Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Page AR-15 » AR Discussions
AR Sponsor: bravocompany
Site Notices
Page / 42
Link Posted: 1/21/2016 9:55:36 PM EDT
[#1]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By HendersonDefense:
There must be a response or post I used with the word "reset" because I had a member message me about what that meant. I've been working in the garage with the mechanics on our HMMWV's and when they reset a vehicle (in the Army), they go through the whole vehicle to "reset" it back to new. We have been doing that with HMMWV's so to anybody else that wondered what I meant.. now you know.
View Quote

I figured it out from context, though I didn't know the Army motor pool term.  It seems like an important thing for your guns to be as "new-ish" as possible so the customer gets a good experience with it.
Link Posted: 1/22/2016 4:18:04 AM EDT
[#2]
I always thought is "Rebuilt" or "Refurbed/Refurbished"


CD
Link Posted: 1/31/2016 9:01:48 AM EDT
[Last Edit: SciFiFlyer] [#3]
I tell others about this thread and it's findings, and it sure is interesting listening to their reactions. The people I've been informing for the most part haven't fired 100 rounds from their AR (or anything) still fewer have reached 1000 yet seem to think this is vital information. I myself haven't reached 1000 in any one firearm I currently own save a .22lr plinker, this thread's usefulness to me comes in what to look for 10 years down the road should I live that long.

Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History

There must be a response or post I used with the word "reset" because I had a member message me about what that meant. I've been working in the garage with the mechanics on our HMMWV's and when they reset a vehicle (in the Army), they go through the whole vehicle to "reset" it back to new. We have been doing that with HMMWV's so to anybody else that wondered what I meant.. now you know.

View Quote


When I read "reset" in a vehicle I imagine the motor pool mechanics hooking the odometers to electric drills, turning back the miles... "Good as new, General!"
Link Posted: 1/31/2016 12:28:42 PM EDT
[Last Edit: USSRangerSM] [#4]
Thanks for sharing with us
Link Posted: 1/31/2016 6:56:47 PM EDT
[#5]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By SciFiFlyer:
When I read "reset" in a vehicle I imagine the motor pool mechanics hooking the odometers to electric drills, turning back the miles... "Good as new, General!"
View Quote

That would be the Cocke County way.

This has been the most informative thread since Pat Rogers on 'what parts break in a carbine class'. Thanks.
Link Posted: 2/1/2016 1:46:11 PM EDT
[Last Edit: TurtlesAlltheWayDown] [#6]
Ron,

1. Thanks a lot, this is awesome information.

2. Thanks for employing vets.  Sad reality but infantry skill set isn't very marketable.

3. What buffer / spring are you using for your Titan Defense - TDI 415?  From what I gather you may be the only subject matter expert on this upper.  

Thanks again
Link Posted: 2/1/2016 2:19:18 PM EDT
[#7]

Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By d5griffin:


Ron,



1. Thanks a lot, this is awesome information.



2. Thanks for employing vets.  Sad reality but infantry skill set isn't very marketable.



3. What buffer / spring are you using for your Titan Defense - TDI 415?  From what I gather you may be the only subject matter expert on this upper.  



Thanks again
View Quote
LIES!

 



Infantry rules:

1.)  Always look cool

2.)  Never get lost

3.)  If lost, refer to #1




See?  Marketable anywhere!
Link Posted: 2/3/2016 1:54:48 AM EDT
[#8]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By DesignatedMarksman:
LIES!  

Infantry rules:
1.)  Always look cool
2.)  Never get lost Geographicly Disorientated
3.)  If lost, refer to #1


See?  Marketable anywhere!
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By DesignatedMarksman:
Originally Posted By d5griffin:
Ron,

1. Thanks a lot, this is awesome information.

2. Thanks for employing vets.  Sad reality but infantry skill set isn't very marketable.

3. What buffer / spring are you using for your Titan Defense - TDI 415?  From what I gather you may be the only subject matter expert on this upper.  

Thanks again
LIES!  

Infantry rules:
1.)  Always look cool
2.)  Never get lost Geographicly Disorientated
3.)  If lost, refer to #1


See?  Marketable anywhere!

FIXED  
Link Posted: 2/3/2016 3:26:51 PM EDT
[Last Edit: The_Hammer] [#9]
Ron, I know I'm probably the millionth person to say this but thank you for taking the time to share all of this with us!

If there's one thing to take away from this thread it's that we have worried entirely too much about breaking parts, barrel wear, ect. It also shows you don't have to spend a fortune to get quality parts (PSA).
Link Posted: 2/4/2016 2:25:45 PM EDT
[#10]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By The_Hammer:
Ron, I know I'm probably the millionth person to say this but thank you for taking the time to share all of this with us!

If there's one thing to take away from this thread it's that we have worried entirely too much about breaking parts, barrel wear, ect. It also shows you don't have to spend a fortune to get quality parts (PSA).
View Quote



That is the exact reason I started these topics. I hope that more people will realize that it doesn't take a $1,500 upper to go out and have fun with their AR15. I've given our experiences here on the range and nobody has paid me to promote their product or keep my mouth quiet. I've tried my hardest to not bad mouth any one company (not my objective) and let the guys that live check to check and hide a few dollars here and there to buy themselves a new "toy" that it's OK to make that purchase. You don't have to skip rent, credit card bills or enjoying a dinner out with the family to have a fun and reliable AR15.

