User Panel
Originally Posted By Steamedliver: I do not believe I’m the only conservative who still believes that taking the high road, playing by the “rules”, trusting the process and moral victory is still a victory (even though it means nothing). I’m coming around to fight fire with fire mentality. View Quote I was you three years ago. I am a rule follower and believe in honesty and fairness. What I didn't realize is, the rules have changed. The new rules are, there are no rules. The only way we get democrats to stop cheating, is to get so viciously good at cheating ourselves, they cry about it and piss laws to stop it. It's the only way. You cannot win a boxing match with rules when the opponent is playing no holds barred MMA rules |
|
|
I wouldn't stand in front of a piss-filled supersoaker. Does that make it a good pistol? - Caboose314
I thought I was covered for 22 cans, but the NFAids is a bitch when it mutates - themagikbullet |
It’s pretty disheartening to realize that so many people would gladly throw democracy out the window.
Throw your duffel bags into the lifeboats boys, she’s going down. |
|
|
So 1% of the population that makes >$150K and has a postgrad and lives in dense urban demographics is 'Elite'?
Or, 'Elitist'? |
|
-Women should always wear tight clothes and men should carry powerful handguns
-Eamus Brandonus |
Is it really cheating if both sides are doing it... and know it?
I'm a firm believer in a level playing field. If it can't happen with the existing rules, change the rules. |
|
|
Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive.
|
|
If someone says “by any means necessary “ you should
not apply your ethical limits to that statement. You should assume the absolute worst. |
|
|
Very interesting that the 1% vote 80% democrat. The media would have you believe that the richest people are evil conservatives. Its like a counterinformation op where they create a straw man to villainize, then fuck everyone BUT the villain with the resulting policies.
|
|
|
Originally Posted By DaGoose: The PDF results has a lot more crazy results. For example. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/231492/Capture_PNG-3170725.png View Quote Guaran-dam-tee you these rich scumbags support *ALL* of these restrictions, so long as they don't apply to *THEM*. |
|
|
Originally Posted By sitdwnandhngon: Over $150,000 a year is the elite? View Quote Metallica: Sad But True (Official Music Video) |
|
"A mass production economy can neither be created nor sustained
without a leveled population, one conditioned to mass habits, mass tastes, mass enthusiasms, predictable mass behaviors." John Gatto |
Not fly enough to be halal....
|
|
17 And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.
|
Originally Posted By 11boomboom: People on this site don't believe that the vast majority of Americans makes less than $80k/year. It's one of arfcom's bubbles. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By 11boomboom: Originally Posted By sitdwnandhngon: Over $150,000 a year is the elite? People on this site don't believe that the vast majority of Americans makes less than $80k/year. It's one of arfcom's bubbles. We had a thread recently. Something like 30% were making over $100. Numerous Car mechanics were making $120 and better. It’s not that much money these days. $150 is far from elite 1%. Maybe upper 10%? |
|
GD- "It's kind of like wading through through slimy lake bed with your feet to find clams below the surface".
- gtfoxy |
Originally Posted By mini14jac: It’s pretty disheartening to realize that so many people would gladly throw democracy out the window. Throw your duffel bags into the lifeboats boys, she’s going down. View Quote Democracy has proven itself to be the death of my people and way of life. Societies and civilizations are instituted to protect those things, over and above political systems or methods of governance. If a political or economic system keeps biting you, you should change systems. Democracy as a political system worked fine in a country with a certain demographic make-up and shared cultural and religious norms. Those traits no longer exist, ergo democracy no longer works. Get rid of it. Replace it with a different system that prioritizes the well being of your tribe above others. This is literally just basic human survival but for some reason middle class people in America are completely fucking oblivious to it. It's blatantly apparent that the people who are imported to replace you can grasp it, and are taking full advantage of your precious "democracy" to do so. |
|
|
Originally Posted By mini14jac: It’s pretty disheartening to realize that so many people would gladly throw democracy out the window. Throw your duffel bags into the lifeboats boys, she’s going down. View Quote We were supposed to be a Republic. The founding fathers knew that pure unrestrained democracy is doomed to failure. She will sink in an ocean of counterfeit dollars, created by people who kept voting en mass for MORE FREE SHIT…. |
|
GD- "It's kind of like wading through through slimy lake bed with your feet to find clams below the surface".
