User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 8/27/2015 7:53:11 PM EDT
[#1]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I bet he has calculated that negative reviews make more money Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
I made it through the first minute. He can FOAD Pretty much this. If you make money by clicks, then posting a divisive and inflammatory review is going to get you more clicks then a review saying that its a good gun. Unfortunately the internet rewards stupidity. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/27/2015 7:56:17 PM EDT
[#2]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Other posters probably don't care too much about a statement like that posted on an internet board. They'll simply click the 'back' button and continue on. Seriously, 2015 has been the year of the hurt feels. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
No sand here, just pointing out the irrational personal attacks that are apparently accepted and defended here so long as other posters like you agree with it. It's an odd double standard! Eta;: notice at least 4 posters seem more offended that I pointed this out than they are over the actual personal attack against members ? Other posters probably don't care too much about a statement like that posted on an internet board. They'll simply click the 'back' button and continue on. Seriously, 2015 has been the year of the hurt feels. Didn't say there were any hurt feelz, did I? I pointed out that it was a personal attack. No where did I say I was offended or upset 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/27/2015 7:58:55 PM EDT
[#3]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Didn't say there were any hurt feelz, did I? I pointed out that it was a personal attack. No where did I say I was offended or upset
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
No sand here, just pointing out the irrational personal attacks that are apparently accepted and defended here so long as other posters like you agree with it. It's an odd double standard! Eta;: notice at least 4 posters seem more offended that I pointed this out than they are over the actual personal attack against members ? Other posters probably don't care too much about a statement like that posted on an internet board. They'll simply click the 'back' button and continue on. Seriously, 2015 has been the year of the hurt feels. Didn't say there were any hurt feelz, did I? I pointed out that it was a personal attack. No where did I say I was offended or upset
Except it wasn't a personal attack, and the fact that you wrote out a long comment about it shows that you're ass-blasted about it. ETA: And you finished your comment with this: Quoted:
Is it ok to directly break the COC and attack other members now? If that's the case, then fuck you, guy. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/27/2015 8:00:11 PM EDT
[#4]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Honestly I take that as a personal attack. I'm not a huge Nutn fan and I disagree with him on a lot of things, but I do watch some of his vids and generally pick up some decent info or learn at least some bit of info from what he's reviewing. Same goes for every other youtube gun/knife reviewer that's consistent and thorough. I watch Sootch, Hickock, LAV, and tons of other content creators on YT and they all offer different perspectives and info on these products. I find nutn annoying but he does offer some consistent data. So, going to continue with the direct blatant personal attacks, guy? Is it ok to directly break the COC and attack other members now? If that's the case, then fuck you, guy. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
The guy and everyone who enjoys his videos is a fucking moron. Honestly I take that as a personal attack. I'm not a huge Nutn fan and I disagree with him on a lot of things, but I do watch some of his vids and generally pick up some decent info or learn at least some bit of info from what he's reviewing. Same goes for every other youtube gun/knife reviewer that's consistent and thorough. I watch Sootch, Hickock, LAV, and tons of other content creators on YT and they all offer different perspectives and info on these products. I find nutn annoying but he does offer some consistent data. So, going to continue with the direct blatant personal attacks, guy? Is it ok to directly break the COC and attack other members now? If that's the case, then fuck you, guy. You self identify as a moron. That's cool. No judgement here. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/27/2015 8:01:39 PM EDT
[#5]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I'm going to tell my mommy on you. This made my stress card spike. For the record, no, no, no you do not learn anything helpful or pick up generally good info from his videos. His videos serve as a warning to others of what not to do. Glock Cerakote LaRue tampering Dispelling Myths of Long Range Shooting and the Sniper Walther PPQ Sniper's Psitol Sniper Prime Everything I've seen from him is a colossal abortion of juvenile magnitude, amplified on 45 minutes youtube videos where all that is clear is that he loves the sound of his own voice, and is about as knowledgeable about firearms as a pre-pubescent Call of Duty fan. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
