User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
AZ, USA
|
Posted: 3/27/2024 3:08:26 PM EDT
[#1]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By NachoDip: She is correct. Maybe some people in here need a history lesson. let’s not get facts in the way. Is she a dumb bitch. Yes. Is her statement correct… also yes. Her insinuation that our opposition to her party's systematic degeneracy places us firmly in the Nazi camp is astonishingly stupid. |
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 3/27/2024 3:23:31 PM EDT
[Last Edit: Isenhelm]
[#2]
We can compare like and unlike things. Or compare how things are alike and not, even when it has no real merit.
I would not say it is similar, even though there could be a final solution to the pedo and pedo materials in schools problem. There just is not a group of people organized who have the power to implement anywhere near such level of a plan.. so again, dissimilar. What about the similarities to what would be grooming of children or subversive campaigns? |
|
|
MO, USA
|
Posted: 3/27/2024 3:27:45 PM EDT
[#3]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By ar15joe: wrong link because she says nothing of the sort Paraphrasing: she talks about "democracy goes away a little at a time / slowly" then says something about LGBTQ in Germany having their rights taken away, then "another group" and "another" etc Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By ar15joe: Originally Posted By Chokey: jfc
wrong link because she says nothing of the sort Paraphrasing: she talks about "democracy goes away a little at a time / slowly" then says something about LGBTQ in Germany having their rights taken away, then "another group" and "another" etc Yup, bullshit link and thread title. Would like her to do gun rights which is actually in the Constitution though before made up pretend rights. |
|
|
NV, USA
|
Posted: 3/27/2024 3:31:45 PM EDT
[#4]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By ar15joe: wrong link because she says nothing of the sort Paraphrasing: she talks about "democracy goes away a little at a time / slowly" then says something about LGBTQ in Germany having their rights taken away, then "another group" and "another" etc They should know, they are doing the same thing against our rights. |
|
|
NV, USA
|
Posted: 3/27/2024 3:33:52 PM EDT
[#5]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By SlipRing: She's right. The Nazis in old Germany burned pedos, groomers, Communists and troons "books." The Allies burned the Nazis' records in turn after the war btw. I can't help but wonder how much of that was covering for the Communists they went to war to save. Now you know why so many them opposed us joining the war, and why so many of us view it as the start of the decline of the West @SlipRing , saveing Communism? It’s like saving a Xenomorph what possible good could come from this? |
|
|
OH, USA
|
Posted: 3/27/2024 3:36:10 PM EDT
[#6]
She's right. That's precisely the kind of shit they burned and censored.
|
|
|
VA, USA
|
Posted: 3/27/2024 3:49:24 PM EDT
[#7]
Speaking of “Dr Jill Biden”, has anybody ever been able to find out what her “research institute” actually does other than act as a money laundering operation? Or is that another aspect of the Biden crime family that, like Bernie Sanders’ wife and her loan fraud, were not allowed to talk about? Just asking…
|
|
|
IN, USA
|
Posted: 3/27/2024 4:33:55 PM EDT
[#8]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Waynehead05: Ummm that's not true. Do you know where/when the first sex change surgery occurred? |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2024 4:47:45 PM EDT
[#9]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By MeInMediocrity: Did Jill Biden really get a doctorate in education? Was it from the Corn Pop School of Educatin'?  She received an honorary doctorate. So she never actually did the required work. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2024 5:25:24 PM EDT
[#10]
They want to fuck kids, and then kill their babies.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2024 5:40:31 PM EDT
[Last Edit: BloodRaven]
[#11]
Her and Joe and that whole fucking family needs to be in prison for the crimes they've committed against this country and its people.
I may honestly cheer when they all die. Fuck ALL of them! |
|
|
|
MI, USA
|
Posted: 3/27/2024 5:52:28 PM EDT
[#12]
The same dumb cunt who lets her husband shower with their daughter? Oh, well that’s good to know…..
