User Panel
|
No F marked FSB will likely make it impossible to Zero. The spec requires a F Marked FSB....somebody screwed up badly at Colt.
|
|
Maybe I overlooked something, but what is up with the trigger group in the bag including the manual and lock?
|
|
|
Quoted:
Won't make a diference on a rifle length barrel. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
No F marked FSB will likely make it impossible to Zero. The spec requires a F Marked FSB....somebody screwed up badly at Colt. Won't make a diference on a rifle length barrel. It does as the Military A4s require it due to the different height of the rear sight created by the rail. |
|
I went through my parts today to see about putting some A2/4 together.... ...you just sealed the deal for me... |
|
Quoted:
It does as the Military A4s require it due to the different height of the rear sight created by the rail. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
No F marked FSB will likely make it impossible to Zero. The spec requires a F Marked FSB....somebody screwed up badly at Colt. Won't make a diference on a rifle length barrel. It does as the Military A4s require it due to the different height of the rear sight created by the rail. I have zeroed 14.5" M4's without the F marked front sight using both carry handle sights as well as Matech BUIS with no problems. A 20" barrel should be no issue since the front sight post won't need to be screwed down as far as a 14.5" will require. |
|
|
|
Quoted:
You did. took out factory FCG. note on the pic said already replaced with Geissele SSA-E. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Maybe I overlooked something, but what is up with the trigger group in the bag including the manual and lock? You did. took out factory FCG. note on the pic said already replaced with Geissele SSA-E. Gotcha It looked like it was sealed in the bag to me. |
|
Quoted:
Won't make a diference on a rifle length barrel. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
No F marked FSB will likely make it impossible to Zero. The spec requires a F Marked FSB....somebody screwed up badly at Colt. Won't make a diference on a rifle length barrel. exactly...the higher F marked was made for carbine length sight radius....while a M16A4 may use an F marked, its not needed.. also, if you have an a1/a2 upper and a f marked fsb on a carbine length barrel, you will probably have to crank the post down, and maybe even file it to sight it in..but with an f marked rifle length, it wont matter... |
|
|
Have you seen any locally at dealers yet other than the one you had transferred in? Others have been curious if the stock spacer is metal or plastic as well so if you ever take the stock off chime in on that as well. I wouldn't take it off just to solve that riddle though. |
|
Quoted:
Have you seen any locally at dealers yet other than the one you had transferred in? Others have been curious if the stock spacer is metal or plastic as well so if you ever take the stock off chime in on that as well. I wouldn't take it off just to solve that riddle though. View Quote Negative - when I ordered mine through GrabAGun they had 15 in stock. The next morning when I checked on the status of my order, they were already sold out However, I will say that GrabAGun has the best price I've seen on these. I shopped around and checked Bud's, Clyde Armory, Impact Guns, Tombstone Tactical, Slick Guns, and Gunbroker. |
|
Thank you for going to the trouble to post all of the pics especially the barrel profile shot.
|
|
Damnit OP, now I'm going to have to get one of these (and probably the FN version as well).
Thanks a lot for the detailed photos! |
|
Quoted:
However, I will say that GrabAGun has the best price I've seen on these. I shopped around and checked Bud's, Clyde Armory, Impact Guns, Tombstone Tactical, Slick Guns, and Gunbroker. View Quote I've got one on the way for $1100 plus $20 shipping. Think 'shop run by owner of competing AR forum' I believe. Prior to finding that deal, Grab A Gun's price was the lowest I had seen. |
|
the F-FSB are required on carbines due to the shorter sight radius (both A1/A2 and flat top).
that's why early carbines came with the higher front sight post from the factory. on rifles it doesnt matter.. you'll be able to zero this Colt AR15A4 just fine. I guess the reason why A4 comes with a F-FSB is just the standardization of the mfg process... it doesnt make sense to keep 2 different FSB. Same thing for the M4 feedramps... no need to manufacure 2 different barrel extensions and upper receivers. |
|
Nice rifle OP!! Do me a favor and don't smother this beauty with "Tactical bullshit"?
|
|
Quoted: No F marked FSB will likely make it impossible to Zero. The spec requires a F Marked FSB....somebody screwed up badly at Colt. View Quote Absolutely incorrect. The original A4's did not have an F marked FSB. The were A2 barrels that had an upper receiver swap. At the worst you would need a taller front sight post. But it is usually a non issue on a 20" barrel. Also, not all F height FSB's are marked. |
|
Quoted:
Absolutely incorrect. The original A4's did not have an F marked FSB. The were A2 barrels that had an upper receiver swap. At the worst you would need a taller front sight post. But it is usually a non issue on a 20" barrel. Also, not all F height FSB's are marked. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
No F marked FSB will likely make it impossible to Zero. The spec requires a F Marked FSB....somebody screwed up badly at Colt. Absolutely incorrect. The original A4's did not have an F marked FSB. The were A2 barrels that had an upper receiver swap. At the worst you would need a taller front sight post. But it is usually a non issue on a 20" barrel. Also, not all F height FSB's are marked. Thank you. Great looking rifle. |
|
I received mine from grabagun this week. Mine shipped with the standard safety and not the ambi. The safety is def a Colt part and I opened the box myself 15 min after my FFL received it so I know no one swapped it out. I'll give Colt a call and see if they'll send me the ambi one. The safety also didn't operate properly and when I took the grip off to inspect, I found the safety detent spring bent at a 90 degree angle. Turned it around and it fixed the issue but again I call Colt and ask if they'll send me a replacement spring. I also have a little marring on the delta ring from the tool they used to compress it while they installed the handguards. A little black touch up took care of that.
