User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 10/5/2016 10:00:40 AM EDT
[#1]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Says the people who fawn over tax returns/Mark Cuban's opinion and Trump calling a fatty a fatty. Look just above you (on the previous page). I think the attacks on Trump from the left are bullshit. I don't need to repeat lies from the left in order to criticize Trump, unlike what you're doing to Cruz. And Cruz lost, get over it. Cruz will not ban you. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/5/2016 10:03:54 AM EDT
[#2]
And
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/5/2016 10:19:11 AM EDT
[#3]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
There's a big difference between not wanting to be on the defense, and being defenseless. Pence neither counter-attacked nor defended, when Trump was attacked. In many instances, he just silently shook his head, and endured the beating. "Trump said [indefensible statement]." Pence was dealt a really shitty hand, and did a really good job with it nonetheless. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/5/2016 10:20:19 AM EDT
[#4]
Quote HistoryQuoted: "Trump said [indefensible statement]." Pence was dealt a really shitty hand, and did a really good job with it nonetheless. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: There's a big difference between not wanting to be on the defense, and being defenseless. Pence neither counter-attacked nor defended, when Trump was attacked. In many instances, he just silently shook his head, and endured the beating. "Trump said [indefensible statement]." Pence was dealt a really shitty hand, and did a really good job with it nonetheless. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/5/2016 10:27:54 AM EDT
[#5]
Fuck preparing. Fuck winning. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/5/2016 10:36:39 AM EDT
[#6]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
God help us. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I go for less insulting people but I do realize that my desire is outmoded these days. You haven't internalized the merger of the political system and the "entertainment industry". In order to be successful in the former politicians must be proficient at the latter. Once the majority of politicians have honed their entertainment skills, the nation will experience significant cost savings.  99% liberal shit. If Trump wins every politician who sees a potential president when he/she looks in a mirror will want to be the host of hes/her own "reality TV" show. The merger will move forward several long steps. God help us. There is no evidence from which a rational person can draw the conclusion that God intervenes in U.S. politics. For better or worse, you're on your own. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/5/2016 10:43:48 AM EDT
[#7]
Quote HistoryWhat can Trump possibly learn? He knows everything. He is without flaws. He is perfect in every respect. He dominated that first debate. He won it easily. He will win this next one easily. 47 States. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/5/2016 11:01:15 AM EDT
[#8]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I'd like to say that I'm surprised, but I'm not. What a petty, insignificant, small, piece of garbage man Trump is. 
Quote HistoryQuoted:
http://theconcourse.deadspin.com/many-people-are-saying-that-donald-trump-is-mad-about-m-1787428755 Many People Are Saying That Donald Trump Is Mad About Mike Pence's Good Reviews I'd like to say that I'm surprised, but I'm not. What a petty, insignificant, small, piece of garbage man Trump is.
sTrump - "Mike, YOU'RE FIRED" |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/5/2016 11:02:41 AM EDT
[#9]
Quote HistoryIs this going to be another "Why don't they like me?" event for sTrump? |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/5/2016 11:47:26 AM EDT
[#10]
I think as more of these media stories come out comparing Pence's debate performance with Trump's you will see that Trump's ego will -force- him to say or tweet something to diminish Pence. Can't have the "team" win something where Trump doesn't get 110 percent of the credit...