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2024 6:42:56 PM EDT
[#13]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By BikerNut: She received an honorary doctorate. So she never actually did the required work. And she insists on being called 'Dr'?  |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2024 7:19:39 PM EDT
[#14]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By wayno945: This tranny mental illness stuff started in Germany in the 1930s. https://www.britannica.com/biography/Magnus-Hirschfeld He was perfectly in step with his contemporaries. The Prussian military generals and officers, really their whole class and cadre, was heavily homosexual, going back even before German unification. Even Friedrich Alfred "Fritz" Krupp, of the famous firm, had his own retreat villa on Capri where he could carry on with literally dozens of teen guys, away (mostly) from prying eyes. Eventually, Fritz got too bold and carefree with his peccadilloes, to the point that the local authorities couldn't continue to turn a blind eye to what was going on, and the wheels came off, sparking a serious scandal that brought much of the raging perversion in the officer class into public discussion in the euro press. It was a scandal, all right; however it was not a surprise. The whole thing was a case of a best/worst-kept secret. It really put the German government in a bind, because homosexuality was against the law in the Reich, but who was going to prosecute? The practice of the male aristocrats having affairs with each other was nothing new, and a big part of the reason homosexuality was known by the euphemism "the German vice". Manchester covers all of that, and a lot more, in his "The Arms of Krupp". The chapter is titled 'Oscar Wilde of the Second Reich'. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2024 7:30:27 PM EDT
[#15]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Kihn: And she insists on being called 'Dr'? Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Kihn: Originally Posted By BikerNut: She received an honorary doctorate. So she never actually did the required work. And she insists on being called 'Dr'? Kinda, she has an Ed.D, a doctorate in education, not an actual PhD. She had to write a paper but it's not an actual dissertation that has to be defended like a PhD. Even a "Senior Contributor" to Forbes, Natalie Wexler ("I write about education, cognitive science, and fairness") doesn't really make the case for respect that she attempts to; in fact, I'd say the article/opinion piece just reinforces the disdain from real PhDs. (Left cold, because forbes) https://www.forbes.com/sites/nataliewexler/2020/12/18/whats-really-behind-the-flap-over-jill-bidens-doctorate/?sh=29343b936089 I'd like to run her paper through one of the newer plagiarism checkers, although it sounds like the paper is vague enough that it probably wouldn't get flagged. Joe on the other hand is well known for his lying and plagiarizing. I'd bet money it's one of the reasons why both obamas college work was hidden away as well. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2024 7:43:03 PM EDT
[#16]
Is her doctorate in elder abuse or pedophilia?
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2024 7:53:52 PM EDT
[#17]
So what does Jill get out of it sexually?
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2024 7:55:04 PM EDT
[#18]
Fine
Call me whatever you want |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2024 8:09:29 PM EDT
[#19]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By ZuoZongtang: So what does Jill get out of it sexually? Probably Hunter, the pool boy, some secret service agents, etc. Not like she wears age or position appropriate attire and she's married to an alleged pedo and she's younger than Joe (remember she was his kids babysitter with his first wife) so I can't imagine she isn't a freak as well. Honestly, not something I think most of us want to think about. 
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2024 8:19:11 PM EDT
[#20]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By NVCapCop: No one is listening to that vile cunt anyway. You took the words right out of my mouth. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2024 8:21:42 PM EDT
[#21]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By sandboxmedic: Kinda, she has an Ed.D, a doctorate in education, not an actual PhD. She had to write a paper but it's not an actual dissertation that has to be defended like a PhD. Even a "Senior Contributor" to Forbes, Natalie Wexler ("I write about education, cognitive science, and fairness") doesn't really make the case for respect that she attempts to; in fact, I'd say the article/opinion piece just reinforces the disdain from real PhDs. (Left cold, because forbes) https://www.forbes.com/sites/nataliewexler/2020/12/18/whats-really-behind-the-flap-over-jill-bidens-doctorate/?sh=29343b936089 I'd like to run her paper through one of the newer plagiarism checkers, although it sounds like the paper is vague enough that it probably wouldn't get flagged. Joe on the other hand is well known for his lying and plagiarizing. I'd bet money it's one of the reasons why both obamas college work was hidden away as well. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By sandboxmedic: Originally Posted By Kihn: Originally Posted By BikerNut: She received an honorary doctorate. So she never actually did the required work. And she insists on being called 'Dr'? Kinda, she has an Ed.D, a doctorate in education, not an actual PhD. She had to write a paper but it's not an actual dissertation that has to be defended like a PhD. Even a "Senior Contributor" to Forbes, Natalie Wexler ("I write about education, cognitive science, and fairness") doesn't really make the case for respect that she attempts to; in fact, I'd say the article/opinion piece just reinforces the disdain from real PhDs. (Left cold, because forbes) https://www.forbes.com/sites/nataliewexler/2020/12/18/whats-really-behind-the-flap-over-jill-bidens-doctorate/?sh=29343b936089 I'd like to run her paper through one of the newer plagiarism checkers, although it sounds like the paper is vague enough that it probably wouldn't get flagged. Joe on the other hand is well known for his lying and plagiarizing. I'd bet money it's one of the reasons why both obamas college work was hidden away as well. If she insists on being addressed that way, it's kind of low rent. |
