User Panel
Quoted:
Huh? What change in doctrine was there with the M14? It was primarily a replacement for the M1 rifle, and used in the same way. Since USMC automatic riflemen used to have the M249 LMG, and now they have the M27 IAR, it sure looks like replacement to me. View Quote |
|
Sounds like they are going to have a nice setup. Using 1 D60 in the weapon and 6 40rd Pmags would a great addition. Not to mention is the USMC actually teaches recruits to shoot at extended ranges like previously with irons allowing Marines to fully utilize the optics when possible.
Also its nice that the individual get to kit out how they want. My unit had an SOP on where everything went depending on if you were a righty or lefty. That always didn't work out so well. It will be interesting to see how cans stand up as well. |
|
Quoted:
God forbid we should hand somebody a compass and a topo map instead of scraping the finish off of rifles. That or teaching people how to properly operate and talk on a radio. I could think of a thousand better skils to work on that would cost not one cent more to perfect than abusing already clean small arms. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
And nearly every rifle in the armory is clean enough, you are not achieving anything by making a Marine scrub his weapon for hours. There is so much more that can be used with that time. Seriously when I got sent to the armory I would pull my rifle out and just sit there with it because I knew it was clean because I cleaned it. I am not breaking it down and going after every piece of carbon with a set of dentists tools. "Attention to detail" be damned. View Quote |
|
|
|
|
From my experience, an improved 40mm round with extended range would have a far greater effect to our capabilities than a bunch of 416s.
At the end of the day, what does a hit from M855A1 fired from an M4A1 look like compared to a hit fired from an M27? |
|
Quoted:
From my experience, an improved 40mm round with extended range would have a far greater effect to our capabilities than a bunch of 416s. At the end of the day, what does a hit from M855A1 fired from an M4A1 look like compared to a hit fired from an M27? View Quote And then the M4 barrel opens up to 5moa+ at 6,000 rounds and the M27 will maintain sub 2moa accuracy past 15,000 rounds. |
|
|
Quoted:
The M14 was supposed to replace multiple weapon systems BAR, M1 Rifle M1/M2 carbine , Thompson and Greasegun. At least that was the idea. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
|
Quoted:
The same, then the M4 breaks bolts at 3-6,000 rounds and the M27 will keep chugging to 20,000+. And then the M4 barrel opens up to 5moa+ at 6,000 rounds and the M27 will maintain sub 2moa accuracy past 15,000 rounds. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
From my experience, an improved 40mm round with extended range would have a far greater effect to our capabilities than a bunch of 416s. At the end of the day, what does a hit from M855A1 fired from an M4A1 look like compared to a hit fired from an M27? And then the M4 barrel opens up to 5moa+ at 6,000 rounds and the M27 will maintain sub 2moa accuracy past 15,000 rounds. Show me. |
|
|
|
Quoted:
Yep.... M14 Replaced the BAR and I would venture to say the M1919A4 since the M60 replaced it. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Yep.... M14 Replaced the BAR and I would venture to say the M1919A4 since the M60 replaced it. This is nothing new. In fact it mirrors the M14 and M16 program in many ways It will be interesting to see if the all-M27 idea lasts, or if -- as with the M16 -- they eventually switch to having a belt-fed LMG in each fire team. |
|
Quoted:
Did I say the 416 doesn't need cleaning? It does, but only the piston which takes 3 seconds. View Quote Is remarkably dumb. Are you suggesting that there won't be carbon/copper fouling in the bore? Are you suggesting there is zero accumulation of fragments/crud under the extractor? Do you think a piston system has zero carbon that enters the receiver? What about all the dirt, dust, sand, rain, ocean water, MRE tobasco sauce, jalapeno cheese, blood, mud, beer, semen and sweat that a grunt will get on and in his weapon? |
|
Quoted:
You've shot 20,000+ of M855A1 through an M27 and at 15,000 rounds it was sub 2 moa accurate? Show me. View Quote So if the M4 has a 3-6,000 round bolt and barrel life with M855 imagine what it is with M855A1. I believe I have heard the M4A1 bolt and barrel life is hovering around 3,000 rounds currently with M855A1. |
|
|
Quoted:
Did I say the 416 doesn't need cleaning? It does, but only the piston which takes 3 seconds. View Quote That carbon gets caked the fuck on there, dude. And it's not like the bolt group doesn't get dirty. It does. Especially suppressed. Cyclic rate on the HK guns is crazy high suppressed, btw. |
|
|
Quoted:
How the fuck would you know? Have you ever cleaned one? That carbon gets caked the fuck on there, dude. And it's not like the bolt group doesn't get dirty. It does. Especially suppressed. Cyclic rate on the HK guns is crazy high suppressed, btw. View Quote Unsuppressed the 416 stays spotless inside the receiver. The piston gets dirty, sure but it's easy to clean. |
|
|
Quoted:
Every gun gets dirty suppressed. Unsuppressed the 416 stays spotless inside the receiver. The piston gets dirty, sure but it's easy to clean. View Quote I know this from personal experience with a friend's MR556A1, and I've even shot a full auto HK416D post sample a few times. |
|
|
|
Quoted:
The same, then the M4 breaks bolts at 3-6,000 rounds and the M27 will keep chugging to 20,000+. And then the M4 barrel opens up to 5moa+ at 6,000 rounds and the M27 will maintain sub 2moa accuracy past 15,000 rounds. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
From my experience, an improved 40mm round with extended range would have a far greater effect to our capabilities than a bunch of 416s. At the end of the day, what does a hit from M855A1 fired from an M4A1 look like compared to a hit fired from an M27? And then the M4 barrel opens up to 5moa+ at 6,000 rounds and the M27 will maintain sub 2moa accuracy past 15,000 rounds. |
|
Nice retort.