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/5/2016 1:43:21 PM EDT
[#11]
https://twitter.com/MonmouthPoll/status/783713771973910532
MonmouthPoll ?@MonmouthPoll BREAKING: Ohio HRC 44 DJT 42 GJ 5 (was 43-39 in August) #OHSen Portman 54 Strickland 39 (was 48-40 in August) ETA D+4 is what they used, which is wishful thinking in Ohio. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/5/2016 1:44:07 PM EDT
[#12]
Quote HistoryQuote HistoryQuoted: https://twitter.com/MonmouthPoll/status/783713771973910532 MonmouthPoll ?@MonmouthPoll BREAKING: Ohio HRC 44 DJT 42 GJ 5 (was 43-39 in August) #OHSen Portman 54 Strickland 39 (was 48-40 in August) |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/5/2016 6:07:49 PM EDT
[#13]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/5/2016 6:09:44 PM EDT
[#14]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Is this going to be another "Why don't they like me?" event for sTrump? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Is this going to be another "Why don't they like me?" event for sTrump? Man his skin is so thin, I hope he never goes blood thinners. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/5/2016 7:57:53 PM EDT
[#15]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Says the people who fawn over tax returns/Mark Cuban's opinion and Trump calling a fatty a fatty. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Says the people who fawn over tax returns/Mark Cuban's opinion and Trump calling a fatty a fatty. Very good piece. ...a Lindsay supporter wrote to Buckley, decrying his plan to run: “It seems to me that we, the members of a minority party, must unite in one purpose, namely, to strengthen the Republican Party and to get Republicans elected. . . . I believe that, as soon as the campaign dust settles and he enters upon his mayoral duties, he will turn out to be a good Republican.”
Here was Buckley’s response: “I have a much higher opinion of John Lindsay than you. He is not the hypocrite you suppose, who will suddenly discover sound principles on arriving at high office. . . . It is my judgment that John Lindsay will do as much harm to the Republican Party if he is elected and becomes powerful, as anyone who has threatened the Party’s role as a defender of the tablets in recent history. If the Republican Party is transformed in his image, I shall give you the Republican Party, and go elsewhere.” Buckley was right: Lindsay ended up being a disastrous mayor, governing from the hard left while maintaining his Republican Party membership. He presided over the near-destruction of America’s greatest city. Fantasy Lindsay didn’t exist. Fantasy Trump doesn’t either. Trump is just Trump: a powerful personality with an agenda and a plan all his own. Pretending him away is delusional and dangerous. If we’re going to elect him, at least let’s be honest about what he is — and what he isn’t. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/5/2016 9:55:43 PM EDT
[#16]
Is Michael Bloomberg a member here? I seem to recall similar statements from someone else who claimed to be in Trump's circle.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/5/2016 10:02:31 PM EDT
[#17]
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/06/us/politics/donald-trump-campaign.html Donald J. Trump’s support has plunged across the swing-state map over the last 10 days, wiping out his political recovery from September and threatening to undo weeks of Republican gains in the battle for control of Congress. For his party, Mr. Trump’s reversal in fortune comes at the worst possible moment: Having muted their criticism of Mr. Trump in hopes that he could at least run competitively through Election Day, Republicans must decide in the next few days, rather than weeks, whether to seek distance from his wobbly campaign. Should Mr. Trump falter badly in his second debate with Hillary Clinton on Sunday in St. Louis, Republican congressional candidates may take it as a cue to flee openly from their nominee, said two senior Republicans involved at high levels of the campaign who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss private party strategy. Liesl Hickey, a Republican strategist involved in several House races in swing states, said she was dismayed by a sudden exodus of independent voters in more diverse parts of the country. "They are really starting to pull away from Trump,” said Ms. Hickey, describing his soaring unpopularity with independents as entering "uncharted territory.” Bu-bye Congress. Bu-bye 240 year old experiment called America and the rest of the free world. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/5/2016 10:03:28 PM EDT
[#18]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Is Michael Bloomberg a member here? I seem to recall similar statements from someone else who claimed to be in Trump's circle.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CuDCdhKWEAAuS7Z.jpg:large America-First is actually Michael Bloomberg? I KNEW IT! |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/5/2016 10:08:46 PM EDT
