User Panel
Originally Posted By italianstallion95: SOCOM is evaluating Flux Raiders for their M17s View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
|
I really like my SLX556C-QD.
|
|
I can’t stand it to think my life is going so fast and I’m not really living it.
|
Originally Posted By astrocreep96: I feel like I've been bamboozled. Here I am enjoying my Sig guns, and all along I was unaware they were an "unfavorable manufacturer"... https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/105138/1000006313-3205639.jpg I guess I need to sell them and maybe buy some KACs (have 2), a Geissele (have 3), and Daniel Defense (have 3), maybe some Colts (have an M16A1 full auto in ATF Form 4 hell, technically haven't shot it yet). Arfcom GD basement dwellers have convinced me of the error of my ways. View Quote Nice rigs ! Don't get bothered by the know nothings on here, the KAC crowd will preach they are the best, the Geiselle crowd will claim they are the best, the LWRC crowd will claim they are the best, and the DD crowd will claim they are the best. Each one will use QC issues that every manufacturer has had: from Geiselle transitioning to cheaper coatings that could never match, price gouging during Covid, bolt catches breaking, Mk16 Bendy-Boy; then comes KAC, then comes LWRC with their SMG45 abortion and some noted accuracy issues with their rifles, and lets not even start with the FN SCAR crowd. History repeats itself. As an FFL and actually seeing customers run NIB firearms, about 20-30% of gun buyers will become attached to 1 brand or maybe 2 or 3 brands and invest all their ego into why their rig is the best. Out of all the brands we move, from a quality and reliability and features standpoint, SIG Sauer overall is a great firearms brand and one of the few that is pushing the envelope and it shows, their P365 series is the nations best seller, a lot of competitive shooters have been running MPXs and P320s, and SOCOM is adopting Rattler/SURG/MCX/Spear-LT. All these factors cause the haters to come out of the woodwork and try to convince us that all us Sig owners should look at our guns the way we look at Hi Points. The brand we by far need RMAs on are Smith & Wessons (excl. S&W revolvers) |
|
|
Why is the sky blue?
What makes the green grass grow? |
Originally Posted By JAG2955: Yep, I saw some of the pics. I hope they make it to like troops as well. It would greatly increase internal security capabilities. View Quote I bought a Raider-X about 3 months ago during the few miracle seconds it was available on the Flux website. Ran my P320 FCU with the Spectre Comp slide/barrel/comp for the first time 2 weeks ago, I was making groupings the size of a cockroach at 75 yds. with that thing, which everyone will tell you is impossible with a pistol. Extremely impressed, absorbs the recoil fairly well, I mounted a P2 ACRO on it and have about 500 rounds through it, reliable has been 100% and I highly recommend the Raider-X if anyone can get their hands on it. After the range the first words to the employees was that SOCOM needs to adopt this thing. |
|
|
I love my Sig's....P226, P320''s, P365. No issues......
|
|
NRA Benefactor Life Member
Buckeye Firearms Association Member Favorite movie quote: Improvise, Adapt, Overcome - Clint Eastwood |
Originally Posted By astrocreep96: I feel like I've been bamboozled. Here I am enjoying my Sig guns, and all along I was unaware they were an "unfavorable manufacturer"... https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/105138/1000006313-3205639.jpg I guess I need to sell them and maybe buy some KACs (have 2), a Geissele (have 3), and Daniel Defense (have 3), maybe some Colts (have an M16A1 full auto in ATF Form 4 hell, technically haven't shot it yet). Arfcom GD basement dwellers have convinced me of the error of my ways. View Quote This whole thread is dumb. "Unfavorable manufacturer"? You have to be an absolute idiot to not see that SIG is dominating and is the leading manufacturer of small arms in the world. Kicking ass in the civi sector, the big .mil side and in SOF units worldwide. I really want to believe that GD mouthbreathers aren't that dumb, so I chalk it up to people being butthurt "their brand" didn't get the MHS contract. |
|
|
Originally Posted By S-1: This whole thread is dumb. "Unfavorable manufacturer"? You have to be an absolute idiot to not see that SIG is dominating and is the leading manufacturer of small arms in the world. Kicking ass in the civi sector, the big .mil side and in SOF units worldwide. I really want to believe that GD mouthbreathers aren't that dumb, so I chalk it up to people being butthurt "their brand" didn't get the MHS contract. View Quote I agree with this |
|
|
Why is the sky blue?