|
|
|
MO, USA
|
Posted: 3/27/2024 8:29:35 PM EDT
[#22]
Can’t read twatter comments without an account
Don’t want a twatter account. Assuming they’re probably in support of of Doctor Jill Babysitters BS. America is dead. Plan accordingly. |
|
|
MO, USA
|
Posted: 3/27/2024 8:33:32 PM EDT
[#23]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By DoubleARon: "When I stormed the beach at Normandy, I knew that even if I died, it would be worth it because my great grandkids could read porn in the school library." - Grandpa, probably. My grandfather fought his way across North Africa into Italy and found himself in France on D Day. He died in 2005. I’m kinda glad for him he didn’t live to see today. I wonder if the wrong side lost. I wonder if he’d wonder that too. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2024 8:38:30 PM EDT
[#24]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Kihn: If she insists on being addressed that way, it's kind of low rent. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Kihn: Originally Posted By sandboxmedic: Originally Posted By Kihn: Originally Posted By BikerNut: She received an honorary doctorate. So she never actually did the required work. And she insists on being called 'Dr'? Kinda, she has an Ed.D, a doctorate in education, not an actual PhD. She had to write a paper but it's not an actual dissertation that has to be defended like a PhD. Even a "Senior Contributor" to Forbes, Natalie Wexler ("I write about education, cognitive science, and fairness") doesn't really make the case for respect that she attempts to; in fact, I'd say the article/opinion piece just reinforces the disdain from real PhDs. (Left cold, because forbes) https://www.forbes.com/sites/nataliewexler/2020/12/18/whats-really-behind-the-flap-over-jill-bidens-doctorate/?sh=29343b936089 I'd like to run her paper through one of the newer plagiarism checkers, although it sounds like the paper is vague enough that it probably wouldn't get flagged. Joe on the other hand is well known for his lying and plagiarizing. I'd bet money it's one of the reasons why both obamas college work was hidden away as well. If she insists on being addressed that way, it's kind of low rent. Outside of an academic setting or when signing off on something where credentialing is expected, insisting on being referred to as "doctor/Dr." when you're not an MD seems to generally be frowned upon by most folks. These days, even most MDs I know don't want to be referred to as "Dr." outside of work as they don't want the hassle or liability. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2024 9:00:24 PM EDT
[Last Edit: Alien]
[#25]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By sandboxmedic: Outside of an academic setting or when signing off on something where credentialing is expected, insisting on being referred to as "doctor/Dr." when you're not an MD seems to generally be frowned upon by most folks. These days, even most MDs I know don't want to be referred to as "Dr." outside of work as they don't want the hassle or liability. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By sandboxmedic: Originally Posted By Kihn: Originally Posted By sandboxmedic: Originally Posted By Kihn: Originally Posted By BikerNut: She received an honorary doctorate. So she never actually did the required work. And she insists on being called 'Dr'? Kinda, she has an Ed.D, a doctorate in education, not an actual PhD. She had to write a paper but it's not an actual dissertation that has to be defended like a PhD. Even a "Senior Contributor" to Forbes, Natalie Wexler ("I write about education, cognitive science, and fairness") doesn't really make the case for respect that she attempts to; in fact, I'd say the article/opinion piece just reinforces the disdain from real PhDs. (Left cold, because forbes) https://www.forbes.com/sites/nataliewexler/2020/12/18/whats-really-behind-the-flap-over-jill-bidens-doctorate/?sh=29343b936089 I'd like to run her paper through one of the newer plagiarism checkers, although it sounds like the paper is vague enough that it probably wouldn't get flagged. Joe on the other hand is well known for his lying and plagiarizing. I'd bet money it's one of the reasons why both obamas college work was hidden away as well. If she insists on being addressed that way, it's kind of low rent. Outside of an academic setting or when signing off on something where credentialing is expected, insisting on being referred to as "doctor/Dr." when you're not an MD seems to generally be frowned upon by most folks. These days, even most MDs I know don't want to be referred to as "Dr." outside of work as they don't want the hassle or liability. I have a client that has got to be one of the dumbest people I have ever dealt with in my professional life and he is one of those people. No idea what he supposedly has a doctorate in, but he should sue the place that he got it from for fraud for determining that he is fit to be awarded with a doctorate degree in anything. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2024 9:04:29 PM EDT
[#26]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By sandboxmedic: Outside of an academic setting or when signing off on something where credentialing is expected, insisting on being referred to as "doctor/Dr." when you're not an MD seems to generally be frowned upon by most folks. These days, even most MDs I know don't want to be referred to as "Dr." outside of work as they don't want the hassle or liability.  |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2024 9:12:32 PM EDT
[Last Edit: CouncilOfDave]
