User Panel
|
I wouldn't stand in front of a piss-filled supersoaker. Does that make it a good pistol? - Caboose314
I thought I was covered for 22 cans, but the NFAids is a bitch when it mutates - themagikbullet |
Sumit discovered a projection based on OEMs "current" assurances was a very bad idea.
The only real hard news out of this was seven remaining open RFQs, all passenger vehicles, with decisions he believes will be made in 2Q and 3Q...but he's not going to commit and get pilloried again. They also can't take small, opportunist job lots that will hamstring the company for larger contracts. It's an ugly look, but the OEMs are in danger of cutting off their own noses on this, and I'm sure they realize that. |
|
"Cease quoting laws to us who have swords"
|
|
Originally Posted By Osprey61: Sumit discovered a projection based on OEMs "current" assurances was a very bad idea. The only real hard news out of this was seven remaining open RFQs, all passenger vehicles, with decisions he believes will be made in 2Q and 3Q...but he's not going to commit and get pilloried again. They also can't take small, opportunist job lots that will hamstring the company for larger contracts. It's an ugly look, but the OEMs are in danger of cutting off their own noses on this, and I'm sure they realize that. View Quote seven remaining? How many were closed? |
|
|
I am not to be confused with -JC- who changed his nick from whatever it was to be like mine - for whatever reason.
Life - What a waste of time. (Me) |
Originally Posted By shblackdragon: seven remaining? How many were closed? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By shblackdragon: Originally Posted By Osprey61: Sumit discovered a projection based on OEMs "current" assurances was a very bad idea. The only real hard news out of this was seven remaining open RFQs, all passenger vehicles, with decisions he believes will be made in 2Q and 3Q...but he's not going to commit and get pilloried again. They also can't take small, opportunist job lots that will hamstring the company for larger contracts. It's an ugly look, but the OEMs are in danger of cutting off their own noses on this, and I'm sure they realize that. seven remaining? How many were closed? one closed that was a trucking company and one other moved their decision out past 2024 |
|
|
Originally Posted By Osprey61: Sumit discovered a projection based on OEMs "current" assurances was a very bad idea. The only real hard news out of this was seven remaining open RFQs, all passenger vehicles, with decisions he believes will be made in 2Q and 3Q...but he's not going to commit and get pilloried again. They also can't take small, opportunist job lots that will hamstring the company for larger contracts. It's an ugly look, but the OEMs are in danger of cutting off their own noses on this, and I'm sure they realize that. View Quote Man, you are still optimistic on this company? |
|
|
What the hell drop in after hours? Don’t know if I should cry our be glad for an opportunity to average down.
|
|
|
Originally Posted By snakes19: one closed that was a trucking company and one other moved their decision out past 2024 View Quote Trucking company for sure, I didn't get the reason for the second. Hard down tomorrow morning for sure, but Sumit explaining very clearly that the OEMs are asking the Lidar companies to pay all the development and integration costs for contract units that won't produce a profit is going to sink in. It's unsustainable. Luminar just laid off 20% of their workforce for a reason, and said more layoffs are coming...and that's with whatever crumbs Austin paid Tesla to throw them. "Decisions expected in the second and third quarter". We're in the second quarter now, but I doubt many people made the connection. I may pick up 10K in the morning, depending on how fall the price falls. |
|
"Cease quoting laws to us who have swords"
|
|
|
|
|
Well that was fun. Compared to others I haven't lost as much value but 4k in one day and 26k since my first buy hurts. A definite no vote from me for any exec comp or additional hiring /board members.