The guy and everyone who enjoys his videos is a fucking moron. Honestly I take that as a personal attack. I'm not a huge Nutn fan and I disagree with him on a lot of things, but I do watch some of his vids and generally pick up some decent info or learn at least some bit of info from what he's reviewing. Same goes for every other youtube gun/knife reviewer that's consistent and thorough. I watch Sootch, Hickock, LAV, and tons of other content creators on YT and they all offer different perspectives and info on these products. I find nutn annoying but he does offer some consistent data. So, going to continue with the direct blatant personal attacks, guy? Is it ok to directly break the COC and attack other members now? If that's the case, then fuck you, guy. Oh shit, better post about DRhodes in the butthurt thread and report him for trolling! Is this what our site has become? I'm going to tell my mommy on you. This made my stress card spike. For the record, no, no, no you do not learn anything helpful or pick up generally good info from his videos. His videos serve as a warning to others of what not to do. Glock Cerakote LaRue tampering Dispelling Myths of Long Range Shooting and the Sniper Walther PPQ Sniper's Psitol Sniper Prime Everything I've seen from him is a colossal abortion of juvenile magnitude, amplified on 45 minutes youtube videos where all that is clear is that he loves the sound of his own voice, and is about as knowledgeable about firearms as a pre-pubescent Call of Duty fan. I really respect you LRR, and your posts are generally very informative and rational. Your threads are awesome. I agree on some of your points but like I said, I'll watch 5 different reviews on a gun from different content creators and generally get some interesting ideas from each. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/27/2015 8:02:29 PM EDT
[#6]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Honestly I take that as a personal attack. I'm not a huge Nutn fan and I disagree with him on a lot of things, but I do watch some of his vids and generally pick up some decent info or learn at least some bit of info from what he's reviewing. Same goes for every other youtube gun/knife reviewer that's consistent and thorough. I watch Sootch, Hickock, LAV, and tons of other content creators on YT and they all offer different perspectives and info on these products. I find nutn annoying but he does offer some consistent data. So, going to continue with the direct blatant personal attacks, guy? Is it ok to directly break the COC and attack other members now? If that's the case, then fuck you, guy. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
The guy and everyone who enjoys his videos is a fucking moron. Honestly I take that as a personal attack. I'm not a huge Nutn fan and I disagree with him on a lot of things, but I do watch some of his vids and generally pick up some decent info or learn at least some bit of info from what he's reviewing. Same goes for every other youtube gun/knife reviewer that's consistent and thorough. I watch Sootch, Hickock, LAV, and tons of other content creators on YT and they all offer different perspectives and info on these products. I find nutn annoying but he does offer some consistent data. So, going to continue with the direct blatant personal attacks, guy? Is it ok to directly break the COC and attack other members now? If that's the case, then fuck you, guy. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/27/2015 8:02:40 PM EDT
[#7]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Fuck that guy. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/27/2015 8:03:47 PM EDT
[#8]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Honestly I take that as a personal attack. I'm not a huge Nutn fan and I disagree with him on a lot of things, but I do watch some of his vids and generally pick up some decent info or learn at least some bit of info from what he's reviewing. Same goes for every other youtube gun/knife reviewer that's consistent and thorough. I watch Sootch, Hickock, LAV, and tons of other content creators on YT and they all offer different perspectives and info on these products. I find nutn annoying but he does offer some consistent data. So, going to continue with the direct blatant personal attacks, guy? Is it ok to directly break the COC and attack other members now? If that's the case, then fuck you, guy. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
The guy and everyone who enjoys his videos is a fucking moron. Honestly I take that as a personal attack. I'm not a huge Nutn fan and I disagree with him on a lot of things, but I do watch some of his vids and generally pick up some decent info or learn at least some bit of info from what he's reviewing. Same goes for every other youtube gun/knife reviewer that's consistent and thorough. I watch Sootch, Hickock, LAV, and tons of other content creators on YT and they all offer different perspectives and info on these products. I find nutn annoying but he does offer some consistent data. So, going to continue with the direct blatant personal attacks, guy? Is it ok to directly break the COC and attack other members now? If that's the case, then fuck you, guy. This year has shown me that there is far more sand on this planet and far bigger vaginas than I ever could have imagined. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/27/2015 8:05:07 PM EDT
