User Panel
[#1]
Quoted:
I entered the discussion to point out a bit of hypocrisy. Many people on ARFCOM believe all drug dealers, drug manufacturers, and multiple murderers are the worst sort of scum, worthy only of a brutal death. Yet in this thread, I see some of the same people saying the actions of fictional drug dealers, drug manufacturers, and multiple murderers are justifiable and that these people have redeeming qualities. Which is it? I know enough about that show to know people thought it well written and brilliantly acted. Maybe it was. I did not watch enough of it to judge that. But with respect to the characters I also know this: White and Jessie were multiple murderers who killed in furtherance of making money from their drug trafficking empire. Under the FBI classification for serial murders, these are what is known as "mission-oriented" serial murderers - one subcategory of which is people who kill for financial gain. Once these fictional characters crossed the line into making and selling meth, they no longer had recourse to any legitimate claim of self-defense against competitors planning to kill them. They voluntarily put themselves into that world - and they always, always, had another way out besides murder - turn themselves over to the USG and testify against the others still in the trade. Redeeming qualities? I don't see one in either character. Then again, as I said I don't like real drug dealers very much either. Raising this resulted in someone making the inference I was sexually abused by a drug dealer. I wasn't. My sister was murdered by one. Pointing this out was my response, albeit with a descriptor that was insulting, and for which I do not apologize. Since then, people have suggested I seek out this sort of discussion. I do, but only to point out my view that drug dealers, drug manufacturers, and multiple murderers, even fictional one, have forfeited any claim to having redeeming qualities. So, think about this when you discuss drug dealers, manufacturers, and people who kill in furtherance of their drug empires, even fictional ones in well written well acted televisions dramas: People like that traffic in human misery for profit. In many cases they are also terrorists (i.e., ever heard of narcoterrorists?) members of Al Qaeda, the Taliban, and ISIS. Or do you think terrorists, even fictional ones, have redeeming qualities? I don't, but then again, people I know died in the South Tower and the Pentagon. Others I know came home from Afghanistan and Iraq with physical and psychological wounds that will never fully heal. Drug traffickers are responsible, directly and indirectly, for the deaths of sisters, brothers, sons, daughters, and countless others. They leave nothing but loss and misery in their wake. All for money. Redeeming qualities? Bullshit. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
How the fuck would anyone know about his sister, and why would he even enter a discussion like this if he was going to be so offended. I entered the discussion to point out a bit of hypocrisy. Many people on ARFCOM believe all drug dealers, drug manufacturers, and multiple murderers are the worst sort of scum, worthy only of a brutal death. Yet in this thread, I see some of the same people saying the actions of fictional drug dealers, drug manufacturers, and multiple murderers are justifiable and that these people have redeeming qualities. Which is it? I know enough about that show to know people thought it well written and brilliantly acted. Maybe it was. I did not watch enough of it to judge that. But with respect to the characters I also know this: White and Jessie were multiple murderers who killed in furtherance of making money from their drug trafficking empire. Under the FBI classification for serial murders, these are what is known as "mission-oriented" serial murderers - one subcategory of which is people who kill for financial gain. Once these fictional characters crossed the line into making and selling meth, they no longer had recourse to any legitimate claim of self-defense against competitors planning to kill them. They voluntarily put themselves into that world - and they always, always, had another way out besides murder - turn themselves over to the USG and testify against the others still in the trade. Redeeming qualities? I don't see one in either character. Then again, as I said I don't like real drug dealers very much either. Raising this resulted in someone making the inference I was sexually abused by a drug dealer. I wasn't. My sister was murdered by one. Pointing this out was my response, albeit with a descriptor that was insulting, and for which I do not apologize. Since then, people have suggested I seek out this sort of discussion. I do, but only to point out my view that drug dealers, drug manufacturers, and multiple murderers, even fictional one, have forfeited any claim to having redeeming qualities. So, think about this when you discuss drug dealers, manufacturers, and people who kill in furtherance of their drug empires, even fictional ones in well written well acted televisions dramas: People like that traffic in human misery for profit. In many cases they are also terrorists (i.e., ever heard of narcoterrorists?) members of Al Qaeda, the Taliban, and ISIS. Or do you think terrorists, even fictional ones, have redeeming qualities? I don't, but then again, people I know died in the South Tower and the Pentagon. Others I know came home from Afghanistan and Iraq with physical and psychological wounds that will never fully heal. Drug traffickers are responsible, directly and indirectly, for the deaths of sisters, brothers, sons, daughters, and countless others. They leave nothing but loss and misery in their wake. All for money. Redeeming qualities? Bullshit. You just had to double down on the stupidity didn't you? Here you go: |
|
[#2]
Quoted:
They'd have to do Season 50 to make any story line. After one season there's a lawsuit against an old folks home and some bickering. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
You're right, forgot about that setup scene. Doesn't seem like a bad plan to bank on a man with stage 4? lung cancer dying soon. That's my guess (cancer meaning Walt doesn't work long). "The light that burns twice as bright burns half as long" only Walt wasn't a light; he was dynamite. Gus took a gamble and lost. I really wish we had more incite into his thinking during the whole thing. He strikes me as a fascinating character. I want to know what was with that Chilean backstory of his. They touched on it briefly when Hank was investigating him, and then it went away. I hope Better Call Saul goes into that some. After one season there's a lawsuit against an old folks home and some bickering. Doesn't sound too dissimilar to the end of Season 1 of BB. |