I am now in a position that I can afford pretty much any weapon I want (I own a transferable M134 "minigun") and have no desire to purchase any high-dollar rifles that do that same thing (my opinion from my experiences) that lower-cost parts kits and rifles. My wife is on the fence about purchasing the Boba Fett gun from Battle Arms Development not because it's the most tactical or high-precision (it may be, I haven't kept up because so much new stuff is constantly being released) but because of the cool factor. Purchase what makes you happy and what you can afford but don't go into bankruptcy because the newest celebrity says it his/her go-to gun.

V/R
Ron
Link Posted: 2/4/2016 5:56:46 PM EDT
[#11]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By HendersonDefense:



That is the exact reason I started these topics. I hope that more people will realize that it doesn't take a $1,500 upper to go out and have fun with their AR15. I've given our experiences here on the range and nobody has paid me to promote their product or keep my mouth quiet. I've tried my hardest to not bad mouth any one company (not my objective) and let the guys that live check to check and hide a few dollars here and there to buy themselves a new "toy" that it's OK to make that purchase. You don't have to skip rent, credit card bills or enjoying a dinner out with the family to have a fun and reliable AR15.

I am now in a position that I can afford pretty much any weapon I want (I own a transferable M134 "minigun") and have no desire to purchase any high-dollar rifles that do that same thing (my opinion from my experiences) that lower-cost parts kits and rifles. My wife is on the fence about purchasing the Boba Fett gun from Battle Arms Development not because it's the most tactical or high-precision (it may be, I haven't kept up because so much new stuff is constantly being released) but because of the cool factor. Purchase what makes you happy and what you can afford but don't go into bankruptcy because the newest celebrity says it his/her go-to gun.

V/R
Ron
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By HendersonDefense:
Originally Posted By The_Hammer:
Ron, I know I'm probably the millionth person to say this but thank you for taking the time to share all of this with us!

If there's one thing to take away from this thread it's that we have worried entirely too much about breaking parts, barrel wear, ect. It also shows you don't have to spend a fortune to get quality parts (PSA).



That is the exact reason I started these topics. I hope that more people will realize that it doesn't take a $1,500 upper to go out and have fun with their AR15. I've given our experiences here on the range and nobody has paid me to promote their product or keep my mouth quiet. I've tried my hardest to not bad mouth any one company (not my objective) and let the guys that live check to check and hide a few dollars here and there to buy themselves a new "toy" that it's OK to make that purchase. You don't have to skip rent, credit card bills or enjoying a dinner out with the family to have a fun and reliable AR15.

I am now in a position that I can afford pretty much any weapon I want (I own a transferable M134 "minigun") and have no desire to purchase any high-dollar rifles that do that same thing (my opinion from my experiences) that lower-cost parts kits and rifles. My wife is on the fence about purchasing the Boba Fett gun from Battle Arms Development not because it's the most tactical or high-precision (it may be, I haven't kept up because so much new stuff is constantly being released) but because of the cool factor. Purchase what makes you happy and what you can afford but don't go into bankruptcy because the newest celebrity says it his/her go-to gun.

V/R
Ron


I am sure your wife is well aware of the matching AR500 armor that she needs to get with the gun, correct?

Link Posted: 2/4/2016 7:39:26 PM EDT
[#12]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By HendersonDefense:



That is the exact reason I started these topics. I hope that more people will realize that it doesn't take a $1,500 upper to go out and have fun with their AR15. I've given our experiences here on the range and nobody has paid me to promote their product or keep my mouth quiet. I've tried my hardest to not bad mouth any one company (not my objective) and let the guys that live check to check and hide a few dollars here and there to buy themselves a new "toy" that it's OK to make that purchase. You don't have to skip rent, credit card bills or enjoying a dinner out with the family to have a fun and reliable AR15.

I am now in a position that I can afford pretty much any weapon I want (I own a transferable M134 "minigun") and have no desire to purchase any high-dollar rifles that do that same thing (my opinion from my experiences) that lower-cost parts kits and rifles. My wife is on the fence about purchasing the Boba Fett gun from Battle Arms Development not because it's the most tactical or high-precision (it may be, I haven't kept up because so much new stuff is constantly being released) but because of the cool factor. Purchase what makes you happy and what you can afford but don't go into bankruptcy because the newest celebrity says it his/her go-to gun.

V/R
Ron
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By HendersonDefense:
Originally Posted By The_Hammer:
Ron, I know I'm probably the millionth person to say this but thank you for taking the time to share all of this with us!

If there's one thing to take away from this thread it's that we have worried entirely too much about breaking parts, barrel wear, ect. It also shows you don't have to spend a fortune to get quality parts (PSA).



That is the exact reason I started these topics. I hope that more people will realize that it doesn't take a $1,500 upper to go out and have fun with their AR15. I've given our experiences here on the range and nobody has paid me to promote their product or keep my mouth quiet. I've tried my hardest to not bad mouth any one company (not my objective) and let the guys that live check to check and hide a few dollars here and there to buy themselves a new "toy" that it's OK to make that purchase. You don't have to skip rent, credit card bills or enjoying a dinner out with the family to have a fun and reliable AR15.

I am now in a position that I can afford pretty much any weapon I want (I own a transferable M134 "minigun") and have no desire to purchase any high-dollar rifles that do that same thing (my opinion from my experiences) that lower-cost parts kits and rifles. My wife is on the fence about purchasing the Boba Fett gun from Battle Arms Development not because it's the most tactical or high-precision (it may be, I haven't kept up because so much new stuff is constantly being released) but because of the cool factor. Purchase what makes you happy and what you can afford but don't go into bankruptcy because the newest celebrity says it his/her go-to gun.