|
|
VCDL
Team Ranstad Camp Patriot Task Force Dagger Foundation Tennessee Squire A Prince whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people. |
Originally Posted By Firebug93: Man, you are still optimistic on this company? View Quote OUST did a 1-10 reverse split in April 2023. It was at $0.38 at the time. Same story with almost all the SPACs, they've been absolutely savaged over the last year. I'm not in the mood to use the word optimistic right now, but I know where all the competition stands right now...big, awkward products with mechanical components, huge cash burn, tiny "contracts" paid for out of company funds. Most of them were valued in the $20 to $30 range when they went public and are all in the shame general range. The ones that look like they're doing alright now have done reverse splits to keep from going under. This fight is far from over, and for better or worse I'm going to ride until my investment thesis changes. |
|
"Cease quoting laws to us who have swords"
|
Originally Posted By Osprey61: Sumit discovered a projection based on OEMs "current" assurances was a very bad idea. The only real hard news out of this was seven remaining open RFQs, all passenger vehicles, with decisions he believes will be made in 2Q and 3Q...but he's not going to commit and get pilloried again. They also can't take small, opportunist job lots that will hamstring the company for larger contracts. It's an ugly look, but the OEMs are in danger of cutting off their own noses on this, and I'm sure they realize that. View Quote Dude seems like the milqtoast of milqtoast |
|
|
bought another 500 @ $0.96
and I've got 30 put contracts at $1.50 that I want to see what they open up at tomorrow morning |
|
|
FJB FBHO
|
|
q3131: I can enjoy necrobeastialexhibitionism as much as the next guy, but homonecrobestailexhibitionism is just plain sick.
Tomislav:If you truly love something, you need to shoot it, then set it on fire. (And then post pics!) كا |
Anybody else feel like throwing up?
|
|
"I keep hearing 'must have a dialogue,' but I keep being told to shut up when I speak." -Sand_Pirate
“I’m starting to think the Internet was a terrible mistake.” -Subnet |
|
Originally Posted By Osprey61: OUST did a 1-10 reverse split in April 2023. It was at $0.38 at the time. Same story with almost all the SPACs, they've been absolutely savaged over the last year. I'm not in the mood to use the word optimistic right now, but I know where all the competition stands right now...big, awkward products with mechanical components, huge cash burn, tiny "contracts" paid for out of company funds. Most of them were valued in the $20 to $30 range when they went public and are all in the shame general range. The ones that look like they're doing alright now have done reverse splits to keep from going under. This fight is far from over, and for better or worse I'm going to ride until my investment thesis changes. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Osprey61: Originally Posted By Firebug93: Man, you are still optimistic on this company? OUST did a 1-10 reverse split in April 2023. It was at $0.38 at the time. Same story with almost all the SPACs, they've been absolutely savaged over the last year. I'm not in the mood to use the word optimistic right now, but I know where all the competition stands right now...big, awkward products with mechanical components, huge cash burn, tiny "contracts" paid for out of company funds. Most of them were valued in the $20 to $30 range when they went public and are all in the shame general range. The ones that look like they're doing alright now have done reverse splits to keep from going under. This fight is far from over, and for better or worse I'm going to ride until my investment thesis changes. Typo? |
|
R.I.P. Jeff Hanneman (1964-2013)
|
Originally Posted By jpcdmd: Balls of steel right there View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By jpcdmd: Originally Posted By JC_: 2 I believe. I just grabbed 50k more shares. Balls of steel right there Probably just dumb. However, my thought process is that the 102k shares I had at the start of the call, well, those are in deep shit no matter what so we shall put that problem to the side. Either it's going to be a tax deduction or I am riding it out. One way or the other, basically not much I can really do at this point with that loss. This last 50k are separate in my mind and were bought at under a dollar per and are roughly 10% up as I type this. Obviously subject to change one way or another. You guys have a lot more experience than I do and I can very well be wrong, but as we all seen, there was a lot of dumping fast tonight and there will likely be some more but there may be a lot of buying as well. Perhaps a lot of guys wanting to reducing their per share price as well as some day traders sniffing about an opportunity. We shall see. |
|
I am not to be confused with -JC- who changed his nick from whatever it was to be like mine - for whatever reason.
