The problem is that the protests have wrongly been associated with the likes of Al Sharpton. The point is that, would you like munitions flying over your town and blowing up so close you can hear them. In addition, there have been alot of injuries and deaths, not just the most recent one. Bush made the right decision. Before you speak, go live in Vieques for a while. You'll agree with Bush very quickly. There is also the issue of D.U. Cancer levels are much higher on Vieques than they were before the advent of D.U. Yet the military claims its safe. Hell, its still 40% radioactive. But, the data shows that it causes Gulf-War Syndrome and other diseases. The Navy can easily find a replacement. This is not a sell out of the military it is doing something that should have been done years ago. By the way, bombing on Culebra (Just north of Vieques) was stopped by Ford after a bomb was 'accidently' dropped in the town reservoir. The government had to pay to build 'em a new reservoir. Simply put, my father was born in Georgia, but moved to Vieques as a child and grew up there. He left in 1968, and returned to the mainland U.S. He saw what happened when Vieques was really used (Early Vietnam War.) Innocent civilians were hurt or died so that SF and Marines could train on Vieques. I know that good training is necessary. But an inhabited island is unacceptable. The Navy used to have another island near Hawaii all to themselves. The only problems, ancient burial grounds. Hell, they were dead already, yet we gave it back. That was wrong, artifacts aren't worth a lack of training, but don't risk innocent civilian lives. Perhaps they could find an island all to themselves. Then I say go for it and blow it to hell. If no civilians are in danger, drop whatever you want, all you want.