Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Arrow Left Previous Page
Page / 68
Posted: 10/19/2016 7:24:45 AM EDT
Time: 9pm ET (8pm CT, 7pm MT, 6pm AZ, 6pm PT)
Moderator: Chris Wallace, Anchor, Fox News Sunday
Location: University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV
TV: ABC, NBC, Fox, CBS, MSNBC, Fox News, Fox Business, CNN, Univision, Telemundo, or C-SPAN.

Streaming links
http://www.cbsnews.com/live/?ftag=CNMdaef904

http://youtu.be/ANT_ZBhpvtw


Link Posted: 10/19/2016 7:38:58 AM EDT
[#1]
In on one. Let's get it on. Might be one of the last sustained periods of time that Hillary Clinton is called out without immediate repercussions.
Link Posted: 10/19/2016 7:42:54 AM EDT
[#2]
In on one! Wonder if they will shake hands first.
Link Posted: 10/19/2016 7:47:31 AM EDT
[#3]
in.gif
Link Posted: 10/19/2016 7:55:45 AM EDT
[#4]
Link Posted: 10/19/2016 7:57:14 AM EDT
[#5]
IN on this bitch
Link Posted: 10/19/2016 7:59:42 AM EDT
[#6]
Dems will drop some shit in the next few hours...video, accusations, something.

They need the narrative off H and a salacious story is their only hope.

Wait for it...

Link Posted: 10/19/2016 8:33:30 AM EDT
[#7]
Reckon I'd better pick up a fresh bottle of single malt today so I can watch the debate properly.
Link Posted: 10/19/2016 9:38:59 AM EDT
[#8]
I hope Trump does as good as the last one, and Wallace is as biased against Hiliary as the other two debates were against Trump.
Link Posted: 10/19/2016 10:34:50 AM EDT
[#9]
Link Posted: 10/19/2016 10:36:25 AM EDT
[#10]
May Trump be even more aggressive than the last debate.
Link Posted: 10/19/2016 11:23:41 AM EDT
[#11]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
May Trump be even more aggressive than the last debate.
View Quote

Internet/social media successes aside, I would guess that the majority of voters who watch this live still do so on their TV, tuned to one of the MSM networks.  It's Trump's last chance to address this large an audience all at once - online viewers still count - before the election, and he knows it. Barring unforeseen events (which could change the direction of the election overnight), it's his last opportunity to drive the stake home; to convince America that preventing economic ruin and reining in a government careening out of control is more important than all the soap opera crap being used by the left to manufacture a crisis.

I think tonight we see Trump at his best, though his path is not without danger.  He'll necessarily be working the edges of some very nasty business, and his temper and straightforwardness will have to be wielded like a fine blade, not swung like a cudgel... though a taste of brass knuckles and blackjacks might come in handy.

What I wouldn't give to be a fly on the wall at Trump Campaign Headquarters today...

___

ETA
I just typed all that to get that damn Wigglin' Hillary to scroll off the top of my browser page.  

Needed a couple more lines.  
Link Posted: 10/19/2016 11:27:21 AM EDT
[#12]
Is this the pre-pre-pre-pregame show?
Link Posted: 10/19/2016 11:27:24 AM EDT
[#13]
Get Some!!!
Link Posted: 10/19/2016 11:28:13 AM EDT
[#14]
I always wonder, this close to an election how are people still "undecided"?

Anyone know what percentage of people are typically swayed by the last debate? It has to be very small, but then again I'm continually impressed with the stupidity of the average voter.
Link Posted: 10/19/2016 11:29:57 AM EDT
[#15]
Trump surprised a lot of people with the last debate.  He needs an equal or better performance this debate.





Link Posted: 10/19/2016 11:32:00 AM EDT
[#16]
I will not be watching it.

I have a self imposed media blackout. It's not worth it. You can forecast everything, there is no "news" left this election cycle. There isn't going to be a single voter swayed, a single thing isn't going to be changed and with Chris Wallace thinking that HE ALONE is the Beltway, I would rather watch paint dry.

It's actually an embarrassment, IMHO.

Far better things to do with my time then sit infront of a TV and give the shitshow my attention and the ratings.

Link Posted: 10/19/2016 11:34:43 AM EDT
[#17]
eh, in on 1.  who knows what happens
Link Posted: 10/19/2016 11:37:36 AM EDT
[#18]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
I hope Trump does as good as the last one, and Wallace is as biased against Hiliary as the other two debates were against Trump.
View Quote


Wallace is a Democrat, he will likely be just as biased as the previous moderators if not more biased to prove Fox isn't a conservative network.
Link Posted: 10/19/2016 11:40:13 AM EDT
[#19]

Does it really matter?