[#9]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I really respect you LRR, and your posts are generally very informative and rational. Your threads are awesome. I agree on some of your points but like I said, I'll watch 5 different reviews on a gun from different content creators and generally get some interesting ideas from each. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
The guy and everyone who enjoys his videos is a fucking moron. Honestly I take that as a personal attack. I'm not a huge Nutn fan and I disagree with him on a lot of things, but I do watch some of his vids and generally pick up some decent info or learn at least some bit of info from what he's reviewing. Same goes for every other youtube gun/knife reviewer that's consistent and thorough. I watch Sootch, Hickock, LAV, and tons of other content creators on YT and they all offer different perspectives and info on these products. I find nutn annoying but he does offer some consistent data. So, going to continue with the direct blatant personal attacks, guy? Is it ok to directly break the COC and attack other members now? If that's the case, then fuck you, guy. Oh shit, better post about DRhodes in the butthurt thread and report him for trolling! Is this what our site has become? I'm going to tell my mommy on you. This made my stress card spike. For the record, no, no, no you do not learn anything helpful or pick up generally good info from his videos. His videos serve as a warning to others of what not to do. Glock Cerakote LaRue tampering Dispelling Myths of Long Range Shooting and the Sniper Walther PPQ Sniper's Psitol Sniper Prime Everything I've seen from him is a colossal abortion of juvenile magnitude, amplified on 45 minutes youtube videos where all that is clear is that he loves the sound of his own voice, and is about as knowledgeable about firearms as a pre-pubescent Call of Duty fan. I really respect you LRR, and your posts are generally very informative and rational. Your threads are awesome. I agree on some of your points but like I said, I'll watch 5 different reviews on a gun from different content creators and generally get some interesting ideas from each. Hey sports fan, are you done yet ? |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/27/2015 8:06:10 PM EDT
[#10]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Except it wasn't a personal attack, and the fact that you wrote out a long comment about it shows that you're ass-blasted about it. ETA: And you finished your comment with this: Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
No sand here, just pointing out the irrational personal attacks that are apparently accepted and defended here so long as other posters like you agree with it. It's an odd double standard! Eta;: notice at least 4 posters seem more offended that I pointed this out than they are over the actual personal attack against members ? Other posters probably don't care too much about a statement like that posted on an internet board. They'll simply click the 'back' button and continue on. Seriously, 2015 has been the year of the hurt feels. Didn't say there were any hurt feelz, did I? I pointed out that it was a personal attack. No where did I say I was offended or upset
Except it wasn't a personal attack, and the fact that you wrote out a long comment about it shows that you're ass-blasted about it. ETA: And you finished your comment with this: Quoted:
Is it ok to directly break the COC and attack other members now? If that's the case, then fuck you, guy. You couldn't be more wrong. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/27/2015 8:07:11 PM EDT
[#11]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
It wouldn't have if he had fucked with the gas block placement. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
 at any KAC fanboys that laughed when LaRue was the target
ETA: I own both and think both are awesome. except this gun works. Regardless, hes a know it all but actual dumb idiot.
It wouldn't have if he had fucked with the gas block placement. theres no proof of that. That was pure speculation. No one, and not you got that gun into their hands and actually fixed it. That assessment was based off a picture. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/27/2015 8:09:37 PM EDT
[#12]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
You couldn't be more wrong. Quote HistoryQuoted:
You couldn't be more wrong. Quoted:
Is it ok to directly break the COC and attack other members now? If that's the case, then fuck you, guy. Someone who isn't butthurt doesn't tell someone else "fuck you." If you're going to lie, you should try and hide your feelings a little better. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/27/2015 8:11:08 PM EDT
[#13]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
He's baiting people for ad revenue. I guess retiring from the Air Force (Guard or Reserves) as an O-5 doesn't pay all that well after all. Does anybody know what youtube pays per view or click? |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/27/2015 8:11:12 PM EDT
[#14]
I know who he is. I don't give a shit what he says.
