User Panel
Quoted:
He didn't have support from his own party let alone the Democrats. The bill was pulled because it was a turd without any chance of passing...but it was just enough theater to damage Trump and his agenda moving forward, just as I suspect Ryan intended. BTW, Ryan runs the House, not the Senate, so the 60 votes thing doesn't apply here. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
His healthcare bill intended to screw Trump. I don't think Ryan wants the Republicans to be the majority party, and I don't think he wants Trump to win in 2020. He's a self-serving scumbag driven only by his own interests. Also, this kind of thing is a feature of our form of government-not a bug-and it's the only thing that saved us from draconian (or any!) gun control during much of Obama's terms. Many of you need to learn how our government works before braying. This bill, which a) would not have repealed Obamacare, b) would increase premiums, and c) would throw ten million off of medicare, was the most obvious example of political suicide I've ever seen. It was sabotage. BTW, Ryan runs the House, not the Senate, so the 60 votes thing doesn't apply here. |
|
Quoted:
The biggest mystery in my head right now is why none of you seem to see the blatantly obvious biting you on your noses. Obamacare was never meant to be the Democrat's solution, remember? It was engineered to fail so that it would destroy the health insurance market and they could replace it with a single payer system. Do you not remember any of this? The Ryan bill would have repealed Obamacare before that disaster struck. Now the disaster is imminent, and Trump isn't going to lift another finger to fix it until after it explodes. Why do you think that is going to be a good outcome for people who have health insurance? View Quote Don't you realize this because speaking of my nose it is as obvious as the BIG nose on my face!!?? |
|
Quoted:
I've always been firmly in line with the Freedom Caucus but I fear this was not a good move. Time will tell. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
His healthcare bill intended to screw Trump. I don't think Ryan wants the Republicans to be the majority party, and I don't think he wants Trump to win in 2020. He's a self-serving scumbag driven only by his own interests. Also, this kind of thing is a feature of our form of government-not a bug-and it's the only thing that saved us from draconian (or any!) gun control during much of Obama's terms. Many of you need to learn how our government works before braying. This bill, which a) would not have repealed Obamacare, b) would increase premiums, and c) would throw ten million off of medicare, was the most obvious example of political suicide I've ever seen. It was sabotage. BTW, Ryan runs the House, not the Senate, so the 60 votes thing doesn't apply here. |
|
Quoted:
Of course I remember all this and if worthless Ryan had any fucking balls, along with Mitchie, this could all be fucking over on its way to being SUBSTANTIALLY over. Don't you realize this because speaking of my nose it is as obvious as the BIG nose on my face!!?? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
The biggest mystery in my head right now is why none of you seem to see the blatantly obvious biting you on your noses. Obamacare was never meant to be the Democrat's solution, remember? It was engineered to fail so that it would destroy the health insurance market and they could replace it with a single payer system. Do you not remember any of this? The Ryan bill would have repealed Obamacare before that disaster struck. Now the disaster is imminent, and Trump isn't going to lift another finger to fix it until after it explodes. Why do you think that is going to be a good outcome for people who have health insurance? Don't you realize this because speaking of my nose it is as obvious as the BIG nose on my face!!?? |
|
Despite the massive win in November, the Republican party remains divided.
Between the religious right, hardcore small government republicans, moderates, the country club republicans, and the good old fashioned RINO's, it is hard to get anyone to agree on anything in the party. Any speaker is going to be put in the impossible position of trying to bring these groups together to agree on anything. All I want from the republicans is to confirm Trump's conservative justices. Beyond that, I don't care if they sit around and do nothing for the next 4 years. Hell, that probably would be preferred. T his means the speaker is irrelevant to me, since the house doesn't do jack for the supreme court. |
|
The worst I can remember was House Speaker Jim Wright ('87-'89). The guy was a crook, finally got caught, and had to resign.
