are to me. http://i672.photobucket.com/albums/vv81/gocartmozart2/magpulms2insinglepointconfiguration.jpg +1 Now, how about the promised aluminum strike plate for the UBR....? 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/8/2010 7:06:21 PM EDT
[#14]
I love both of mine. They do add some weight so for a SBR or L/W upper the weight is noticable otherwise they are GTG. It would be nice if they could make one that is the same but only lighter. If they could I would only have UBR's on my guns, other than my plain jane 20" A2.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/9/2010 9:02:30 AM EDT
[#15]
WE HAVE TAN IN STOCK.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/9/2010 9:37:19 AM EDT
[#16]
UBR is good stuff
Pat Rogers 3 day Carbine Operators course: 
A couple pics from different matches: 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/9/2010 10:14:24 AM EDT
[#17]
I had one and sold it. It was WAY too heavy for my application and I didn't like the fact that the swivel cups didn't limit rotation.
However, it is nicely made and super solid. I imagine it would work well in certain applications. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/9/2010 12:19:08 PM EDT
[#18]
Quoted:
They are. I've used standard M4 stock (old and new style), CTR, SOPMOD, and MOE. I settled on the UBR as it balances a long railed, 16" rifle very well. Even though the overall weight is heavier, the better balance makes the rifle handle much better. The preset feature is pretty cool. Pics: http://public.blu.livefilestore.com/y1pa1KHQPsFVvjpXOjNgdGjsWx2FKldJaRxudvbaMIsm0GD3CDvE8aoCmsPHBR2KiINbFfcs7qyBaF2DQN-tIixhA/DSC_4817.jpg http://public.blu.livefilestore.com/y1pwoMeCJGYMWE0vqflccrCVkSCOUciOih94GlPrurL-Yle8OzqQzlLL00benNK97Zb_Le7uMqypWVuZ7LN3uoZIA/DSC_4847.jpg Thats a sweet tactial train background... HA HA. |
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