What makes the green grass grow? |
Originally Posted By S-1: You have to be an absolute idiot to not see that SIG is dominating and is the leading manufacturer of small arms in the world. Kicking ass in the civi sector, the big .mil side and in SOF units worldwide. View Quote This is where most of the hate (and jealously from those invested in brand XYZ) is coming from:
If Sigs were such junk, none of the above would be happening. At my FFL, if Sigs were such garbage we would see them as the most RMA'd brand (it's actually Smith & Wesson). What always gets me the most are the "lowest bidder" comments, if global 1st world military and police truly went with the lowest bidder, Planet Earth would be swimming in Rugers, Kel Tecs, and Smith & Wessons. Yet it's always Glock, Sig, H&K, and FN that run basically all the small arms in global 1st world military and police. |
|
|
Originally Posted By S-1: This whole thread is dumb. "Unfavorable manufacturer"? You have to be an absolute idiot to not see that SIG is dominating and is the leading manufacturer of small arms in the world. Kicking ass in the civi sector, the big .mil side and in SOF units worldwide. I really want to believe that GD mouthbreathers aren't that dumb, so I chalk it up to people being butthurt "their brand" didn't get the MHS contract. View Quote I couldn't have said it any better! |
|
NRA Benefactor Life Member
Buckeye Firearms Association Member Favorite movie quote: Improvise, Adapt, Overcome - Clint Eastwood |
Originally Posted By italianstallion95: This is where most of the hate (and jealously from those invested in brand XYZ) is coming from: Sig USA is the largest exporter of firearms in the United States; Sig P365 and P320 are the best selling semi-autos in the United States right now for the last 2 or 3 years; Sig is easily the #2 pistol brand (behind Glock) in law enforcement use in the US right now; Sig P320s are being adopted by multiple first world nationals for their police or military sidearm (Canada, Australia, France, Denmark, Costa Rica, Norway, etc.) Sig MCXs have been used by SOCOM since at least 2017 and now the Spear-LT looks like it will replace the legendary HK416 within CAG. Sig M17s/M18s were selected as our official US military sidearm and has been confirmed to be in use with some SOCOM circles. Sig Spear (big boy) is the Army's new battle rifle. Sig Rattler/SURG/legacy MCX are all being procured by SOCOM. View Quote Your facts says it all.....but, I still like Glock's. They are the 2 brands I swear by. |
|
NRA Benefactor Life Member
Buckeye Firearms Association Member Favorite movie quote: Improvise, Adapt, Overcome - Clint Eastwood |
Originally Posted By Liv_C: Your facts says it all.....but, I still like Glock's. They are the 2 brands I swear by. View Quote The only three sidearm brands that both myself and all my employees are strapped with are the Big 3 - Glock, Sig, and H&K. The G19.5 MOS w/ GPT is still one of my favorite handguns of all time, along with my P365s and P320s. |
|
|
I own a fair number of SIGs. It cracks me up when people talk about their poor quality and/or Indian made parts.
First the Indian made parts are made by the same company that made jet turbine fins in your passenger airliner, so if you think it’s trash, I wouldn’t fly. Second, for all my SIGs, I’ve only had 1 part break. It was the firing pin on my ‘94 P229. Which was before MIM. And for the Cohen haters, if he was so bad, why is Kimber crap and SIG soaring? Mostly, to answer the OP, I think people just like hating on winners. They hope to see success hit failure. Mixed with the insecure gun owners that need some validation that their favorite brand is good. Guess what? They’re all good. At least the major brands. |
|
|
Originally Posted By BuddyChryst: Mostly, to answer the OP, I think people just like hating on winners. They hope to see success hit failure. Mixed with the insecure gun owners that need some validation that their favorite brand is good. Guess what? They’re all good. At least the major brands. View Quote Agreed, that's usually what happens. I'm always taken back to how people would trash Glock as the perfect example of this. |
|
|
SIG is a great manufacturer if you just act like they never made anything after 2000.
