The Chicago Tribune
July 16, 2001
Busting the global flow of guns
By Salim Muwakkil
The Bush administration's recent moves to thwart a United Nations pact curbing the global flow of small arms reveals just how much it is a captive of the National Rifle Association's gun-happy lobby.
But it also underscored the growing incompatibility of right-wing Republicanism with emerging global trends.
At the opening of the UN Conference on the Illicit Trade in Small Arms and Light Weapons, John R. Bolton, the U.S. undersecretary of state for arms control and international security, made it clear that the U.S. did not find all guns "problematic" and would not join any effort to "constrain legal trade and legal manufacturing of small arms and light weapons."
The UN estimates that there are more than 500 million small arms in the world, about half of which were acquired illegally. These weapons are used to arm child soldiers, rival militia, criminal gangs and other "irregular forces" that kill about 4 million people each year, say UN officials. The problem is particularly acute in places like Afghanistan, Sierra Leone and Angola, where the UN estimates there are more than 17 million light weapons in circulation.
The conference is seeking ways to curtail the bustling trade in illicit arms that fuels those deadly conflicts; its goal is to introduce global standards and tracing methods that assure some control of weapon distribution. Some regional groups and nations already have implemented rigorous efforts to reduce the flow of small arms (for example, South Africa and Norway have programs that destroy small weapons found in the wrong hands).
The 10-day UN conference, which will end July 20, is the first attempt to forge an international consensus.
"The United States would not join consensus on a final document that contains measures abrogating the constitutional right to bear arms," Bolton said in his remarks. He said the U.S. would object to any plan that included prohibitions on private ownership of military arms, or any steps toward a binding global treaty.
Critics complained that the U.S. opposes the UN effort because it is the world's leading arms producer and, like Russia, China and India, reaps huge profits from looser weapons controls. While there undoubtedly are commercial pressures at work, Bolton wrapped his remarks in 2nd-Amendment imagery. UN officials went out of their way to allay the Bush administration's fears that constitutional protections would be infringed, even publishing a booklet addressed to the U.S. called "Setting the Record Straight." What's more, the conference's action plan would not be legally binding.
Bolton is a former vice president of the American Enterprise Institute, a Washington, D.C.-based conservative think tank, so he understood the need to pitch his remarks to the anti-UN theme so beloved by the American right. For many years, far-right groups like the John Birch Society and various branches of the so-called "Patriots" movement (even the Ku Klux Klan) have railed against the UN for its reputed intent to strip away U.S. rights and liberties and create a One World government. With the collapse of the Soviet Union, the international agency has been elevated to the global headquarters of godless communism by many of these right-wing forces.