Link Posted: 10/19/2016 11:40:52 AM EDT
[#20]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
In on one! Wonder if they will shake hands first.
View Quote


Clinton camp has already requested format change so Bill and Melania do not cross paths

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/10/19/report-melania-bill-wont-have-to-shake-hands-at-debate-after-clinton-request.html
Link Posted: 10/19/2016 11:40:55 AM EDT
[#21]
In on 1!
Link Posted: 10/19/2016 11:48:13 AM EDT
[#22]
In on 1...from Las Vegas. Will be drinking (probably drunk), and hanging at the pool by the time the debate starts.
Link Posted: 10/19/2016 11:53:53 AM EDT
[#23]
In!
Link Posted: 10/19/2016 11:55:18 AM EDT
[#24]
OST
Link Posted: 10/19/2016 11:56:43 AM EDT
[#25]
Lots of talk about latinos vote in Nevada and nationwide
Here we go again
Link Posted: 10/19/2016 12:07:55 PM EDT
[#26]
1st statement by Chris Wallace, "Due to the sensitive nature, including classified materials, of the alleged Wikileaks information, any discussion that goes this direction will be cut off."
Link Posted: 10/19/2016 12:09:52 PM EDT
[#27]
I'll start the over/under on how many question Chris Wallace provided Hillary at all of them.
Link Posted: 10/19/2016 12:39:29 PM EDT
[#28]
I hear Michael Buffer is doing the debate stage announcement.
Link Posted: 10/19/2016 12:44:34 PM EDT
[#29]
In.
Link Posted: 10/19/2016 12:46:50 PM EDT
[#30]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
1st statement by Chris Wallace, "Due to the sensitive nature, including classified materials, of the alleged Wikileaks information, any discussion that goes this direction will be cut off."
View Quote

Interesting.

And sucky.
Link Posted: 10/19/2016 12:52:49 PM EDT
[#31]
!NI
Link Posted: 10/19/2016 1:24:22 PM EDT
[#32]
In on 1.  FHRC.
Link Posted: 10/19/2016 1:25:07 PM EDT
[#33]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Interesting.

And sucky.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
1st statement by Chris Wallace, "Due to the sensitive nature, including classified materials, of the alleged Wikileaks information, any discussion that goes this direction will be cut off."

Interesting.

And sucky.


Kinda dumb.  They are now in the public domain - not discussing them because of prior classification is equivalent to covering your ears and saying lalalalala!
Link Posted: 10/19/2016 1:31:06 PM EDT
[#34]
In on 1






/MAGA
Link Posted: 10/19/2016 1:44:56 PM EDT
[#35]
Link Posted: 10/19/2016 1:47:33 PM EDT
[#36]
Hopefully I'll be able to watch it
Link Posted: 10/19/2016 1:54:17 PM EDT
[#37]

Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


I'll start the over/under on how many question Chris Wallace provided Hillary at all of them.
View Quote


Rush had some good ones for her the other day:



My Debate Questions for Mrs. Clinton






 
Link Posted: 10/19/2016 2:25:21 PM EDT
[#38]
In
Link Posted: 10/19/2016 2:29:39 PM EDT
[#39]
Tag
Link Posted: 10/19/2016 2:31:07 PM EDT
[#40]
Page 1
Link Posted: 10/19/2016 2:41:14 PM EDT
[#41]
She is a filthy criminal. Trump should treat her as such. He needs to make sure every response includes references to her crimes.
Link Posted: 10/19/2016 2:41:15 PM EDT
[#42]








Link Posted: 10/19/2016 2:53:26 PM EDT
[#43]
IN.  I was not going to watch any of this shit show, but I think I have to.  It will be epic.
Link Posted: 10/19/2016 2:56:05 PM EDT
[#44]
I'll wait for the crowder thread
Link Posted: 10/19/2016 3:02:38 PM EDT
[#45]
In...
Link Posted: 10/19/2016 5:21:57 PM EDT
[#46]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


Kinda dumb.  They are now in the public domain - not discussing them because of prior classification is equivalent to covering your ears and saying lalalalala!
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
1st statement by Chris Wallace, "Due to the sensitive nature, including classified materials, of the alleged Wikileaks information, any discussion that goes this direction will be cut off."

Interesting.

And sucky.


Kinda dumb.  They are now in the public domain - not discussing them because of prior classification is equivalent to covering your ears and saying lalalalala!

I have not found this on any news site... any cite, OP?
Link Posted: 10/19/2016 5:23:21 PM EDT
[#47]
sofa king in
Link Posted: 10/19/2016 5:24:51 PM EDT
[#48]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

I have not found this on any news site... any cite, OP?
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
1st statement by Chris Wallace, "Due to the sensitive nature, including classified materials, of the alleged Wikileaks information, any discussion that goes this direction will be cut off."

Interesting.

And sucky.

Kinda dumb.  They are now in the public domain - not discussing them because of prior classification is equivalent to covering your ears and saying lalalalala!

I have not found this on any news site... any cite, OP?

I think he was speculating. My guess is the wikileaks emails get brought up by Wallace.
Link Posted: 10/19/2016 5:32:36 PM EDT
[#49]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

I think he was speculating. My guess is the wikileaks emails get brought up by Wallace.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
1st statement by Chris Wallace, "Due to the sensitive nature, including classified materials, of the alleged Wikileaks information, any discussion that goes this direction will be cut off."

Interesting.

And sucky.

Kinda dumb.  They are now in the public domain - not discussing them because of prior classification is equivalent to covering your ears and saying lalalalala!

I have not found this on any news site... any cite, OP?

I think he was speculating. My guess is the wikileaks emails get brought up by Wallace.

Upon re-reading, I agree.  ~whew~  
Link Posted: 10/19/2016 5:34:04 PM EDT
[#50]
Arrow Left Previous Page
Page / 68
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top