|
[#3]
|
|
[#4]
Quoted:
That's a lot of words just to say "I don't know anything about the characters" and "I can't separate fiction from reality." So what shows and movies do you like? View Quote So, you'd be okay with watching a fictional and well acted and written TV show that points out the redeeming qualities of a group of Islamic terrorists who kill Americans because they need the money to finance their family's middle class life in Kileen or Assholeistan after they shoot up the local US Army base. Or a fictional series that points out the redeeming qualities of Usama bin Laden, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, Pablo Escobar, or Nidal Malik Hasan? How about a TV show that points out the redeeming qualities of pedophiliic porn merchants? They have families who need money too. How about one on Supreme Court Justices that sell out conservative values on issues like the plain meaning of words like "states" or homosexual marriage? You'd get the SJW liberals to go for that one too. I need to copyright that idea - it might be an Emmy winning idea! I guess anything goes on TV if it is well written and well acted, and the characters redeeming qualities overshadow everything else they do. As for what I like, in fiction I like crime shows where a police officer or detective, though doing his job well, catches the criminal. For example, I am currently watching Foyle's War and Inspector Morse. I also have a fondness for almost every version of Sherlock Holmes ever done (Jeremy Brett being my favorite). I also like very non-PC cop movies like Charlie Chan. A good intelligence thriller is also something i enjoy. Last night I fell asleep watching Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy. Gary Oldham nailed the character of George Smiley. I also enjoy non-fiction documentaries on almost every topic known, if the liberal herp isn't too strong. I am currently watching a series about the hunt for Nazi war criminals that was done by BBC. I was surprised to learn how many involved in the mass extermination of humans were not even tried (about 90%) and how few were given their just reward - a hangman's noose. The History and Discovery channels were once my favorite cable stations, but they went too far into the antireality bullshit, so much so, I dropped cable altogether and now just watch NetFlix |
|
[#6]
Quoted:
I entered the discussion to point out a bit of hypocrisy. Many people on ARFCOM believe all drug dealers, drug manufacturers, and multiple murderers are the worst sort of scum, worthy only of a brutal death. Yet in this thread, I see some of the same people saying the actions of fictional drug dealers, drug manufacturers, and multiple murderers are justifiable and that these people have redeeming qualities. Which is it? I know enough about that show to know people thought it well written and brilliantly acted. Maybe it was. I did not watch enough of it to judge that. But with respect to the characters I also know this: White and Jessie were multiple murderers who killed in furtherance of making money from their drug trafficking empire. Under the FBI classification for serial murders, these are what is known as "mission-oriented" serial murderers - one subcategory of which is people who kill for financial gain. Once these fictional characters crossed the line into making and selling meth, they no longer had recourse to any legitimate claim of self-defense against competitors planning to kill them. They voluntarily put themselves into that world - and they always, always, had another way out besides murder - turn themselves over to the USG and testify against the others still in the trade. Redeeming qualities? I don't see one in either character. Then again, as I said I don't like real drug dealers very much either. Raising this resulted in someone making the inference I was sexually abused by a drug dealer. I wasn't. My sister was murdered by one. Pointing this out was my response, albeit with a descriptor that was insulting, and for which I do not apologize. Since then, people have suggested I seek out this sort of discussion. I do, but only to point out my view that drug dealers, drug manufacturers, and multiple murderers, even fictional one, have forfeited any claim to having redeeming qualities. So, think about this when you discuss drug dealers, manufacturers, and people who kill in furtherance of their drug empires, even fictional ones in well written well acted televisions dramas: People like that traffic in human misery for profit. In many cases they are also terrorists (i.e., ever heard of narcoterrorists?) members of Al Qaeda, the Taliban, and ISIS. Or do you think terrorists, even fictional ones, have redeeming qualities? I don't, but then again, people I know died in the South Tower and the Pentagon. Others I know came home from Afghanistan and Iraq with physical and psychological wounds that will never fully heal. Drug traffickers are responsible, directly and indirectly, for the deaths of sisters, brothers, sons, daughters, and countless others. They leave nothing but loss and misery in their wake. All for money. Redeeming qualities? Bullshit. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
How the fuck would anyone know about his sister, and why would he even enter a discussion like this if he was going to be so offended. I entered the discussion to point out a bit of hypocrisy. Many people on ARFCOM believe all drug dealers, drug manufacturers, and multiple murderers are the worst sort of scum, worthy only of a brutal death. Yet in this thread, I see some of the same people saying the actions of fictional drug dealers, drug manufacturers, and multiple murderers are justifiable and that these people have redeeming qualities. Which is it? I know enough about that show to know people thought it well written and brilliantly acted. Maybe it was. I did not watch enough of it to judge that. But with respect to the characters I also know this: White and Jessie were multiple murderers who killed in furtherance of making money from their drug trafficking empire. Under the FBI classification for serial murders, these are what is known as "mission-oriented" serial murderers - one subcategory of which is people who kill for financial