V/R
Ron


Thank you for that statement, Ron.  I appreciate what you said, being someone with a family that doesn't have much (if any from time-to-time) extra income to use on toys for myself.  If and when I buy something, I have to make sure the cost/benefit makes sense for my budget restrictions.  Someday, I'll have the funds to get the Colt Mk18 that I've always wanted with a suppressor, LMT rear sight, Aimpoint/EoTech, and other expensive add-ons, a sweet Mk12, and not have to worry about getting the absolute best deal on the items I'm looking for.  For now, I'm going with PSA and other companies with items that I can afford so I can have fun and have something for protection, instead of nothing.  It's nice to hear someone with experience, and money , voice that they understand the situation a lot of the members of arfcom are in, and not judging people because they aren't going after Noveske/Colt/DD/etc.

Link Posted: 2/4/2016 8:37:21 PM EDT
[#13]
Hi Ron

Thanks for the great write up.

A quick question, out of all the M4 / AR manufacturers Colts LMT, DD, HK etc etc...

Is there a manufacturers tend to outperform the others?
Link Posted: 2/5/2016 12:21:50 PM EDT
[Last Edit: 702Wolfi] [#14]
@ Ron

If you have any in use, I would love to know how Clamp-on, and unpinned but loctited set screw gas blocks are holding up. Thanks.
Link Posted: 2/5/2016 12:57:54 PM EDT
[#15]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By 702Wolfi:
@ Ron

If you have any in use, I would love to know how Clamp-on, and unpinned but loctited set screw gas blocks are holding up. Thanks.
View Quote



^^^^ This
Link Posted: 2/5/2016 1:22:04 PM EDT
[#16]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By 702Wolfi:
@ Ron

If you have any in use, I would love to know how Clamp-on, and unpinned but loctited set screw gas blocks are holding up. Thanks.
View Quote


We have several of these in use by manufactures to include MicroMOA, YHM and Daniel Defense. All of the low profile gas blacks are completely mounted under the quad rails and not one of them has a dimpled barrel to ensure a positive lock. I was very surprised to find out that they don't loosen up after time. You can see carbon from gas blowing out all round the gas block (after thousands and thousands of rounds) that in my opinion, has caused the set screws to "freeze up" and stay in place. Carbon plays havoc on our suppressed weapons because it gets into all the threads and baffles so that's what leads me to believe it actually is helping us with keeping the gas block stay put.

Also, we do have one M4 with a YHM clamp-on folding front sight and gas block combo. We only used it for looks because all the metal portions were finished in FDE molyresin and the rest of the furniture was FDE. We wanted to use MOE handguards on it but it initially had a low profile gas and Korean quad rail mounted. Because I couldn't find our jig to properly drill the holes for a standard front sight base, we used a YHM clamp-on unit that had been sitting a parts box for at least 4-5 years. To my surprise, even the YHM clamp-on unit has not budged. This one really blew my mind because it's not dimpled and I thought for sure that forward pressure customers use when holding the weapon, it would surely slip forward slowly lose gas. Again, this weapon has plenty of carbon blowing out around the gas area and I will again assume it's carbon getting into the screws and around the clamping assembly and "freezing" up from all the carbon.

All of the low profile gas blocks have held up equally but I prefer the MicroMOA units that have the gas restriction plug that allows us to slow down (and not over gas) the short barrel M4's. I would like to compare two 10" M4's by putting both on the line at the same time and use a standard gas block and a MicroMOA gas block and see if the bolt lasts longer. You can definitely feel the difference when using the MicroMOA unit (Baby Govnah) but if it can extend the life of the bolt from shearing in addition to providing a "softer" customer experience, it's a win-win situation.


Link Posted: 2/5/2016 1:36:12 PM EDT
[#17]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By HendersonDefense:


We have several of these in use by manufactures to include MicroMOA, YHM and Daniel Defense. All of the low profile gas blacks are completely mounted under the quad rails and not one of them has a dimpled barrel to ensure a positive lock. I was very surprised to find out that they don't loosen up after time. You can see carbon from gas blowing out all round the gas block (after thousands and thousands of rounds) that in my opinion, has caused the set screws to "freeze up" and stay in place. Carbon plays havoc on our suppressed weapons because it gets into all the threads and baffles so that's what leads me to believe it actually is helping us with keeping the gas block stay put.

Also, we do have one M4 with a YHM clamp-on folding front sight and gas block combo. We only used it for looks because all the metal portions were finished in FDE molyresin and the rest of the furniture was FDE. We wanted to use MOE handguards on it but it initially had a low profile gas and Korean quad rail mounted. Because I couldn't find our jig to properly drill the holes for a standard front sight base, we used a YHM clamp-on unit that had been sitting a parts box for at least 4-5 years. To my surprise, even the YHM clamp-on unit has not budged. This one really blew my mind because it's not dimpled and I thought for sure that forward pressure customers use when holding the weapon, it would surely slip forward slowly lose gas. Again, this weapon has plenty of carbon blowing out around the gas area and I will again assume it's carbon getting into the screws and around the clamping assembly and "freezing" up from all the carbon.

All of the low profile gas blocks have held up equally but I prefer the MicroMOA units that have the gas restriction plug that allows us to slow down (and not over gas) the short barrel M4's. I would like to compare two 10" M4's by putting both on the line at the same time and use a standard gas block and a MicroMOA gas block and see if the bolt lasts longer. You can definitely feel the difference when using the MicroMOA unit (Baby Govnah) but if it can extend the life of the bolt from shearing in addition to providing a "softer" customer experience, it's a win-win situation.


View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By HendersonDefense:
Originally Posted By 702Wolfi:
@ Ron

If you have any in use, I would love to know how Clamp-on, and unpinned but loctited set screw gas blocks are holding up. Thanks.