- gtfoxy |
Originally Posted By Matthew_Q: "The elite 1% individuals who make over $150,000 a year, live in densely populated areas, and have postgraduate degrees" The criteria for the polling was not just income, it was location and education level. RIF. View Quote |
|
|
|
Did he interview the billionaire black rap moguls?
|
|
For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities, His eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly seen, being understood from His workmanship, so that men are without excuse.
|
Originally Posted By DaGoose: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qng4jqdgfDw When veteran pollster Scott Rasmussen surveyed a group of Americans he calls the elite 1% earlier this year, he discovered a startling number who say it’s OK to win an election by cheating. The elite 1%—individuals who make over $150,000 a year, live in densely populated areas, and have postgraduate degrees—are overwhelmingly liberal. They give President Joe Biden an 82% approval rating, compared to his 40% average from the rest of Americans. Rasmussen asked these liberal voters: “Suppose that your favorite candidate loses a close election. However, people on the campaign know that they can win by cheating without being caught. Would you rather have your candidate win by cheating or lose by playing fair?” Among all Americans, just 7% said they would want their candidate to win by cheating. But that number rose to 35% among the elite 1% and skyrocketed to 69% among those who are part of the politically obsessed 1%, meaning they talk about politics every day. “I’ve been polling for a very long time and the last finding is the most terrifying poll result I’ve ever seen,” Rasmussen told The Daily Signal. Rasmussen spoke to “The Daily Signal Podcast” about his findings and his upcoming plans for a weekly TV show. View Quote It's good that this is being exposed and looked into - it always should - but societal elites basically saying "We should be allowed to cheat" with the implication being "we're the good people" should not shock anyone over ... say ... 35 years old. |
|
|
Originally Posted By ACEB36TC: I got SLAMMED here about ten years ago for saying the Repubs needed to get in the ditches and fight dirtier than the Dems. They didn't and here we are. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By ACEB36TC: Originally Posted By Buckshot4U: Originally Posted By Steamedliver: I do not believe I’m the only conservative who still believes that taking the high road, playing by the “rules”, trusting the process and moral victory is still a victory (even though it means nothing). I’m coming around to fight fire with fire mentality. Ditto. I continue to fight off "coming around", but it is more and more tempting all the time. I got SLAMMED here about ten years ago for saying the Repubs needed to get in the ditches and fight dirtier than the Dems. They didn't and here we are. You can't out-dirty the dems. Being underhanded in service to their unexplainable utopian goals is nearly their core reason for existing. It is not for... virtually everyone else. You beat them by *actually enforcing the rules and handing out real material punishment and losses of power and position* to those who do stuff that deserves it. This automatically targets them because they do more of that stuff. The reason this doesn't happen is not because everyone not them are unafraid to play dirty, it's because we don't believe in doing the boring mundane stuff that puts us in the position to do it. I'm too busy drywalling in my new house extension, the heck with getting that bureaucratic job! Real life calls! Than, after they have all the levers of power, we get screwed. |
|
|
Originally Posted By Matthew_Q: "The elite 1% individuals who make over $150,000 a year, live in densely populated areas, and have postgraduate degrees" The criteria for the polling was not just income, it was location and education level. RIF. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Matthew_Q: Originally Posted By MrGoodkat: $150k is the elite 1%? "The elite 1% individuals who make over $150,000 a year, live in densely populated areas, and have postgraduate degrees" The criteria for the polling was not just income, it was location and education level. RIF. It's not the elites. It's the people who COULD move away from the urban hellscapes who choose not to. Probably for some idiotic ideological reasons. |
|
|
We elite now.