[#27]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By 56xdx_Z: Maybe she is right. Weimar germany had all kinds of weird perversions going on, which the Nazis gained clout by cleaning up. The crazed leftists of the 1920s era in Germany had public bestiality by the end of it, and they ultimately aided hitler's rise by giving him an easy and obvious boogieman She's just saying the part that is typically kept quiet out loud. Weimar Germany was super fucked up, even by today's standards. It's most of the reason I want these people nowhere near relevance. We have historical precedent showing where this leads. We don't want anything to do with it, on either side of the pendulum. Some seem determined to go through that all again. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2024 9:20:53 PM EDT
[Last Edit: Kihn]
[#28]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By CouncilOfDave: Yep. She's just saying the part that us typically kept quiet out loud. Weimar Germany was super fucked up, even by today's standards. It's most of the reason I want these people nowhere near relevance. We have historical precedent showing where this leads. We don't want anything to do with it, on either side of the pendulum. Some seem determined to go through that all again. Only problem is the use of the binary of two choices, of the Left being Weimar Germany and the Right being Hitler. It's the Left who is engaged in authoritarianism. Trying to eliminate its political opposition. Ending free speech and engaging in censorship. Controlling the education system as a device of indoctrination. Of using a court system separate from one of traditional legal remedies. Of using the state's intelligence apparatus as an enforcement tool of the party, to silence its critics and punish its enemies. Of ending border security and allowing abuses of the citizenry for a greater calling. Of engaging in bending the mind of others to their will, i.e. 200 genders, women can have penises and men can have babies. The Left is Hitler. |
|
|
|
OK, USA
|
Posted: 3/27/2024 9:25:40 PM EDT
[#29]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By sixnine: Nope, and this thread has been educational. I literally had no idea. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By sixnine: Originally Posted By Waynehead05: Ummm that's not true. Do you know where/when the first sex change surgery occurred? It’s pretty crazy that I grew up knowing the nazis were book burning haters of knowledge, and never once thought to look up what books they burned. I was well into my late 30s when my nephew asked me ”what books are the nazis burning?” while watching Indiana Jones The Last Crusade (he was innocently just curious). I thought for a second and said, I honestly don’t know. Then I did some research. And was blown away by what I found. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2024 9:26:59 PM EDT
[Last Edit: CouncilOfDave]
[#30]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Kihn: Only problem is the use of the binary of two choices, of the Left being Weimar Germany and the Right being Hitler. It's the Left who is engaged in authoritarianism. Trying to eliminate its political opposition. Ending free speech and engaging in censorship. Controlling the education system as a device of indoctrination. Of using a court system separate from one of traditional legal remedies. Of using the state's intelligence apparatus as an enforcement tool of the party, to silence its critics and punish its enemies. Of ending border security and allowing abuses of the citizenry for a greater calling. Of engaging in bending the mind of others to their will, i.e. 200 genders, women can have penises and men can have babies. The Left is Hitler. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Kihn: Originally Posted By CouncilOfDave: Yep. She's just saying the part that us typically kept quiet out loud. Weimar Germany was super fucked up, even by today's standards. It's most of the reason I want these people nowhere near relevance. We have historical precedent showing where this leads. We don't want anything to do with it, on either side of the pendulum. Some seem determined to go through that all again. Only problem is the use of the binary of two choices, of the Left being Weimar Germany and the Right being Hitler. It's the Left who is engaged in authoritarianism. Trying to eliminate its political opposition. Ending free speech and engaging in censorship. Controlling the education system as a device of indoctrination. Of using a court system separate from one of traditional legal remedies. Of using the state's intelligence apparatus as an enforcement tool of the party, to silence its critics and punish its enemies. Of ending border security and allowing abuses of the citizenry for a greater calling. Of engaging in bending the mind of others to their will, i.e. 200 genders, women can have penises and men can have babies. The Left is Hitler. No, the Right isn't Hitler. Someone eventually may well be, though. |
|
|
|
OK, USA
|
Posted: 3/27/2024 9:31:31 PM EDT
[Last Edit: Waynehead05]
[#31]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Kihn: Only problem is the use of the binary of two choices, of the Left being Weimar Germany and the Right being Hitler. It's the Left who is engaged in authoritarianism. Trying to eliminate its political opposition. Ending free speech and engaging in censorship. Controlling the education system as a device of indoctrination. Of using a court system separate from one of traditional legal remedies. Of using the state's intelligence apparatus as an enforcement tool of the party, to silence its critics and punish its enemies. Of ending border security and allowing abuses of the citizenry for a greater calling. Of engaging in bending the mind of others to their will, i.e. 200 genders, women can have penises and men can have babies. The Left is Hitler. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Kihn: Originally Posted By CouncilOfDave: Yep. She's just saying the part that us typically kept quiet out loud. Weimar Germany was super fucked up, even by today's standards. It's most of the reason I want these people nowhere near relevance. We have historical precedent showing where this leads. We don't want anything to do with it, on either side of the pendulum. Some seem determined to go through that all again. Only problem is the use of the binary of two choices, of the Left being Weimar Germany and the Right being Hitler. It's the Left who is engaged in authoritarianism. Trying to eliminate its political opposition. Ending free speech and engaging in censorship. Controlling the education system as a device of indoctrination. Of using a court system separate from one of traditional legal remedies. Of using the state's intelligence apparatus as an enforcement tool of the party, to silence its critics and punish its enemies. Of ending border security and allowing abuses of the citizenry for a greater calling. Of engaging in bending the mind of others to their will, i.e. 200 genders, women can have penises and men can have babies. The Left is Hitler. I don’t know about that. I’m now at the point that if someone came into power and was wanting to execute doctors that provide hormones, “puberty blockers”, and perform sex operations on minors, as well as adults that continue to push these perversions on children with books and dancing trannies exposing their genitalia… I could possibly be convinced to support them (the hypothetical person that would execute the pervs. I don’t support the pervs). In case you haven’t noticed, these things, and worse, are all being done in the open, in many cases against the will of at least one of the parents. And all that’s being done to combat it is talk. |
|
|
WY, USA
|
Posted: 3/27/2024 9:33:38 PM EDT
[#32]
Maybe that German guy with the funny mustache was right about a few things after all.
|
|
|
OK, USA
|
Posted: 3/27/2024 9:35:53 PM EDT
[#33]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By CouncilOfDave: I don't see it that way at all, so please don't read that into my post. No, the Right isn't Hitler. Someone eventually may well be, though. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By CouncilOfDave: Originally Posted By Kihn: Originally Posted By CouncilOfDave: Yep. She's just saying the part that us typically kept quiet out loud. Weimar Germany was super fucked up, even by today's standards. It's most of the reason I want these people nowhere near relevance. We have historical precedent showing where this leads. We don't want anything to do with it, on either side of the pendulum. Some seem determined to go through that all again. Only problem is the use of the binary of two choices, of the Left being Weimar Germany and the Right being Hitler. It's the Left who is engaged in authoritarianism. Trying to eliminate its political opposition. Ending free speech and engaging in censorship. Controlling the education system as a device of indoctrination. Of using a court system separate from one of traditional legal remedies. Of using the state's intelligence apparatus as an enforcement tool of the party, to silence its critics and punish its enemies. Of ending border security and allowing abuses of the citizenry for a greater calling. Of engaging in bending the mind of  others to their will, i.e. 200 genders, women can have penises and men can have babies. The Left is Hitler. No, the Right isn't Hitler. Someone eventually may well be, though. In addition to having never looking into what books the Nazis burned, I also had never listened to an Hitler speech. Until last week when there were several posted on twitter with ai audio translations. I can’t imagine many here would disagree with the things Hitler was saying. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2024 9:36:43 PM EDT
[Last Edit: Kihn]
[#34]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By CouncilOfDave: I don't see it that way at all, so please don't read that into my post. No, the Right isn't Hitler. Someone eventually may well be, though. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By CouncilOfDave: Originally Posted By Kihn: Originally Posted By CouncilOfDave: Yep. She's just saying the part that us typically kept quiet out loud. Weimar Germany was super fucked up, even by today's standards. It's most of the reason I want these people nowhere near relevance. We have historical precedent showing where this leads. We don't want anything to do with it, on either side of the pendulum. Some seem determined to go through that all again. Only problem is the use of the binary of two choices, of the Left being Weimar Germany and the Right being Hitler. It's the Left who is engaged in authoritarianism. Trying to eliminate its political opposition. Ending free speech and engaging in censorship. Controlling the education system as a device of indoctrination. Of using a court system separate from one of traditional legal remedies. Of using the state's intelligence apparatus as an enforcement tool of the party, to silence its critics and punish its enemies. Of ending border security and allowing abuses of the citizenry for a greater calling. Of engaging in bending the mind of others to their will, i.e. 200 genders, women can have penises and men can have babies. The Left is Hitler. No, the Right isn't Hitler. Someone eventually may well be, though. Well, you and I know that. But that is not what she is selling. This is an association made for many, many decades. And most don't know the difference either. Adorno's 'Authoritarian Personality'. they really are terrible labels. But that's 'democracy'. Hitler being labeled the Right (side of Socialism) is not necessarily wrong. Georg Strasser and Joseph Goebbels were hard left. Ernst Rohm was the perpetual never-ending leftist revolutionary. But that ended in summer of 1934 when they went all one form Fascist after the purging (which still seems weird when Mussolini said he would always be a socialist after becoming dictator) The Nazi Party before 1933 had at least 3 factions competing... |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2024 9:38:14 PM EDT
[#35]
Check her doctorate thesis?