[#19]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
"Trump said [indefensible statement]." Pence was dealt a really shitty hand, and did a really good job with it nonetheless. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
There's a big difference between not wanting to be on the defense, and being defenseless. Pence neither counter-attacked nor defended, when Trump was attacked. In many instances, he just silently shook his head, and endured the beating. "Trump said [indefensible statement]." Pence was dealt a really shitty hand, and did a really good job with it nonetheless. Trump's statements are not that indefensible. For example, Kaine said that Trump said (to paraphrase): "Mexicans are rapists and criminals," or something along those lines. But Trump never actually said that. If you look at Trump's actual comment in context, you can see it's totally defensible, because Trump specifically said some of them were good people, which Kaine omitted. And Kaine omitted these things intentionally to mislead the public about what Trump actually said. So yes, actually Pence could have defended a lot of Trump's statements in circumstances like these. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/5/2016 10:12:36 PM EDT
[#20]
Donald Trump Takes Credit for Mike Pence’s Debate Performancehttp://time.com/4520238/donald-trump-mike-pence-debate-performance/ Donald Trump praised Mike Pence’s debate performance Wednesday afternoon, but he said the credit is really due to the top of the ticket. "Mike Pence did an incredible job, and I’m getting a lot of credit because that’s really my first so-called choice, that was my first hire,” Trump said in Henderson, Nevada. "I’d argue that Mike had the single most decisive victory in the history of vice presidential debates. I believe that, too. And last night America also got to look firsthand at my judgment.”  |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/5/2016 10:13:19 PM EDT
[#21]
https://twitter.com/seanhannity/status/783850273420738560
Sean Hannity Verified account
?@seanhannity @megynkelly u should be mad at @HillaryClinton Clearly you support her. And @realDonaldTrump did talk to u. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/5/2016 10:21:37 PM EDT
[#22]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Is Michael Bloomberg a member here? I seem to recall similar statements from someone else who claimed to be in Trump's circle.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CuDCdhKWEAAuS7Z.jpg:large Bloomberg hates Trump? Excellent! Therefore if Trump wins, Bloomberg won't have influence over Trump because Trump will be angry about Bloomberg attacking him during the election. Trump would probably want to get him back by getting even tougher on protecting the 2A and stopping illegal immigration to get revenge. I never would have guessed so many on this forum would rather side with Hillary Clinton and Bloomberg than Trump. If you criticize Trump so insistently during the general election, you're helping the liberals who criticize Trump seem as if they have more credibility, which increases the chances Hillary Clinton wins the election. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/5/2016 10:30:32 PM EDT
[#23]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Bloomberg hates Trump? Excellent! Therefore if Trump wins, Bloomberg won't have influence over Trump because Trump will be angry about Bloomberg attacking him during the election. Trump would probably want to get him back by getting even tougher on protecting the 2A and stopping illegal immigration to get revenge. I never would have guessed so many on this forum would rather side with Hillary Clinton and Bloomberg than Trump. If you criticize Trump so insistently during the general election, you're helping the liberals who criticize Trump seem as if they have more credibility, which increases the chances Hillary Clinton wins the election. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Is Michael Bloomberg a member here? I seem to recall similar statements from someone else who claimed to be in Trump's circle.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CuDCdhKWEAAuS7Z.jpg:large Bloomberg hates Trump? Excellent! Therefore if Trump wins, Bloomberg won't have influence over Trump because Trump will be angry about Bloomberg attacking him during the election. Trump would probably want to get him back by getting even tougher on protecting the 2A and stopping illegal immigration to get revenge. I never would have guessed so many on this forum would rather side with Hillary Clinton and Bloomberg than Trump. If you criticize Trump so insistently during the general election, you're helping the liberals who criticize Trump seem as if they have more credibility, which increases the chances Hillary Clinton wins the election. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/5/2016 11:03:57 PM EDT