|
|
|
Originally Posted By italianstallion95: I bought a Raider-X about 3 months ago during the few miracle seconds it was available on the Flux website. Ran my P320 FCU with the Spectre Comp slide/barrel/comp for the first time 2 weeks ago, I was making groupings the size of a cockroach at 75 yds. with that thing, which everyone will tell you is impossible with a pistol. Extremely impressed, absorbs the recoil fairly well, I mounted a P2 ACRO on it and have about 500 rounds through it, reliable has been 100% and I highly recommend the Raider-X if anyone can get their hands on it. After the range the first words to the employees was that SOCOM needs to adopt this thing. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By italianstallion95: Originally Posted By JAG2955: Yep, I saw some of the pics. I hope they make it to like troops as well. It would greatly increase internal security capabilities. I bought a Raider-X about 3 months ago during the few miracle seconds it was available on the Flux website. Ran my P320 FCU with the Spectre Comp slide/barrel/comp for the first time 2 weeks ago, I was making groupings the size of a cockroach at 75 yds. with that thing, which everyone will tell you is impossible with a pistol. Extremely impressed, absorbs the recoil fairly well, I mounted a P2 ACRO on it and have about 500 rounds through it, reliable has been 100% and I highly recommend the Raider-X if anyone can get their hands on it. After the range the first words to the employees was that SOCOM needs to adopt this thing. I actually had a great email (or Messenger) conversation with one of Flux's guys (Alex, I think), about getting widespread adoption of it throughout the military. -less training time, or just better training density -improved accuracy and speed -small logistical footprint, relatively low cost All for much better internal security (CONUS and overseas), or for specialized missions or personnel. |
|
|
Originally Posted By italianstallion95: The only three sidearm brands that both myself and all my employees are strapped with are the Big 3 - Glock, Sig, and H&K. The G19.5 MOS w/ GPT is still one of my favorite handguns of all time, along with my P365s and P320s. View Quote Nice line up....but I haven't shot any H&K'S. |
|
NRA Benefactor Life Member
Buckeye Firearms Association Member Favorite movie quote: Improvise, Adapt, Overcome - Clint Eastwood |
|
Originally Posted By JAG2955: I have one of their MP17s, the predecessor to the Raider. I actually had a great email (or Messenger) conversation with one of Flux's guys (Alex, I think), about getting widespread adoption of it throughout the military. -less training time, or just better training density -improved accuracy and speed -small logistical footprint, relatively low cost All for much better internal security (CONUS and overseas), or for specialized missions or personnel. View Quote I've e-mailed Alex a bit, he seems like a nice and knowledgeable guy. And certainly the Raider is a superb PDW scenario weapon especially considering the military magazine compatibility and it's not a firearm, just a very fancy grip module. |
|
|
View Quote Looks like Garand Thumb. |
|
Why is the sky blue?
What makes the green grass grow? |
View Quote Florida looks weird on a map also, but it's a great state to live in. |
|
|
|
View Quote And since the time that I bought mine, factory 30rd mags. |
|
|
4800 rounds of 9mm 124gr through my pair of P320s and zero issues (aside from magazine springs getting replaced.