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2024 9:38:47 PM EDT
[Last Edit: Kihn]
[#36]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Waynehead05: I don’t know about that. I’m now at the point that if someone came into power and was wanting to execute doctors that provide hormones, “puberty blockers”, and perform sex operations on minors, as well as adults that continue to push these perversions on children with books and dancing trannies exposing their genitalia… I could possibly be convinced to support them (the hypothetical person that would execute the pervs. I don’t support the pervs). In case you haven’t noticed, these things, and worse, are all being done in the open, in many cases against the will of at least one of the parents. And all that’s being done to combat it is talk. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Waynehead05: Originally Posted By Kihn: Originally Posted By CouncilOfDave: Yep. She's just saying the part that us typically kept quiet out loud. Weimar Germany was super fucked up, even by today's standards. It's most of the reason I want these people nowhere near relevance. We have historical precedent showing where this leads. We don't want anything to do with it, on either side of the pendulum. Some seem determined to go through that all again. Only problem is the use of the binary of two choices, of the Left being Weimar Germany and the Right being Hitler. It's the Left who is engaged in authoritarianism. Trying to eliminate its political opposition. Ending free speech and engaging in censorship. Controlling the education system as a device of indoctrination. Of using a court system separate from one of traditional legal remedies. Of using the state's intelligence apparatus as an enforcement tool of the party, to silence its critics and punish its enemies. Of ending border security and allowing abuses of the citizenry for a greater calling. Of engaging in bending the mind of others to their will, i.e. 200 genders, women can have penises and men can have babies. The Left is Hitler. I don’t know about that. I’m now at the point that if someone came into power and was wanting to execute doctors that provide hormones, “puberty blockers”, and perform sex operations on minors, as well as adults that continue to push these perversions on children with books and dancing trannies exposing their genitalia… I could possibly be convinced to support them (the hypothetical person that would execute the pervs. I don’t support the pervs). In case you haven’t noticed, these things, and worse, are all being done in the open, in many cases against the will of at least one of the parents. And all that’s being done to combat it is talk. Which makes today's Left Hitler. Surprisingly, Hitler's Nazi Party won the majority plurality in 1932 (enabling him to become Chancellor and eventually become dictator) because of the woman's vote. Karen got us here where we are today. Coincidence? |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2024 9:41:03 PM EDT
[#37]
She is a bigger perv than joe.
