I didn't see this posted. Remember, it is for the children.
[url]http://www.sunspot.net/news/local/bal-md.olesker26jul26.column?coll=bal%2Dhome%2Dcolumnists[/url]
Who'll take responsibility for shootings of children?
Michael Olesker
Originally published Jul 26, 2001
Michael Olesker
JOHN JOSEPH Price is part of our national haunting now, one of the American children killed by one of the other American children because a gun happened to be handy. His name, already a newspaper headline, will become a courtroom case number. Great debates will take place in his absence, arguments flung across the radio airwaves to fill time between the commercials. All that will be lost is the boy's humanity.
His mother, Carole Price, tried to hold onto that yesterday, the day after she and her husband, John, filed suit in Baltimore Circuit Court. The morning newspaper headline said they are seeking $6 million. Carole Price, knowing the legal odds are long, said she is seeking something bigger than $6 million: accountability.
And memory.
"I think, 'What would he look like now?'" she said yesterday of her lost son. "He'd be getting ready to drive a car. He'd be 16. I think about him going to school. I think about all the things I'm not going to be able to do with him. I feel really cheated. He was taken from me, and nobody asked me first. I don't know how to let it go. I don't think I could let him go. I think I should miss him forever."
Next month will be three years since John, then 13, was killed by a 9-year-old who found a loaded 9 mm handgun at a White Marsh townhouse. John had gone there, his mother said, to visit the younger boy for a few minutes before returning home for dinner. Two younger children were also there. The 9-year-old boy's father was renting a room at the house.
"We were friendly as neighbors," Carole Price said. "You know, you wave when you see them, the kids play outside together. We were neighbors. And then, nothing. John died at 4:21 in the afternoon. They moved out at 3 o'clock the following morning. We've never had contact. They never said a word. If my child killed another child, I'd go on my hands and knees and beg forgiveness. We never heard anything."
In the 16-count lawsuit filed Tuesday, the Price family seeks damages from the gun's manufacturer, Sturm, Ruger & Co. of Southport, Conn., claiming product liability, negligence and breach of warranty. Damages are sought against the gun company, the Fallston pawnshop where the gun was purchased - and the 9-year-old boy and his father.
"I would like someone to have said, 'Your child died in my home because of my negligence,'" Carole Price said. "I would like some kind of acknowledgement, some kind of apology. If we had gotten that kind of apology, then this kind of lawsuit might have been prevented."
But there are no apologies, and there are no acknowledgements, in the endless debate over guns. The gun runners, and all their knights-errant, dig in their heels as the body counts rise. They couch their arguments in the Constitution, in legal technicalities, in warped logic that insists that the more killing power we have, the safer we are.
And they fight even the smallest gestures of compromise, insisting that each safety measure that might save lives is instead a veiled attempt to dismantle an entire industry, and a national nostalgia for weaponry.