User Panel
Posted: 2/14/2016 1:13:51 AM EDT
"There were no WMD in Iraq"
Yea well, your buddies in the NY Times disagree with you on that one. CIA secretly gathering Iraqi chemical weapons in Iraq in 2006 This is just the tip of the iceberg the NY Times found out about. 2.4k chemical warheads found in just one stash Fuck that lying piece of shit. |
|
OP you will need to get over the pain.......Trump will be our next President
we don't need the left placing Obama on the bench as a justice |
|
It would be easier to find his truthful statements than to list his lies.
|
|
Quoted:
"There were no WMD in Iraq" Yea well, your buddies in the NY Times disagree with you on that one. CIA secretly gathering Iraqi chemical weapons in Iraq in 2006 This is just the tip of the iceberg the NY Times found out about. 2.4k chemical warheads found in just one stash Fuck that lying piece of shit. View Quote This guy gets it... |
|
Quoted:
OP you will need to get over the pain.......Trump will be our next President we don't need the left placing Obama on the bench as a justice View Quote Romney was going to be our last president. That didn't happen and even if Trump is nominated, he won't be elected for several reasons. |
|
Don't care how many lies Republicans tell.. I'm still voting for them over any Dem. Doesn't phase me at all.
|
|
|
Quoted:
Romney was going to be our last president. That didn't happen and even if Trump is nominated, he won't be elected for several reasons. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
OP you will need to get over the pain.......Trump will be our next President we don't need the left placing Obama on the bench as a justice Romney was going to be our last president. That didn't happen and even if Trump is nominated, he won't be elected for several reasons. You're sounding more Australian by the day (not a compliment, in case you were wondering) Trump is the only one with serious inertia in this race, besides wacky Uncle Bernie, who has a lock on the philosophy major sophomore and middle-age pizza deliveryman vote. |
|
I remember when the NY times reported there were no chemical weapons and bush and Cheney made it up in order to start a war.
Times have changed. |
|
Quoted:
Well if you're saying that, invading Afghanistan was retarded, too. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Who fucking cares. Invading Iraq was retarded. Well if you're saying that, invading Afghanistan was retarded, too. Sign me up for the short bus then. |
|
Quoted:
Well if you're saying that, invading Afghanistan was retarded, too. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Who fucking cares. Invading Iraq was retarded. Well if you're saying that, invading Afghanistan was retarded, too. Invading no. Staying there? |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Who fucking cares. Invading Iraq was retarded. Well if you're saying that, invading Afghanistan was retarded, too. Invading no. Staying there? It's one thing to kick their ass, it's another to try to change their culture. Both occupations were beyond retarded. |
|
|
Quoted:
Who fucking cares. Invading Iraq was retarded. View Quote I agree: worthless nation building strategy that let our brothers die in vain, while our freedoms were pillaged (patriot act) in the context of security. The US gave Iraq chemical weapons, but the Iraqi war was sold to the public to stem the nuclear threat (remember the defunct Iraqi who told the CIA that Saddam bought yellow cake uranium from Libya). The war was hyped on a knee jerk to 9/11 (committed by Saudis) to dispatch the oil revenues from Iraq ("the war will pay for itself..") |
|
Quoted:
"There were no WMD in Iraq" Yea well, your buddies in the NY Times disagree with you on that one. CIA secretly gathering Iraqi chemical weapons in Iraq in 2006 This is just the tip of the iceberg the NY Times found out about. 2.4k chemical warheads found in just one stash Fuck that lying piece of shit. View Quote Everybody knew they had pre-1991 chemical shells right up to the invasion, not really what was referred to for the WMD justification for an invasion. People are now being disingenuous. |
|
|
We have members here that fucking found them! He is full of shit.
|
|
Quoted:
You're sounding more Australian by the day (not a compliment, in case you were wondering) Trump is the only one with serious inertia in this race, besides wacky Uncle Bernie, who has a lock on the philosophy major sophomore and middle-age pizza deliveryman vote. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
OP you will need to get over the pain.......Trump will be our next President we don't need the left placing Obama on the bench as a justice Romney was going to be our last president. That didn't happen and even if Trump is nominated, he won't be elected for several reasons. You're sounding more Australian by the day (not a compliment, in case you were wondering) Trump is the only one with serious inertia in this race, besides wacky Uncle Bernie, who has a lock on the philosophy major sophomore and middle-age pizza deliveryman vote. What does my address have to do with anything? Romney lost, despite everyone saying he'd win by a landslide. Trump's shit, poll numbers with him going against Clinton or Sanders is shit. Which even if he was a "shoe in" there's that little problem with voter fraud, and other tomfuckery which makes me seriously question the legitimacy of our elections. |
|
Quoted:
It's one thing to kick their ass, it's another to try to change their culture. Both occupations were beyond retarded. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Who fucking cares. Invading Iraq was retarded. Well if you're saying that, invading Afghanistan was retarded, too. Invading no. Staying there? It's one thing to kick their ass, it's another to try to change their culture. Both occupations were beyond retarded. This, in spades. The fact that "Nation Building" worked more or less as intended one time immediately after WW2 in a unique set of circumstances has utterly fucked our military policy ever since. |
|
He was wrong and the other guy I was willing to vote for was made to look like a complete fucking liar by everyone on the stage. I already knew about Cruz's changing stances on immigration and the fact he wanted shit loads of H1Bs, that's why he is my second choice and Trump is my first.
|
|
To understand trump.. you need to understand Alex Jones. Trump is a Alex jones infowars fanboy and it shows with alot of his retarded remarks. Wouldn't be surprised if they are best buds.
|
|
|
Quoted:
To understand trump.. you need to understand Alex Jones. Trump is a Alex jones infowars fanboy and it shows with alot of his retarded remarks. Wouldn't be surprised if they are best buds. View Quote lol because of this? This is just disingenuous rationalizations. The WMD justification had little to do with this old ordnance. |
|
Bald.
