User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 4/28/2015 11:21:32 AM EDT
[#1]
I would use it.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/28/2015 11:22:08 AM EDT
[#2]
Just another manufacturer or dealer on the market. I personally haven't heard anything about this BCG or company.
Either wait for reviews or go with Radical Firearms BCG (same price from Primary Arms), DSG Arms BCG or Aim Surplus BCG. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/28/2015 11:34:10 AM EDT
[#3]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/28/2015 11:36:03 AM EDT
[#4]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Just another manufacturer or dealer on the market. I personally haven't heard anything about this BCG or company. Either wait for reviews or go with Radical Firearms BCG (same price from Primary Arms), DSG Arms BCG or Aim Surplus BCG. I have not used any of their branded products. My brother did buy some Anderson lowers from them without any issues. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/28/2015 4:55:16 PM EDT
[#5]
That is the same picture Anderson has on their web page for their BCG. Most likely it's a Anderson BCG. I picked one up during their last black Friday sale. Can't comment on durability, it only has about 300 rds through it.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/28/2015 4:57:05 PM EDT
[#6]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I would use it. +1 Looks to be decent. I'd run it as well. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/28/2015 4:57:59 PM EDT
[#7]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
That is the same picture Anderson has on their web page for their BCG. Most likely it's a Anderson BCG. I picked one up during their last black Friday sale. Can't comment on durability, it only has about 300 rds through it. If it is, I have an Anderson BCG with 2000+ rounds on it, still good to go. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/28/2015 5:03:51 PM EDT
[#8]
Quote HistoryQuoted: If it is, I have an Anderson BCG with 2000+ rounds on it, still good to go. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: That is the same picture Anderson has on their web page for their BCG. Most likely it's a Anderson BCG. I picked one up during their last black Friday sale. Can't comment on durability, it only has about 300 rds through it. If it is, I have an Anderson BCG with 2000+ rounds on it, still good to go. That would not surprise me, I doubt Fat Boy tactical is making their own BCG's and they're known for supplying cheap Anderson lowers. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/28/2015 5:08:45 PM EDT
[#9]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
That would not surprise me, I doubt Fat Boy tactical is making their own BCG's and they're known for supplying cheap Anderson lowers. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
That is the same picture Anderson has on their web page for their BCG. Most likely it's a Anderson BCG. I picked one up during their last black Friday sale. Can't comment on durability, it only has about 300 rds through it. If it is, I have an Anderson BCG with 2000+ rounds on it, still good to go. That would not surprise me, I doubt Fat Boy tactical is making their own BCG's and they're known for supplying cheap Anderson lowers. Sounds likely to me as well. There's only so many companies that make BCG's, and as you said I doubt fatboy is one of em lol. I just picked up a CMT BCG yesterday as well, looks on par with my Anderson minus chrome lining, but that's not a huge deal. Looks like it was HPT although it's not marked for it, there are HEAVY brass markings, but it's only been test fired. I just wish I could find out if the bolt was 9310 or c-158! (Bought it private sale) |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/28/2015 5:18:22 PM EDT
[#10]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Sounds likely to me as well. There's only so many companies that make BCG's, and as you said I doubt fatboy is one of em lol. I just picked up a CMT BCG yesterday as well, looks on par with my Anderson minus chrome lining, but that's not a huge deal. Looks like it was HPT although it's not marked for it, there are HEAVY brass markings, but it's only been test fired. I just wish I could find out if the bolt was 9310 or c-158! (Bought it private sale) Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
That is the same picture Anderson has on their web page for their BCG. Most likely it's a Anderson BCG. I picked one up during their last black Friday sale. Can't comment on durability, it only has about 300 rds through it. If it is, I have an Anderson BCG with 2000+ rounds on it, still good to go. That would not surprise me, I doubt Fat Boy tactical is making their own BCG's and they're known for supplying cheap Anderson lowers. Sounds likely to me as well. There's only so many companies that make BCG's, and as you said I doubt fatboy is one of em lol. I just picked up a CMT BCG yesterday as well, looks on par with my Anderson minus chrome lining, but that's not a huge deal. Looks like it was HPT although it's not marked for it, there are HEAVY brass markings, but it's only been test fired. I just wish I could find out if the bolt was 9310 or c-158! (Bought it private sale) I had a CM marked bolt and it bothers the hell out of me not knowing the specs |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/28/2015 5:20:54 PM EDT
[#11]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I had a CM marked bolt and it bothers the hell out of me not knowing the specs Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
That is the same picture Anderson has on their web page for their BCG. Most likely it's a Anderson BCG. I picked one up during their last black Friday sale. Can't comment on durability, it only has about 300 rds through it. If it is, I have an Anderson BCG with 2000+ rounds on it, still good to go. That would not surprise me, I doubt Fat Boy tactical is making their own BCG's and they're known for supplying cheap Anderson lowers. Sounds likely to me as well. There's only so many companies that make BCG's, and as you said I doubt fatboy is one of em lol. I just picked up a CMT BCG yesterday as well, looks on par with my Anderson minus chrome lining, but that's not a huge deal. Looks like it was HPT although it's not marked for it, there are HEAVY brass markings, but it's only been test fired. I just wish I could find out if the bolt was 9310 or c-158! (Bought it private sale) I had a CM marked bolt and it bothers the hell out of me not knowing the specs I can tell most of the specs just by looking (that's it's phosphated, key looks forged, carrier isn't chrome lined etc. But although none of my 9310 bolts have failed me, I'd still prefer the bolt to be c-158 |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/28/2015 9:45:03 PM EDT
[#12]
Looks good to me. Especially for $80, honestly at this point building a proper spec M4 is not hard. Actually I may buy me one for a new build.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/28/2015 9:48:22 PM EDT
[#13]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Looks good to me. Especially for $80, honestly at this point building a proper spec M4 is not hard. Actually I may buy me one for a new build. Those arent MILSPEC BCG's incase you're trying to stay 100 percent clone correct. They appear to be close though minus the 9310 bolt |
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