I don't click on his drivel. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/27/2015 8:11:21 PM EDT
[#15]
Quote HistoryQuoted: He's baiting people for ad revenue. Exactly why I didn't even click. I keep thinking I'm going to run into him out in the desert... so far I have been lucky, and have not. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/27/2015 8:12:14 PM EDT
[#16]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
The KAC I have is actually pretty damn light for a 16 inch barrel. Mod 1 URX 3.1 I put an Elcan on it too which isn't exactly the lightest optic. Which Elcan? M145? Or Spectre? |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/27/2015 8:12:45 PM EDT
[#17]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
You couldn't be more wrong. So you're saying you weren't ass-mad about it? If not, then why insult him at the end of your comment? Or are you disagreeing with me telling you it wasn't a personal attack? If so, here's the rule about personal attacks: "6) Attacking or insulting a person in an effort to elicit a negative response. You have a right to disagree, but please do so in a respectful manner. " Being that he didn't specifically state your name, or quote you, or refer to any member specifically, it's not attacking or insulting a person other than Nutnfancy. You came into the thread and bitched about his comment, which wasn't about anyone specifically other than Nutnfancy. You can make comments in general about people who do things (i.e. "People who split lanes are cunts") and it doesn't fall under the rule. So unless you're Nutnfancy, he hasn't personally attacked or insulted you. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/27/2015 8:13:48 PM EDT
[#18]
Just one man's opinion, GD. Get over it.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/27/2015 8:13:53 PM EDT
[#19]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Like I said. Morons. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
lolz at the guys who didn't bother watching.... he liked the gun, thought it was well made, just too expensive. that is an argument many here in GD make with regards to the "fancy roll mark" rifles. I watched it. Everything he said about specific details was either incorrect or crazy. Like I said. Morons. QFT |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/27/2015 8:14:09 PM EDT
[#20]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I bought a Mod 0 during the panic for around 1600. He is as good at finding deals as he is at installing gas blocks. lol, this is funny though. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/27/2015 8:15:24 PM EDT
[#21]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I guess retiring from the Air Force (Guard or Reserves) as an O-5 doesn't pay all that well after all. Does anybody know what youtube pays per view or click? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
He's baiting people for ad revenue. I guess retiring from the Air Force (Guard or Reserves) as an O-5 doesn't pay all that well after all. Does anybody know what youtube pays per view or click? Youtube should seriously only count it as a view if you watch more than 50% of the video. That would solve this problem quickly. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/27/2015 8:15:32 PM EDT
[#22]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Lol at him talking about gas blocks. Mod0 is attached by press fitting besides those screws btw nutn, so you would a have a hard time getting it off to ruin that gun like you did the Larue. I also like how he says the competition has rounded lugs, dual extractors etc. He wants the super thin barrel fluted, then claims the KAC profile barrel that has a completely different gas length and profile is "mil spec". Calls the bolt an "m16" bolt. its not its propriety. Calls a URX rail UBX rail. Says its too heavy and too expensive, recommends LWRC. Does he actually know anything about guns???? ANYTHING? At one point in time he recommended CCI Blazer 115gr Gold Dot (not sure if they still make that particular load: 115gr GD in aluminum case) as carry ammo because ... it was cheap and he could shoot a lot of it.  |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/27/2015 8:15:48 PM EDT
[#23]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I bought a Mod 0 during the panic for around 1600. He is as good at finding deals as he is at installing gas blocks. Ya, that struck me as odd also. I've got about what he quoted as the MSRP for his example into my complete rifle. But I also bought the upper and lower separately (as I had funds) and have much newer SR-15E3 IWS Mod1 upper with the lighter 3.1URX rail. I way over-paid and still got a far newer and upgraded rifle over what he paid for what I assume to be a used rifle. Is anybody is paying $2200 MSRP on a mod0 anyway? I mean, those are pretty much only available on the used market now right? |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/27/2015 8:16:17 PM EDT
[#24]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Tag for when I have a free 8 hours. You found an edited down version? Link please. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/27/2015 8:17:32 PM EDT
[#25]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Youtube should seriously only count it as a view if you watch more than 50% of the video. That would solve this problem quickly. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
