User Panel
|
Finally my state gets second place for something, sadly this is a shitty thing to get second place for.
|
|
Hmmm. Seems something is inversely proportional between the states at the top and the states at the bottom.
What could it be. what could it be? |
|
rank by % white folk, see how it matches up.
diversity kills. |
|
|
|
Quoted:
Look at SC's demographics, and realize that one particular group, while comprising 30 percent of our population, commit 74 percent of the murders. 91 percent of those murders are against other members of the same group. The group? You guessed it: Lesbians. Kidding! LOL! It's not Lesbians. I'll let Carnac clue you in... View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Baltimore routinely has half the total murders in MD, with only 10% of the population of the state. Look at SC's demographics, and realize that one particular group, while comprising 30 percent of our population, commit 74 percent of the murders. 91 percent of those murders are against other members of the same group. The group? You guessed it: Lesbians. Kidding! LOL! It's not Lesbians. I'll let Carnac clue you in... If you haven't noticed, one certain race that consists of 13% of the US population commits 50% of all murders in the US. This is pretty consistent year to year if you break it down by race. |
|
Quoted: The 10 worst have plenty of pro gun states so I am not sure how that argument works. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: So wait a sec.... You're telling me that Texas, one of the most gun friendly states, has a lower rate of murders by firearms than California? Cali, I am disappoint. Maybe they should pass more laws. Surely, the criminals will think they're serious when the next law passes. The 10 worst have plenty of pro gun states so I am not sure how that argument works. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Holy shit, NH has fewer murders per 100k than Iceland. 12 in the whole state. I wonder why? Let me see: http://ow.ly/VeSkC THAT'S RACIST!! |
|
Quoted: If you haven't noticed, one certain race that consists of 13% of the US population commits 50% of all murders in the US. This is pretty consistent year to year if you break it down by race. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Baltimore routinely has half the total murders in MD, with only 10% of the population of the state. Look at SC's demographics, and realize that one particular group, while comprising 30 percent of our population, commit 74 percent of the murders. 91 percent of those murders are against other members of the same group. The group? You guessed it: Lesbians. Kidding! LOL! It's not Lesbians. I'll let Carnac clue you in... If you haven't noticed, one certain race that consists of 13% of the US population commits 50% of all murders in the US. This is pretty consistent year to year if you break it down by race. @6.5% committing 50%. |
|
Quoted:
Socioeconomics matter more than geography, the two just happen to correlate fairly well. The top 10 worst are primarily poorer states with relatively large populations of poor and uneducated. View Quote "Socioeconomic." The vast majority of the people I grew up with were poor and, by most people's standards, "uneducated" and they didn't go around killing each other. Being poor doesn't turn you into a murderer, nor does being "uneducated." Typical leftist bullshit. The area where I live still has a sky high poverty rate but your chances of getting murdered here are very, very low. That's where liberals get it ass backwards. Graduating from high school isn't going to magically endow you with some sort of superior moral character. Rather, violent, predatory shitbags are simply not very likely to finish high school. People don't commit murder because they missed out on high school biology classes. So yeah, there's a statistical correlation between education and crime, but it's not a cause and effect relationship. It's o.k. We know what you actually meant to say was that the states in question have a high percentage of people from a particularly brutal, destructive subculture that glorifies violence, drug use, and stupidity while exhibiting not the slightest, remotest concept of impulse control. A subculture mollycoddled and bankrolled from cradle to prison to grave by the U.S. taxpayer. A grotesque underclass of predatory parasites nurtured by, and wholly dependent upon, the federal government. |
|
Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Holy shit, NH has fewer murders per 100k than Iceland. 12 in the whole state. I wonder why? Let me see: http://ow.ly/VeSkC THAT'S RACIST!! Stupid racist numbers!!! |
|
Quoted:
"Socioeconomic." The vast majority of the people I grew up with were poor and, by most people's standards, "uneducated" and they didn't go around killing each other. Being poor doesn't turn you into a murderer, nor does being "uneducated." Typical leftist bullshit. The area where I live still has a sky high poverty rate but your chances of getting murdered here are very, very low. That's where liberals get it ass backwards. Graduating from high school isn't going to magically endow you with some sort of superior moral character. Rather, violent, predatory shitbags are simply not very likely to finish high school. People don't commit murder because they missed out on high school biology classes. So yeah, there's a statistical correlation between education and crime, but it's not a cause and effect relationship. It's o.k. We know what you actually meant to say was that the states in question have a high percentage of people from a particularly brutal, destructive subculture that glorifies violence, drug use, and stupidity while exhibiting not the slightest, remotest concept of impulse control. A subculture mollycoddled and bankrolled from cradle to prison to grave by the U.S. taxpayer. A grotesque underclass of predatory parasites nurtured by, and wholly dependent upon, the federal government. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Socioeconomics matter more than geography, the two just happen to correlate fairly well. The top 10 worst are primarily poorer states with relatively large populations of poor and uneducated. "Socioeconomic." The vast majority of the people I grew up with were poor and, by most people's standards, "uneducated" and they didn't go around killing each other. Being poor doesn't turn you into a murderer, nor does being "uneducated." Typical leftist bullshit. The area where I live still has a sky high poverty rate but your chances of getting murdered here are very, very low. That's where liberals get it ass backwards. Graduating from high school isn't going to magically endow you with some sort of superior moral character. Rather, violent, predatory shitbags are simply not very likely to finish high school. People don't commit murder because they missed out on high school biology classes. So yeah, there's a statistical correlation between education and crime, but it's not a cause and effect relationship. It's o.k. We know what you actually meant to say was that the states in question have a high percentage of people from a particularly brutal, destructive subculture that glorifies violence, drug use, and stupidity while exhibiting not the slightest, remotest concept of impulse control. A subculture mollycoddled and bankrolled from cradle to prison to grave by the U.S. taxpayer. A grotesque underclass of predatory parasites nurtured by, and wholly dependent upon, the federal government. must be why west virginia isso high on the list |
|
|
|
Quoted:
Ca is 21/50 in murder rate. Floriduh is 13/50. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
California stats are impressive. Obviously gun control is really working for them. Ca is 21/50 in murder rate. Floriduh is 13/50. I wasn't comparing our two states. Most people get my point. You obviously didn't. |
|
|
Quoted:
California stats are impressive. Obviously gun control is really working for them. View Quote Seems like both murders per capita and murders with firearms per capita increased, but they increased faster elsewhere, so California got a small bump for total murders from 21st to 20th place but got a relative drop in firearms murders from 11th to 15th place. Looks like Guam, American Samoa, and the Northern Marianas didn't have murders this year, if our colonies are only included when the actually have murders (which I assume, seeing as how Guam was listed for 2013's stats). |
|
Quoted:
rank by % white folk, see how it matches up. diversity kills. View Quote I was just thinking how interesting it would be, to see the murders overlayed on the Demographics map. I'm betting there would be very few surprises. That's not to say white people are harmless. They are by far, the deadliest breed when provoked and organized. More methodical and scientific. |
|
|
Quoted:
Even worse, it's mostly males. @6.5% committing 50%. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Baltimore routinely has half the total murders in MD, with only 10% of the population of the state. Look at SC's demographics, and realize that one particular group, while comprising 30 percent of our population, commit 74 percent of the murders. 91 percent of those murders are against other members of the same group. The group? You guessed it: Lesbians. Kidding! LOL! It's not Lesbians. I'll let Carnac clue you in... If you haven't noticed, one certain race that consists of 13% of the US population commits 50% of all murders in the US. This is pretty consistent year to year if you break it down by race. @6.5% committing 50%. It's worse than that. You have to take out the very young, and the very old. Those in the prime murdering ages of 14-50, would only consist of maybe 3.5%. So, 3.5% commit 50% of the murders. |
|
Indiana gets inflated by its proximity to Illinois. We get a lot of Chicago gang banging that carriers over into Gary, and unfortunately has made its way south down I65 to Indy.
|
|
|
|
Quoted:
Seems like both murders per capita and murders with firearms per capita increased, but they increased faster elsewhere, so California got a small bump for total murders from 21st to 20th place but got a relative drop in firearms murders from 11th to 15th place. Looks like Guam, American Samoa, and the Northern Marianas didn't have murders this year, if our colonies are only included when the actually have murders (which I assume, seeing as how Guam was listed for 2013's stats). View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
California stats are impressive. Obviously gun control is really working for them. Seems like both murders per capita and murders with firearms per capita increased, but they increased faster elsewhere, so California got a small bump for total murders from 21st to 20th place but got a relative drop in firearms murders from 11th to 15th place. Looks like Guam, American Samoa, and the Northern Marianas didn't have murders this year, if our colonies are only included when the actually have murders (which I assume, seeing as how Guam was listed for 2013's stats). Guam did, it was included in the FBI data, but I removed it from my chart for this year. It had 6 murders on the FBI table. |
|
Quoted: Shoot if you look at Illinois, probably half their total murders are just Chicago, which is about 20% of their population. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Thanks a lot, Birmingham. Take away the 417 murders and 2.7mil people from shitcago and IL would be near the bottom of the list. A good bit of the other 260 is likely from Rockford. |
|
Personally, I like to start by reviewing the raw data before processing it. Post-processing is where politics enters and makes statistics into "a game".