|
|
Quoted:
It shouldn't be assumed that those two want the same things as we do, or Trump does, or the electorate voted for. I don't see a lack of courage, I see a lack of interest, or perhaps a lack of conviction. View Quote That is why I am PISSED............he needs to grow a set of balls and do what the VOTERS WANT!!! |
|
Quoted:
Despite the massive win in November, the Republican party remains divided. Between the religious right, hardcore small government republicans, moderates, the country club republicans, and the good old fashioned RINO's, it is hard to get anyone to agree on anything in the party. Any speaker is going to be put in the impossible position of trying to bring these groups together to agree on anything. All I want from the republicans is to confirm Trump's conservative justices. Beyond that, I don't care if they sit around and do nothing for the next 4 years. Hell, that probably would be preferred. T his means the speaker is irrelevant to me, since the house doesn't do jack for the supreme court. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Well NO SHIT!!?? That is why I am PISSED. View Quote I read a piece which suggested that if people didn't buy insurance then their "tax credit" should be paid to an insurance company. If the person got sick or was injured the money paid to the insurer would be applied to the insurance premium. Presumably if they didn't decide to get insurance the insurer would pocket the money. That's a plan that important, powerful interests could get behind! Campaign contributions would flow. Politicians would see the The program would become the law of the land. Fortunes would be made. Other fortunes would be saved. Congress would have fulfilled its true purpose and its solemn duty. |
|
Welp I can see who the next target of the Bannon/Breitbart rage machine is...
|
|
Quoted:
Well NO SHIT!!?? That is why I am PISSED............he needs to grow a set of balls and do what the VOTERS WANT!!! View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
It shouldn't be assumed that those two want the same things as we do, or Trump does, or the electorate voted for. I don't see a lack of courage, I see a lack of interest, or perhaps a lack of conviction. That is why I am PISSED............he needs to grow a set of balls and do what the VOTERS WANT!!! |
|
|
|
Quoted:
I think there's a chance they'll get something done. I read a piece which suggested that if people didn't buy insurance then their "tax credit" should be paid to an insurance company. If the person got sick or was injured the money paid to the insurer would be applied to the insurance premium. Presumably if they didn't decide to get insurance the insurer would pocket the money. That's a plan that important, powerful interests could get behind! Campaign contributions would flow. Politicians would see the The program would become the law of the land. Fortunes would be made. Other fortunes would be saved. Congress would have fulfilled its true purpose and its solemn duty. View Quote |
|
There's alleged video of Ryan sucking Boner off! At this point I believe it!
|
|
Quoted:
Well NO SHIT!!?? That is why I am PISSED............he needs to grow a set of balls and do what the VOTERS WANT!!! View Quote Half the voters (Dems and fat chunk of indies) like it. Let's ignore those. Among the other half, 1/3 want no government in healthcare at all, 1/3 want private insurance plus a government safety net (i.e., Medicare/Medicaide, aka, pre-Obamacare), and another 1/3 aren't sure what they want, as long as it isn't Obamacare. That's what Ryan was (and still is) faced with. No matter what he did, he was going to get no more than 2/3 of that 50%. In other words, 33% House support for anything. We were all snowed into thinking that the GOP was united in dumping Obamacare, because of the number of bills they passed knowing that they would never make it past the Senate, much less the President. Now, with the Senate and the White House in GOP hands, their votes have consequences. So, you can argue that Ryan sucks because he isn't a far-right nationalist, but you can't argue he sucks because he can't get moderates and conservatives to drop their "we want all or nothing" approach. I expect the failures of tax reform and infrastructure spending will prove that the GOP is too fractured to govern, independents are going to remember that at least the Democrats could pass shit, the House flips in 2018 and the Senate and WH (as long as the Dems don't step on their dicks in the primaries) are back in Dem hands in 2020. By that point, Obamacare will have succeeded in torpedoing much of the private health insurance market, and we will get single payer, funded by cutting the DOD budget down to the NATO standard of % of GDP. |
|
|
Quoted:
I think there's a chance they'll get something done. I read a piece which suggested that if people didn't buy insurance then their "tax credit" should be paid to an insurance company. If the person got sick or was injured the money paid to the insurer would be applied to the insurance premium. Presumably if they didn't decide to get insurance the insurer would pocket the money. That's a plan that important, powerful interests could get behind! Campaign contributions would flow. Politicians would see the The program would become the law of the land. Fortunes would be made. Other fortunes would be saved. Congress would have fulfilled its true purpose and its solemn duty. View Quote |