[#24]
Quote HistoryQuote HistoryQuoted: https://twitter.com/seanhannity/status/783850273420738560 Sean Hannity Verified account ?@seanhannity @megynkelly u should be mad at @HillaryClinton Clearly you support her. And @realDonaldTrump did talk to u. What a fucking turdball. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/5/2016 11:21:40 PM EDT
[#25]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Trump's statements are not that indefensible. For example, Kaine said that Trump said (to paraphrase): "Mexicans are rapists and criminals," or something along those lines. But Trump never actually said that. If you look at Trump's actual comment in context, you can see it's totally defensible, because Trump specifically said some of them were good people, which Kaine omitted. And Kaine omitted these things intentionally to mislead the public about what Trump actually said. So yes, actually Pence could have defended a lot of Trump's statements in circumstances like these. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
There's a big difference between not wanting to be on the defense, and being defenseless. Pence neither counter-attacked nor defended, when Trump was attacked. In many instances, he just silently shook his head, and endured the beating. "Trump said [indefensible statement]." Pence was dealt a really shitty hand, and did a really good job with it nonetheless. Trump's statements are not that indefensible. For example, Kaine said that Trump said (to paraphrase): "Mexicans are rapists and criminals," or something along those lines. But Trump never actually said that. If you look at Trump's actual comment in context, you can see it's totally defensible, because Trump specifically said some of them were good people, which Kaine omitted. And Kaine omitted these things intentionally to mislead the public about what Trump actually said. So yes, actually Pence could have defended a lot of Trump's statements in circumstances like these. Yes, THAT was a defensible statement. Pence COULD have said, "NO, Trump said that all of the Mexican Rapists and Criminals they send over are Rapists and Criminals." Rather than focus on the issues and policy, Pence could have studied up on all the stuff Trump said. He could have hired experts to help him learn all the stupid shit Trump said! Trump advocating Saudi Arabia be able to get a nuke. Pence decided to not defend that. What SHOULD he have said? |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/6/2016 12:25:11 AM EDT
[#26]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Yes, THAT was a defensible statement. Pence COULD have said, "NO, Trump said that all of the Mexican Rapists and Criminals they send over are Rapists and Criminals." Rather than focus on the issues and policy, Pence could have studied up on all the stuff Trump said. He could have hired experts to help him learn all the stupid shit Trump said! Trump advocating Saudi Arabia be able to get a nuke. Pence decided to not defend that. What SHOULD he have said? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
There's a big difference between not wanting to be on the defense, and being defenseless. Pence neither counter-attacked nor defended, when Trump was attacked. In many instances, he just silently shook his head, and endured the beating. "Trump said [indefensible statement]." Pence was dealt a really shitty hand, and did a really good job with it nonetheless. Trump's statements are not that indefensible. For example, Kaine said that Trump said (to paraphrase): "Mexicans are rapists and criminals," or something along those lines. But Trump never actually said that. If you look at Trump's actual comment in context, you can see it's totally defensible, because Trump specifically said some of them were good people, which Kaine omitted. And Kaine omitted these things intentionally to mislead the public about what Trump actually said. So yes, actually Pence could have defended a lot of Trump's statements in circumstances like these. Yes, THAT was a defensible statement. Pence COULD have said, "NO, Trump said that all of the Mexican Rapists and Criminals they send over are Rapists and Criminals." Rather than focus on the issues and policy, Pence could have studied up on all the stuff Trump said. He could have hired experts to help him learn all the stupid shit Trump said! Trump advocating Saudi Arabia be able to get a nuke. Pence decided to not defend that. What SHOULD he have said? Pence decided not to defend sTrump |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/6/2016 12:42:42 AM EDT
[#27]
Quote HistoryIt is fucking stupid to oppose your guy during an election. The nationalreview is fucking stupid and you are right at home with them Top_Secret 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/6/2016 1:10:26 AM EDT