My P226 was having issues but it was bought 2nd hand. I guess that makes me a fanboi for not dropping it or having it go off in my carry iwb holster. |
|
|
Originally Posted By italianstallion95: This is where most of the hate (and jealously from those invested in brand XYZ) is coming from:
If Sigs were such junk, none of the above would be happening. At my FFL, if Sigs were such garbage we would see them as the most RMA'd brand (it's actually Smith & Wesson). What always gets me the most are the "lowest bidder" comments, if global 1st world military and police truly went with the lowest bidder, Planet Earth would be swimming in Rugers, Kel Tecs, and Smith & Wessons. Yet it's always Glock, Sig, H&K, and FN that run basically all the small arms in global 1st world military and police. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By italianstallion95: Originally Posted By S-1: You have to be an absolute idiot to not see that SIG is dominating and is the leading manufacturer of small arms in the world. Kicking ass in the civi sector, the big .mil side and in SOF units worldwide. This is where most of the hate (and jealously from those invested in brand XYZ) is coming from:
If Sigs were such junk, none of the above would be happening. At my FFL, if Sigs were such garbage we would see them as the most RMA'd brand (it's actually Smith & Wesson). What always gets me the most are the "lowest bidder" comments, if global 1st world military and police truly went with the lowest bidder, Planet Earth would be swimming in Rugers, Kel Tecs, and Smith & Wessons. Yet it's always Glock, Sig, H&K, and FN that run basically all the small arms in global 1st world military and police. Another one of my favorites from the "SIGs suck" crowd and something that you heard a lot after SIG was selected for the MHS. Glock Boyz were saying that the modularity of the 320 would never be taken advantage of, not needed etc etc. They couldn't have been more wrong. Within the units that allow it, you're seeing all kinds of configurations making the pistol more personalized to the end user. |
|
|
Originally Posted By S-1: This whole thread is dumb. "Unfavorable manufacturer"? You have to be an absolute idiot to not see that SIG is dominating and is the leading manufacturer of small arms in the world. Kicking ass in the civi sector, the big .mil side and in SOF units worldwide. I really want to believe that GD mouthbreathers aren't that dumb, so I chalk it up to people being butthurt "their brand" didn't get the MHS contract. View Quote This post, this one right here, is what we refer to as "your winner." |
|
|
Originally Posted By S-1: This whole thread is dumb. "Unfavorable manufacturer"? You have to be an absolute idiot to not see that SIG is dominating and is the leading manufacturer of small arms in the world. Kicking ass in the civi sector, the big .mil side and in SOF units worldwide. I really want to believe that GD mouthbreathers aren't that dumb, so I chalk it up to people being butthurt "their brand" didn't get the MHS contract. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By S-1: Originally Posted By astrocreep96: I feel like I've been bamboozled. Here I am enjoying my Sig guns, and all along I was unaware they were an "unfavorable manufacturer"... https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/105138/1000006313-3205639.jpg I guess I need to sell them and maybe buy some KACs (have 2), a Geissele (have 3), and Daniel Defense (have 3), maybe some Colts (have an M16A1 full auto in ATF Form 4 hell, technically haven't shot it yet). Arfcom GD basement dwellers have convinced me of the error of my ways. This whole thread is dumb. "Unfavorable manufacturer"? You have to be an absolute idiot to not see that SIG is dominating and is the leading manufacturer of small arms in the world. Kicking ass in the civi sector, the big .mil side and in SOF units worldwide. I really want to believe that GD mouthbreathers aren't that dumb, so I chalk it up to people being butthurt "their brand" didn't get the MHS contract. +1 |
|
|
Originally Posted By S-1: Another one of my favorites from the "SIGs suck" crowd and something that you heard a lot after SIG was selected for the MHS. Glock Boyz were saying that the modularity of the 320 would never be taken advantage of, not needed etc etc. They couldn't have been more wrong. Within the units that allow it, you're seeing all kinds of configurations making the pistol more personalized to the end user. View Quote Absolutely, they said the modularity was a gimmick, and here we are with at least 12+ companies making P320 and P365 grip modules. |
|
|
Originally Posted By Liv_C: Your facts says it all.....but, I still like Glock's. They are the 2 brands I swear by. View Quote I have both and do not understand from a logical stand point the hate. From a fanboi stand point it makes sense but it is dumb. Then again, I like a lot of different handguns like poly pistols, hi powers, 1911s, SAA, etc. |
|
|
Originally Posted By S-1: I see that you're a gun collector, not a shooter. Carry on. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By S-1: Originally Posted By psychotr: SIG is a great manufacturer if you just act like they never made anything after 2000. I see that you're a gun collector, not a shooter. Carry on. And I guess that would be my problem, I am not a collector and like to shoot the guns I have. |
|
|
|
I think the 1911s are ugly. And I’m not opposed to external extractors..
|
|
|
Originally Posted By PRasko: Buy old sigs, not new. That's my stance on the company. Same with s&w. They can keep their shitty new pistols and I'll keep using my old revolvers and 5906 tsw. God i sound like a fking Fudd, I swear I'm not a fking fudd.. View Quote If you’re talking about m&ps, you’re wrong. If by new guns, you’re referring to revolvers…you’re definitely old fashioned. A Fudd is not someone who likes old gun designs. A Fudd is someone who says “I support the 2a, but…” |
|
"Now none of the frightened soldiers moved, for they saw that cowardice and valor purchased equal plots in the snipers' killing field."