gain. Once these fictional characters crossed the line into making and selling meth, they no longer had recourse to any legitimate claim of self-defense against competitors planning to kill them. They voluntarily put themselves into that world - and they always, always, had another way out besides murder - turn themselves over to the USG and testify against the others still in the trade. Redeeming qualities? I don't see one in either character. Then again, as I said I don't like real drug dealers very much either. Raising this resulted in someone making the inference I was sexually abused by a drug dealer. I wasn't. My sister was murdered by one. Pointing this out was my response, albeit with a descriptor that was insulting, and for which I do not apologize. Since then, people have suggested I seek out this sort of discussion. I do, but only to point out my view that drug dealers, drug manufacturers, and multiple murderers, even fictional one, have forfeited any claim to having redeeming qualities. So, think about this when you discuss drug dealers, manufacturers, and people who kill in furtherance of their drug empires, even fictional ones in well written well acted televisions dramas: People like that traffic in human misery for profit. In many cases they are also terrorists (i.e., ever heard of narcoterrorists?) members of Al Qaeda, the Taliban, and ISIS. Or do you think terrorists, even fictional ones, have redeeming qualities? I don't, but then again, people I know died in the South Tower and the Pentagon. Others I know came home from Afghanistan and Iraq with physical and psychological wounds that will never fully heal. Drug traffickers are responsible, directly and indirectly, for the deaths of sisters, brothers, sons, daughters, and countless others. They leave nothing but loss and misery in their wake. All for money. Redeeming qualities? Bullshit. When you trim quote trees if you could try and not fuck it up so much that you have someone's post attributed to another poster that would be terrific. |
|
[#7]
Quoted:
Since I believe that normal people aren't murdered by drug dealers on a recurring basis without having some sort of involvement with drugs... the question stands. I'm curious about how your sister died, and what, if any, involvement she had in the drug trade. Further, I wonder if your answer will still be consistent with your opinion of their "forfeit[ure of] any claim to having redeeming qualities." View Quote You don't know DC in the 1980s. Many people unrelated to the drug trade got caught in the crossfire of the Cocaine and Crack War that raged from 1985 to around 1995 (e.g., 479 just in 1991). There were large areas of the city you didn't go to, but that didn't stop the drug traffickers from coming into poor, yet decent areas. Do people in the drug trade have redeeming qualities? Not if they traffic in crack, meth, or similar Schedule 1 drugs that have no medicinal value. Heroin should be taken from Schedule 1 and put into Schedule 2, and given to people with terminal illnesses if needed to deal with their pain (I believe there is currently a compassionate use exception for heroin in Schedule 1 for this reason, but as I understand it, it is rarely used). Marijuana - well I say screw the Schedule 1 listing - it clearly hasn't worked there and we are seeing some medical uses being found (e.g.., treating severe cases of childhood epilepsy). I think it should be legalized and regulated like alcohol and tobacco. |
|
[#8]
Quoted:
You don't know DC in the 1980s. Many people unrelated to the drug trade got caught in the crossfire of the Cocaine and Crack War that raged from 1985 to around 1995 (e.g., 479 just in 1991). There were large areas of the city you didn't go to, but that didn't stop the drug traffickers from coming into poor, yet decent areas. Do people in the drug trade have redeeming qualities? Not if they traffic in crack, meth, or similar Schedule 1 drugs that have no medicinal value. Heroin should be taken from Schedule 1 and put into Schedule 2, and given to people with terminal illnesses if needed to deal with their pain (I believe there is currently a compassionate use exception for heroin in Schedule 1 for this reason, but as I understand it, it is rarely used). Marijuana - well I say screw the Schedule 1 listing - it clearly hasn't worked there and we are seeing some medical uses being found (e.g.., treating severe cases of childhood epilepsy). I think it should be legalized and regulated like alcohol and tobacco. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Since I believe that normal people aren't murdered by drug dealers on a recurring basis without having some sort of involvement with drugs... the question stands. I'm curious about how your sister died, and what, if any, involvement she had in the drug trade. Further, I wonder if your answer will still be consistent with your opinion of their "forfeit[ure of] any claim to having redeeming qualities." You don't know DC in the 1980s. Many people unrelated to the drug trade got caught in the crossfire of the Cocaine and Crack War that raged from 1985 to around 1995 (e.g., 479 just in 1991). There were large areas of the city you didn't go to, but that didn't stop the drug traffickers from coming into poor, yet decent areas. Do people in the drug trade have redeeming qualities? Not if they traffic in crack, meth, or similar Schedule 1 drugs that have no medicinal value. Heroin should be taken from Schedule 1 and put into Schedule 2, and given to people with terminal illnesses if needed to deal with their pain (I believe there is currently a compassionate use exception for heroin in Schedule 1 for this reason, but as I understand it, it is rarely used). Marijuana - well I say screw the Schedule 1 listing - it clearly hasn't worked there and we are seeing some medical uses being found (e.g.., treating severe cases of childhood epilepsy). I think it should be legalized and regulated like alcohol and tobacco. Since you keep dodging the question I'm going to infer that your sister did something that got her killed besides mere wrong place wrong time. |
|
[#9]
Walt and Jessie's final episode fight scene:
Jack - Get him off Todd, will 'ya? Kenny- Yeah, Toddy, get them both off. *Everyone laughs* |
|
[#10]
Can we all just quit pretending and go ahead and admit that the first season of Better Call Saul was a disappointment? I didn't expect it to be Breaking Bad and I wanted desperately to like it but honestly, most episodes, it was all I could do to stay awake.
