User Panel
[#1]
Been following this thread from day one.
I live at the confluence of the Ohio and Mississippi, after looking at all the inflow/outflow numbers I did some checking of the Mississippi. Just south of me at Memphis......Holy Shit ZOMGWTFBBQ its been flowing about 1.4 Million cfs for the last week! |
|
[#2]
Quoted:
Thanks Like I said everything has just become jumbled together in my mind about this damn dam lol I thought it was but couldn't remember where I thought I saw something View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I've been following since day one so forgive me as all the pics and pages seem to just blend together in my mind. Has it been posted here or released what they are planning on doing exactly for the rebuild? Like a chart or list of what they are doing where? Thanks One of the best threads on here imho Like I said everything has just become jumbled together in my mind about this damn dam lol I thought it was but couldn't remember where I thought I saw something Talk of filling in the canyon with concrete and putting a new front on is the same, but the details of filling with what, and when are left out. |
|
[#3]
I was reading a magazine at the barber shop the other day. It had an aerial photo of the dam. Was that yours?
|
|
[#4]
Anybody have any idea what they're doing with the big crane visible in the new spillway webcam?
|
|
[#5]
|
|
[#6]
Quoted:
I was reading a magazine at the barber shop the other day. It had an aerial photo of the dam. Was that yours? View Quote |
|
[#7]
|
|
[#8]
another flyover video from Juan
Oroville 15 May Update -Recovery |
|
[#10]
|
|
[#11]
Is that pad on the bottom right of the spillway where the concrete plant goes?
|
|
[#13]
Good, they have a lot of work to do.
It will be interesting to watch. |
|
[#14]
Quoted:
gates to close for the season tomorrow at 9am https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DAHX-sjVwAAYzWd.jpg View Quote |
|
[#15]
I suppose they will be using the power house to maintain outflow.
Is 8000 CFS, IIRC. I've also been thinking about all the snow in the mountains... Hope they have it calculated... |
|
[#16]
Quoted:
Quoted:
gates to close for the season tomorrow at 9am https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DAHX-sjVwAAYzWd.jpg Whatever is left they are saying can be handled by the power plant outlets and the repaired river valve outlet. |
|
[#18]
View Quote Those look like new 773's. Let alone the rest of the iron there.. |
|
[#19]
Oroville Dam Damage a 10 on scale of 10 says Expert Sounds like planned 'repairs' are a band aid. |
|
[#20]
View Quote |
|
[#21]
Quoted:
I can see how it might take 2 seasons now, but 3 full years? With no enviro regs causing delays, what could make it take that long? Though the ongoing lack of a batch plant tells me quite a bit straight off. |
|
[#22]
|
|
[#23]
Quoted:
Batch plant is being assembled at the boat ramp parking lot. http://i.imgur.com/7QlTyYN.jpg http://i.imgur.com/xxQedKQ.jpg and lots of drilling going on all over. http://i.imgur.com/X519QMt.jpg View Quote |
|
[#24]
Looks like they're building access ramps onto the lower part of the spillway. Although why they're shoving dirt into it the hole, there in the middle on the left side, doesn't make a lot of sense.
Spillway webcam |
|
[#25]
Quoted:
The professor seemed a bit biased toward "decomissioning" in the interview, but he was right about DWR having no concept of "safe" or "risk". Reporter was wrong in that it took 3 years to build just the spillway originally. I can see how it might take 2 seasons now, but 3 full years? With no enviro regs causing delays, what could make it take that long? Though the ongoing lack of a batch plant tells me quite a bit straight off. View Quote These things are bigger than you are thinking. |
|
[#26]
Quoted:
Looks like they're building access ramps onto the lower part of the spillway. Although why they're shoving dirt into it the hole, there in the middle on the left side, doesn't make a lot of sense. Spillway webcam View Quote |
|
[#27]
I have been wondering about decommission this dam. Without full use of both of the original river diversion tunnels, could they drain the reservoir quickly enough with water flow through the current penstock tunnels into the power plant and river diversion valve before the next rain season?