He's baiting people for ad revenue. I guess retiring from the Air Force (Guard or Reserves) as an O-5 doesn't pay all that well after all. Does anybody know what youtube pays per view or click? Youtube should seriously only count it as a view if you watch more than 50% of the video. That would solve this problem quickly. Then he'd only have 1 view... |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/27/2015 8:18:11 PM EDT
[#26]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Fuck that guy. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/27/2015 8:18:29 PM EDT
[#27]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Calls the bolt an "m16" bolt. its not its propriety. E3 totally not worth it brah....no cerekote on it. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/27/2015 8:21:30 PM EDT
[#28]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
E3 totally not worth it brah....no cerekote on it. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Calls the bolt an "m16" bolt. its not its propriety. E3 totally not worth it brah....no cerekote on it. Nutn would agree. He'd say its just a convention with a bunch of gaming nerds. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/27/2015 8:23:20 PM EDT
[#29]
I assume someone told him its not really designed or marketed as an "accurate" rifle. 2moa for something that runs right is fine by me. not watching 20 minutes of that.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/27/2015 8:24:28 PM EDT
[#30]
Quote HistoryQuoted: "Can't change the ejection, it ejects right" Well yeah.... |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/27/2015 8:25:49 PM EDT
[#31]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I'll watch 5 different reviews on a gun from different content creators and generally get some interesting ideas from each. What is the benefit of watching 4 real reviews and then adding one false review full of disinformation, lies, and insanity? |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/27/2015 8:25:53 PM EDT
[#32]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I really respect you LRR, and your posts are generally very informative and rational. Your threads are awesome. I agree on some of your points but like I said, I'll watch 5 different reviews on a gun from different content creators and generally get some interesting ideas from each. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
The guy and everyone who enjoys his videos is a fucking moron. Honestly I take that as a personal attack. I'm not a huge Nutn fan and I disagree with him on a lot of things, but I do watch some of his vids and generally pick up some decent info or learn at least some bit of info from what he's reviewing. Same goes for every other youtube gun/knife reviewer that's consistent and thorough. I watch Sootch, Hickock, LAV, and tons of other content creators on YT and they all offer different perspectives and info on these products. I find nutn annoying but he does offer some consistent data. So, going to continue with the direct blatant personal attacks, guy? Is it ok to directly break the COC and attack other members now? If that's the case, then fuck you, guy. Oh shit, better post about DRhodes in the butthurt thread and report him for trolling! Is this what our site has become? I'm going to tell my mommy on you. This made my stress card spike. For the record, no, no, no you do not learn anything helpful or pick up generally good info from his videos. His videos serve as a warning to others of what not to do. Glock Cerakote LaRue tampering Dispelling Myths of Long Range Shooting and the Sniper Walther PPQ Sniper's Psitol Sniper Prime Everything I've seen from him is a colossal abortion of juvenile magnitude, amplified on 45 minutes youtube videos where all that is clear is that he loves the sound of his own voice, and is about as knowledgeable about firearms as a pre-pubescent Call of Duty fan. I really respect you LRR, and your posts are generally very informative and rational. Your threads are awesome. I agree on some of your points but like I said, I'll watch 5 different reviews on a gun from different content creators and generally get some interesting ideas from each. If you haven't learned by now that you don't get any "content" from Nutnfancy, other than how big of a twat he is, then I feel sorry for you. He's not a contet creator, he's a bullshit slinger. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/27/2015 8:37:35 PM EDT
[#33]
Any NUTNFANCY supporter is a certified sadist and/or absolute dolt. It takes far too long for that squibbly mouthed kook to prattle long enough to get 1 or possibly 2 coherent arguments/facts recorded.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/27/2015 8:38:17 PM EDT
[#34]
I'm not a fan of nutnfancy, but I do love nutnfancy threads.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/27/2015 8:39:30 PM EDT
[#35]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Except it wasn't a personal attack, and the fact that you wrote out a long comment about it shows that you're ass-blasted about it. ETA: And you finished your comment with this: Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