We have several of these in use by manufactures to include MicroMOA, YHM and Daniel Defense. All of the low profile gas blacks are completely mounted under the quad rails and not one of them has a dimpled barrel to ensure a positive lock. I was very surprised to find out that they don't loosen up after time. You can see carbon from gas blowing out all round the gas block (after thousands and thousands of rounds) that in my opinion, has caused the set screws to "freeze up" and stay in place. Carbon plays havoc on our suppressed weapons because it gets into all the threads and baffles so that's what leads me to believe it actually is helping us with keeping the gas block stay put.

Also, we do have one M4 with a YHM clamp-on folding front sight and gas block combo. We only used it for looks because all the metal portions were finished in FDE molyresin and the rest of the furniture was FDE. We wanted to use MOE handguards on it but it initially had a low profile gas and Korean quad rail mounted. Because I couldn't find our jig to properly drill the holes for a standard front sight base, we used a YHM clamp-on unit that had been sitting a parts box for at least 4-5 years. To my surprise, even the YHM clamp-on unit has not budged. This one really blew my mind because it's not dimpled and I thought for sure that forward pressure customers use when holding the weapon, it would surely slip forward slowly lose gas. Again, this weapon has plenty of carbon blowing out around the gas area and I will again assume it's carbon getting into the screws and around the clamping assembly and "freezing" up from all the carbon.

All of the low profile gas blocks have held up equally but I prefer the MicroMOA units that have the gas restriction plug that allows us to slow down (and not over gas) the short barrel M4's. I would like to compare two 10" M4's by putting both on the line at the same time and use a standard gas block and a MicroMOA gas block and see if the bolt lasts longer. You can definitely feel the difference when using the MicroMOA unit (Baby Govnah) but if it can extend the life of the bolt from shearing in addition to providing a "softer" customer experience, it's a win-win situation.




Wow, thank you very much Ron! Your input on this will give me a better sleep for sure.
Link Posted: 2/5/2016 1:52:05 PM EDT
[Last Edit: 702Wolfi] [#18]
There is one more thing that would interest me. It is very difficult and time consuming to align the gas tube when assembling a new AR-15. I personally align my tubes so that the gas tube free floats into the upper receiver. That way the gas key can easily move the tube to its desired direction via a shorter distance, rather than dragging it all the way up from a corner or something. And when I go full anal, I align it so that the tube enters the upper slight above center, but still free floating, because in most AR's, the bolt carrier/gas key engages with the tube from above center under live fire. I know that most AR home builders, and probably even most factory builders somewhat neglect this, and the tube more often than not rests against the gas tube insert in the upper receiver.

So my question is, how is the mushroom part at the end of the tube holding up? Any premature leaks there from a less than ideal aligned gas tube? Thanks again.
Link Posted: 2/5/2016 5:52:56 PM EDT
[#19]
tag
Link Posted: 2/6/2016 1:43:47 AM EDT
[#20]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By HendersonDefense:


We have several of these in use by manufactures to include MicroMOA, YHM and Daniel Defense. All of the low profile gas blacks are completely mounted under the quad rails and not one of them has a dimpled barrel to ensure a positive lock. I was very surprised to find out that they don't loosen up after time. You can see carbon from gas blowing out all round the gas block (after thousands and thousands of rounds) that in my opinion, has caused the set screws to "freeze up" and stay in place. Carbon plays havoc on our suppressed weapons because it gets into all the threads and baffles so that's what leads me to believe it actually is helping us with keeping the gas block stay put.

Also, we do have one M4 with a YHM clamp-on folding front sight and gas block combo. We only used it for looks because all the metal portions were finished in FDE molyresin and the rest of the furniture was FDE. We wanted to use MOE handguards on it but it initially had a low profile gas and Korean quad rail mounted. Because I couldn't find our jig to properly drill the holes for a standard front sight base, we used a YHM clamp-on unit that had been sitting a parts box for at least 4-5 years. To my surprise, even the YHM clamp-on unit has not budged. This one really blew my mind because it's not dimpled and I thought for sure that forward pressure customers use when holding the weapon, it would surely slip forward slowly lose gas. Again, this weapon has plenty of carbon blowing out around the gas area and I will again assume it's carbon getting into the screws and around the clamping assembly and "freezing" up from all the carbon.

All of the low profile gas blocks have held up equally but I prefer the MicroMOA units that have the gas restriction plug that allows us to slow down (and not over gas) the short barrel M4's. I would like to compare two 10" M4's by putting both on the line at the same time and use a standard gas block and a MicroMOA gas block and see if the bolt lasts longer. You can definitely feel the difference when using the MicroMOA unit (Baby Govnah) but if it can extend the life of the bolt from shearing in addition to providing a "softer" customer experience, it's a win-win situation.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By HendersonDefense:
Originally Posted By 702Wolfi:
@ Ron

If you have any in use, I would love to know how Clamp-on, and unpinned but loctited set screw gas blocks are holding up. Thanks.


We have several of these in use by manufactures to include MicroMOA, YHM and Daniel Defense. All of the low profile gas blacks are completely mounted under the quad rails and not one of them has a dimpled barrel to ensure a positive lock. I was very surprised to find out that they don't loosen up after time. You can see carbon from gas blowing out all round the gas block (after thousands and thousands of rounds) that in my opinion, has caused the set screws to "freeze up" and stay in place. Carbon plays havoc on our suppressed weapons because it gets into all the threads and baffles so that's what leads me to believe it actually is helping us with keeping the gas block stay put.