Life - What a waste of time. (Me) |
Maybe they should close what's left of the existing ATM and open another, even higher ATM. Except the Craig-Hallum interns, whose sole job is to hit "sell" 100 shares at a time, might revolt on that idea... After the open tomorrow, what happens next: $1.50/share or $0.50/share? |
|
|
Just so you know I havent started my weed-eater this year. I also sold out at $2.50
|
|
|
Originally Posted By snakes19: one closed that was a trucking company and one other moved their decision out past 2024 View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By snakes19: Originally Posted By shblackdragon: Originally Posted By Osprey61: Sumit discovered a projection based on OEMs "current" assurances was a very bad idea. The only real hard news out of this was seven remaining open RFQs, all passenger vehicles, with decisions he believes will be made in 2Q and 3Q...but he's not going to commit and get pilloried again. They also can't take small, opportunist job lots that will hamstring the company for larger contracts. It's an ugly look, but the OEMs are in danger of cutting off their own noses on this, and I'm sure they realize that. seven remaining? How many were closed? one closed that was a trucking company and one other moved their decision out past 2024 The trucking company referenced in this? If so details from them would be nice, "primarily driven" suggests a win? Revenue for the first quarter of 2024 was $1.0 million, compared to $0.8 million for the first quarter of 2023 primarily driven by sales of MOVIA sensors to a global commercial trucking OEM. |
|
|
Originally Posted By nolan7120: Originally Posted By Osprey61: Originally Posted By Firebug93: Man, you are still optimistic on this company? OUST did a 1-10 reverse split in April 2023. It was at $0.38 at the time. Same story with almost all the SPACs, they've been absolutely savaged over the last year. I'm not in the mood to use the word optimistic right now, but I know where all the competition stands right now...big, awkward products with mechanical components, huge cash burn, tiny "contracts" paid for out of company funds. Most of them were valued in the $20 to $30 range when they went public and are all in the shame general range. The ones that look like they're doing alright now have done reverse splits to keep from going under. This fight is far from over, and for better or worse I'm going to ride until my investment thesis changes. Typo? Nah, I'd call that "poetic license" |
|
|
|
|
United we stand, divided we fall!
I’m just here for the post count. I do my best proofreading after I hit send. |
Tomorrow could be an interesting day.
|
|
|
80% of my shares have $3 covered calls sold against them expiring next Friday. Saw they were at $0.02 today and thought about rolling them out. Unfortunately I decided to hold out for a few more bucks.
|
|
|
I can remain stubborn longer than the market can be irrational.
|
|
|
I find this interesting:
Anubhav Verma Thanks, Sumit. The next question is, last year at the Retail Investor Day, MicroVision reiterated that the company is very far ahead of the competition and it would take years for them to catch up. Does this statement still hold true? And if it does, the OEMs are still keeping their bar standard high, or are they lowering it to accommodate more choice in suppliers? Sumit Sharma Yeah. It is 100% true, and I'll give you an example. These seven RFQs we're talking about that MAVIN is part of, we have to dumb down MAVIN to be in the middle of it. I mean, it's -- there's things that we have to do, but we can certainly do it, right? I mean, there's nothing new development. It's just new calibration, new firmware, new development for us as part of our ASIC, so it's not that big of a deal. But as you can imagine, right, as I always said, right, it is best-in-class, so far ahead. When you get into these RFQs, nothing has been thrown at us that requires us to meet it. If anything else, we've been brought towards the mean. |
|
|
Originally Posted By apexcrusade: I find this interesting: Anubhav Verma Thanks, Sumit. The next question is, last year at the Retail Investor Day, MicroVision reiterated that the company is very far ahead of the competition and it would take years for them to catch up. Does this statement still hold true? And if it does, the OEMs are still keeping their bar standard high, or are they lowering it to accommodate more choice in suppliers? Sumit Sharma Yeah. It is 100% true, and I'll give you an example. These seven RFQs we're talking about that MAVIN is part of, we have to dumb down MAVIN to be in the middle of it. I mean, it's -- there's things that we have to do, but we can certainly do it, right? I mean, there's nothing new development. It's just new calibration, new firmware, new development for us as part of our ASIC, so it's not that big of a deal. But as you can imagine, right, as I always said, right, it is best-in-class, so far ahead. When you get into these RFQs, nothing has been thrown at us that requires us to meet it. If anything else, we've been brought towards the mean. View Quote I thought this was fascinating. Sumit went on to talk about the widely divergent demands from multiple OEMs. I strongly believe he wasn't talking to the stockholders, he was talking directly to the OEMs and giving them very general information about their competitors to drive home some of the sticking points in the contract negotiations. "Some OEMs want to see our manufacturing strategy proposals to commit to factories in Asia and North America for volumes that would not justify two factory locations. Some OEMs explicitly want a factory in the U.S. To be clear, they will not accept a NAFTA country, but only a U.S. contract manufacturing factory while expecting cost structures that are only possible from Asia. Others will only review proposals from Asia, while a small group wants to see a diversified operation strategy with multiple continents. Again, the expectation is that we will fund this with our investors." The bolded portion smacks of talk in the US Congress about concerns over Chinese Lidar patent infringement and technology theft... The second bolded portion is the full stop. They can't float another, even larger offering to fund production. I'm actually happy they've draw this line in the sand. |