No sand here, just pointing out the irrational personal attacks that are apparently accepted and defended here so long as other posters like you agree with it. It's an odd double standard! Eta;: notice at least 4 posters seem more offended that I pointed this out than they are over the actual personal attack against members ? Other posters probably don't care too much about a statement like that posted on an internet board. They'll simply click the 'back' button and continue on. Seriously, 2015 has been the year of the hurt feels. Didn't say there were any hurt feelz, did I? I pointed out that it was a personal attack. No where did I say I was offended or upset
Except it wasn't a personal attack, and the fact that you wrote out a long comment about it shows that you're ass-blasted about it. ETA: And you finished your comment with this: Quoted:
Is it ok to directly break the COC and attack other members now? If that's the case, then fuck you, guy. It was an impersonal attack, perhaps quasi-personal. Shut her down boys.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/27/2015 8:39:31 PM EDT
[#36]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
So you're saying you weren't ass-mad about it? If not, then why insult him at the end of your comment? Or are you disagreeing with me telling you it wasn't a personal attack? If so, here's the rule about personal attacks: "6) Attacking or insulting a person in an effort to elicit a negative response. You have a right to disagree, but please do so in a respectful manner. " Being that he didn't specifically state your name, or quote you, or refer to any member specifically, it's not attacking or insulting a person other than Nutnfancy. You came into the thread and bitched about his comment, which wasn't about anyone specifically other than Nutnfancy. You can make comments in general about people who do things (i.e. "People who split lanes are cunts") and it doesn't fall under the rule. So unless you're Nutnfancy, he hasn't personally attacked or insulted you. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
You couldn't be more wrong. So you're saying you weren't ass-mad about it? If not, then why insult him at the end of your comment? Or are you disagreeing with me telling you it wasn't a personal attack? If so, here's the rule about personal attacks: "6) Attacking or insulting a person in an effort to elicit a negative response. You have a right to disagree, but please do so in a respectful manner. " Being that he didn't specifically state your name, or quote you, or refer to any member specifically, it's not attacking or insulting a person other than Nutnfancy. You came into the thread and bitched about his comment, which wasn't about anyone specifically other than Nutnfancy. You can make comments in general about people who do things (i.e. "People who split lanes are cunts") and it doesn't fall under the rule. So unless you're Nutnfancy, he hasn't personally attacked or insulted you. Nope, not butthurt! The fuck you guy I added in a sarcastic tone but admittedly it can be tough to get sarcasm from the written word. Also I was already in this thread responding to someone else earlier. Not seeing why this is causing such an uproar. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/27/2015 8:42:03 PM EDT
[#37]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Fuck that guy. The internet = Giving the village idiot/asshole/pedo/know it all cock smoker a megaphone since 1993. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/27/2015 8:45:17 PM EDT
[#38]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Youtube should seriously only count it as a view if you watch more than 50% of the video. That would solve this problem quickly. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
He's baiting people for ad revenue. I guess retiring from the Air Force (Guard or Reserves) as an O-5 doesn't pay all that well after all. Does anybody know what youtube pays per view or click? Youtube should seriously only count it as a view if you watch more than 50% of the video. That would solve this problem quickly. I haven't set up my youtube channel to monetize anything. I try to keep my vids as short as possible, and try my best not to talk at all. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/27/2015 8:51:33 PM EDT
[#40]
I don't think nutn gives a shit about subscribers or views. If he did his videos wouldn't be so long and he'd do more of them. I don't get all the hate. He does a lot of shooting. I think his videos are quite repetitive at times but he's better than most of what's on tv and I like his opinions because he's shot so many different kinds of guns. He's a pretty good shot too.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/27/2015 8:53:09 PM EDT
[#41]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Nope, not butthurt! The fuck you guy I added in a sarcastic tone but admittedly it can be tough to get sarcasm from the written word. Also I was already in this thread responding to someone else earlier. Not seeing why this is causing such an uproar. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
