User Panel
Yes, inject millions of slave labourers into an already struggling sector. I'm sure the people losing their jobs because they've been replaced by someone who is being forced to do it for free will appreciate the sentiment.
It's like some people watched the Chinese building cities just because they could, that are now crumbling because there's no one to live in them, and said to themselves "What a great idea! We should do that!". |
|
|
I'm sure the commercials would be warm and fuzzy, with old film of WPA construction sites and current video of multi-cultural-color-gender-handicap families enjoying an afternoon in the park.
|
|
Socialism starts out looking attractive. Lets give all 18-20 year old a paid internship. Help them learn an occupation while they work. Of course, this will kill private trade schools, and it will limit jobs after the internship - but that's ok.
|
|
|
So, to all that argued against it because we are free men...who shouldn't be forced to pick cotton or pave roads....
Should we force young men to fight and die in musty jungles for no reason? In other words, are you intellectually consistent? Do you hold draft dodgers to be heroes or cowards? |
|
Quoted:
So, to all that argued against it because we are free men...who shouldn't be forced to pick cotton or pave roads.... Should we force young men to fight and die in musty jungles for no reason? In other words, are you intellectually consistent? Do you hold draft dodgers to be heroes or cowards? View Quote NO... we shouldn't force young men to die in the musty jungles for no reason. YES... if it becomes TRULY necessary, we may have to draft young men to defend our borders (though of course I hope it never comes to that). But we don't seem to care about or borders or security anymore... so, I guess there's no point of a draft anyways... |
|
Fuck that.
Labor cost is probably the biggest thing keeping our bloated government as small as it is. The last thing we want to give them is free labor. |
|
Mamas boy Jaden first job is working on building a highway I am going to use.....
Just NO |
|
View Quote Weird, because, you agree with me that compulsory service to the State is unamerican and wrong.... So..... Are you a hippie Paul bot or what? |
|
I am not pro-slavery, no matter the noble cause. If you can't get people to volunteer to do it, it is not worth doing.
|
|
Quoted:
So, to all that argued against it because we are free men...who shouldn't be forced to pick cotton or pave roads.... Should we force young men to fight and die in musty jungles for no reason? In other words, are you intellectually consistent? Do you hold draft dodgers to be heroes or cowards? View Quote Nope, again, if you can not get men to volunteer to fight for their country, maybe you need to look at why not? |
|
America... where you can be whatever you want to be. Right after you finish these two years of state-mandated manual labor.
Cuz FREEDOM! Fucks sake, arfcom. |
|
Quoted:
Because Americorps works so well we need to expand it? View Quote Hey, I saw them in downtown San Antonio a couple of years after The Great One, the Freer of the Oppressed, Barrack Obama was elected. They were on one of those big charter buses and got off in the plaza. They were were wearing matching hoodies. I am not sure what they worked on because I could not see any difference when I came by during my lunch hour. |
|
|
FDR did that already, it was called "The New Deal."
It worked pretty damn well. |
|
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
You want people to build highways that can't even put the correct three items in a bag? People rise to expectations People fall to their level of training and experience, and they would have none. How about draft welfare recipients, and whip them until they do shit right, or they'll find other work. |
|
Quoted:
FDR did that already, it was called "The New Deal." It worked pretty damn well. View Quote The only thing the New Deal did was win him multiple reelections. It didn't do a damn thing to shorten the Depression or make it any less bad. Point of fact, it mostly likely prolonged the Depression. |
|
|
|
Quoted:
So, to all that argued against it because we are free men...who shouldn't be forced to pick cotton or pave roads.... Should we force young men to fight and die in musty jungles for no reason? In other words, are you intellectually consistent? Do you hold draft dodgers to be heroes or cowards? View Quote No one forced me. |
|
|
|
Quoted:
Sup player? Do I make you feel inadequate? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Another fucking patchouli thread Sup player? Do I make you feel inadequate? No. In every thread I've ever read of yours, inadequacy was the last thing I can imagine feeling. |
|
This is how a thread looks when someone wants to troll, but just can't get it put together.
Mostly because people remember past threads started by the same member. |
|
|
No service?
No govt assistance of any kind...scholarships, grants, loans, no welfare without special situation. No right to vote. You don't give, you have no voice. Am I sounding like a socialist? And I'm not saying it has to be hard labor....find something productive. Cut grass. Assist at welfare office or child services.... |
|
Everyone knows there are no skills needed to work on buildings and infrastructure projects. Construction is for dopes, anyway.