Also, we do have one M4 with a YHM clamp-on folding front sight and gas block combo. We only used it for looks because all the metal portions were finished in FDE molyresin and the rest of the furniture was FDE. We wanted to use MOE handguards on it but it initially had a low profile gas and Korean quad rail mounted. Because I couldn't find our jig to properly drill the holes for a standard front sight base, we used a YHM clamp-on unit that had been sitting a parts box for at least 4-5 years. To my surprise, even the YHM clamp-on unit has not budged. This one really blew my mind because it's not dimpled and I thought for sure that forward pressure customers use when holding the weapon, it would surely slip forward slowly lose gas. Again, this weapon has plenty of carbon blowing out around the gas area and I will again assume it's carbon getting into the screws and around the clamping assembly and "freezing" up from all the carbon.

All of the low profile gas blocks have held up equally but I prefer the MicroMOA units that have the gas restriction plug that allows us to slow down (and not over gas) the short barrel M4's. I would like to compare two 10" M4's by putting both on the line at the same time and use a standard gas block and a MicroMOA gas block and see if the bolt lasts longer. You can definitely feel the difference when using the MicroMOA unit (Baby Govnah) but if it can extend the life of the bolt from shearing in addition to providing a "softer" customer experience, it's a win-win situation.

Just when I thought this thread was dead, you go ahead and do something like this.

Very good info to know.

I will also second the question about gas tube wear.  I've seen it personally on high volume guns, especially RLGS.  I'm interested to know the life of gas tubes.  I personally spend a lot of time ensuring they are aligned optimally for the key fit, not binding.

Just had a friend bring his in because it was locking up the action.  His gas block was back too far, so the flange was somehow press-fitting deep inside the carrier key.  Both were nitrided, which are not what the TDP calls for.  TDP calls for soft steel carrier keys.
Link Posted: 2/6/2016 1:48:24 AM EDT
[#21]
Link Posted: 2/6/2016 2:27:51 AM EDT
[#22]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By HeavyMetal:
When I tweak gas tubes, it is with the upper upside down.

The spring in the magazine pushes the bolt carrier up to the top of the receiver.  The wear pattern on well-used receivers will confirm this by the shiny spots on the anodizing.
View Quote


I will get the pics but that same spot on one of our receivers has been worn out so badly that the upper receiver is no longer functional. This is the first time that we've worn out an AR15 upper receiver to the point that it can no longer function properly,

V/R
Ron
Link Posted: 2/6/2016 7:19:35 AM EDT
[#23]
Link Posted: 2/6/2016 9:51:35 AM EDT
[#24]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By amphibian:

Thanks!  
Your experience mirrors ours.  As long as the set screws are torqued on properly from the start, it doesn't move.  We also just use blue loctite.  It seems that after doing some initial strings of fire the heat cycles turn it into cement.  At one time, I had dumped blue loctite into the hole then screwed the set screws in and the loctite got between the gas block and barrel and again it is like cement after a few heat cycles.  We had to remove the block off the barrel with a hydraulic press.  Again with no dimpling.  
However, we still have customers demand dimpling so we do that anyway for barrels that come with our standard Govnah.
 
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By amphibian:
Originally Posted By HendersonDefense:
Originally Posted By 702Wolfi:
@ Ron

If you have any in use, I would love to know how Clamp-on, and unpinned but loctited set screw gas blocks are holding up. Thanks.


We have several of these in use by manufactures to include MicroMOA, YHM and Daniel Defense. All of the low profile gas blacks are completely mounted under the quad rails and not one of them has a dimpled barrel to ensure a positive lock. I was very surprised to find out that they don't loosen up after time. You can see carbon from gas blowing out all round the gas block (after thousands and thousands of rounds) that in my opinion, has caused the set screws to "freeze up" and stay in place. Carbon plays havoc on our suppressed weapons because it gets into all the threads and baffles so that's what leads me to believe it actually is helping us with keeping the gas block stay put.

Also, we do have one M4 with a YHM clamp-on folding front sight and gas block combo. We only used it for looks because all the metal portions were finished in FDE molyresin and the rest of the furniture was FDE. We wanted to use MOE handguards on it but it initially had a low profile gas and Korean quad rail mounted. Because I couldn't find our jig to properly drill the holes for a standard front sight base, we used a YHM clamp-on unit that had been sitting a parts box for at least 4-5 years. To my surprise, even the YHM clamp-on unit has not budged. This one really blew my mind because it's not dimpled and I thought for sure that forward pressure customers use when holding the weapon, it would surely slip forward slowly lose gas. Again, this weapon has plenty of carbon blowing out around the gas area and I will again assume it's carbon getting into the screws and around the clamping assembly and "freezing" up from all the carbon.

All of the low profile gas blocks have held up equally but I prefer the MicroMOA units that have the gas restriction plug that allows us to slow down (and not over gas) the short barrel M4's. I would like to compare two 10" M4's by putting both on the line at the same time and use a standard gas block and a MicroMOA gas block and see if the bolt lasts longer. You can definitely feel the difference when using the MicroMOA unit (Baby Govnah) but if it can extend the life of the bolt from shearing in addition to providing a "softer" customer experience, it's a win-win situation.



Thanks!  
Your experience mirrors ours.  As long as the set screws are torqued on properly from the start, it doesn't move.  We also just use blue loctite.  It seems that after doing some initial strings of fire the heat cycles turn it into cement.  At one time, I had dumped blue loctite into the hole then screwed the set screws in and the loctite got between the gas block and barrel and again it is like cement after a few heat cycles.  We had to remove the block off the barrel with a hydraulic press.  Again with no dimpling.  
However, we still have customers demand dimpling so we do that anyway for barrels that come with our standard Govnah.
 