|
"Cease quoting laws to us who have swords"
|
Originally Posted By Osprey61: I thought this was fascinating. Sumit went on to talk about the widely divergent demands from multiple OEMs. I strongly believe he wasn't talking to the stockholders, he was talking directly to the OEMs and giving them very general information about their competitors to drive home some of the sticking points in the contract negotiations. "Some OEMs want to see our manufacturing strategy proposals to commit to factories in Asia and North America for volumes that would not justify two factory locations. Some OEMs explicitly want a factory in the U.S. To be clear, they will not accept a NAFTA country, but only a U.S. contract manufacturing factory while expecting cost structures that are only possible from Asia. Others will only review proposals from Asia, while a small group wants to see a diversified operation strategy with multiple continents. Again, the expectation is that we will fund this with our investors." The bolded portion smacks of talk in the US Congress about concerns over Chinese patent infringement and technology theft... The second bolded portion is the full stop. They can't float another, even larger offering to fund production. I'm actually happy they've draw this line in the sand. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Osprey61: Originally Posted By apexcrusade: I find this interesting: Anubhav Verma Thanks, Sumit. The next question is, last year at the Retail Investor Day, MicroVision reiterated that the company is very far ahead of the competition and it would take years for them to catch up. Does this statement still hold true? And if it does, the OEMs are still keeping their bar standard high, or are they lowering it to accommodate more choice in suppliers? Sumit Sharma Yeah. It is 100% true, and I'll give you an example. These seven RFQs we're talking about that MAVIN is part of, we have to dumb down MAVIN to be in the middle of it. I mean, it's -- there's things that we have to do, but we can certainly do it, right? I mean, there's nothing new development. It's just new calibration, new firmware, new development for us as part of our ASIC, so it's not that big of a deal. But as you can imagine, right, as I always said, right, it is best-in-class, so far ahead. When you get into these RFQs, nothing has been thrown at us that requires us to meet it. If anything else, we've been brought towards the mean. I thought this was fascinating. Sumit went on to talk about the widely divergent demands from multiple OEMs. I strongly believe he wasn't talking to the stockholders, he was talking directly to the OEMs and giving them very general information about their competitors to drive home some of the sticking points in the contract negotiations. "Some OEMs want to see our manufacturing strategy proposals to commit to factories in Asia and North America for volumes that would not justify two factory locations. Some OEMs explicitly want a factory in the U.S. To be clear, they will not accept a NAFTA country, but only a U.S. contract manufacturing factory while expecting cost structures that are only possible from Asia. Others will only review proposals from Asia, while a small group wants to see a diversified operation strategy with multiple continents. Again, the expectation is that we will fund this with our investors." The bolded portion smacks of talk in the US Congress about concerns over Chinese patent infringement and technology theft... The second bolded portion is the full stop. They can't float another, even larger offering to fund production. I'm actually happy they've draw this line in the sand. There is a lot of interesting insight as to current state of affairs in those comments. I was ready for a large buy but the price got away from me. I'll take it. |
|
|
Added 1500 more. Last purchase. Here’s to hopium.
|
|
|
"Cease quoting laws to us who have swords"
|
Hoping for a 1000 hours pullback. Just missed my buy order price.
|
|
|
I was late to the party (earnings call) yesterday, as life got in the way, but did I hear it correctly that the automakers are forcing the lidar firms (not just microvision) to eat the NRE's?
My guess is they got tired of being burned by over-hyped SPAC's and startups eating away their budgets and not having delivered something that is workable or cost effective to manufacture. Will this have the distinct possibility of forcing still further consolidation in the industry? Anyway, still in for the long(er) haul. |
|
SYSTEM: Let's not rehash a locked&nuked thread
|
"Cease quoting laws to us who have swords"
|
Had my brother make a swing trade for me yesterday afternoon since schwab won't let me deposit and buy MVIS right away.