|
|
Going to get me some of that A quad goodness ! Not too bothered about the "F" mark....if it bugs me later, I'll just engrave it in. I'll also be switching to an all metal back door, and R.E. spacer if needed. On will go the M5 and MIAD grip with bolt and pin insert. Will stuff in a DPMS steel CH. Then a RRA Stand Alone BUIS, and some awesome ACOG optic. A killer three point sling...and then I'll be ready for whatever evil the TV set can throw at me ! ! ! Huzzah ! The good Colonel has done it again.
|
|
They used to put in really awful steel blocks with pins, which almost ruined the lower ! Had to be machined out with carbide ! The new block is nowhere near as bad and will resist lower receiver torquing under severe loads. I'm not gonna complain, but then I never did about the Colt Heavy Duty FCG pins in .174" either. The new A4 rifle looks like a sure winner....will be jumping on one soon !
|
|
Quoted:
Absolutely incorrect. The original A4's did not have an F marked FSB. The were A2 barrels that had an upper receiver swap. At the worst you would need a taller front sight post. But it is usually a non issue on a 20" barrel. Also, not all F height FSB's are marked. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
No F marked FSB will likely make it impossible to Zero. The spec requires a F Marked FSB....somebody screwed up badly at Colt. Absolutely incorrect. The original A4's did not have an F marked FSB. The were A2 barrels that had an upper receiver swap. At the worst you would need a taller front sight post. But it is usually a non issue on a 20" barrel. Also, not all F height FSB's are marked. Ok, I called our Colt Armorer at work and asked. He made further calls and this is what I got back- Every military A4 that has left Colt as an A4 has a F height fsb. Rebuilds by DOD done in house could be anything. The F height fsb vs the standard is .04 difference in height. This can often be compensated for with a taller post but it is frowned upon because the post can end up higher than the ears. These rifles were intended to have a F marked fsb. Basically, flat top receiver rifles are supposed to have F height fsbs. |
|
Looking at this colt makes me want to buy an M16 from them.
But I still like my M&P15 tactical |
|
Quoted:
Absolutely incorrect. The original A4's did not have an F marked FSB. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
No F marked FSB will likely make it impossible to Zero. The spec requires a F Marked FSB....somebody screwed up badly at Colt. Absolutely incorrect. The original A4's did not have an F marked FSB. This is not correct. The first run of production M16A4s (not test trial or engineering guns) had an F marked front sight. |
|
That colt looks good. I just picked up a bcm a4 from g and r tactical. I'm about to order me an SSA-E!
|
|
Quoted:
No F marked FSB will likely make it impossible to Zero. The spec requires a F Marked FSB....somebody screwed up badly at Colt. View Quote I don't believe the original A4 even had M4 feed ramps. Why would an A4 have M4 feed ramps? Evens sounds silly if you know why they exist. Now we come to the feared "F" marked FSB!!! OHHHH The Horror!!!!! |
|
Nothing is better looking then a 20" rifle I really like that rollmark |
|
The old Bushmasters used a non "F" marked front sight base. BM matched it with a commercial handle or rear sight. When using a mil-spec carry handle or rear sight (with a height of .083), a taller (+.040) front sight was necessary to get a mechanical zero and be able to zero the rifle. The non "F" marked front sight tower matches a commercial height (.079) carry handle or rear sight. I can't imagine that Colt would intentionally couple a non "F" tower with a mil-spec carry handle without including a +.040" front sight post. I would measure the carry handle height to see if it is commercial or mil-spec. Either 1) the tower is unmarked (but mil spec-not likely) and the carry handle is mil-spec OR 2) the tower is commercial and the carry handle height is also commercial (.083), which is my bet.
|
|
I think the issue is that Colt could have used the F marked front sight base, as is done with the military weapons, but they didn't. This reminds me of Colt using parts simply to get rid of excess components that are still on hand. I wish I could find some of the Colt A2 upper receivers that I used to have laying around, I would make an M16A2 clone in a minute.
|
|
Quoted: I think the issue is that Colt could have used the F marked front sight base, as is done with the military weapons, but they didn't. This reminds me of Colt using parts simply to get rid of excess components that are still on hand. I wish I could find some of the Colt A2 upper receivers that I used to have laying around, I would make an M16A2 clone in a minute. View Quote I will say this. There is no way Colt would use those parts on a new and highly sought after rifle if they don't work together. And there are A4's out there that do not say Colt on the side. |
|
Based on an unpostable thread about an unavailable similar stick... Can you post a pic of the shelf area? Thanks |
|
Quoted:
The old Bushmasters used a non "F" marked front sight base. BM matched it with a commercial handle or rear sight. When using a mil-spec carry handle or rear sight (with a height of .083), a taller (+.040) front sight was necessary to get a mechanical zero and be able to zero the rifle. The non "F" marked front sight tower matches a commercial height (.079) carry handle or rear sight. I can't imagine that Colt would intentionally couple a non "F" tower with a mil-spec carry handle without including a +.040" front sight post. I would measure the carry handle height to see if it is commercial or mil-spec. Either 1) the tower is unmarked (but mil spec-not likely) and the carry handle is mil-spec OR 2) the tower is commercial and the carry handle height is also commercial (.083), which is my bet. View Quote The gun has a non f marked front sight base. It is not f height. The post is a low post, not a tall carbine post. The carry handle is mil height. Colt has never made a commercial height carry handle. |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.