Which State has the largest number of murders? California_____________1,697 Texas____________________1,141 New York____________________613 Pennsylvania____________________609 Georgia____________________540 Michigan____________________531 North Carolina____________________469 Ohio____________________436 Illinois3____________________428 Louisiana____________________407 Missouri____________________402 Tennessee____________________370 New Jersey____________________337 Virginia____________________337 Maryland____________________309 South Carolina____________________301 Indiana____________________299 Arizona____________________258 Washington____________________172 Nevada____________________169 Oklahoma____________________167 Mississippi____________________161 Kentucky____________________160 Wisconsin____________________158 Arkansas____________________154 Colorado____________________149 Massachusetts____________________131 District of Columbia______________105 New Mexico____________________96 Kansas____________________89 Connecticut____________________83 Minnesota____________________82 Oregon____________________73 West Virginia____________________62 Utah____________________61 Iowa____________________55 Delaware____________________54 Nebraska____________________51 Alaska____________________41 Idaho____________________30 Montana____________________27 Rhode Island____________________25 Virgin Islands____________________25 Maine____________________21 South Dakota____________________15 North Dakota____________________14 Wyoming____________________13 New Hampshire____________________12 Vermont____________________10 Guam____________________6 Hawaii____________________5 Alabama____________________1 I don't really like the frequency interpretation. It makes murder seem like a random act, occurring as a rate within a State's population. That is malarkey! Murder is not a random thing. Murder, by legal definition, is a deliberate act. What I want to see is the geographic distribution of the data, where are the unsafe areas. What I want to see is the cause (motive) of the murders - drug money related, spousal abuse,... Crime statistics plotted geographically can be seen here - Crime Mapping |
|
Quoted:
Personally, I like to start by reviewing the raw data before processing it. Post-processing is where politics enters and makes statistics into "a game". Which State has the largest number of murders? -snip- View Quote You can't be serious Some of your numbers are fucky, and you left out FL. The raw data effectively shows you the population of each state, useless. |
|
Quoted:
You can't be serious Some of your numbers are fucky, and you left out FL. The raw data effectively shows you the population of each state, useless. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Personally, I like to start by reviewing the raw data before processing it. Post-processing is where politics enters and makes statistics into "a game". Which State has the largest number of murders? -snip- You can't be serious Some of your numbers are fucky, and you left out FL. The raw data effectively shows you the population of each state, useless. Wrong! According to that logic, the rate (murders/100,000) would be constant. It is not. Re-read the post. This type of response is indicative of the types of politicking I was mentioning above. |
|
Wow, Wyoming must be looking pretty empty without those 13 people around.
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted:
In gross terms, sure. However............. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Thanks a lot, Birmingham. In gross terms, sure. However............. But, according to an AL.com analysis of the numbers, it's not the state's most crime-infested. Statewide, Anniston had the highest homicide and violent crime rate per capita, while Selma had the highest property crime and total rate. There was a murder a block away from their stadium while we were playing them a few weeks ago. Guy that got shot was a little brother to a Tampa Bay Buccaneers defensive back. |
|
Quoted:
I would love to see a simple correlation graph. I think we'd reach statistical significance. View Quote Crime statistics plotted geographically can be seen here - Crime Mapping You can sort/filter by crime type (murder, in this case), range of dates, etc. |
|
|
|
|
Quoted:
The 10 worst have plenty of pro gun states so I am not sure how that argument works. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
So wait a sec.... You're telling me that Texas, one of the most gun friendly states, has a lower rate of murders by firearms than California? Cali, I am disappoint. Maybe they should pass more laws. Surely, the criminals will think they're serious when the next law passes. The 10 worst have plenty of pro gun states so I am not sure how that argument works. Cut out the south end of north las vegas, numbers and dead presidents and the ghetto strip you would see Nevada fall pretty far to the bottom of the list. |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.