[#28]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Pence decided not to defend sTrump Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: There's a big difference between not wanting to be on the defense, and being defenseless. Pence neither counter-attacked nor defended, when Trump was attacked. In many instances, he just silently shook his head, and endured the beating. "Trump said [indefensible statement]." Pence was dealt a really shitty hand, and did a really good job with it nonetheless. Trump's statements are not that indefensible. For example, Kaine said that Trump said (to paraphrase): "Mexicans are rapists and criminals," or something along those lines. But Trump never actually said that. If you look at Trump's actual comment in context, you can see it's totally defensible, because Trump specifically said some of them were good people, which Kaine omitted. And Kaine omitted these things intentionally to mislead the public about what Trump actually said. So yes, actually Pence could have defended a lot of Trump's statements in circumstances like these. Yes, THAT was a defensible statement. Pence COULD have said, "NO, Trump said that all of the Mexican Rapists and Criminals they send over are Rapists and Criminals." Rather than focus on the issues and policy, Pence could have studied up on all the stuff Trump said. He could have hired experts to help him learn all the stupid shit Trump said! Trump advocating Saudi Arabia be able to get a nuke. Pence decided to not defend that. What SHOULD he have said? Pence decided not to defend sTrump  Pence defended Trump saying almost exactly what is in red above. He told Kaine "you brought up the mexican thing again, but trump said many were good people, you keep leaving that out of the quote." Then he went on to clarify that trump was talking about criminal aliens.If you are going to bag on Pence for not defending trump at least pick some stupid shit trump said that Pence didn't defend him on. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/6/2016 1:39:06 AM EDT
[#29]
Quote HistoryQuoted: It is fucking stupid to oppose your guy during an election. The nationalreview is fucking stupid and you are right at home with them Top_Secret Quote HistoryQuoted: It is fucking stupid to oppose your guy during an election. The nationalreview is fucking stupid and you are right at home with them Top_Secret "All of the media that posts things that might be critical of Trump is failing and fucking stupid and irrelevant, but Drudge and Breitbart and Alex Jones are obviously amazing and fantastic and yuuuuuge and bigly.' |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/6/2016 1:53:13 AM EDT
[#30]
Wow. Almost 300 pages of pure fucking stupid.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/6/2016 2:06:07 AM EDT
[#31]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Wow. Almost 300 pages of pure fucking stupid. Amazing... |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/6/2016 2:09:20 AM EDT
[#32]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Wow. Almost 300 pages of pure fucking stupid. Thanks for coming out. Did you sign the pledge on page 87? |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/6/2016 2:10:27 AM EDT
[#33]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Amazing... Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Wow. Almost 300 pages of pure fucking stupid. Amazing... What's 'amazing' is having nominated Don Trump as the conservative nominee. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/6/2016 5:25:37 AM EDT
[#34]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Wow. Almost 300 pages of pure fucking stupid awesome. FIFY. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/6/2016 5:50:39 AM EDT
[#35]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
What's 'amazing' is having nominated Don Trump as the conservative nominee. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Wow. Almost 300 pages of pure fucking stupid. Amazing... What's 'amazing' is having nominated Don Trump as the conservative nominee. Funnier yet is how the most diehard Trumptards fight to keep this thread alive. We get it, you have a NY liberal running against a NY liberal. And the guy can't even be bothered enough to practice enough for a debate. We know you know your guy sucks. Don't shit on us cause we point it out. But really, most voters need to stay the fuck home. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/6/2016 6:10:22 AM EDT
[#36]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
And the guy can't even be bothered enough to practice enough for a debate. I have hopes that the enormity of what they've done will sink in on Sunday, when Trump totally blows it.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/6/2016 6:23:19 AM EDT
[#37]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Amazing... Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Wow. Almost 300 pages of pure fucking stupid. Amazing... If Hillary wins....You will see why they knew better than to let us elect Trump! |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/6/2016 6:48:14 AM EDT