|
|
[#11]
Quoted:
So, you'd be okay with watching a fictional and well acted and written TV show that points out the redeeming qualities of a group of Islamic terrorists who kill Americans because they need the money to finance their family's middle class life in Kileen or Assholeistan after they shoot up the local US Army base. Or a fictional series that points out the redeeming qualities of Usama bin Laden, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, Pablo Escobar, or Nidal Malik Hasan? How about a TV show that points out the redeeming qualities of pedophiliic porn merchants? They have families who need money too. How about one on Supreme Court Justices that sell out conservative values on issues like the plain meaning of words like "states" or homosexual marriage? You'd get the SJW liberals to go for that one too. I need to copyright that idea - it might be an Emmy winning idea! I guess anything goes on TV if it is well written and well acted, and the characters redeeming qualities overshadow everything else they do. As for what I like, in fiction I like crime shows where a police officer or detective, though doing his job well, catches the criminal. For example, I am currently watching Foyle's War and Inspector Morse. I also have a fondness for almost every version of Sherlock Holmes ever done (Jeremy Brett being my favorite). I also like very non-PC cop movies like Charlie Chan. A good intelligence thriller is also something i enjoy. Last night I fell asleep watching Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy. Gary Oldham nailed the character of George Smiley. I also enjoy non-fiction documentaries on almost every topic known, if the liberal herp isn't too strong. I am currently watching a series about the hunt for Nazi war criminals that was done by BBC. I was surprised to learn how many involved in the mass extermination of humans were not even tried (about 90%) and how few were given their just reward - a hangman's noose. The History and Discovery channels were once my favorite cable stations, but they went too far into the antireality bullshit, so much so, I dropped cable altogether and now just watch NetFlix View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
That's a lot of words just to say "I don't know anything about the characters" and "I can't separate fiction from reality." So what shows and movies do you like? So, you'd be okay with watching a fictional and well acted and written TV show that points out the redeeming qualities of a group of Islamic terrorists who kill Americans because they need the money to finance their family's middle class life in Kileen or Assholeistan after they shoot up the local US Army base. Or a fictional series that points out the redeeming qualities of Usama bin Laden, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, Pablo Escobar, or Nidal Malik Hasan? How about a TV show that points out the redeeming qualities of pedophiliic porn merchants? They have families who need money too. How about one on Supreme Court Justices that sell out conservative values on issues like the plain meaning of words like "states" or homosexual marriage? You'd get the SJW liberals to go for that one too. I need to copyright that idea - it might be an Emmy winning idea! I guess anything goes on TV if it is well written and well acted, and the characters redeeming qualities overshadow everything else they do. As for what I like, in fiction I like crime shows where a police officer or detective, though doing his job well, catches the criminal. For example, I am currently watching Foyle's War and Inspector Morse. I also have a fondness for almost every version of Sherlock Holmes ever done (Jeremy Brett being my favorite). I also like very non-PC cop movies like Charlie Chan. A good intelligence thriller is also something i enjoy. Last night I fell asleep watching Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy. Gary Oldham nailed the character of George Smiley. I also enjoy non-fiction documentaries on almost every topic known, if the liberal herp isn't too strong. I am currently watching a series about the hunt for Nazi war criminals that was done by BBC. I was surprised to learn how many involved in the mass extermination of humans were not even tried (about 90%) and how few were given their just reward - a hangman's noose. The History and Discovery channels were once my favorite cable stations, but they went too far into the antireality bullshit, so much so, I dropped cable altogether and now just watch NetFlix You're acting like we think Walter White is a good person. He's not. His character was pretty fleshed out, though. He wasn't just "generic bad guy with no positive traits". That's something you seem to prefer; shallow characters. A well written show is a well written show. Downfall was a good film. I enjoyed it. I'm sure you would hate it, though, because it portrays Hitler as a person instead of as a mustache-twirling Disney villain. |
|
[#12]
Quoted:
Can we all just quit pretending and go ahead and admit that the first season of Better Call Saul was a disappointment? I didn't expect it to be Breaking Bad and I wanted desperately to like it but honestly, most episodes, it was all I could do to stay awake. View Quote I don't know, I love Breaking Bad, it is one of my favorites. But I absolutely LOVED BCS, and it's not just from the love of BB, I found myself watching it and forgetting completely about BB. |
|
[#13]
Quoted:
I entered the discussion to point out a bit of hypocrisy. Many people on ARFCOM believe all drug dealers, drug manufacturers, and multiple murderers are the worst sort of scum, worthy only of a brutal death. Yet in this thread, I see some of the same people saying the actions of fictional drug dealers, drug manufacturers, and multiple murderers are justifiable and that these people have redeeming qualities. Which is it? I know enough about that show to know people thought it well written and brilliantly acted. Maybe it was. I did not watch enough of it to judge that. But with respect to the characters I also know this: White and Jessie were multiple murderers who killed in furtherance of making money from their drug trafficking empire. Under the FBI classification for serial murders, these are what is known as "mission-oriented" serial murderers - one subcategory of which is people who kill for financial gain. Once these fictional characters crossed the line into making and selling meth, they no longer had recourse to any legitimate claim of self-defense against competitors planning to kill them. They voluntarily put themselves into that world - and they always, always, had another way out besides murder - turn themselves over to the USG and testify against the others still in the trade. Redeeming qualities? I don't see one in either character. Then again, as I said I don't like real drug dealers very much either. Raising this resulted in someone making the inference I was sexually abused by a drug dealer. I wasn't. My sister was murdered by one. Pointing this out was my response, albeit with a descriptor that was insulting, and for which I do not apologize. Since then, people have suggested I seek out this sort of discussion. I do, but only to point out my view that drug dealers, drug manufacturers, and multiple murderers, even fictional one, have forfeited any claim to having redeeming qualities. So, think about this when you discuss drug dealers, manufacturers, and people who kill in furtherance of their drug empires, even fictional ones in well written well acted televisions dramas: People like that traffic in human misery for profit. In many cases they are also terrorists (i.e., ever heard of narcoterrorists?) members of Al Qaeda, the Taliban, and ISIS. Or do you think terrorists, even fictional ones, have redeeming qualities? I don't, but then again, people I know died in the South Tower and the Pentagon. Others I know came home from Afghanistan and Iraq with physical and psychological wounds that will never fully heal. Drug traffickers are responsible, directly and indirectly, for the deaths of sisters, brothers, sons, daughters, and countless others. They leave nothing but loss and misery in their wake. All for money. Redeeming qualities? Bullshit. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