Then again, the very first search result that came up regarding the top 1% put that number at >590K, which makes more sense. |
|
Not fly enough to be halal....
|
|
|
Not elite
|
|
|
Originally Posted By TheLookingGlass: My brother in law is jut like this. He makes a little over a million a year and says he has no problem with ballot stuffing and other means of cheating at elections as long as it keeps Trump and other conservatives out of office. He also freely admits he sees nothing wrong with using lawfare against trump and his supporters. View Quote He needs a helicopter ride. |
|
Preferred Pronoun: Space Lord Mutherfucker
|
Originally Posted By Buckshot4U: Ditto. I continue to fight off "coming around", but it is more and more tempting all the time. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Buckshot4U: Originally Posted By Steamedliver: I do not believe I’m the only conservative who still believes that taking the high road, playing by the “rules”, trusting the process and moral victory is still a victory (even though it means nothing). I’m coming around to fight fire with fire mentality. Ditto. I continue to fight off "coming around", but it is more and more tempting all the time. The "high road" was always a myth. It was the "beat the enemy with their own rules" from that list. Look where that got us. Has it worked? A loss is a loss. We need to accept that we need to fight evenly or lose. The left has pulled all the stops. If we lose the House before the election... |
|
|
brought back from the beyond to be a half-dead short-bus riding seat warmer in the Dracula factory
"non-degree special student status" **Do not Karen-tinize the Eschaton!!!** |
Originally Posted By DaGoose: The PDF results has a lot more crazy results. For example. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/231492/Capture_PNG-3170725.png View Quote this right here is pants on head |
|
|
Originally Posted By Meadowmuffin: Your coming around? I am already there! respect View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Meadowmuffin: Originally Posted By Steamedliver: I do not believe I’m the only conservative who still believes that taking the high road, playing by the “rules”, trusting the process and moral victory is still a victory (even though it means nothing). I’m coming around to fight fire with fire mentality. Your coming around? I am already there! respect Agree. I came around fast during Trump. It was obvious very quickly how entrenched the libs are and that they intend to do whatever it takes to stay there. |
|
|
A great follow up question would be "If it is OK for your candidate to win by cheating, would it also be OK for your candidate's opponent to win by cheating?"
|
|
|
Originally Posted By jb31: The "high road" was always a myth. It was the "beat the enemy with their own rules" from that list. Look where that got us. Has it worked? A loss is a loss. We need to accept that we need to fight evenly or lose. The left has pulled all the stops. If we lose the House before the election... View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By jb31: Originally Posted By Buckshot4U: Originally Posted By Steamedliver: I do not believe I’m the only conservative who still believes that taking the high road, playing by the “rules”, trusting the process and moral victory is still a victory (even though it means nothing). I’m coming around to fight fire with fire mentality. Ditto. I continue to fight off "coming around", but it is more and more tempting all the time. The "high road" was always a myth. It was the "beat the enemy with their own rules" from that list. Look where that got us. Has it worked? A loss is a loss. We need to accept that we need to fight evenly or lose. The left has pulled all the stops. If we lose the House before the election... The actual high road that's really there - that virtually nobody uses - is enforcing the rules of the game. America as intended is a game of baseball, but the democrats/establishment are playing murderball. So we either force them to play baseball again, or kick them out out of the game entirely or ... Take our ball and our bat and *leave.* eta: for all the world it looks like we aren't going to do any of the three and we're just going to collectively stand here and get bludgeoned to death. "We" being the US collectively. |
|
|
|