“Everything is hard before it is easy.” |
I had a 220ST. Gun was way more accurate than I ever was. I loved it. But I’d get a lot of failure to extract and double feeds.
It went back to them 3-4 times before it was right. Chamber needed to be relieved and polished. Extractor tightened up. Each time it went back, they gave me a couple free magazines. The last time it went back I had a trigger job done on it. Fantastic gun and I really miss it. I want one with a dot and a flashlight with 10-12 round mags. Would be a great range toy and bedside gun. |
|
"Now none of the frightened soldiers moved, for they saw that cowardice and valor purchased equal plots in the snipers' killing field."
“Everything is hard before it is easy.” |
Originally Posted By skindroid: I became a Walther fanboy by dry firing a PDP Compact at my LGS last year. I also had a P320 and a VP9 out of the case to try out. After I felt the trigger on that PDP, I let the sales guy know he could put the other guns away. Now I have between 3k-4k rounds through my Walther. FWIW, I have experienced zero malfunctions - and I mean absolutely zero. The only thing I added was a metal guide rod. Recoil spring weight is stock. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/430189/1000000347_jpg-3204822.JPG Try one out if you get the chance. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By skindroid: Originally Posted By Boom_Stick: Originally Posted By Epyon: 5. The p320 trigger is by far the WORST striker fired trigger on any gun I have ever shot.EVER. Ive got 3 flavors of SF; sig, glock and HK. To me glock is the worst. Its a gate latch staple gun no matter how you try to doctor it up. Vp9 and p320 for me are neckNneck with a nod towards the p320. It just breaks so nice for a SF. Ive heard the walther SF is the best of the best but ive got no trigger time on it. I became a Walther fanboy by dry firing a PDP Compact at my LGS last year. I also had a P320 and a VP9 out of the case to try out. After I felt the trigger on that PDP, I let the sales guy know he could put the other guns away. Now I have between 3k-4k rounds through my Walther. FWIW, I have experienced zero malfunctions - and I mean absolutely zero. The only thing I added was a metal guide rod. Recoil spring weight is stock. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/430189/1000000347_jpg-3204822.JPG Try one out if you get the chance. I want one of these. The only handgun I’ve seen that looks decent with a mailbox red dot on it. |
|
"Now none of the frightened soldiers moved, for they saw that cowardice and valor purchased equal plots in the snipers' killing field."
“Everything is hard before it is easy.” |
Originally Posted By S-1: A few mouthbreathers in GD says otherwise! Stop with your lies! Funny that you mentioned S&W. I was voluntold to attend a M&P/Shield armorers course a few month ago. The Smith rep was saying don't buy a gun from them right now. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By S-1: Originally Posted By italianstallion95: Originally Posted By DernHumpus: I want to like Sig as a manufacturer, but they sure have a lot of black eyes these days and the fanbois still run rampant. Sig is one of the very few manufacturers pushing boundaries and coming out with innovative products especially compared to Glocks, it is no surprise there will be teething problems. However, most of these are overblown especially when internet recycling starts, now some are saying the P938 is not drop safe to now P320s blowing up when Glocks loaded with the wrong handloads for 30+ years. So much double standard out there. I'm an FFL and although P365s/P320s are among our best selling pistols and the M400 among our best selling rifles, we have not had any customers detailing their bad or RMA experiences. The brand that we have had by far the most finish/QC issues with NIB guns requiring RMA is Smith & Wesson, then followed by Ruger. I personally own a good amount of firearms, and at the moment I have about 8 or 9 SIGs (P365s, Spear-LT, P320s, MPXs). Thousands of rounds between each Sig I own, and I have yet to have a parts breakage, catastrophic failure, or fight stopping malfunction. Of course I shoot quality ammo Fiocchi/Hornady/S&B/Federal and clean my firearms after every range session. Again, a lot of this recent hate stems for Glock not being the most popular kid on the block, combined with Sig winning numerous military contracts that usually Glock or H&K or FN were taking, and the fact that a non-Glock is apparently the best selling pistol in the country (P365). A few mouthbreathers in GD says otherwise! Stop with your lies! Funny that you mentioned S&W. I was voluntold to attend a M&P/Shield armorers course a few month ago. The Smith rep was saying don't buy a gun from them right now. Riiiiggghhtttt 🙄 |
|
"Now none of the frightened soldiers moved, for they saw that cowardice and valor purchased equal plots in the snipers' killing field."