M4 tested with M855. Attached File Attached File And here is the requirements for the M27 with Mk318 SOST. Reliability
3.1 System Reliability. The system should demonstrate 15,000 Mean Rounds Between Essential Function Failure (MRBEFF) for Class III malfunctions (i.e., for non-operator correctable malfunctions which cause the loss of essential functionality) and 900 MRBEFF for Class I and II malfunctions combined. Class I malfunctions are operator clearable within 10 seconds, whereas Class II malfunctions require more than 10 seconds but less than 10 minutes (for 95 percent of all Class II malfunctions that occur) to clear but can be corrected by the operator with available equipment. 3.2 Barrel Life. The system barrel should have a service life of 24,000 rounds minimum with MK318 Government ammunition. 15,000 rounds before failure. 24,000 rounds barrel life. Compare that to the M4 according to SOCOM. 600 rounds between Stoppages. 3-6,000 rounds before failure 4-6,000 rounds barrel life. Of course that was prior to M855A1. The M4A1 with M855A1 is closer to 3,000 rounds on bolt and barrels now. |
|
If you don't believe that take it from PEO.
Granted they list the stoppage rate much higher now. Gun is still toast by 6,000 rounds with M855. M855A1 is much harder on the gun, which is why it's burning out around 3,000 rounds. Attached File |
|
Quoted:
Damn, have you been listening in on my phone calls? View Quote Im behind your direction a 100%. Its about time someone on high actually looked at whats available beyond what they say your only allowed to work with, see how that effects the squad on the enemy and played around squad structure developing new tactics/direction. These arent amazeballs billion dollar development technology boondogles like the Army puts out(and the USMC is guilty of it too). This is an off the shelf lets go fuck some shit up better mentality. Love it like some gourmet crayons. |
|
Quoted:
Is the HK 416 bolt subjected to HPT like the M4 bolts? View Quote However Norway's C8s don't use HPT bolts and Colt Canada doesn't do that and they still break bolts at 6,000 rounds with M855. Norway's 416 have bolt life's in excessof 10,000 rounds. I've spoken with Arctic1 and he says on average he saw 15,000+ rounds through their 416s with nothing breaking. Fact is the M16 was fine for 1940s-1950s tech, but it's a piece of crap that breaks Ricky tick compared to modern guns. Metallurgy has come a long way in 77-67 years, and the 416 takes advantage of that. |
|
|
Quoted:
Pretty much zero carbon enters the receiver on the 416 unless suppressed. If something gets in the rifle it's a quick 1 second wipe down and done. Barrel cleaning is the same between weapons. However internally unless you get something in it the M27 bolt and carrier can just be ignored. They stay spotless for thousands and thousands of rounds. Here's a comparison. 100 rounds on a M4/416. http://popgun.ru/files/g/2/thumbs/1457576.jpg http://popgun.ru/files/g/2/thumbs/1457578.jpg View Quote That's 100 rounds on that M4 bolt? Was there a stick of butter and a charcoal briquet jammed in the receiver during the shooting? Dude. Seriously, have you ever even fired any of these guns, even once? This is just like your expertise on suppressive fire. The M27 is a great gun, but you talk authoritatively about things you clearly don't know a fucking thing about. There are people on this board who argue against HK guns solely because HK's self-appointed spokesman (you) is retarded. |
|
|
Quoted:
Remember you said that, my friend. We are watching the US Army LSAT developments....... I like machine guns and true light support weapons, too! I like them a lot. That capability looks promising...or something like it. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
It's a special weekend duty assignment where a squad of marines operate Uber vehicles and transport drunk Marines from watering holes to their barracks at a cyclic rate. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
|
Quoted:
Your bolt life figures are still off. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