Originally Posted By FlashMan-7k: The actual high road that's really there - that virtually nobody uses - is enforcing the rules of the game. America as intended is a game of baseball, but the democrats/establishment are playing murderball. So we either force them to play baseball again, or kick them out out of the game entirely or ... Take our ball and our bat and *leave.* eta: for all the world it looks like we aren't going to do any of the three and we're just going to collectively stand here and get bludgeoned to death. "We" being the US collectively. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By FlashMan-7k: Originally Posted By jb31: Originally Posted By Buckshot4U: Originally Posted By Steamedliver: I do not believe I’m the only conservative who still believes that taking the high road, playing by the “rules”, trusting the process and moral victory is still a victory (even though it means nothing). I’m coming around to fight fire with fire mentality. Ditto. I continue to fight off "coming around", but it is more and more tempting all the time. The "high road" was always a myth. It was the "beat the enemy with their own rules" from that list. Look where that got us. Has it worked? A loss is a loss. We need to accept that we need to fight evenly or lose. The left has pulled all the stops. If we lose the House before the election... The actual high road that's really there - that virtually nobody uses - is enforcing the rules of the game. America as intended is a game of baseball, but the democrats/establishment are playing murderball. So we either force them to play baseball again, or kick them out out of the game entirely or ... Take our ball and our bat and *leave.* eta: for all the world it looks like we aren't going to do any of the three and we're just going to collectively stand here and get bludgeoned to death. "We" being the US collectively. The issue is that we let it go too far. I agree with others in that the biggest difference in the last 5-10 years is that the veil of fairness, in politics, in the legal system, in the economy, has been lifted. We were not playing a fair game, we just didn't know. There are no checks and balances, the system is completely dysfunctional. "Our team" has been secretly working with the other team. The game is an illusion. The people no longer control the government or politics. By extension, the legal system and methods to right the ship. |
|
|
Originally Posted By Steamedliver: I do not believe I’m the only conservative who still believes that taking the high road, playing by the “rules”, trusting the process and moral victory is still a victory (even though it means nothing). I’m coming around to fight fire with fire mentality. View Quote |
|
If the truth makes you uncomfortable, don't blame the truth. Blame the lie that made you comfortable. -James Ng Uni
|
Originally Posted By Steamedliver: I do not believe I’m the only conservative who still believes that taking the high road, playing by the “rules”, trusting the process and moral victory is still a victory (even though it means nothing). I’m coming around to fight fire with fire mentality. View Quote If only one side of any conflict is bound by the rules, the result is a foregone conclusion. To remain engaged in such a situation voluntarily is sheer lunacy - or treachery. |
|
|
|
|
Originally Posted By HermanSnerd:
In reality, those two hot chicks that you just met that want you to come home with them for "a good time", are merely the bait for the huge guy hiding in the closet wearing a Batman suit. |
|
|
Originally Posted By Gator: Right here shows you the liberal indoctrination is working. These are the people you would think are smart and educated, and as such would see through the smokescreen that FJB has been an objectively terrible president. View Quote They have specialized skill sets and live lives only loosely connected to reality. |
|
|
Originally Posted By DonS: Not by itself: individuals who make over $150,000 a year, live in densely populated areas, and have postgraduate degrees View Quote Aggregating 20 disparate surveys to artificially create a sufficient sized sample pool of individuals that match near non-sensical criteria to "survey" is called fucking with the numbers to reach a predetermined conclusion. |
|
Originally Posted By HermanSnerd:
In reality, those two hot chicks that you just met that want you to come home with them for "a good time", are merely the bait for the huge guy hiding in the closet wearing a Batman suit. |
$150k wasn't even elite or top 1% 20 years ago.
|
|
|
Originally Posted By HighPlains1911: Yea when people talk about they 1% what they are actually telling you is they’re retarded. Any sort of extraordinary level of influence is probably occurring more at the .0001% or something. View Quote This poll is basically about the class of people who are strong Democrat voters. They are not "elite" in the sense of having particularly high levels of power. But they are an elite class of sorts that benefits from Democrat power and enable it. |
|
|
1% is $650k a year, used to be 400k.
$150k yr is middle class. |
|
|
Originally Posted By HeavyMetal: He needs a helicopter ride. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By HeavyMetal: Originally Posted By TheLookingGlass: My brother in law is jut like this. He makes a little over a million a year and says he has no problem with ballot stuffing and other means of cheating at elections as long as it keeps Trump and other conservatives out of office. He also freely admits he sees nothing wrong with using lawfare against trump and his supporters. He needs a helicopter ride. In my experience, no one abuses their workers worse than a rich piece of shit liberal. |
|
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.