“Everything is hard before it is easy.” |
There are too many BSers I don't pay much attention to them. Mention a chain restaurant, and watch how many post they get the shits. Some on GD never stop getting the shits. Same goes for guns.
|
|
The Devil owns the fence line.
|
The Devil owns the fence line.
|
Originally Posted By mudholestomper: Riiiiggghhtttt 🙄 View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By mudholestomper: Originally Posted By S-1: Originally Posted By italianstallion95: Originally Posted By DernHumpus: I want to like Sig as a manufacturer, but they sure have a lot of black eyes these days and the fanbois still run rampant. Sig is one of the very few manufacturers pushing boundaries and coming out with innovative products especially compared to Glocks, it is no surprise there will be teething problems. However, most of these are overblown especially when internet recycling starts, now some are saying the P938 is not drop safe to now P320s blowing up when Glocks loaded with the wrong handloads for 30+ years. So much double standard out there. I'm an FFL and although P365s/P320s are among our best selling pistols and the M400 among our best selling rifles, we have not had any customers detailing their bad or RMA experiences. The brand that we have had by far the most finish/QC issues with NIB guns requiring RMA is Smith & Wesson, then followed by Ruger. I personally own a good amount of firearms, and at the moment I have about 8 or 9 SIGs (P365s, Spear-LT, P320s, MPXs). Thousands of rounds between each Sig I own, and I have yet to have a parts breakage, catastrophic failure, or fight stopping malfunction. Of course I shoot quality ammo Fiocchi/Hornady/S&B/Federal and clean my firearms after every range session. Again, a lot of this recent hate stems for Glock not being the most popular kid on the block, combined with Sig winning numerous military contracts that usually Glock or H&K or FN were taking, and the fact that a non-Glock is apparently the best selling pistol in the country (P365). A few mouthbreathers in GD says otherwise! Stop with your lies! Funny that you mentioned S&W. I was voluntold to attend a M&P/Shield armorers course a few month ago. The Smith rep was saying don't buy a gun from them right now. Riiiiggghhtttt 🙄 Right what? You're right. I didn't go to the armorers course, he didn't say to avoid S&W's right now, or that they shipped new M&Ps to a midsized agency that had no rifling in the barrels and that there is a lot of shit QC right now for them because of the move. |
|
|
View Quote I can't imagine using a plastic grocery bag for a holster. Looks like just another gimmick. They should just name it Gimli from LOTR. |
|
The Devil owns the fence line.
|
Extorris, because he's a heartless cunt. The purity of his apathy is laboratory grade, and I sleep well knowing that he's out there somewhere,
not giving a shit about anyone or anything. |
The P22X series are some of my favorite pistols, super reliable, accurate, smooth. I started to get mildly irritated with Sig when, instead of maintaining consistent availability of their flagship pistol models, they decided to release gimmicky "special editions," sometimes with goofy bullshit milled into them. The Legions get a half pass on this because they've managed to keep them in production for a while and the Grayguns triggers, sight upgrades, optic cuts, and SAO models are legit improvements on excellent pistols.