[#38]
Quote HistoryQuoted: If Hillary wins....You will see why they knew better than to let us elect Trump! Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Wow. Almost 300 pages of pure fucking stupid. Amazing... If Hillary wins....You will see why they knew better than to let us elect Trump!  |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/6/2016 7:06:03 AM EDT
[#39]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
If Hillary wins....You will see why they knew better than to let us elect Trump! Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Wow. Almost 300 pages of pure fucking stupid. Amazing... If Hillary wins....You will see why they knew better than to let us elect Trump! People here have the power to "let" you elect Trump? You should ask them to do so. Try saying "please." |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/6/2016 7:25:03 AM EDT
[#40]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
It is fucking stupid to oppose your guy during an election. The nationalreview is fucking stupid and you are right at home with them Top_Secret Quote HistoryQuoted:
It is fucking stupid to oppose your guy during an election. The nationalreview is fucking stupid and you are right at home with them Top_Secret He's not "my guy". As long as Trump remains the face of the Republican party, I will not be a Republican. Pretty simple. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/6/2016 7:32:41 AM EDT
[#41]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Trump advocating Saudi Arabia be able to get a nuke. Pence decided to not defend that. What SHOULD he have said? He should've said, "Media reports have said that Saudi Arabia already owns some Pakistani nukes in Pakistan and delivery vehicles in Saudi Arabia. And that's because they didn't trust Obama and Hillary on Iran." |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/6/2016 8:06:26 AM EDT
[#42]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/6/2016 8:21:02 AM EDT
[#43]
Quote HistoryThe Trump Cult was correct. He is putting states in play that another Republican nominee wouldn't be able to. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/6/2016 9:23:37 AM EDT
[#44]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Yes, THAT was a defensible statement. Pence COULD have said, "NO, Trump said that all of the Mexican Rapists and Criminals they send over are Rapists and Criminals." Rather than focus on the issues and policy, Pence could have studied up on all the stuff Trump said. He could have hired experts to help him learn all the stupid shit Trump said! Trump advocating Saudi Arabia be able to get a nuke. Pence decided to not defend that. What SHOULD he have said? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
There's a big difference between not wanting to be on the defense, and being defenseless. Pence neither counter-attacked nor defended, when Trump was attacked. In many instances, he just silently shook his head, and endured the beating. "Trump said [indefensible statement]." Pence was dealt a really shitty hand, and did a really good job with it nonetheless. Trump's statements are not that indefensible. For example, Kaine said that Trump said (to paraphrase): "Mexicans are rapists and criminals," or something along those lines. But Trump never actually said that. If you look at Trump's actual comment in context, you can see it's totally defensible, because Trump specifically said some of them were good people, which Kaine omitted. And Kaine omitted these things intentionally to mislead the public about what Trump actually said. So yes, actually Pence could have defended a lot of Trump's statements in circumstances like these. Yes, THAT was a defensible statement. Pence COULD have said, "NO, Trump said that all of the Mexican Rapists and Criminals they send over are Rapists and Criminals." Rather than focus on the issues and policy, Pence could have studied up on all the stuff Trump said. He could have hired experts to help him learn all the stupid shit Trump said! Trump advocating Saudi Arabia be able to get a nuke. Pence decided to not defend that. What SHOULD he have said? Nuclear proliferation Putin NATO Deportation force Tax Returns All statements where Trump said something, and Pence was forced to ignore it or pretend Trump never said it. Pence did the best he could with his garbage hand, but it was still a garbage hand. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/6/2016 9:44:01 AM EDT
[#45]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Did you guys even listen to the debate? Pence defended Trump saying almost exactly what is in red above. He told Kaine "you brought up the mexican thing again, but trump said many were good people, you keep leaving that out of the quote." Then he went on to clarify that trump was talking about criminal aliens.
