User Panel
More fakenews I'm sure. |
|
Did the FBI have evidence of a breach larger than Snowden? A lawsuit says yes
A former U.S. intelligence contractor tells Circa he walked away with more than 600 million classified documents on 47 hard drives from the National Security Agency and the CIA, a haul potentially larger than Edward Snowden's now infamous breach. And now he is suing former FBI Director James Comey and other government figures, alleging the bureau has covered up evidence he provided them showing widespread spying on Americans that violated civil liberties. The suit, filed late Monday night by Dennis Montgomery, was assigned to the same federal judge who has already ruled that some of the NSA's collection of data on Americans violates the U.S. Constitution’s Fourth Amendment, setting up an intriguing legal proceeding in the nation’s capital this summer. Montgomery says the evidence he gave to the FBI chronicle the warrantless collection of phone, financial and personal data and the unmasking of identities in spy data about millions of Americans,. “This domestic surveillance was all being done on computers supplied by the FBI," Montgomery told Circa in an interview. "So these supercomputers, which are FBI computers, the CIA is using them to do domestic surveillance." Documents obtained by Circa outside of the lawsuit show that the U.S. attorney’s office in Washington in 2015 approved a grant of limited immunity for Montgomery so he could explain how he managed to walk out of his contract and the buildings he worked in with the classified material. Montgomery alleges that more than 20 million American identities were illegally unmasked - credit reports, emails, phone conversations and Internet traffic, were some of the items the NSA and CIA collected. He said he returned the hard drives to the FBI, a fact confirmed in government documents reviewed by Circa. More at link http://circa.com/politics/accountability/james-comey-sued-by-intelligence-contractor-dennis-montgomery-over-spying-on-americans |
|
Quoted:
Did the FBI have evidence of a breach larger than Snowden? A lawsuit says yes A former U.S. intelligence contractor tells Circa he walked away with more than 600 million classified documents on 47 hard drives from the National Security Agency and the CIA, a haul potentially larger than Edward Snowden's now infamous breach. And now he is suing former FBI Director James Comey and other government figures, alleging the bureau has covered up evidence he provided them showing widespread spying on Americans that violated civil liberties. The suit, filed late Monday night by Dennis Montgomery, was assigned to the same federal judge who has already ruled that some of the NSA's collection of data on Americans violates the U.S. Constitution’s Fourth Amendment, setting up an intriguing legal proceeding in the nation’s capital this summer. Montgomery says the evidence he gave to the FBI chronicle the warrantless collection of phone, financial and personal data and the unmasking of identities in spy data about millions of Americans,. “This domestic surveillance was all being done on computers supplied by the FBI," Montgomery told Circa in an interview. "So these supercomputers, which are FBI computers, the CIA is using them to do domestic surveillance." Documents obtained by Circa outside of the lawsuit show that the U.S. attorney’s office in Washington in 2015 approved a grant of limited immunity for Montgomery so he could explain how he managed to walk out of his contract and the buildings he worked in with the classified material. Montgomery alleges that more than 20 million American identities were illegally unmasked - credit reports, emails, phone conversations and Internet traffic, were some of the items the NSA and CIA collected. He said he returned the hard drives to the FBI, a fact confirmed in government documents reviewed by Circa. More at link http://circa.com/politics/accountability/james-comey-sued-by-intelligence-contractor-dennis-montgomery-over-spying-on-americans View Quote Attached File Attached File |
|
Quoted:
Yep, and look...real evidence....... https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/404934/image-224981.JPG https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/404934/image-224982.JPG View Quote Amazing. We been dropping bombs in this thread for two hundred pages now. Good times. |
|
Quoted:
Wowee. Just look at that! Amazing. We been dropping bombs in this thread for two hundred pages now. Good times. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Yep, and look...real evidence....... https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/404934/image-224981.JPG https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/404934/image-224982.JPG Amazing. We been dropping bombs in this thread for two hundred pages now. Good times. Montgomery is a fucking loon and conman. Feel free to hitch your wagon to this idiot. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dennis_L._Montgomery His own lawyer called him a "habitual liar and fraud". Montgomery used the same bullshit story about "data" from NSA to try and show that the government was spying on Sheriff Arpaio back in 2015: In April 2015, Arpaio confirmed the confidential informant relationship in testimony before Judge Snow. At Arpaio's request, two National Security Agency computer specialists examined Montgomery's material and concluded, contrary to Montgomery's representations, that it did not contain data from the CIA.Arpaio later characterized the result of Montgomery's investigation as "junk". |
|
Quoted:
Dropping bombs? More like this: https://media.giphy.com/media/11jucxrYlHScko/giphy.gif Montgomery is a fucking loon and conman. Feel free to hitch your wagon to this idiot. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dennis_L._Montgomery His own lawyer called him a "habitual liar and fraud". Montgomery used the same bullshit story about "data" from NSA to try and show that the government was spying on Sheriff Arpaio back in 2015: If this is a "bomb" - please feel free to keep them coming. They're doing your side a solid. View Quote Interesting... Which SIDE are you on???? |
|
Quoted:
"If this is a "bomb" - please feel free to keep them coming. They're doing your side a solid." Interesting... Which SIDE are you on???? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Dropping bombs? More like this: https://media.giphy.com/media/11jucxrYlHScko/giphy.gif Montgomery is a fucking loon and conman. Feel free to hitch your wagon to this idiot. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dennis_L._Montgomery His own lawyer called him a "habitual liar and fraud". Montgomery used the same bullshit story about "data" from NSA to try and show that the government was spying on Sheriff Arpaio back in 2015: If this is a "bomb" - please feel free to keep them coming. They're doing your side a solid. Interesting... Which SIDE are you on???? #pizzagate |
|
hey, can one of you VA guys search those 20 million names and see what the .gov has on dex357?