How the fuck would anyone know about his sister, and why would he even enter a discussion like this if he was going to be so offended. I entered the discussion to point out a bit of hypocrisy. Many people on ARFCOM believe all drug dealers, drug manufacturers, and multiple murderers are the worst sort of scum, worthy only of a brutal death. Yet in this thread, I see some of the same people saying the actions of fictional drug dealers, drug manufacturers, and multiple murderers are justifiable and that these people have redeeming qualities. Which is it? I know enough about that show to know people thought it well written and brilliantly acted. Maybe it was. I did not watch enough of it to judge that. But with respect to the characters I also know this: White and Jessie were multiple murderers who killed in furtherance of making money from their drug trafficking empire. Under the FBI classification for serial murders, these are what is known as "mission-oriented" serial murderers - one subcategory of which is people who kill for financial gain. Once these fictional characters crossed the line into making and selling meth, they no longer had recourse to any legitimate claim of self-defense against competitors planning to kill them. They voluntarily put themselves into that world - and they always, always, had another way out besides murder - turn themselves over to the USG and testify against the others still in the trade. Redeeming qualities? I don't see one in either character. Then again, as I said I don't like real drug dealers very much either. Raising this resulted in someone making the inference I was sexually abused by a drug dealer. I wasn't. My sister was murdered by one. Pointing this out was my response, albeit with a descriptor that was insulting, and for which I do not apologize. Since then, people have suggested I seek out this sort of discussion. I do, but only to point out my view that drug dealers, drug manufacturers, and multiple murderers, even fictional one, have forfeited any claim to having redeeming qualities. So, think about this when you discuss drug dealers, manufacturers, and people who kill in furtherance of their drug empires, even fictional ones in well written well acted televisions dramas: People like that traffic in human misery for profit. In many cases they are also terrorists (i.e., ever heard of narcoterrorists?) members of Al Qaeda, the Taliban, and ISIS. Or do you think terrorists, even fictional ones, have redeeming qualities? I don't, but then again, people I know died in the South Tower and the Pentagon. Others I know came home from Afghanistan and Iraq with physical and psychological wounds that will never fully heal. Drug traffickers are responsible, directly and indirectly, for the deaths of sisters, brothers, sons, daughters, and countless others. They leave nothing but loss and misery in their wake. All for money. Redeeming qualities? Bullshit. Autism speaks. It's time to listen. |
|
[#14]
Quoted:
Since you keep dodging the question I'm going to infer that your sister did something that got her killed besides mere wrong place wrong time. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Since I believe that normal people aren't murdered by drug dealers on a recurring basis without having some sort of involvement with drugs... the question stands. I'm curious about how your sister died, and what, if any, involvement she had in the drug trade. Further, I wonder if your answer will still be consistent with your opinion of their "forfeit[ure of] any claim to having redeeming qualities." You don't know DC in the 1980s. Many people unrelated to the drug trade got caught in the crossfire of the Cocaine and Crack War that raged from 1985 to around 1995 (e.g., 479 just in 1991). There were large areas of the city you didn't go to, but that didn't stop the drug traffickers from coming into poor, yet decent areas. Do people in the drug trade have redeeming qualities? Not if they traffic in crack, meth, or similar Schedule 1 drugs that have no medicinal value. Heroin should be taken from Schedule 1 and put into Schedule 2, and given to people with terminal illnesses if needed to deal with their pain (I believe there is currently a compassionate use exception for heroin in Schedule 1 for this reason, but as I understand it, it is rarely used). Marijuana - well I say screw the Schedule 1 listing - it clearly hasn't worked there and we are seeing some medical uses being found (e.g.., treating severe cases of childhood epilepsy). I think it should be legalized and regulated like alcohol and tobacco. Since you keep dodging the question I'm going to infer that your sister did something that got her killed besides mere wrong place wrong time. Wrong place, wrong time. To the best of my knowledge she wasn't there buying or selling drugs. She wasn't an innocent to be sure, but she till got murdered. |
|
[#16]
Quoted:
Wrong place, wrong time. To the best of my knowledge she wasn't there buying or selling drugs. She wasn't an innocent to be sure, but she till got murdered. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Since I believe that normal people aren't murdered by drug dealers on a recurring basis without having some sort of involvement with drugs... the question stands. I'm curious about how your sister died, and what, if any, involvement she had in the drug trade. Further, I wonder if your answer will still be consistent with your opinion of their "forfeit[ure of] any claim to having redeeming qualities." You don't know DC in the 1980s. Many people unrelated to the drug trade got caught in the crossfire of the Cocaine and Crack War that raged from 1985 to around 1995 (e.g., 479 just in 1991). There were large areas of the city you didn't go to, but that didn't stop the drug traffickers from coming into poor, yet decent areas. Do people in the drug trade have redeeming qualities? Not if they traffic in crack, meth, or similar Schedule 1 drugs that have no medicinal value. Heroin should be taken from Schedule 1 and put into Schedule 2, and given to people with terminal illnesses if needed to deal with their pain (I believe there is currently a compassionate use exception for heroin in Schedule 1 for this reason, but as I understand it, it is rarely used). Marijuana - well I say screw the Schedule 1 listing - it clearly hasn't worked there and we are seeing some medical uses being found (e.g.., treating severe cases of childhood epilepsy). I think it should be legalized and regulated like alcohol and tobacco. Since you keep dodging the question I'm going to infer that your sister did something that got her killed besides mere wrong place wrong time. Wrong place, wrong time. To the best of my knowledge she wasn't there buying or selling drugs. She wasn't an innocent to be sure, but she till got murdered. So... what you're saying is that she could have gone to the USG, confessed to her involvement, and testified against those still involved. |