The 556 rifles could have been so much more than they were. I like mine, but don't shoot it that much because Sig stopped supporting it, and the Swiss import parts are harder to come by than they were 15 years ago. The scalloped rail pistol frames were a mistake, but the regular frames don't have wear issues as long as you keep them lubed, preferably with grease. What really pissed me off was when they quietly discontinued the P239 and all parts support virtually overnight. I carried one for ~10 years, decided one day I should pick up some more magazines and springs just to keep on hand-none to be found anywhere outside of ebay sellers asking AWB prices for them-only it wasn't 1994-2004, and these were 7 round .40 mags. That pushed me over to CZ for a replacement. Then they decided to go all in on cheap POS guns like the P250 and the striker fired version of it, the P320. I still want a P226 and P220 10mm, but outside of those they don't really make anything that interests me. I haven't experienced the quality issues personally. |
|
|
Originally Posted By BobRoberts: Pretty simple they were skipping the 20k test for either pistol because they were both mature striker fired designs, it’s stated in the report. Glock wasn’t going to magically get the win even if they did it. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By BobRoberts: Pretty simple they were skipping the 20k test for either pistol because they were both mature striker fired designs, it’s stated in the report. Glock wasn’t going to magically get the win even if they did it. IIRC Glock wasn't really in serious contention because what they submitted didn't really fit the solicitation. Calling the P320 a "mature striker fired design" is generous, especially when comparing it to Glock. Originally Posted By Epyon: 5. The p320 trigger is by far the WORST striker fired trigger on any gun I have ever shot.EVER. This is coming from a man that owns a Taurus G3. Preferences are subjective, but this one is unusual. The P320 has one of the best triggers I've used on a striker gun. It's not better than Walther's, and Walther also doesn't have apparent safety issues with theirs, but I digress. |
|
|
Originally Posted By S-1: Right what? You're right. I didn't go to the armorers course, he didn't say to avoid S&W's right now, or that they shipped new M&Ps to a midsized agency that had no rifling in the barrels and that there is a lot of shit QC right now for them because of the move. View Quote Agreed, the Massachusetts State Police just gave up on the M&P 2.0 after adopting it last year because there were so many quality problems with the units being received, now MSP is transitioning to the P320 X-Carry. |
|
|
Originally Posted By AK-12: Preferences are subjective, but this one is unusual. The P320 has one of the best triggers I've used on a striker gun. It's not better than Walther's, and Walther also doesn't have apparent safety issues with theirs, but I digress. View Quote Walther PPQ/PDP are absolutely some of the best striker triggers out there, I agree. But let's not kid ourselves, Walther (as well as Glock, S&W, Kimber, Ruger, FN, Beretta and others) all had a recall/safety upgrade at one point with at least one of their models. |
|
|
Originally Posted By italianstallion95: Agreed, the Massachusetts State Police just gave up on the M&P 2.0 after adopting it last year because there were so many quality problems with the units being received, now MSP is transitioning to the P320 X-Carry. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By italianstallion95: Originally Posted By S-1: Right what? You're right. I didn't go to the armorers course, he didn't say to avoid S&W's right now, or that they shipped new M&Ps to a midsized agency that had no rifling in the barrels and that there is a lot of shit QC right now for them because of the move. Agreed, the Massachusetts State Police just gave up on the M&P 2.0 after adopting it last year because there were so many quality problems with the units being received, now MSP is transitioning to the P320 X-Carry. Be careful, you're going to be called a liar by GD mouthbreathers. Riiiiggghhtttt... |
|
|
Biggest thing I've learned in this thread is that the newer M&P's might be shit? When did that happen? I always thought it had a great record and reputation.
|
|
|
Originally Posted By italianstallion95: Walther PPQ/PDP are absolutely some of the best striker triggers out there, I agree. But let's not kid ourselves, Walther (as well as Glock, S&W, Kimber, Ruger, FN, Beretta and others) all had a recall/safety upgrade at one point with at least one of their models. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By italianstallion95: Walther PPQ/PDP are absolutely some of the best striker triggers out there, I agree. But let's not kid ourselves, Walther (as well as Glock, S&W, Kimber, Ruger, FN, Beretta and others) all had a recall/safety upgrade at one point with at least one of their models. Fair enough. I don't have a PDP and hadn't seen that. I will say that there don't appear to be safety issues with the M17/18, whether that's because of the manual safety or not. Originally Posted By italianstallion95: Agreed, the Massachusetts State Police just gave up on the M&P 2.0 after adopting it last year because there were so many quality problems with the units being received, now MSP is transitioning to the P320 X-Carry. My experience with M&Ps has not been great. |
|
|
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.