I might need to get my story straight for my interview |
|
|
Quoted:
So do you go by join date or post count when deciding who brings the napkins for a mutual masturbation session? View Quote |
|
|
Quoted:
Hey, he got you to admit you're a lefty. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
They're doing your side a solid. Every reference to "sides" can only refer to the right-left political dichotomy. There was literally no chance I totally refering to the various sides of the debate (s) in this thread. |
|
|
|
Hasn't been too much screeching in this thread lately.
Is the Comey thread the new |
|
|
|
Quoted:
That would change Trump being full of shit how? View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Comey didn't want to investigate the unmasking, probably because he was involved in it. Wray will investigate it. You know, it's funny how y'all have invested so much effort in obstructing Trump from putting his people in charge of the DOJ, and then you act shocked that the DOJ has not yet investigated Trump's claims. Y'all ain't foolin no one. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
That would change Trump being full of shit how? Also, you're saying the FBI is the only entity that could investigate improper IC procedures or actions? Ignoring the fact that Trump tweeted like he already had "information" - why couldn't he get DOJ OIG to look into this? (Not run by Comey). Or the HPSCI? (Not run by Comey). Or the SSCI (Not run by Comey). Or ask for a Select Committee (Not run by Comey). Or DOD OIG to look at the DOD IC components (Not run by Comey). Or maybe just ask his NSA Director (Not Comey). Any one of those entities could have found evidence to support some "illegal" wiretap on Trump and/or Trump tower. No it was Comey blocking all of this, I'm sure... |
|
Quoted:
Trump's tweet(s) that were the basis of this thread dealt with "unmasking" how, exactly? Also, you're saying the FBI is the only entity that could investigate improper IC procedures or actions? Ignoring the fact that Trump tweeted like he already had "information" - why couldn't he get DOJ OIG to look into this? (Not run by Comey). Or the HPSCI? (Not run by Comey). Or the SSCI (Not run by Comey). Or ask for a Select Committee (Not run by Comey). Or DOD OIG to look at the DOD IC components (Not run by Comey). Or maybe just ask his NSA Director (Not Comey). Any one of those entities could have found evidence to support some "illegal" wiretap on Trump and/or Trump tower. No it was Comey blocking all of this, I'm sure... View Quote |
|
|
Quoted:
We're talking about criminal violations by U.S. citizens under color of law. That's an FBI investigation. Besides, what does a zamboni driver know about all this anyways? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Trump's tweet(s) that were the basis of this thread dealt with "unmasking" how, exactly? Also, you're saying the FBI is the only entity that could investigate improper IC procedures or actions? Ignoring the fact that Trump tweeted like he already had "information" - why couldn't he get DOJ OIG to look into this? (Not run by Comey). Or the HPSCI? (Not run by Comey). Or the SSCI (Not run by Comey). Or ask for a Select Committee (Not run by Comey). Or DOD OIG to look at the DOD IC components (Not run by Comey). Or maybe just ask his NSA Director (Not Comey). Any one of those entities could have found evidence to support some "illegal" wiretap on Trump and/or Trump tower. No it was Comey blocking all of this, I'm sure... He has chosen not to, for some odd reason. |
|
|
Quoted:
Sure the FBI has a role to play in criminal prosecutions (if there are any). If Comey was the issue (which is silly - but I'll entertain your nonsense) - then there are tons of other outlets Trump could have used to investigate / expose the corruption. You wouldn't support a new version of the Church Committee to get to the bottom of this? Then why hasn't Trump? He has chosen not to, for some odd reason. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Wray will do an excellent job with the investigation, he is very well qualified, and criminal investigations are handled by the FBI. They have the expertise to collect the evidence to put the swamp creatures in jail. This isn't about vindicating some tweet. This is about putting the swamp creatures in jail. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Sure the FBI has a role to play in criminal prosecutions (if there are any). If Comey was the issue (which is silly - but I'll entertain your nonsense) - then there are tons of other outlets Trump could have used to investigate / expose the corruption. You wouldn't support a new version of the Church Committee to get to the bottom of this? Then why hasn't Trump? He has chosen not to, for some odd reason. |
|
Quoted:
Wray will do an excellent job with the investigation, he is very well qualified, and criminal investigations are handled by the FBI. They have the expertise to collect the evidence to put the swamp creatures in jail. This isn't about vindicating some tweet. This is about putting the swamp creatures in jail. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Sure the FBI has a role to play in criminal prosecutions (if there are any). If Comey was the issue (which is silly - but I'll entertain your nonsense) - then there are tons of other outlets Trump could have used to investigate / expose the corruption. You wouldn't support a new version of the Church Committee to get to the bottom of this? Then why hasn't Trump? He has chosen not to, for some odd reason. You make a good point about Wray. Remember this when it's his turn in the barrel because he displeases the Trump bots for doing his job. ETA: Beat by Dmnoid. As usual. |
|
Quoted:
The red is what this thread is about, however. You make a good point about Wray. Remember this when it's his turn in the barrel because he displeases the Trump bots for doing his job. ETA: Beat by Dmnoid. As usual. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Trump doesn't operate on GD's timetable. He had to fire Comey to get rid of the obstructions to his investigation. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Trump doesn't operate on GD's timetable. He had to fire Comey to get rid of the obstructions to his investigation. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
The red is what this thread is about, however. You make a good point about Wray. Remember this when it's his turn in the barrel because he displeases the Trump bots for doing his job. ETA: Beat by Dmnoid. As usual. |
|
Quoted:
The red is what this thread is about, however. View Quote Who are you?, the GD police? This thread, like everyone other thread in the history of GD is about whatever the hell people decide to make it about. Familiar with the phrase, "This didn't go the way you intended, OP, did it?" yeah, this thread is now about libtarded NEVERTRUMPERS and their tireless screeching. It's also about some guy that posts from his mom's basement and the number of cats he owns. REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE |
|
Quoted:
L.......O.........L............. Who are you?, the GD police? This thread, like everyone other thread in the history of GD is about whatever the hell people decide to make it about. Familiar with the phrase, "This didn't go the way you intended, OP, did it?" yeah, this thread is now about libtarded NEVERTRUMPERS and their tireless screeching. It's also about some guy that posts from his mom's basement and the number of cats he owns. REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE View Quote |
|
Quoted:
I just posted a myriad of ways that a competent executive could have investigated (or exposed) what Trump claimed. Trump has taken none of these actions, and has publicly stated that his reason for firing Comey was because of the "Russia thing" and was unrelated to this "wiretapping" nonsense. View Quote |
|
|
Quoted:
What did Donald tell you was the desired outcome? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
Quoted:
The point that you glossed over is that the FBI is not the only tool he has at his disposal to effect the desired outcome and that use of one or more of the others does not preclude the use of the FBI. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Actually it is the only option if you want to bring criminal charges against the leakers/unmaskers. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
The point that you glossed over is that the FBI is not the only tool he has at his disposal to effect the desired outcome and that use of one or more of the others does not preclude the use of the FBI. |
|
|
Quoted:
You are ignoring that Trump's route is logical and consistent. There is no reason to do it any other way. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
|
Quoted:
His route most closely resembles a Family Circus comic. He has multiple avenues at his disposal to get after the truth. Instead, he punted to Congress and (to be determined) the FBI. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
You are ignoring that there are other options which do not preclude FBI involvement. |
|
|
|
Quoted:
He's draining the swamp. He's replacing Comey with Wray. Now we just need to get rid of McCabe as well and the FBI should be good to go. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
Quoted:
Hasn't been too much screeching in this thread lately. Is the Comey thread the new View Quote POLTERGEIST II: THE OTHER SIDE 1986 MOVIE TELEVISION TRAILER VERSION 1 "THEY'RE BA-ACK!" |
|
Quoted:
That eyedropper's going to be the ticket right up to the point it starts raining again. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Is that why he put the swamp in charge of the draining process? Special investigators/counsels for all of the things. |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.