LOL. That's 100 rounds on that M4 bolt? Was there a stick of butter and a charcoal briquet jammed in the receiver during the shooting? Dude. Seriously, have you ever even fired any of these guns, even once? This is just like your expertise on suppressive fire. The M27 is a great gun, but you talk authoritatively about things you clearly don't know a fucking thing about. There are people on this board who argue against HK guns solely because HK's self-appointed spokesman (you) is retarded. View Quote The pro M4 crowd is just like the M14 crowd. It's the greatest gun in the world, except in testing, but the testing is always rigged in favor of others. Every argument for the M14 can be applied to the M4. |
|
Quoted:
Henderson Defense has some good threads with some info on bolt life. The run a rental range for Full Auto's in Vegas, the non HPT bolts have a very long service life, but even the HPT bolts last longer in their use than the 3-6k mentioned here. Mind you they are not firing M855 or M855A1; which I understand makes a difference. View Quote Especially SOCOM, whom state the M4 has a 3-6,000 round bolt life with M855. |
|
|
Quoted:
I'll also add this. Two Broken 416 bolts. Both fired 25,000 rounds from a 10.4" variant. The Mk18 gets 3,000 rounds on a good day before it snaps bolt lugs. So the 10" 416 literally gets 8.33 times the bolt life of the Mk18. http://www.hkpro.com/forum/attachments/hk416-hk417-hq/40971d1459002362-hk416-bolt-broke-25k-round-count-acceptable-lifespan-fb_20160326_22_16_45_saved_picture.jpg View Quote It's a problem, that's why they had LWRC enhanced bolts in their inventory, but for the most part they just conducted training until something actually broke. Before deployment you will need a new barrel/bolt and damaged bolts will get caught during inspections. |
|
Quoted:
I would say SOCOM and PEO know more about the M4 than Henderson could ever hope to. Especially SOCOM, whom state the M4 has a 3-6,000 round bolt life with M855. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Henderson Defense has some good threads with some info on bolt life. The run a rental range for Full Auto's in Vegas, the non HPT bolts have a very long service life, but even the HPT bolts last longer in their use than the 3-6k mentioned here. Mind you they are not firing M855 or M855A1; which I understand makes a difference. Especially SOCOM, whom state the M4 has a 3-6,000 round bolt life with M855. I want to see the US military adopt the best weapon systems they can at an affordable cost. If that is the IAR or something new, then so be it. If the costs of upgrading don't make a big enough benefit over the M4 then so be it. |
|
Quoted:
Nice retort. M4 tested with M855. https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/414147/Screenshot-20170622-141915-236552.JPG https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/414147/Screenshot-20170622-141921-236553.JPG And here is the requirements for the M27 with Mk318 SOST. 900 rounds between Stoppages. 15,000 rounds before failure. 24,000 rounds barrel life. Compare that to the M4 according to SOCOM. 600 rounds between Stoppages. 3-6,000 rounds before failure 4-6,000 rounds barrel life. Of course that was prior to M855A1. The M4A1 with M855A1 is closer to 3,000 rounds on bolt and barrels now. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
M4 tested with M855. https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/414147/Screenshot-20170622-141915-236552.JPG https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/414147/Screenshot-20170622-141921-236553.JPG And here is the requirements for the M27 with Mk318 SOST. Reliability
3.1 System Reliability. The system should demonstrate 15,000 Mean Rounds Between Essential Function Failure (MRBEFF) for Class III malfunctions (i.e., for non-operator correctable malfunctions which cause the loss of essential functionality) and 900 MRBEFF for Class I and II malfunctions combined. Class I malfunctions are operator clearable within 10 seconds, whereas Class II malfunctions require more than 10 seconds but less than 10 minutes (for 95 percent of all Class II malfunctions that occur) to clear but can be corrected by the operator with available equipment. 3.2 Barrel Life. The system barrel should have a service life of 24,000 rounds minimum with MK318 Government ammunition. 15,000 rounds before failure. 24,000 rounds barrel life. Compare that to the M4 according to SOCOM. 600 rounds between Stoppages. 3-6,000 rounds before failure 4-6,000 rounds barrel life. Of course that was prior to M855A1. The M4A1 with M855A1 is closer to 3,000 rounds on bolt and barrels now. |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.