Bought 1000 at $0.99, and I Just had him sell it for $1.305. Easy case of 9mm on that one. |
|
|
Originally Posted By Osprey61: I thought this was fascinating. Sumit went on to talk about the widely divergent demands from multiple OEMs. I strongly believe he wasn't talking to the stockholders, he was talking directly to the OEMs and giving them very general information about their competitors to drive home some of the sticking points in the contract negotiations. "Some OEMs want to see our manufacturing strategy proposals to commit to factories in Asia and North America for volumes that would not justify two factory locations. Some OEMs explicitly want a factory in the U.S. To be clear, they will not accept a NAFTA country, but only a U.S. contract manufacturing factory while expecting cost structures that are only possible from Asia. Others will only review proposals from Asia, while a small group wants to see a diversified operation strategy with multiple continents. Again, the expectation is that we will fund this with our investors." The bolded portion smacks of talk in the US Congress about concerns over Chinese Lidar patent infringement and technology theft... The second bolded portion is the full stop. They can't float another, even larger offering to fund production. I'm actually happy they've draw this line in the sand. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Osprey61: Originally Posted By apexcrusade: I find this interesting: Anubhav Verma Thanks, Sumit. The next question is, last year at the Retail Investor Day, MicroVision reiterated that the company is very far ahead of the competition and it would take years for them to catch up. Does this statement still hold true? And if it does, the OEMs are still keeping their bar standard high, or are they lowering it to accommodate more choice in suppliers? Sumit Sharma Yeah. It is 100% true, and I'll give you an example. These seven RFQs we're talking about that MAVIN is part of, we have to dumb down MAVIN to be in the middle of it. I mean, it's -- there's things that we have to do, but we can certainly do it, right? I mean, there's nothing new development. It's just new calibration, new firmware, new development for us as part of our ASIC, so it's not that big of a deal. But as you can imagine, right, as I always said, right, it is best-in-class, so far ahead. When you get into these RFQs, nothing has been thrown at us that requires us to meet it. If anything else, we've been brought towards the mean. I thought this was fascinating. Sumit went on to talk about the widely divergent demands from multiple OEMs. I strongly believe he wasn't talking to the stockholders, he was talking directly to the OEMs and giving them very general information about their competitors to drive home some of the sticking points in the contract negotiations. "Some OEMs want to see our manufacturing strategy proposals to commit to factories in Asia and North America for volumes that would not justify two factory locations. Some OEMs explicitly want a factory in the U.S. To be clear, they will not accept a NAFTA country, but only a U.S. contract manufacturing factory while expecting cost structures that are only possible from Asia. Others will only review proposals from Asia, while a small group wants to see a diversified operation strategy with multiple continents. Again, the expectation is that we will fund this with our investors." The bolded portion smacks of talk in the US Congress about concerns over Chinese Lidar patent infringement and technology theft... The second bolded portion is the full stop. They can't float another, even larger offering to fund production. I'm actually happy they've draw this line in the sand. the problem is if another company is willing to fund those productions then MVIS isn't going to win the contract. No contract wins = no company in year or so You can't make money if you keep telling your potential clients no |
|
|
|
Originally Posted By merick: Just put your buy where you would have put your stop; zero. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By merick: Originally Posted By apexcrusade: Hoping for a 1000 hours pullback. Just missed my buy order price. Just put your buy where you would have put your stop; zero. Does buying at zero equal not buying at all, or buying 100% of the float? Sounds like a plan. |
|
|
Originally Posted By Osprey61: I'm there as well. Didn't expect the price to recover this quickly from yesterday's panic. AH volume was over 3M shares, btw. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Osprey61: Originally Posted By apexcrusade: Hoping for a 1000 hours pullback. Just missed my buy order price. I'm there as well. Didn't expect the price to recover this quickly from yesterday's panic. AH volume was over 3M shares, btw. Any other time I would have bought in pre-market at a low, and the price would have plunged at the open. Not this time, I said. I'm no dummy. |
|
|