|
|
|
|
OK, USA
|
Posted: 3/27/2024 9:52:10 PM EDT
[#38]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Kihn: Which makes today's Left Hitler. Surprisingly, Hitler's Nazi Party won the majority plurality in 1932 (enabling him to become Chancellor and eventually become dictator) because of the woman's vote. Karen got us here where we are today. Coincidence? Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Kihn: Originally Posted By Waynehead05: Originally Posted By Kihn: Originally Posted By CouncilOfDave: Yep. She's just saying the part that us typically kept quiet out loud. Weimar Germany was super fucked up, even by today's standards. It's most of the reason I want these people nowhere near relevance. We have historical precedent showing where this leads. We don't want anything to do with it, on either side of the pendulum. Some seem determined to go through that all again. Only problem is the use of the binary of two choices, of the Left being Weimar Germany and the Right being Hitler. It's the Left who is engaged in authoritarianism. Trying to eliminate its political opposition. Ending free speech and engaging in censorship. Controlling the education system as a device of indoctrination. Of using a court system separate from one of traditional legal remedies. Of using the state's intelligence apparatus as an enforcement tool of the party, to silence its critics and punish its enemies. Of ending border security and allowing abuses of the citizenry for a greater calling. Of engaging in bending the mind of others to their will, i.e. 200 genders, women can have penises and men can have babies. The Left is Hitler. I don’t know about that. I’m now at the point that if someone came into power and was wanting to execute doctors that provide hormones, “puberty blockers”, and perform sex operations on minors, as well as adults that continue to push these perversions on children with books and dancing trannies exposing their genitalia… I could possibly be convinced to support them (the hypothetical person that would execute the pervs. I don’t support the pervs). In case you haven’t noticed, these things, and worse, are all being done in the open, in many cases against the will of at least one of the parents. And all that’s being done to combat it is talk. Which makes today's Left Hitler. Surprisingly, Hitler's Nazi Party won the majority plurality in 1932 (enabling him to become Chancellor and eventually become dictator) because of the woman's vote. Karen got us here where we are today. Coincidence? Are you trying to say that Hitler got the majority of women’s vote? Because I will disagree with that statement, wholeheartedly. The Weimar Republic was all about women’s rights, and that women can and should do everything men do. Which is exactly what the left pushes today. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2024 9:54:07 PM EDT
[#39]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By JimEN: What the fuck is wrong with these people? Are they fucking serious? What's even worse that that is the people who go along with this. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2024 9:56:09 PM EDT
[#40]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By 56xdx_Z: Maybe she is right. Weimar germany had all kinds of weird perversions going on, which the Nazis gained clout by cleaning up. The crazed leftists of the 1920s era in Germany had public bestiality by the end of it, and they ultimately aided hitler's rise by giving him an easy and obvious boogieman The Nazis had some known homosexuals in high positions too, like Ernst Rohm. They were all over the place. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2024 10:04:04 PM EDT
[Last Edit: Kihn]
[#41]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Waynehead05: Are you trying to say that Hitler got the majority of women’s vote? Because I will disagree with that statement, wholeheartedly. The Weimar Republic was all about women’s rights, and that women can and should do everything men do. Which is exactly what the left pushes today. Yes. the Women's vote on issues of the economy (1929 depression) gave the Nazi party plurality majority (parliamentary multi-party government instituted by the Treaty of Versailles) during parliamentary voting in 1932. For the first time, the Nazis had more deputies than any other party (7-8 of them). the Communists came in right behind them. And Zentrum not far behind that. A bunch of political fuckery by Hindenburg's Reichsrat put them through three chancellors in 4-5 months. Hitler maneuvered his way into the Chancellor's job by outsmarting the Reichsrat fuckery that thought he was an idiot and could control him. Then Hitler went all dictator after staging the Reichstag fire within a month of getting the job. The women's vote in 1932 gave him the leverage to do all that. Generally speaking, German women were rather traditional. Conservative. family oriented. Before Nazism. Nazism gave them work (later war years), promoted out-of-wedlock babymaking, rewarded them for service as mothers and defenders of the German mythos. The Gestapo did not really prosecute morality things on them because they were blood Germans. Unless they pissed off somebody special or were making a fuss running counter to the Nazi narrative. If they kept it within bounds there was no problem. Their behavior, in a general sense for single women, was supposedly scandalous on the Strength Through Joy voyages (Gestapo reports). |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2024 10:04:51 PM EDT
[#42]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By _DR: The Nazis had some known homosexuals in high positions too, like Ernst Rohm. They were all over the place. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By _DR: Originally Posted By 56xdx_Z: Maybe she is right. Weimar germany had all kinds of weird perversions going on, which the Nazis gained clout by cleaning up. The crazed leftists of the 1920s era in Germany had public bestiality by the end of it, and they ultimately aided hitler's rise by giving him an easy and obvious boogieman The Nazis had some known homosexuals in high positions too, like Ernst Rohm. They were all over the place. SA leadership was chock full of them. Some sick sadistic fuckers too. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2024 10:09:25 PM EDT