ADCO has said in the past the only legitimate reason for the dimples are alignment and they do nothing to secure it.
Link Posted: 2/7/2016 11:32:14 AM EDT
[#25]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Diz:
This is probably one of the top 2-3 no-shit threads I've ever read on-line.  Thanks to Henderson Defense for sharing this.  And thanks to them for hiring vets and giving them such a supportive workplace.

And here this thread sits buried on page 2 of the AR discussions.  Couldn't even find the AK thread after going back 4-5 pages.

Pretty sad state of affairs.  Some of the most important info ever posted on line and doesn't even rate a sticky.  Huh.  

Here is a guy offering up his experiences to the public, for free, and the response here was pretty mixed.  Some guys get it, and thanked him; others just had to nit-pick at him, others had to argue amongst themselves because they got butt-hurt over his findings.   Others are praying for this thread to slip into oblivion I suppose.  

Well, I guess we don't want to offend the big money vendors and their legions of fanbouys.
View Quote


Not me, love it and back to the top with ya.
Link Posted: 2/7/2016 1:29:27 PM EDT
[#26]
Quite a few of you have asked about how the Colt M4's are holding up since being put on the line (according to our records, this particular rifle went on the line 02 OCT 15). They have handled very well with no broken bolts, no broken hammer/trigger pins, no eroded gas tubes or any other failures up until this week. I do want to put it out there that the RSO's really like these weapons. They were all outfitted with the exact same Magpul furniture in two different colors to help in swapping out weekly. They all have MOE handguards with a forward pistol grip to help control heat issues. These weapons get hot after several magazines and when you have parties of anywhere from 2-20 people shooting, the weapons are intolerable for the person who's never handled a firearm to enjoy the experience.

That being said, the RSO's have used these weapons every day of the week and migrate towards the Colt's. They have been on the line since the first week of October and as stated above, they haven't suffered from any issues up until this point. The only reason that I am bringing this up is because I was in the armory yesterday morning and I noticed on of the Colt's disassembled on the bench. It was a FDE model and I knew that those models were on the line and shouldn't be down for cleaning. I asked my armorer Danny Boy what the issue was and he said that the ejector spring was in about 7-8 pieces and that it actually happened to be the second one of the morning. I thought that was pretty odd for two ejector springs to go out in the same day. My other armorer Sean stated that he had already replaced two others early this week for a total of four Colt M4's to suffer ejector spring failure in one week. Also, the ejector pin spring sheared upon failure and had to be punched out.

For this rifle to have four HARD months of use and only suffer from a ejector spring failure is really good in my opinion but the fact that four went down with the exact same issue is what's strange. Also, we never saw the usual slow down during the November through February season and these weapons have continued to see high round counts. Without looking at numbers of rounds consumed for the time period it's fair to see these rifles have no less than 25,000-30,000 rounds through them.

Today is my day off but I will send a message to the armorers to go ahead replace all the ejector springs in the Colt M4's as preventive maintenance and to avoid malfunctions with customers on the range.

V/R
Ron






Link Posted: 2/7/2016 1:36:32 PM EDT
[#27]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By HendersonDefense:
Quite a few of you have asked about how the Colt M4's are holding up since being put on the line (according to our records, this particular rifle went on the line 02 OCT 15). They have handled very well with no broken bolts, no broken hammer/trigger pins, no eroded gas tubes or any other failures up until this week. I do want to put it out there that the RSO's really like these weapons. They were all outfitted with the exact same Magpul furniture in two different colors to help in swapping out weekly. They all have MOE handguards with a forward pistol grip to help control heat issues. These weapons get hot after several magazines and when you have parties of anywhere from 2-20 people shooting, the weapons are intolerable for the person who's never handled a firearm to enjoy the experience.

That being said, the RSO's have used these weapons every day of the week and migrate towards the Colt's. They have been on the line since the first week of October and as stated above, they haven't suffered from any issues up until this point. The only reason that I am bringing this up is because I was in the armory yesterday morning and I noticed on of the Colt's disassembled on the bench. It was a FDE model and I knew that those models were on the line and shouldn't be down for cleaning. I asked my armorer Danny Boy what the issue was and he said that the ejector spring was in about 7-8 pieces and that it actually happened to be the second one of the morning. I thought that was pretty odd for two ejector springs to go out in the same day. My other armorer Sean stated that he had already replaced two others early this week for a total of four Colt M4's to suffer ejector spring failure in one week. Also, the ejector pin spring sheared upon failure and had to be punched out.

For this rifle to have four HARD months of use and only suffer from a ejector spring failure is really good in my opinion but the fact that four went down with the exact same issue is what's strange. Also, we never saw the usual slow down during the November through February season and these weapons have continued to see high round counts. Without looking at numbers of rounds consumed for the time period it's fair to see these rifles have no less than 25,000-30,000 rounds through them.

Today is my day off but I will send a message to the armorers to go ahead replace all the ejector springs in the Colt M4's as preventive maintenance and to avoid malfunctions with customers on the range.

V/R
Ron

http://i.imgur.com/8GfpeLe.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/YdkFsKV.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/8gyO3wG.jpg
View Quote


Thanks for the update. 25,000-30,000 is a lot of rounds for a ejector spring. I believe they have a maintenance plan of 10,000 rounds. So you tripled their expected life.

Good stuff.
Link Posted: 2/7/2016 1:42:49 PM EDT
[Last Edit: HeavyMetal] [#28]
Link Posted: 2/7/2016 1:46:09 PM EDT
[#29]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By HeavyMetal:
25-30K on the original bolts?
View Quote


Yes sir. Not one bolt failure on the Colt's to date.