If you are going to bag on Pence for not defending trump at least pick some stupid shit trump said that Pence didn't defend him on. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted: There's a big difference between not wanting to be on the defense, and being defenseless. Pence neither counter-attacked nor defended, when Trump was attacked. In many instances, he just silently shook his head, and endured the beating. "Trump said [indefensible statement]." Pence was dealt a really shitty hand, and did a really good job with it nonetheless. Trump's statements are not that indefensible. For example, Kaine said that Trump said (to paraphrase): "Mexicans are rapists and criminals," or something along those lines. But Trump never actually said that. If you look at Trump's actual comment in context, you can see it's totally defensible, because Trump specifically said some of them were good people, which Kaine omitted. And Kaine omitted these things intentionally to mislead the public about what Trump actually said. So yes, actually Pence could have defended a lot of Trump's statements in circumstances like these. Yes, THAT was a defensible statement. Pence COULD have said, "NO, Trump said that all of the Mexican Rapists and Criminals they send over are Rapists and Criminals." Rather than focus on the issues and policy, Pence could have studied up on all the stuff Trump said. He could have hired experts to help him learn all the stupid shit Trump said! Trump advocating Saudi Arabia be able to get a nuke. Pence decided to not defend that. What SHOULD he have said? Pence decided not to defend sTrump Pence defended Trump saying almost exactly what is in red above. He told Kaine "you brought up the mexican thing again, but trump said many were good people, you keep leaving that out of the quote." Then he went on to clarify that trump was talking about criminal aliens.
If you are going to bag on Pence for not defending trump at least pick some stupid shit trump said that Pence didn't defend him on. Maybe I should have posted, "Pence decided not to defend all of sTrump's bullshit statements/policies" Pence is a much better man than sTrump. He chose not to defend the lesser man's every fault Clearer? |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/6/2016 9:48:16 AM EDT
[#46]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/6/2016 10:17:28 AM EDT
[#47]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
There is no evidence from which a rational person can draw the conclusion that God intervenes in U.S. politics. For better or worse, you're on your own. False post... Is false... 
The Founding Fathers presented a strong case against your false argument... 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/6/2016 10:24:21 AM EDT
[#48]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Trump's statements are not that indefensible. For example, Kaine said that Trump said (to paraphrase): "Mexicans are rapists and criminals," or something along those lines. But Trump never actually said that. If you look at Trump's actual comment in context, you can see it's totally defensible, because Trump specifically said some of them were good people, which Kaine omitted. And Kaine omitted these things intentionally to mislead the public about what Trump actually said. So yes, actually Pence could have defended a lot of Trump's statements in circumstances like these. The problem with Trumps, "statements" are that he constantly and consistently contradicts himself...He hands his enemies a lot of contradictory "statements" that do not add up... Yeah, the "Mexicans are rapists" statement is taken out of context. He was defending --if you look at the context-- those who come here to work, and castigating those who come here and commit crime. Trumps defense --after the Convention-- are that those who come here to displace American workers will be given "legal status" (amnesty) so they can vote for more socialism until the day they die in the Democrat Party. And those who commit crimes will be sent home. Not much of a defense from a conservative perspective. The truth... Pence is not a bad and immoral person. Between Trump and Hillary and her running mate, Pence is the only one with an ounce of ethics and morality. Pence was given a crap sandwich to defend, regardless of which direction you approach this... |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/6/2016 10:38:21 AM EDT
[#49]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
False post... Is false... https://i.ytimg.com/vi/xU7S1nWBrFQ/maxresdefault.jpg The Founding Fathers presented a strong case against your false argument...
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
There is no evidence from which a rational person can draw the conclusion that God intervenes in U.S. politics. For better or worse, you're on your own. False post... Is false... https://i.ytimg.com/vi/xU7S1nWBrFQ/maxresdefault.jpg The Founding Fathers presented a strong case against your false argument...
Thanks for proving my point. The Founding fathers have nothing to do with U.S. politics. They designed the government, not the current political system, although I'm certain the distinction escapes you. And even the system of government they designed is gone and has been so for more than a century. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/6/2016 10:49:42 AM EDT
[#50]
http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/299473-trump-threatens-to-sue-over-nasty-campaign-ads
Speaking at a rally in Henderson, Nev., the GOP presidential nominee insisted he would help veterans if elected and complained that he was unfairly targeted by negative advertising.
“And then I saw today ... a commercial where — it was really a nasty commercial, totally made up, about me with vets,” Trump said. “There is nobody that loves the vets more or respects the vets more. They’re spending hundreds of millions of dollars on false commercials, and it’s a disgrace. So what we’ll do, I guess we’ll sue them. Let’s sue them.” |
|
|
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