[#43]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Kihn: Well, you and I know that. But that is not what she is selling. This is an association made for many, many decades. And most don't know the difference either. Adorno's 'Authoritarian Personality'. they really are terrible labels. But that's 'democracy'. Hitler being labeled the Right (side of Socialism) is not necessarily wrong. Georg Strasser and Joseph Goebbels were hard left. Ernst Rohm was the perpetual never-ending leftist revolutionary. But that ended in summer of 1934 when they went all one form Fascist after the purging (which still seems weird when Mussolini said he would always be a socialist after becoming dictator) The Nazi Party before 1933 had at least 3 factions competing... Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Kihn: Originally Posted By CouncilOfDave: Originally Posted By Kihn: Originally Posted By CouncilOfDave: Yep. She's just saying the part that us typically kept quiet out loud. Weimar Germany was super fucked up, even by today's standards. It's most of the reason I want these people nowhere near relevance. We have historical precedent showing where this leads. We don't want anything to do with it, on either side of the pendulum. Some seem determined to go through that all again. Only problem is the use of the binary of two choices, of the Left being Weimar Germany and the Right being Hitler. It's the Left who is engaged in authoritarianism. Trying to eliminate its political opposition. Ending free speech and engaging in censorship. Controlling the education system as a device of indoctrination. Of using a court system separate from one of traditional legal remedies. Of using the state's intelligence apparatus as an enforcement tool of the party, to silence its critics and punish its enemies. Of ending border security and allowing abuses of the citizenry for a greater calling. Of engaging in bending the mind of others to their will, i.e. 200 genders, women can have penises and men can have babies. The Left is Hitler. No, the Right isn't Hitler. Someone eventually may well be, though. Well, you and I know that. But that is not what she is selling. This is an association made for many, many decades. And most don't know the difference either. Adorno's 'Authoritarian Personality'. they really are terrible labels. But that's 'democracy'. Hitler being labeled the Right (side of Socialism) is not necessarily wrong. Georg Strasser and Joseph Goebbels were hard left. Ernst Rohm was the perpetual never-ending leftist revolutionary. But that ended in summer of 1934 when they went all one form Fascist after the purging (which still seems weird when Mussolini said he would always be a socialist after becoming dictator) The Nazi Party before 1933 had at least 3 factions competing...  Yeah, what she's selling is bullshit, broadly speaking. How fucking degenerate Germany was during that time is about the only part she got right. I don't see the left as literally Hitler, either. There's some shared qualities for sure, but it's more of a resemblance than an impersonation. Shit ain't gonna repeat, but it's gonna rhyme, I guess. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2024 10:12:40 PM EDT
[#44]
Evil
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2024 10:18:40 PM EDT
[#45]
...then one day for no reason at all...
she's not entirely incorrect, she just seem to think the nazi's appeared without reason... and for some even crazier reason seems to think that goading people who are raising warning signs about this, people saying this is all too far, that they are bad people without even considering why they might see it this way... eventually something will snap and the pendulum will swing... then pejoratives will mean nothing when there is nothing left to lose. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2024 10:20:21 PM EDT
[#46]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By CouncilOfDave: I realize I didn't read your post in the correct context. I'm not well educated, as you're probably aware. Yeah, what she's selling is bullshit, broadly speaking. How fucking degenerate Germany was during that time is about the only part she got right. I don't see the left as literally Hitler, either. There's some shared qualities for sure, but it's more of a resemblance than an impersonation. Shit ain't gonna repeat, but it's gonna rhyme, I guess. This is just an amateur hobby thing for me of recent times. I'm fascinated by it because the common knowledge about Nazism does it injustice as to how absurdly deep and crazy complex it was. I sometimes assume that people have the same POV I had back then. No judgement call on you, again assuming we are aligned about what the Left is. Never felt we were conflicted. I am saying the Left is much more Hitler because the Right isn't doing authoritarian shit though... |
|
|
|
WA, USA
|
Posted: 3/27/2024 10:42:12 PM EDT
[#47]
Its a mystery why Hitler rose to power.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2024 10:43:12 PM EDT
[#48]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By PWR2LBS: Its a mystery why Hitler rose to power. Or why he remained so popular right up to the end. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2024 10:43:37 PM EDT
[#49]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By BikerNut: She received an honorary doctorate. So she never actually did the required work. And that nitwit on The View wanted her made Surgeon General. What a maroon... |
|
|
|
ISR
|
Posted: 3/27/2024 10:59:53 PM EDT
[Last Edit: USMCTanker]
[#50]
I half listed to that cunt on the radio on the way home the other day, any she sounded horrified that local school boards and school librarians were being held to account by parents, politicians, and conservative activists that don’t want inappropriate, sexually explicit material available to children that you can’t read out loud publicly without being arrested for violating obscenity laws.
She can fuck right off. If it came down to a binary choice between allowing our impressionable young to be exposed to such perverted filth, or wearing a brown shirt burning books, well…I know where my priorities are. We must as a nation protect the innocent from these fucking heathens and allow them to be children, not expose them to things God never intended for our young to be exposed to. |
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