V/R
Ron
Link Posted: 2/7/2016 1:47:09 PM EDT
[#30]
Link Posted: 2/7/2016 2:24:41 PM EDT
[#31]
It would seem that all of the "improved" bolts that are being offered these days aren't really necessary. It also seems that the HP testing isn't as destructive and some people thought.
Link Posted: 2/7/2016 2:35:48 PM EDT
[#32]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By HendersonDefense:


Yes sir. Not one bolt failure on the Colt's to date.

V/R
Ron
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By HendersonDefense:
Originally Posted By HeavyMetal:
25-30K on the original bolts?


Yes sir. Not one bolt failure on the Colt's to date.

V/R
Ron


That is impressive! Amazing how quality AR's are holding up with preventative maintenance. If it isn't broke, do not fix it
Link Posted: 2/7/2016 4:27:52 PM EDT
[#33]
Ron, I'm really impressed with the way those M4s have held up.  Your experience with ejector springs makes me wonder something, though: do you have a specific inspection routine for when the guns come off the line for cleaning (that might include "look at the ejector springs"), or do your armorers just inspect everything while deep cleaning the guns?

I'll also echo The Hammer's observation: just about every AR shooter should stop fretting about systematic failures and just pay attention to shooting.  The way your guns are used is really "abuse" to the rest of us, and having ONLY some spring failures after that much use is hugely impressive.  (I'll bet the springs failed because they got cooked from all the heat those guns had to deal with, NOT because they were not well made.)

I'll keep working on trigger and sight alignment techniques, and I'm not going to worry about failures while I'm doing it.  Parts will fail with use, major or minor notwithstanding.  This applies to guns, cars, computers, and everything else.  The only time to worry is when multiple parts fail, or when parts fail far more often than they should.  Or more dramatically than they should - a bolt failing at the cam pin hole is less worrisome than one failing at multiple lugs at the same time.

So my spares stash is still there, and your extremely informative posts have helped me in deciding what spares to stock, but I won't be surprised if I only rarely use any of those parts.  I never have the chance to shoot the ever lovin' snot out of any of my guns, let alone to the level that ALL of yours get used!

Keep on rocking, Ron; I'm looking forward to your next illuminating "here's what my armorers showed me today" post!
Link Posted: 2/8/2016 2:13:08 AM EDT
[#34]
Ron,

Your guys probably already know, but the ejector spring on a TDP gun is duplicated in the pistol grip with the selector detent spring.

Makes field repair for military armorers much easier as long as the original in the bolt hasn't fragmented like yours.
Link Posted: 2/8/2016 10:00:27 AM EDT
[#35]
Link Posted: 2/8/2016 9:17:31 PM EDT
[#36]
Ron, you mentioned your friendship with the New Frontier Amorry owner. Do you use any of their products? Was curious about how polymer lowers hold up under prolonged use.
Link Posted: 2/8/2016 9:32:42 PM EDT
[#37]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By LRRPF52:
Ron,

Your guys probably already know, but the ejector spring on a TDP gun is duplicated in the pistol grip with the selector detent spring.

Makes field repair for military armorers much easier as long as the original in the bolt hasn't fragmented like yours.
View Quote


Well thats good to know. Thanks
Link Posted: 2/8/2016 10:04:12 PM EDT
[#38]
I've previously stated that we've never lost a AR15 receiver due to wear like we have with AK's. Well, with over three years of constant use that is no longer the truth. It's very clear how deep the bolt carrier key has worn into the upper receiver over the years. The armorers made notes in their records about the wear pattern but didn't see a need to replace the receiver as it continued to function and barrels had been swapped (making sure the headspace was kept in spec) with no issue of reliability.

The weapon came off the line because the RSO stated that the bolt wouldn't go into battery. Initially they assumed there must have been a sheared key or case inside the barrel extension area that wouldn't allow the bolt to close. After further inspection, they noticed that the bolt was hitting the face of the barrel extension. They stripped the weapon down and that's when they discovered that there had been so much wear that the bolt carrier was being pushed upward and causing the misalignment. To go back and do the math on the round count would take a VERY long time and even then it would only be good estimate. What I do know is that this particular rifle was one of mine before we opened Battlefield Vegas and has been on the line since day one. It's had two barrel swaps, several bolt's and numerous springs, extractors, etc but it was a great running gun and that's why they kept it on the line. I don't remember who I purchased this receiver from but it's fair to say that it wasn't a high-dollar upper by any means. This was a personal weapon that we used for demo's and I couldn't afford a nice rifle to let LE use and abuse so more than likely it was from JT Distributing or DS Arms.

We had distributor accounts set up with both of them prior to opening Battlefield and used quite a bit of their products. Either way, it's a standard forged upper receiver that has lasted untold thousands of rounds before failing. I don't want people to come out and say that I am stretching the truth but I will throw some numbers out there and let you do the math. Each M4 on the line will get a minimum of 20 magazines run through it each day and each magazine has 25 rounds. Just for fun, let's just say that it was on the line only 3 out of the 7 days of week for 3 years and 3 months. Now, that is a very conservative number because there are SO many times that we go through 10,000+ rounds of .223 on a Saturday in the last three years.

Here are some pics...








Link Posted: 2/9/2016 10:37:05 AM EDT
[Last Edit: EVR] [#39]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By HendersonDefense:
I've previously stated that we've never lost a AR15 receiver due to wear like we have with AK's. Well, with over three years of constant use that is no longer the truth. It's very clear how deep the bolt carrier key has worn into the upper receiver over the years. The armorers made notes in their records about the wear pattern but didn't see a need to replace the receiver as it continued to function and barrels had been swapped (making sure the headspace was kept in spec) with no issue of reliability.