|
[#17]
Quoted:
Can we all just quit pretending and go ahead and admit that the first season of Better Call Saul was a disappointment? I didn't expect it to be Breaking Bad and I wanted desperately to like it but honestly, most episodes, it was all I could do to stay awake. View Quote I thought it was pretty good for the most part. Not up to BB standards in my opinion though. One thing I didn't like about it was how old Mike looked. He has aged a lot since he first appeared in BB and he looks way too old in BCS. |
|
[#18]
Quoted: That's a lot of words just to say "I don't know anything about the characters" and "I can't separate fiction from reality." So what shows and movies do you like? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: How the fuck would anyone know about his sister, and why would he even enter a discussion like this if he was going to be so offended. I entered the discussion to point out a bit of hypocrisy. Many people on ARFCOM believe all drug dealers, drug manufacturers, and multiple murderers are the worst sort of scum, worthy only of a brutal death. Yet in this thread, I see some of the same people saying the actions of fictional drug dealers, drug manufacturers, and multiple murderers are justifiable and that these people have redeeming qualities. Which is it? I know enough about that show to know people thought it well written and brilliantly acted. Maybe it was. I did not watch enough of it to judge that. But with respect to the characters I also know this: White and Jessie were multiple murderers who killed in furtherance of making money from their drug trafficking empire. Under the FBI classification for serial murders, these are what is known as "mission-oriented" serial murderers - one subcategory of which is people who kill for financial gain. Once these fictional characters crossed the line into making and selling meth, they no longer had recourse to any legitimate claim of self-defense against competitors planning to kill them. They voluntarily put themselves into that world - and they always, always, had another way out besides murder - turn themselves over to the USG and testify against the others still in the trade. Redeeming qualities? I don't see one in either character. Then again, as I said I don't like real drug dealers very much either. Raising this resulted in someone making the inference I was sexually abused by a drug dealer. I wasn't. My sister was murdered by one. Pointing this out was my response, albeit with a descriptor that was insulting, and for which I do not apologize. Since then, people have suggested I seek out this sort of discussion. I do, but only to point out my view that drug dealers, drug manufacturers, and multiple murderers, even fictional one, have forfeited any claim to having redeeming qualities. So, think about this when you discuss drug dealers, manufacturers, and people who kill in furtherance of their drug empires, even fictional ones in well written well acted televisions dramas: People like that traffic in human misery for profit. In many cases they are also terrorists (i.e., ever heard of narcoterrorists?) members of Al Qaeda, the Taliban, and ISIS. Or do you think terrorists, even fictional ones, have redeeming qualities? I don't, but then again, people I know died in the South Tower and the Pentagon. Others I know came home from Afghanistan and Iraq with physical and psychological wounds that will never fully heal. Drug traffickers are responsible, directly and indirectly, for the deaths of sisters, brothers, sons, daughters, and countless others. They leave nothing but loss and misery in their wake. All for money. Redeeming qualities? Bullshit. That's a lot of words just to say "I don't know anything about the characters" and "I can't separate fiction from reality." So what shows and movies do you like? Blow, cocaine cowboys and spun? |
|
[#19]
Because True Detective Season 1 was a far superior show. Fucking breaking bad acting got a ton of bandwaggoners on board and stole the Emmy from them.
|
|
[#20]
|
|
[#21]
Quoted:
I got halfway through season 2 and quit out of boredom. I couldn't like any of the characters and their personal relationships, which seemed to be most of what the show was about, were uninteresting to me. Walt's an idiot and Jesse's so fucking stupid I'm surprised he can feed himself. Does it really get that much better after season 2? If so maybe I'll give it another try. View Quote I watched the first two seasons when it came out. I got bored and didn't watch the rest... not until all this hubbub was everywhere about it. I was thinking "this show is still on?" I binge watched it since it was all out except the last few episodes. Not worth it but I was on the road at the time so it killed downtime for me. |
|
[#22]
Quoted:
I thought it was pretty good for the most part. Not up to BB standards in my opinion though. One thing I didn't like about it was how old Mike looked. He has aged a lot since he first appeared in BB and he looks way too old in BCS. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Can we all just quit pretending and go ahead and admit that the first season of Better Call Saul was a disappointment? I didn't expect it to be Breaking Bad and I wanted desperately to like it but honestly, most episodes, it was all I could do to stay awake. I thought it was pretty good for the most part. Not up to BB standards in my opinion though. One thing I didn't like about it was how old Mike looked. He has aged a lot since he first appeared in BB and he looks way too old in BCS. I'd rather them use the same actors looking older than they should than having someone else. I thought the same, and it will only get worse by the end of the series. |
|
[#23]
Quoted: I entered the discussion to point out a bit of hypocrisy. Many people on ARFCOM believe all drug dealers, drug manufacturers, and multiple murderers are the worst sort of scum, worthy only of a brutal death. Yet in this thread, I see some of the same people saying the actions of fictional drug dealers, drug manufacturers, and multiple murderers are justifiable and that these people have redeeming qualities. Which is it? I know enough about that show to know people thought it well written and brilliantly acted. Maybe it was. I did not watch enough of it to judge that. But with respect to the characters I also know this: White and Jessie were multiple murderers who killed in furtherance of making money from their drug trafficking empire. Under the FBI classification for serial murders, these are what is known as "mission-oriented" serial murderers - one subcategory of which is people who kill for financial gain. Once these fictional characters crossed the line into making and selling meth, they no longer had recourse to any legitimate claim of self-defense against competitors planning to kill them. They voluntarily put themselves into that world - and they always, always, had another way out besides murder - turn