|
|
[#28]
Quoted:
I have been wondering about decommission this dam. Without full use of both of the original river diversion tunnels, could they drain the reservoir quickly enough with water flow through the current penstock tunnels into the power plant and river diversion valve before the next rain season? View Quote Without repairs they could not drain the lake sufficiently. But it's not a good idea to remove the Dam even if they could. The record flows that caused this mess are precisely why the Dam is there. It's to prevent those flow levels from getting down stream and flooding everyone down there. If they had maintained the spillway such that it didn't get a hole in it... then they wouldn't have had to shut it down while they checked it out... and could have been using it to flow out reasonable amounts of water that down stream could handle and it would absorb the flood flows like it was designed to. But because they had to shut it down water built up higher than it should have... add to that the concern about running the spillway at higher flow rates due to increased erosion and the situation got out of hand. Point is... the Dam is a good thing... They just have to run it correctly as flood control and maintain it properly. |
|
[#29]
Quoted:
no. Without repairs they could not drain the lake sufficiently. But it's not a good idea to remove the Dam even if they could. The record flows that caused this mess are precisely why the Dam is there. It's to prevent those flow levels from getting down stream and flooding everyone down there. If they had maintained the spillway such that it didn't get a hole in it... then they wouldn't have had to shut it down while they checked it out... and could have been using it to flow out reasonable amounts of water that down stream could handle and it would absorb the flood flows like it was designed to. But because they had to shut it down water built up higher than it should have... add to that the concern about running the spillway at higher flow rates due to increased erosion and the situation got out of hand. Point is... the Dam is a good thing... They just have to run it correctly as flood control and maintain it properly. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
I have been wondering about decommission this dam. Without full use of both of the original river diversion tunnels, could they drain the reservoir quickly enough with water flow through the current penstock tunnels into the power plant and river diversion valve before the next rain season? Without repairs they could not drain the lake sufficiently. But it's not a good idea to remove the Dam even if they could. The record flows that caused this mess are precisely why the Dam is there. It's to prevent those flow levels from getting down stream and flooding everyone down there. If they had maintained the spillway such that it didn't get a hole in it... then they wouldn't have had to shut it down while they checked it out... and could have been using it to flow out reasonable amounts of water that down stream could handle and it would absorb the flood flows like it was designed to. But because they had to shut it down water built up higher than it should have... add to that the concern about running the spillway at higher flow rates due to increased erosion and the situation got out of hand. Point is... the Dam is a good thing... They just have to run it correctly as flood control and maintain it properly. |
|
[#31]
|
|
[#32]
Quoted:
I get all of that. But everything has a lifespan, right? That guy in video above is talking about how the head gate structure is cracking. Replacing that might mean having to keep the reservoir at significantly lower level and relying on the power plant and river valve to maintain it there. I am just curious that if the dam became somehow compromised that it needed to be basically shut down for major repair or replacement, could it? Even with the energy dispersion ring properly replaced to allow safe use of the river valve, could they flow enough water out of the reservoir to empty it? How many cfs would that flow? View Quote They would need a way to get about 200,000 cfs out of the lake to safely shut everything down for major repairs. I don't believe they can do that with the power plant + river valve... and would need to add some other method of getting water out of the lake. |
|
[#33]
Oroville Spillways May 21, 2017 "The Bridge" |
|
[#34]
|
|
[#35]
View Quote |
|
[#36]
Quoted:
I have been wondering about decommission this dam. Without full use of both of the original river diversion tunnels, could they drain the reservoir quickly enough with water flow through the current penstock tunnels into the power plant and river diversion valve before the next rain season? View Quote |
|
[#38]
View Quote |
|
[#39]
|
|
[#40]
What happened to all the Whailing Wendies who thought the world in CA was coming to an end...
And bitched about everything the Engineers were doing to fix this issue... |
|
[#41]
View Quote |
|
[#42]
|
|
[#43]
|
|
[#44]
Quoted:
What happened to all the Whailing Wendies who thought the world in CA was coming to an end... And bitched about everything the Engineers were doing to fix this issue... View Quote |
|
[#45]
Per California Department of Water Resources beginning as soon as Wednesday, May 24th, there will be aggressive
blasting operations at the Oroville Spillway, possibly on a daily basis.Exact times are not known, but do not be surprised if you hear explosions. As part of the recovery process, FERC is requiring that DWR install a siren at the construction site during the term of the construction. The purpose of the siren is to notify construction workers if they need to evacuate the construction site (i.e., for blasting), as well as notifying people adjacent to the site (i.e., hikers, fishermen, neighbors etc.) that they need to be aware something will be happening at the construction site. The siren is not for community evacuation purposes. View Quote |
|
[#46]
|
|
[#47]
Someone please enlighten me. Is the 'river valve' the same as the diversion tunnels or part of them?
TY |
|
[#48]
if they're blasting a bunch today... you'll want to have this stream open
http://www.parks.ca.gov/live/lakeorovillesra_spillway |
|
[#49]
Quoted:
if they're blasting a bunch today... you'll want to have this stream open http://www.parks.ca.gov/live/lakeorovillesra_spillway View Quote |
|
[#50]
Quoted:
if they're blasting a bunch today... you'll want to have this stream open http://www.parks.ca.gov/live/lakeorovillesra_spillway View Quote |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.