The weapon came off the line because the RSO stated that the bolt wouldn't go into battery. Initially they assumed there must have been a sheared key or case inside the barrel extension area that wouldn't allow the bolt to close. After further inspection, they noticed that the bolt was hitting the face of the barrel extension. They stripped the weapon down and that's when they discovered that there had been so much wear that the bolt carrier was being pushed upward and causing the misalignment. To go back and do the math on the round count would take a VERY long time and even then it would only be good estimate. What I do know is that this particular rifle was one of mine before we opened Battlefield Vegas and has been on the line since day one. It's had two barrel swaps, several bolt's and numerous springs, extractors, etc but it was a great running gun and that's why they kept it on the line. I don't remember who I purchased this receiver from but it's fair to say that it wasn't a high-dollar upper by any means. This was a personal weapon that we used for demo's and I couldn't afford a nice rifle to let LE use and abuse so more than likely it was from JT Distributing or DS Arms.

We had distributor accounts set up with both of them prior to opening Battlefield and used quite a bit of their products. Either way, it's a standard forged upper receiver that has lasted untold thousands of rounds before failing. I don't want people to come out and say that I am stretching the truth but I will throw some numbers out there and let you do the math. Each M4 on the line will get a minimum of 20 magazines run through it each day and each magazine has 25 rounds. Just for fun, let's just say that it was on the line only 3 out of the 7 days of week for 3 years and 3 months. Now, that is a very conservative number because there are SO many times that we go through 10,000+ rounds of .223 on a Saturday in the last three years.

Here are some pics...

http://i.imgur.com/R0nWZm0.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/AVVXqNY.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/N59gdEO.jpg


View Quote


Wow!!

Amazing.

You've probably said already somewhere, but what lube?

Ever try G96 Gun Treatment aerosol?  There is a Canadian study that actually measured gun WEAR {aluminum framed pistol} that had that stuff as one of the best.  It is also easy to apply.  Takes no time at all {no disassembly needed and can be easily used on a gun you don't want to clean yet}.
Link Posted: 2/9/2016 11:06:46 AM EDT
[Last Edit: muvef] [#40]
I came up with 253,500 rds.

Edit:  Thanks for posting Ron.  This is great information.
Link Posted: 2/9/2016 11:55:48 AM EDT
[Last Edit: EVR] [#41]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By muvef:
I came up with 253,500 rds.

Edit:  Thanks for posting Ron.  This is great information.
View Quote


I forgot the YEARS!!

So we have 20x25=500 x 3=1500 {per week}.  3 years =  c.156 weeks.  3 months = c. 12 weeks. Total weeks =168.  Rounds per week 1500 X Total weeks = 252,000 rounds.

Counting the extra days as it looks like you did you get the extra rounds.

Either way that is a whale of a lot of bullets!!

Ron:

What is your backstop made of and how often do you mine it?

...of course I guess by now it might just be made entirely of bullets!  
Link Posted: 2/9/2016 12:08:01 PM EDT
[Last Edit: The_Hammer] [#42]
I came up with 84,000

Edit: For whatever reason I used 500 a week instead of 1500

So Ron, as of now you've had one upper receiver wear out but no lowers correct?

Who all believes that this is sticky worthy? I for one damn sure do.
Link Posted: 2/9/2016 1:29:35 PM EDT
[#43]
Ron,

Have you used any of the Ruger guns?  The SR-556 piston or the AR-556 DI?
Link Posted: 2/9/2016 7:12:46 PM EDT
[#44]
252,000 estimated rounds to wear out an upper....  amazing.
 Can I assume the  same lower was used  the entire round count, and is still  functioning ?
Link Posted: 2/9/2016 7:45:10 PM EDT
[#45]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Fullpower:
252,000 estimated rounds to wear out an upper....  amazing.  Can I assume the  same lower was used  the entire round count, and is still  functioning ?
View Quote


That's the low estimate. If you say 5 days a week its at 490,000 rounds.
Link Posted: 2/9/2016 8:06:34 PM EDT
[#46]
To save the receiver would it be possible to open up the slot (width and depth) and insert a new gas key channel, retained with permanent Loctite?

Joe
Link Posted: 2/9/2016 8:14:49 PM EDT
[#47]
Have you considered one of the new Secubit Round counters from CAA on your AR's and other railed firearms as a way to track round counts and keep digital records?

CAA Secubit
Link Posted: 2/9/2016 8:54:42 PM EDT
[Last Edit: EVR] [#48]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Slimjim:
Have you considered one of the new Secubit Round counters from CAA on your AR's and other railed firearms as a way to track round counts and keep digital records?

CAA Secubit
View Quote


The dude would rather have a dollar counter that might save him a few hours off his accountant's bill!!!
Link Posted: 2/9/2016 10:21:17 PM EDT
[#49]

Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Slimjim:


Have you considered one of the new Secubit Round counters from CAA on your AR's and other railed firearms as a way to track round counts and keep digital records?



CAA Secubit
View Quote
Id bet that the counter will wear out and stop working before the rifle.
Link Posted: 2/9/2016 10:36:44 PM EDT
[#50]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By scudzuki:
To save the receiver would it be possible to open up the slot (width and depth) and insert a new gas key channel, retained with permanent Loctite?

Joe
View Quote

Would be faaaaaar cheaper just to buy a new receiver. Machinist time ain't cheap.
Page / 42
Page AR-15 » AR Discussions
AR Sponsor: bravocompany
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top