OP is dildos. |
|
Quoted:
No service? No govt assistance of any kind...scholarships, grants, loans, no welfare without special situation. No right to vote. You don't give, you have no voice. Am I sounding like a socialist? View Quote Yes, actually. You do sound like a socialist. Why is it you think government should be doing those things in the first place? Why is it the provenance of government to give educational scholarships? Is the government a bank, that it should pick and choose which businesses it thinks should BE in business and grant loans for them from the public trough? |
|
I'd rather have my kid worry about finishing high school than working on some BS public project.
|
|
I have said for some time that after high school there should be two years of mandatory service.
Don't want to join the military? How about the Peace Corp or something similar? in exchange you get some money for college or trade school and get to grow up a little before you go drink away 4 years of your life while paying $30K to skip class. I went to college after 6 years in the Army and best thing I could of done. If I had gone right out of HS I would have failed out. |
|
Quoted:
I have said for some time that after high school there should be two years of mandatory service. Don't want to join the military? How about the Peace Corp or something similar? in exchange you get some money for college or trade school and get to grow up a little before you go drink away 4 years of your life while paying $30K to skip class. I went to college after 6 years in the Army and best thing I could of done. If I had gone right out of HS I would have failed out. View Quote Well, I guess mommy government knows best, doesn't it? |
|
Quoted:
I have said for some time that after high school there should be two years of mandatory service. Don't want to join the military? How about the Peace Corp or something similar? in exchange you get some money for college or trade school and get to grow up a little before you go drink away 4 years of your life while paying $30K to skip class. I went to college after 6 years in the Army and best thing I could of done. If I had gone right out of HS I would have failed out. View Quote This may be the 2nd dumbest post in this thread. |
|
Quoted:
This may be the 2nd dumbest post in this thread. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
I have said for some time that after high school there should be two years of mandatory service. Don't want to join the military? How about the Peace Corp or something similar? in exchange you get some money for college or trade school and get to grow up a little before you go drink away 4 years of your life while paying $30K to skip class. I went to college after 6 years in the Army and best thing I could of done. If I had gone right out of HS I would have failed out. This may be the 2nd dumbest post in this thread. Hey man. We can't just have people willy nilly getting jobs or going into business. That labor needs to be directed. By qualified experts. In a progressive and scientific manner. Anything else is anarchy. |
|
Quoted:
Thoughts on requiring 16-18 year Olds to work on public infrastructure improvements? View Quote 9.3 million 17 and 18 year olds (total) being paid minimum ($10) wage for 2 years is $93 B per year. |
|
Quoted:
Thoughts on requiring 16-18 year Olds to work on public infrastructure improvements? I have never heard anyone talk about this sort of thing. It would be like israel"s military service, bUT for public works. myself, I am not for this. I merely offer it for discussion. View Quote I lol at the notion of 16yo cheerleaders being forced to build bridges - and not drafting females is just sexist. It's a rather blatant bit of indentured servitude, but at least it is more sensible than the idiot idea of drafting everyone into the military. We could use a few million people fixing the roads and bridges, those millions being bored and stuck in garrison stateside is just pointless. If it were optional, for people 18 and up, and paid off student loans completely after you'd served your term, yes. Otherwise, no. |
|
|
I'm sure all the inner city "teens" will benefit from a forced labor program and be the first to sign up
|
|
Quoted: This is how a thread looks when someone wants to troll, but just can't get it put together. Mostly because people remember past threads started by the same member. View Quote It's called being too clever by half. "Cheeky" is fun, because it requires brains and isn't too serious. "Clever" is tedious, because it's usually boorish semantics designed to show how smart somebody is, while simultaneously undermining making progress toward that goal. "Wit" is often confused for "obvious technique" around here by those who think themselves witty, but prove themselves to be boorish. IMO. |
|
Quoted: Probably because involantary servitude violates the founding ideals and legal framework of the nation. How about a program based on free will choice and just compensation? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: I have never heard anyone talk about this sort of thing. Probably because involantary servitude violates the founding ideals and legal framework of the nation. How about a program based on free will choice and just compensation? LOL. Do you even indentured servitude bro? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indentured_servitude_in_the_Americas#North_America |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.