Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login

Log In

A valid email is required.
Password is required.
Site Notices
6/21/2017 8:25:40 PM
Posted: 6/7/2001 2:13:45 PM EDT
?
Link Posted: 6/7/2001 2:21:27 PM EDT
In 2002 I believe.
Link Posted: 6/7/2001 2:26:28 PM EDT
Buy now, buy plenty! I already did and my bank account shows it.
Link Posted: 6/7/2001 2:26:35 PM EDT
There's two bills AB35 and SB52. Senate votes on AB35 Assembly votes on SB52 Davis need to sign these into law.
Link Posted: 6/7/2001 2:28:50 PM EDT
Originally Posted By Chaingun: There's two bills AB35 and SB52. Senate votes on AB35 Assembly votes on SB52 Davis need to sign these into law.
View Quote
and do you doubt that will happen??
Link Posted: 6/7/2001 2:30:55 PM EDT
Didn't Davis say he was not going to push any more gun laws? Can't he veto or table this POS till it expires or something? Yeah, I know, fat f*****g chance! They are kicking the shit out of us!
Link Posted: 6/7/2001 2:33:45 PM EDT
Originally Posted By the_survivalist:
Originally Posted By Chaingun: There's two bills AB35 and SB52. Senate votes on AB35 Assembly votes on SB52 Davis need to sign these into law.
View Quote
and do you doubt that will happen??
View Quote
Our only chance is to Blitz Davis with calls/emails/faxes. This might work. He agreed not to sign in new laws for 2k not 2001.
Link Posted: 6/7/2001 2:38:02 PM EDT
Link Posted: 6/7/2001 2:41:33 PM EDT
Originally Posted By ChaZ: Senate votes on AB35 Assembly votes on SB52 ??? Why is it named "AB" if Senate votes on it? Shouldn't it be "SB" as an acronym for "Senate Bill"? Just asking, I don't understand those communist voting system down there... -[blue]ChaZ[/blue][img]http://www.stopstart.fsnet.co.uk/smilie/skull.gif[/img]
View Quote
It was my impression that each group must approve the other's bills. Or maybe I just made it up because it sounds like a good idea [:D]
Link Posted: 6/7/2001 2:43:10 PM EDT
And they are going to keep kicking ass until everyone stops giving to gun reactive groups and spends it on proactive kick-ass lawyers to file suit against state, local and fed gov't for violating our Constitutional rights. If we don't take it back soon, we will never get it back. Win or lose, at least you know where you stand, and I prefer that to letting them chip away until all rights are gone. This is why I did not move to CT. for a job relocation offer.
Link Posted: 6/7/2001 2:50:10 PM EDT
[url]www.uniontrib.com/news/uniontrib/wed/news/news_1n6guns.html[/url] Gun bill headed for Assembly battle By James P. Sweeney COPLEY NEWS SERVICE June 6, 2001 [B] SACRAMENTO -- Democrats muscled a controversial handgun-licensing measure to the Assembly floor yesterday by adding additional supporters to a committee that narrowly rejected it last week. Without further debate, the reconfigured Appropriations Committee approved the legislation by Assemblyman Kevin Shelley, D-San Francisco, by a bare majority.[/B] Does this bother anyone else? From what I understand they booted off one of their own democrats from the committee who previously voted "no" and then arbitrarily added members until they got enough "yes" votes to get it to the assembly floor. Why the hell even bother with the legislative process anymore?
Link Posted: 6/7/2001 3:03:50 PM EDT
That is the process-do whatever it takes to win. This is how you keep advancing the socialist agenda that the Dem's are in love with. Must be working, they keep getting elected...
Link Posted: 6/7/2001 3:05:09 PM EDT
Imbrog- Someone in Pat Bates office said it's technically legal but sorta gray and really sleazy. What did you expect?
Link Posted: 6/7/2001 5:16:01 PM EDT
All I will say is "BE PREPARED" Sodie>> I hear ya, stock-piling mags as we speak. Got 100 NIW USGI (Center, Sanchez and Adventureline) so far in the past month. Working on 50 more. The kids don't need to eat this week ;)
Top Top