Originally Posted By jpk33: I was late to the party (earnings call) yesterday, as life got in the way, but did I hear it correctly that the automakers are forcing the lidar firms (not just microvision) to eat the NRE's? My guess is they got tired of being burned by over-hyped SPAC's and startups eating away their budgets and not having delivered something that is workable or cost effective to manufacture. Will this have the distinct possibility of forcing still further consolidation in the industry? Anyway, still in for the long(er) haul. View Quote Well, they're trying, but Sumit said very clearly we won't be doing it. It's a very complex situation. Here's the longer quote, I just excerpted the factory location part earlier. All OEMs want varying levels of perception features, some running within the LiDAR, some running in their ECU, some claiming they need no perception, but want our source code. Some OEMs want the LiDAR in roofline, others want them integrated in headlamp and some others are only looking at behind windshield integration. They want our core LiDAR to be flexible enough to fit into all their locations. They are aware of the trade-offs in each location, but will require updates to the core hardware. All OEMs want varying levels of perception features, some running within the LiDAR, some running in their ECU, some claiming they need no perception, but want our source code. Some OEMs want the LiDAR in roofline, others want them integrated in headlamp and some others are only looking at behind windshield integration. They want our core LiDAR to be flexible enough to fit into all their locations. They are aware of the trade-offs in each location, but will require updates to the core hardware. Some OEMs only want to work with us as a LiDAR Tier-1 with contract manufacturing agreements in place, others prefer a traditional Tier-1 with a diversified product portfolio and profitability with us in a partnership with them, and a smaller group wants to see our Tier-2 strategy even if the volumes do not justify any licensing model. OEMs do work very closely with us and are willing to compromise their needs, but in general, there's a wide area we need to navigate on each RFQ. Some OEMs only want to work with us as a LiDAR Tier-1 with contract manufacturing agreements in place, others prefer a traditional Tier-1 with a diversified product portfolio and profitability with us in a partnership with them, and a smaller group wants to see our Tier-2 strategy even if the volumes do not justify any licensing model. OEMs do work very closely with us and are willing to compromise their needs, but in general, there's a wide area we need to navigate on each RFQ." |
|
"Cease quoting laws to us who have swords"
|
Originally Posted By Osprey61: I'm there as well. Didn't expect the price to recover this quickly from yesterday's panic. AH volume was over 3M shares, btw. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Osprey61: Originally Posted By apexcrusade: Hoping for a 1000 hours pullback. Just missed my buy order price. I'm there as well. Didn't expect the price to recover this quickly from yesterday's panic. AH volume was over 3M shares, btw. Lot of panic selling yesterday AH, from a brief look at r/mvis some of those guys should be on suicide watch. |
|
|
Originally Posted By Osprey61: Well, they're trying, but Sumit said very clearly we won't be doing it. It's a very complex situation. Here's the longer quote, I just excerpted the factory location part earlier. All OEMs want varying levels of perception features, some running within the LiDAR, some running in their ECU, some claiming they need no perception, but want our source code. Some OEMs want the LiDAR in roofline, others want them integrated in headlamp and some others are only looking at behind windshield integration. They want our core LiDAR to be flexible enough to fit into all their locations. They are aware of the trade-offs in each location, but will require updates to the core hardware. All OEMs want varying levels of perception features, some running within the LiDAR, some running in their ECU, some claiming they need no perception, but want our source code. Some OEMs want the LiDAR in roofline, others want them integrated in headlamp and some others are only looking at behind windshield integration. They want our core LiDAR to be flexible enough to fit into all their locations. They are aware of the trade-offs in each location, but will require updates to the core hardware. Some OEMs only want to work with us as a LiDAR Tier-1 with contract manufacturing agreements in place, others prefer a traditional Tier-1 with a diversified product portfolio and profitability with us in a partnership with them, and a smaller group wants to see our Tier-2 strategy even if the volumes do not justify any licensing model. OEMs do work very closely with us and are willing to compromise their needs, but in general, there's a wide area we need to navigate on each RFQ. Some OEMs only want to work with us as a LiDAR Tier-1 with contract manufacturing agreements in place, others prefer a traditional Tier-1 with a diversified product portfolio and profitability with us in a partnership with them, and a smaller group wants to see our Tier-2 strategy even if the volumes do not justify any licensing model. OEMs do work very closely with us and are willing to compromise their needs, but in general, there's a wide area we need to navigate on each RFQ." View Quote Did any OEM anywhere mention mvis by name in connection with revenue? |
|
|
Originally Posted By snakes19: the problem is if another company is willing to fund those productions then MVIS isn't going to win the contract. No contract wins = no company in year or so You can't make money if you keep telling your potential clients no View Quote Who else has the cash to do so? |
|
I wouldn't stand in front of a piss-filled supersoaker. Does that make it a good pistol? - Caboose314
I thought I was covered for 22 cans, but the NFAids is a bitch when it mutates - themagikbullet |
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.