|
|
Quoted:
And what exactly is that with regards to Obamacare? Half the voters (Dems and fat chunk of indies) like it. Let's ignore those. Among the other half, 1/3 want no government in healthcare at all, 1/3 want private insurance plus a government safety net (i.e., Medicare/Medicaide, aka, pre-Obamacare), and another 1/3 aren't sure what they want, as long as it isn't Obamacare. That's what Ryan was (and still is) faced with. No matter what he did, he was going to get no more than 2/3 of that 50%. In other words, 33% House support for anything. We were all snowed into thinking that the GOP was united in dumping Obamacare, because of the number of bills they passed knowing that they would never make it past the Senate, much less the President. Now, with the Senate and the White House in GOP hands, their votes have consequences. So, you can argue that Ryan sucks because he isn't a far-right nationalist, but you can't argue he sucks because he can't get moderates and conservatives to drop their "we want all or nothing" approach. I expect the failures of tax reform and infrastructure spending will prove that the GOP is too fractured to govern, independents are going to remember that at least the Democrats could pass shit, the House flips in 2018 and the Senate and WH (as long as the Dems don't step on their dicks in the primaries) are back in Dem hands in 2020. By that point, Obamacare will have succeeded in torpedoing much of the private health insurance market, and we will get single payer, funded by cutting the DOD budget down to the NATO standard of % of GDP. View Quote He could have AT LEAST done that!!! Get this fucking thing going........................don't come up with a plan that cannot even pass the majority of the GOP held House for god's sake. |
|
"The worst?"
I'd nominate John Boehner long before nominating Ryan. You'd really prefer that Ryan stepped down and Boehner came back? |
|
Quoted:
How does that accomplish anything different than single payer would? The US tax payers foot the bill for the pool, the main difference being it is filtered through the government and then insurance companies. View Quote Relieving large employers of most of the obligation to pay for the cost of their employees' and their employees' families' medical treatment by "sharing the burden" with the entire society is the point of the exercise. Sometimes that is described as "leveling the playing field" so those employers compete effectively in the global market with companies located in countries which already have government paid medical treatment. Everyone supports a level playing field, right? |
|
|
Quoted:
I've always been firmly in line with the Freedom Caucus but I fear this was not a good move. Time will tell. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Of course I remember all this and if worthless Ryan had any fucking balls, along with Mitchie, this could all be fucking over or on its way to being SUBSTANTIALLY over. Don't you realize this because speaking of my nose it is as obvious as the BIG nose on my face!!?? View Quote Did they do a bad job of assembling and selling the plan? It did seem like they didn't have a plan out there for a very long time, and then when they released the plan they tried to rush it through. My concern is now about the other issues; tax cuts, budget, The Wall, infrastructure, etc. Is the Freedom Caucus going to dig in their heels on everything (Border Adjustment Tax? NO WAY! KILL THE BILL! GIVE US EVERYTHING OR GIVE US NOTHING!!!) or is Ryan going to be able to get some compromises in order to move MAGA forward? |
|
|
Quoted:
You make an interesting point. Did this bill fail because Ryan didn't exercise sufficient leadership to get the Freedom Caucus on board, or did the cats just refuse to be herded? Did they do a bad job of assembling and selling the plan? It did seem like they didn't have a plan out there for a very long time, and then when they released the plan they tried to rush it through. My concern is now about the other issues; tax cuts, budget, The Wall, infrastructure, etc. Is the Freedom Caucus going to dig in their heels on everything (Border Adjustment Tax? NO WAY! KILL THE BILL! GIVE US EVERYTHING OR GIVE US NOTHING!!!) or is Ryan going to be able to get some compromises in order to move MAGA forward? View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Are you really blaming the Freedom Caucus for the President's inability to lead? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
You make an interesting point. Did this bill fail because Ryan didn't exercise sufficient leadership to get the Freedom Caucus on board, or did the cats just refuse to be herded? Did they do a bad job of assembling and selling the plan? It did seem like they didn't have a plan out there for a very long time, and then when they released the plan they tried to rush it through. My concern is now about the other issues; tax cuts, budget, The Wall, infrastructure, etc. Is the Freedom Caucus going to dig in their heels on everything (Border Adjustment Tax? NO WAY! KILL THE BILL! GIVE US EVERYTHING OR GIVE US NOTHING!!!) or is Ryan going to be able to get some compromises in order to move MAGA forward? |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.