User Panel
|
|
Quoted:
Shooters calc says a 750gr AMAX would need almost 200 MOA in elevation. You got a point. View Quote plus the inherent inaccuracies of the round combination. I have no doubt they shot at someone at that range. But thats about it. |
|
|
Quoted:
You didnt read the story and you don't shoot long range. View Quote I read to story and it is Bull Shit. Time of flight is 8 second or better. Nobody stands still for 8 seconds. Mac Tac 50s are 2 MOA guns with any issued ammo before conditions. A torso at 3450 meters is a 0.4 MOA target before conditions. No issued 50 cal sniper rifle has the capability to be adjusted to a 3450 meter zero. Canucks are more full of sniper BS than #NEVERTRUMP BS. |
|
Serious question but what kind of optics do they use???
I can't see shit over 2 miles from me unless I use a telescope! |
|
|
|
Quoted:
Never mind fucking up the range by less than 1% would result in a miss by feet. assuming you got the wind to within 1 MPH over the entire course of the shot, got the elevation delta perfect, with perfect barometric pressure and humidity to with 3%. plus the inherent inaccuracies of the round combination. I have no doubt they shot at someone at that range. But thats about it. View Quote Its like trying to kill an ant with a tooth pick. When you could use a flame thrower on the whole colony. |
|
Quoted:
Wow. Good shot. https://beta.images.theglobeandmail.com/429/incoming/article35416811.ece/BINARY/image.jpg View Quote |
|
|
|
Quoted:
He might not even be a great shooter. At that distance, there is at least as much luck as skill. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
Yeah I'm going with BS on this, unless the rifle was fitted with a MASSIVE 100+ moa Rail, there isn't enough adjustment on the scope, and even with a hold over reticle there still is t enough on the lense to cover such a massive change.
One would likely have the same odds of hitting a man sized target at that distance if they just pointed the rifle in the general direction and fired. There are nearly a hundred variables that come into play at that range, and even the smallest ones of consequence could mean a miss if not perfectly adjusted for. |
|
Quoted:
I think MrBurns is right on, with this. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
Quoted:
He might not even be a great shooter. At that distance, there is at least as much luck as skill. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Never mind fucking up the range by less than 1% would result in a miss by feet. assuming you got the wind to within 1 MPH over the entire course of the shot, got the elevation delta perfect, with perfect barometric pressure and humidity to with 3%. plus the inherent inaccuracies of the round combination. I have no doubt they shot at someone at that range. But thats about it. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Shooters calc says a 750gr AMAX would need almost 200 MOA in elevation. You got a point. plus the inherent inaccuracies of the round combination. I have no doubt they shot at someone at that range. But thats about it. |
|
Maybe it was an API round that set something on fire and subsequently killed the target?!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted:
He might not even be a great shooter. At that distance, there is at least as much luck as skill. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
But my book on sharpshooting and sniping doesn't mention him. It doesn't say how many shots it took. The truth is that the bullet isn't supersonic at that distance so it cannot shoot to call. Very glad he connected though, and it's still a win. |
|
|
Quoted:
I just don't know why you'd engage a target at 3400 meters WITH A RIFLE. Where the miss is extemely likely. Versus Arty that can fuck up the entire group of them with a couple rounds of 155. Or a 500 lbs bomb. Its like trying to kill an ant with a tooth pick. When you could use a flame thrower on the whole colony. View Quote |
|
What was his inclination? Says he fired from a "high-rise", which can buy you some elevation on your turrets from the cosine of the angle. Also, does the issued scope base come with extra elevation built in? curious...
|
|
Quoted:
Dang, those Canadians REALLY like killing bad guys from super long range. View Quote News of pancakes travels fast, in this case it made it nearly 3 and a half kilometers and the fucker was spreading the word. Something had to be done. Don't fuck with our pancakes. |
|
Quoted:
He might not even be a great shooter. At that distance, there is at least as much luck as skill. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
|
|
Hmm, this gets me to thinking. Maybe they used some kind of Canuckian wizbang, laser guided 50 cal ogive they're testing before the flappy headed fuckers invade. It's only a matter of time. Somone should call Alex Jones.
|
|
|
Quoted:
Hmm, this gets me to thinking. Maybe they used some kind of Canuckian wizbang, laser guided 50 cal ogive they're testing before the flappy headed fuckers invade. It's only a matter of time. Somone should call Alex Jones. View Quote |
|
|
|
|
Quoted:
Shooting from the top of a high rise building may have given some advantage, yes/no ? No sniper here, just curious. View Quote A 26 story building is only about 100 meters tall. I suspect not many buildings that tall are still inhabitable in that part of the world. Even a 20 degree look angle will only buy you about 10 MOA and that is a very steep angle needing a 325 story building. |
|
Good shoot, rah rah, and all. I'm still in the camp that says he was lucky that asshole didn't turn to scratch his ass during that particular 8 second span of time.
|
|
I will have to claim BS.
2707 Yards 1.54mi Shot! Savage 110BA 338 Lapua |
|
Quoted:
Think of the difference in angles over 3.5 km. View Quote Wouldn't the height advantage give the shooter a lesser angle and a better sight picture ? I would like to know the height of the building, say it was 200 feet. How much would that advantage the shooter for targeting and calculating bullet drop over distance ? |
|
Quoted:
There is not enough elevation in conventional optic to come close to dialing in 3450 meters of 50 cal drop. Until we hear what the setup was this is going in the "most likely BS" file. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Dang, those Canadians REALLY like killing bad guys from super long range. Until we hear what the setup was this is going in the "most likely BS" file. Seems like this story turns up every year or two about canadian Snipers. Seems like it gets longer every time. Fake news. |
|
Quoted:
I just don't know why you'd engage a target at 3400 meters WITH A RIFLE. Where the miss is extemely likely. Versus Arty that can fuck up the entire group of them with a couple rounds of 155. Or a 500 lbs bomb. Its like trying to kill an ant with a tooth pick. When you could use a flame thrower on the whole colony. View Quote |
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.