You couldn't be more wrong. So you're saying you weren't ass-mad about it? If not, then why insult him at the end of your comment? Or are you disagreeing with me telling you it wasn't a personal attack? If so, here's the rule about personal attacks: "6) Attacking or insulting a person in an effort to elicit a negative response. You have a right to disagree, but please do so in a respectful manner. " Being that he didn't specifically state your name, or quote you, or refer to any member specifically, it's not attacking or insulting a person other than Nutnfancy. You came into the thread and bitched about his comment, which wasn't about anyone specifically other than Nutnfancy. You can make comments in general about people who do things (i.e. "People who split lanes are cunts") and it doesn't fall under the rule. So unless you're Nutnfancy, he hasn't personally attacked or insulted you. Nope, not butthurt! The fuck you guy I added in a sarcastic tone but admittedly it can be tough to get sarcasm from the written word. Also I was already in this thread responding to someone else earlier. Not seeing why this is causing such an uproar. Because he's a fudd and some people take him seriously. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/27/2015 8:54:35 PM EDT
[#42]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I don't think nutn gives a shit about subscribers or views. If he did his videos wouldn't be so long and he'd do more of them. I don't get all the hate. He does a lot of shooting. I think his videos are quite repetitive at times but he's better than most of what's on tv and I like his opinions because he's shot so many different kinds of guns. He's a pretty good shot too. I have seen a lot of movies. I am now a movie expert. I have eaten a lot of sandwiches. I am now a head chef at a Michelin restaurant. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/27/2015 8:57:03 PM EDT
[#43]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I have seen a lot of movies. I am now a movie expert. I have eaten a lot of sandwiches. I am now a head chef at a Michelin restaurant. Yep. I know fuck-all about cars, I am now going to drive a bunch and then explain exact engine specs and get them all wrong. You should believe my reviews because I drove a bunch of cars! |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/27/2015 9:02:52 PM EDT
[#44]
Came here to make a thread about the same thing, but I was beaten
 . I thought the groups he showed were interesting. 3shot groups for everything, but the Kac? Lots of vertical and horizontal stringing makes me think it was shit ammo and a bad shooter. Not to mention it didn't seem consistent in placement. Personally I think the rifle is more accurate then that, but I wasn't on the rifle when it was being shot so I can't be sure, same way I can't be sure nutn doesn't know how to install a gasblock 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/27/2015 9:04:31 PM EDT
[#45]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I watched it. Everything he said about specific details was either incorrect or crazy. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
lolz at the guys who didn't bother watching.... he liked the gun, thought it was well made, just too expensive. that is an argument many here in GD make with regards to the "fancy roll mark" rifles. I watched it. Everything he said about specific details was either incorrect or crazy. Quoted:
Quoted:
Nothing he said in the video seems to match up with reality. I think it would actually be impossible to say more incorrect info in a single video about specs/parts/etc. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/27/2015 9:05:41 PM EDT
[#46]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/27/2015 9:08:50 PM EDT
[#47]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
An excellent summation of the Nut'n experience. Quote HistoryI think of that clip every time I see an excerpt from one of his "reviews" 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/27/2015 9:14:09 PM EDT
[#48]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
What is the benefit of watching 4 real reviews and then adding one false review full of disinformation, lies, and insanity? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
I'll watch 5 different reviews on a gun from different content creators and generally get some interesting ideas from each. What is the benefit of watching 4 real reviews and then adding one false review full of disinformation, lies, and insanity? I think it's important to take reviews in general with a grain of salt. I agree nutn presents tons of stupid and/or wrong information in a lot of his videos. He's all pro shotgun/AK and gets stuff wrong fairly often. He's still ocassionaly capable of putting a good perspective or data out on at least some aspects or products. For instance, I learned some bits about the buffalo bore loads for 10mm from one of his vids. Would I get more/better/more accurate info elsewhere? Yeah, but I still watch bits of his content looking for more data or opinions on some products. Sometimes I learn something, but I get more info from forums. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/27/2015 9:14:58 PM EDT
[#49]
His judgement is fucky.
Can't help but wonder if he is: a) Attention whoring for more ad revenue? b) Suffering the long-term effects of repeated autoerotic asphyxiation? I'm not going to give him the click, so I guess I'll never know. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/27/2015 9:16:42 PM EDT
[#50]
Not clicking, already know what a hare lip looks like.
|
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