BALD. BAAALD. it's bold faced, not bald faced or bawled faced or bowled face. "So and so tells his most male pattern baldness faced lie" |
|
Quoted:
"There were no WMD in Iraq" Yea well, your buddies in the NY Times disagree with you on that one. CIA secretly gathering Iraqi chemical weapons in Iraq in 2006 This is just the tip of the iceberg the NY Times found out about. 2.4k chemical warheads found in just one stash Fuck that lying piece of shit. View Quote Enough with the butthurt. Go scream at the moon. |
|
I know people directly affected by Iraqi WMDs. Trump either lied or is too ignorant to know the difference between a WMD and a WMD program. Either way hes not a man competent enough to be president.
|
|
Wasn't the reason for the invasion something to do with yellow cake uranium and the fear of a nuclear program?
Nobody has ever denied Iraq had mustard gas and Sarin gas shells in the past. He used them against the Kurds and against the Iranians. '13er seems to be confused with history. |
|
Quoted:
Wasn't the reason for the invasion something to do with yellow cake uranium and the fear of a nuclear program? Nobody has ever denied Iraq had mustard gas and Sarin gas shells in the past. He used them against the Kurds and against the Iranians. '13er seems to be confused with history. View Quote Can I ask what it feels like when your guy spouts the exact same talking points left wingers have used against R's for the past 12-14 years? It's gotta feel pretty shitty right. I mean it's word for word. |
|
Here's my take on the whole shitty situation:
Did Sadam have WMDs? Sure, he used them against the Kurds. Did he aspire to nukes? I'm sure but how much work and research went in that direction other than wishful thinking? Who knows? Was Sadam a bad guy? Sure, fucked his own people and ruled with an iron fist but he was our guy when he was fighting Iran. Was he a stabilizing force in Iraq and the region? Over all, yes. He kept shit in line and people were afraid of him. Should we have killed him off? If we had rolled into Baghdad in 1991 then no problem but to do it 20 years later under the guise of 9/11 was BS Is Trump an idiot I don't trust? Sure is but if I am forced to choose between him or Hillary or Bernie I will hold my nose and do it. |
|
Quoted:
Wasn't the reason for the invasion something to do with yellow cake uranium and the fear of a nuclear program? Nobody has ever denied Iraq had mustard gas and Sarin gas shells in the past. He used them against the Kurds and against the Iranians. '13er seems to be confused with history. View Quote Umm...yes, basically. Iraq had a bunch of shit they weren't allowed to have per the UN. They did have it, denied it, it was used as part of the basis for the Iraq war. But they did not have what was alleged. But they did have shit that was prohibited. Long story short, we'd be better off today with the iron fist of Sadaam crushing opposition in Iraq today than our current clusterfuck |
|
|
Quoted:
You're sounding more Australian by the day (not a compliment, in case you were wondering) Trump is the only one with serious inertia in this race, besides wacky Uncle Bernie, who has a lock on the philosophy major sophomore and middle-age pizza deliveryman vote. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
OP you will need to get over the pain.......Trump will be our next President we don't need the left placing Obama on the bench as a justice Romney was going to be our last president. That didn't happen and even if Trump is nominated, he won't be elected for several reasons. You're sounding more Australian by the day (not a compliment, in case you were wondering) Trump is the only one with serious inertia in this race, besides wacky Uncle Bernie, who has a lock on the philosophy major sophomore and middle-age pizza deliveryman vote. If so its because we have the largest group of uneducated morons in this country. Trump us winning one thing, the biggest idiot. No wonder he draws that crowd. |
|
|
Quoted:
"There were no WMD in Iraq" Yea well, your buddies in the NY Times disagree with you on that one. CIA secretly gathering Iraqi chemical weapons in Iraq in 2006 This is just the tip of the iceberg the NY Times found out about. 2.4k chemical warheads found in just one stash Fuck that lying piece of shit. View Quote Arty shells with mustard gas and Sarin maybe not so much...that is very World War One. Limited area of effect. Biological warheads or dispersal systems may be WMD, nukes yeah no argument. The Tsarnaev brothers' pressure cooker full of ball bearings and explosives was ruled in the US as a WMD. By that criteria a Bofors 40mm or 250lb JDAM would be WMDs. We have dropped a shitton of WMDs since 2003 amirite? Try again, pal. |
|
|
|
|
Quoted:
Arty shells with mustard gas and Sarin maybe not so much...that is very World War One. Limited area of effect. Biological warheads or dispersal systems may be WMD, nukes yeah no argument. The Tsarnaev brothers' pressure cooker full of ball bearings and explosives was ruled in the US as a WMD. By that criteria a Bofors 40mm or 250lb JDAM would be WMDs. We have dropped a shitton of WMDs since 2003 amirite? Try again, pal. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
"There were no WMD in Iraq" Yea well, your buddies in the NY Times disagree with you on that one. CIA secretly gathering Iraqi chemical weapons in Iraq in 2006 This is just the tip of the iceberg the NY Times found out about. 2.4k chemical warheads found in just one stash Fuck that lying piece of shit. Arty shells with mustard gas and Sarin maybe not so much...that is very World War One. Limited area of effect. Biological warheads or dispersal systems may be WMD, nukes yeah no argument. The Tsarnaev brothers' pressure cooker full of ball bearings and explosives was ruled in the US as a WMD. By that criteria a Bofors 40mm or 250lb JDAM would be WMDs. We have dropped a shitton of WMDs since 2003 amirite? Try again, pal. Wanna know how I know you know nothing about chemical warfare? |
|
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.