Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login

Log In

A valid email is required.
Password is required.
Posted: 12/19/2001 9:00:47 AM EDT
If Bill Clinton was still president, how much donating would Osama Bin Laden have to do to earn one of those presidential pardens?
Link Posted: 12/19/2001 9:05:22 AM EDT
Just a hummer
Link Posted: 12/19/2001 9:07:58 AM EDT
Probably a weekend stay at a hotel with a few cute little Afghan women running around.
Link Posted: 12/19/2001 9:23:11 AM EDT
Just a trip on the Camel Express. Oh, wait, Bob243 already pointed that out.
Link Posted: 12/19/2001 9:25:49 AM EDT
Link Posted: 12/19/2001 9:38:07 AM EDT
Last I heard, all Osama was promising was 72 virgins I think Clinton would jump all over them, litterally!
Link Posted: 12/19/2001 1:06:06 PM EDT
Very funny. Actually we would be giving bin Laden money. On 9-11 when the first WTC tower was on fire and before the second tower was hit, former Governor of NY (Democrat) Cuomo was talking on FXNWS saying that USA did not have the resources to prevent such attacks and the government must negotiate with and appease whoever crashed the first plane. I was listening and watching in disbelief of the first tower burning, thinking of people trapped and dying, while that Cuomo shmuck talked of appeasement, when the second plane appeared and crashed into the second tower. Cuomo was cut off by FOX in mid sentence and no more whining left wing radicals were heard from the morning of 9-11 on FOX. But if Gore was in power I believe Cuomo's political line of appeasement would be followed. If the Democrats were in power the Taliban and bin Laden would not be crushed today, as they have been crushed by President Bush and the US Armed Forces. The Taliban and bin Laden would be more powerful and influential than ever if it had been up to the Democrats to lead us and the US Armed Forces.
Link Posted: 12/19/2001 1:18:42 PM EDT
Hell, if Clinton or Gore were in office there would be a stand at every intersection giving out the new USOA* head wraps. *United States of Arabia
Link Posted: 12/19/2001 1:23:41 PM EDT
Link Posted: 12/19/2001 3:49:52 PM EDT
[Last Edit: 12/19/2001 3:45:24 PM EDT by 5subslr5]
"If Bill Clinton was still president ?" Clinton, on behalf of the United States of America, would have issued a "public apology" to each country that lost "their native sons" (aka, the terrorists)in that tragic loss of 9/11. Clinton would have instantly agreed to pay "victim compensation" to each country and family losing a terrorist (aka, native son) on 9/11. Clinton's pay-offs to those unfortunate countries and families losing terrorists on 9/11 would have been financed by levying a "death" tax"* on the "RICH" (defined as $50,000/year - total household income.) people who were rich enough to be in that area at that time on that day and be killed. (*Death tax retro-active to 1/01/01) ABC, CBS, CNN and NBC would have lauded "statesman clinton's" skillful avoidance of spilling further terrorists blood - truly a president of piece - as well as his show of "fiscal responsibility." (aka the Death Tax, retroactive) On Fox O'Reilly would gave spun clear out of the zone-of-no-rotation. clinton would have instructed Attorney General reno to bring a $125 Trillion suit on behalf of those countries and families losing terrorists on 9/11 against all who financed or constructed the World Trade Towers there by causing "Sky Blockage" and providing Twin Tower targets which caused those terrorists-flown hijacked American airliners to run into them. (A fairly reliable source believes the suit against the "Pentagon" will be based on the use of Latin in the buildings description as well as the government constructing a building so low as to provide a difficult target thus causing the needless loss of terrorists lives....) (Less is known about the pending PENN suit but veteran reno watchers believe that ultimately criminal charges will be filed against families of the dead Americans. The most likely charge ? Relative of felonious assaulter on a terrorists in the midst of a high-jacking and terror attack - a Federal crime punishable by 10 years locked in bill's residential library. janet reno would have expanded the suit into a class-action allowing those countries and families not actually sending terrorists but who really wanted to but didn't know there was gonna be a BIG payout ! (Hati was reported to have a large voice in that decision as Hati stands as a momument to ahhh, oh clinton's Nation-Building (uh) successes.) Finally Attorney General janet with impecable reno logic would have explained as no guns were used by the terrorist in any of the high-jackings on 9/11 the American people obviously had no need for guns - ever. Both the "New York Times and the "Washington Post" papers of 9/12 printed their belief that reno's reminder of the undisputable fact that "the attacks were done in the morning" will be the devisive factor in her winning the debate of logic and thus the right to "TAKE the GUNS." It is widely believed Reps. Waters, Maxine and Condit, Gary will shepherd the bill in the house.
Link Posted: 12/19/2001 3:55:14 PM EDT
He would have launched a few cruise missles and that would be end of it.
Link Posted: 12/19/2001 3:55:15 PM EDT
Originally Posted By Bob243: Probably a weekend stay at a hotel with a few cute little Afghan women running around.
View Quote
Cute little Afghan women? I think finding them would be more difficult than a war with the USA.
Link Posted: 12/19/2001 4:24:23 PM EDT
Originally Posted By geezhound: Cute little Afghan women? I think finding them would be more difficult than a war with the USA.
View Quote
Actually, some (admittedly few) of the pictures I've seen of Afghan women have been of some stunningly beautiful females -- once you see beyond the rags they're dressed in and the squalor they live in...
Top Top