themselves over to the USG and testify against the others still in the trade. Redeeming qualities? I don't see one in either character. Then again, as I said I don't like real drug dealers very much either. Raising this resulted in someone making the inference I was sexually abused by a drug dealer. I wasn't. My sister was murdered by one. Pointing this out was my response, albeit with a descriptor that was insulting, and for which I do not apologize. Since then, people have suggested I seek out this sort of discussion. I do, but only to point out my view that drug dealers, drug manufacturers, and multiple murderers, even fictional one, have forfeited any claim to having redeeming qualities. So, think about this when you discuss drug dealers, manufacturers, and people who kill in furtherance of their drug empires, even fictional ones in well written well acted televisions dramas: People like that traffic in human misery for profit. In many cases they are also terrorists (i.e., ever heard of narcoterrorists?) members of Al Qaeda, the Taliban, and ISIS. Or do you think terrorists, even fictional ones, have redeeming qualities? I don't, but then again, people I know died in the South Tower and the Pentagon. Others I know came home from Afghanistan and Iraq with physical and psychological wounds that will never fully heal. Drug traffickers are responsible, directly and indirectly, for the deaths of sisters, brothers, sons, daughters, and countless others. They leave nothing but loss and misery in their wake. All for money. Redeeming qualities? Bullshit. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: How the fuck would anyone know about his sister, and why would he even enter a discussion like this if he was going to be so offended. I entered the discussion to point out a bit of hypocrisy. Many people on ARFCOM believe all drug dealers, drug manufacturers, and multiple murderers are the worst sort of scum, worthy only of a brutal death. Yet in this thread, I see some of the same people saying the actions of fictional drug dealers, drug manufacturers, and multiple murderers are justifiable and that these people have redeeming qualities. Which is it? I know enough about that show to know people thought it well written and brilliantly acted. Maybe it was. I did not watch enough of it to judge that. But with respect to the characters I also know this: White and Jessie were multiple murderers who killed in furtherance of making money from their drug trafficking empire. Under the FBI classification for serial murders, these are what is known as "mission-oriented" serial murderers - one subcategory of which is people who kill for financial gain. Once these fictional characters crossed the line into making and selling meth, they no longer had recourse to any legitimate claim of self-defense against competitors planning to kill them. They voluntarily put themselves into that world - and they always, always, had another way out besides murder - turn themselves over to the USG and testify against the others still in the trade. Redeeming qualities? I don't see one in either character. Then again, as I said I don't like real drug dealers very much either. Raising this resulted in someone making the inference I was sexually abused by a drug dealer. I wasn't. My sister was murdered by one. Pointing this out was my response, albeit with a descriptor that was insulting, and for which I do not apologize. Since then, people have suggested I seek out this sort of discussion. I do, but only to point out my view that drug dealers, drug manufacturers, and multiple murderers, even fictional one, have forfeited any claim to having redeeming qualities. So, think about this when you discuss drug dealers, manufacturers, and people who kill in furtherance of their drug empires, even fictional ones in well written well acted televisions dramas: People like that traffic in human misery for profit. In many cases they are also terrorists (i.e., ever heard of narcoterrorists?) members of Al Qaeda, the Taliban, and ISIS. Or do you think terrorists, even fictional ones, have redeeming qualities? I don't, but then again, people I know died in the South Tower and the Pentagon. Others I know came home from Afghanistan and Iraq with physical and psychological wounds that will never fully heal. Drug traffickers are responsible, directly and indirectly, for the deaths of sisters, brothers, sons, daughters, and countless others. They leave nothing but loss and misery in their wake. All for money. Redeeming qualities? Bullshit. I want to have your baby. |
|
[#25]
|
|
[#26]
Quoted:
Because True Detective Season 1 was a far superior show. Fucking breaking bad acting got a ton of bandwaggoners on board and stole the Emmy from them. View Quote 'True Detective' S1 was terrific, but it had the misfortune of airing the same year as the greatest season of tv ever. What was most impressive about 'Breaking Bad' was that each season was better than the previous one. I've never seen that before from a 5+ season series. We sure as shit aren't going to be getting it from 'True Detective.' 'Breaking Bad' was great for 62 episodes over 5 seasons while 'True Detective' was great for a single 8 episode season. They are both amazing, but one was a dynasty and the other was a flash in the pan. |
|
[#27]
Quoted:
It's the only 5+ season tv series I've ever seen where each season is better than the previous one. The last season was the best season of television I've ever seen. It won the EMMY for best drama, best lead actor in a drama, best supporting actor in a drama, best supporting actress in a drama, and best writing in a drama. So to answer your question: yeah, it really does "get that better after season 2." View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
I got halfway through season 2 and quit out of boredom. I couldn't like any of the characters and their personal relationships, which seemed to be most of what the show was about, were uninteresting to me. Walt's an idiot and Jesse's so fucking stupid I'm surprised he can feed himself. Does it really get that much better after season 2? If so maybe I'll give it another try. It's the only 5+ season tv series I've ever seen where each season is better than the previous one. The last season was the best season of television I've ever seen. It won the EMMY for best drama, best lead actor in a drama, best supporting actor in a drama, best supporting actress in a drama, and best writing in a drama. So to answer your question: yeah, it really does "get that better after season 2." While I agree each season got even better, I was hooked on this show since the opening scene with the pants flying in the air and loved every minute of it. So if 3rdpig still isn't feeling it in season 2, I would say no. |
|
[#29]
|
|
[#30]
Quoted:
While I agree each season got even better, I was hooked on this show since the opening scene with the pants flying in the air and loved every minute of it. So if 3rdpig still isn't feeling it in season 2, I would say no. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I got halfway through season 2 and quit out of boredom. I couldn't like any of the characters and their personal relationships, which seemed to be most of what the show was about, were uninteresting to me. Walt's an idiot and Jesse's so fucking stupid I'm surprised he can feed himself. Does it really get that much better after season 2? If so maybe I'll give it another try. It's the only 5+ season tv series I've ever seen where each season is better than the previous one. The last season was the best season of television I've ever seen. It won the EMMY for best drama, best lead actor in a drama, best supporting actor in a drama, best supporting actress in a drama, and best writing in a drama. So to answer your question: yeah, it really does "get that better after season 2." While I agree each season got even better, I was hooked on this show since the opening scene with the pants flying in the air and loved every minute of it. So if 3rdpig still isn't feeling it in season 2, I would say no. Actually, towards the end of S2 is where most people seem to agree the show really picks up. There are more than a few episodes in the first 1 1/2 seasons that are a little on the slow side. After that pretty much the only boring episode was the fly one. 3rdpig is a few pumps away from an orgasm and you're telling him to stop. |
|
[#31]
Quoted:
I know everybody is down on S2, but I think it's a little early to say this. I'd at least give them a chance until the end. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
We sure as shit aren't going to be getting it from 'True Detective.' I know everybody is down on S2, but I think it's a little early to say this. I'd at least give them a chance until the end. I don't think it's too early at all. The season is 25% over and there is a snowball's chance in hell it will be better than the first season. |
|
[#32]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Can we all just quit pretending and go ahead and admit that the first season of Better Call Saul was a disappointment? I didn't expect it to be Breaking Bad and I wanted desperately to like it but honestly, most episodes, it was all I could do to stay awake. I loved it. Me too - no complaints at all. |
|
[#33]
Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Can we all just quit pretending and go ahead and admit that the first season of Better Call Saul was a disappointment? I didn't expect it to be Breaking Bad and I wanted desperately to like it but honestly, most episodes, it was all I could do to stay awake. I loved it. Me too - no complaints at all. |
|
[#34]
Quoted:
I know everybody is down on S2, but I think it's a little early to say this. I'd at least give them a chance until the end. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
We sure as shit aren't going to be getting it from 'True Detective.' I know everybody is down on S2, but I think it's a little early to say this. I'd at least give them a chance until the end. Can you sum up what's happened so far in S2? I sure as hell can't and I literally just watched the episodes today. Vince Vaughn and Colin Farrell gargle each other's balls and suck at acting. Something something money invested and stolen boring and no existential bullshit from Rust |
|
[#35]
I saw a guy at Walker Stalker Con in Orlando this past weekend that I swore was Bryan Cranston with a shaved head and beard. With a top hat, he was Walter White.
|
|
[#36]
Quoted:
While I agree each season got even better, I was hooked on this show since the opening scene with the pants flying in the air and loved every minute of it. So if 3rdpig still isn't feeling it in season 2, I would say no. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I got halfway through season 2 and quit out of boredom. I couldn't like any of the characters and their personal relationships, which seemed to be most of what the show was about, were uninteresting to me. Walt's an idiot and Jesse's so fucking stupid I'm surprised he can feed himself. Does it really get that much better after season 2? If so maybe I'll give it another try. It's the only 5+ season tv series I've ever seen where each season is better than the previous one. The last season was the best season of television I've ever seen. It won the EMMY for best drama, best lead actor in a drama, best supporting actor in a drama, best supporting actress in a drama, and best writing in a drama. So to answer your question: yeah, it really does "get that better after season 2." While I agree each season got even better, I was hooked on this show since the opening scene with the pants flying in the air and loved every minute of it. So if 3rdpig still isn't feeling it in season 2, I would say no. That got me too |
|
[#37]
Quoted:
Wrong place, wrong time. To the best of my knowledge she wasn't there buying or selling drugs. She wasn't an innocent to be sure, but she till got murdered. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Since I believe that normal people aren't murdered by drug dealers on a recurring basis without having some sort of involvement with drugs... the question stands. I'm curious about how your sister died, and what, if any, involvement she had in the drug trade. Further, I wonder if your answer will still be consistent with your opinion of their "forfeit[ure of] any claim to having redeeming qualities." You don't know DC in the 1980s. Many people unrelated to the drug trade got caught in the crossfire of the Cocaine and Crack War that raged from 1985 to around 1995 (e.g., 479 just in 1991). There were large areas of the city you didn't go to, but that didn't stop the drug traffickers from coming into poor, yet decent areas. Do people in the drug trade have redeeming qualities? Not if they traffic in crack, meth, or similar Schedule 1 drugs that have no medicinal value. Heroin should be taken from Schedule 1 and put into Schedule 2, and given to people with terminal illnesses if needed to deal with their pain (I believe there is currently a compassionate use exception for heroin in Schedule 1 for this reason, but as I understand it, it is rarely used). Marijuana - well I say screw the Schedule 1 listing - it clearly hasn't worked there and we are seeing some medical uses being found (e.g.., treating severe cases of childhood epilepsy). I think it should be legalized and regulated like alcohol and tobacco. Since you keep dodging the question I'm going to infer that your sister did something that got her killed besides mere wrong place wrong time. Wrong place, wrong time. To the best of my knowledge she wasn't there buying or selling drugs. She wasn't an innocent to be sure, but she till got murdered. There you have it, folks. |
|
[#38]
Quoted: Quoted: Can we all just quit pretending and go ahead and admit that the first season of Better Call Saul was a disappointment? I didn't expect it to be Breaking Bad and I wanted desperately to like it but honestly, most episodes, it was all I could do to stay awake. I loved it. |
|
[#40]
Quoted: By all logical and strategic rights, Walt should have allowed Jesse's "Old Yeller" moment long before he drew so much attention to himself. The main character I feel sorry for is Hank. He was a true blue cop who chased down the bad guys no matter where it took him or who stood in his way. He died heroically. View Quote ...And in a way Hank's antithesis Mike who was the only person Walt killed in a fit of rage that letting live wouldn't matter to Walt because he was that disciplined not to talk. Walt even apologized to Mike as he sat dying by the river. "Walter, just shut the fuck up and let me die in peace..." INSERT QUOTE TEXT Quoted: lol, this thread is jacked up. Glad I only read page 1 |
|
[#43]
Quoted:
So, you'd be okay with watching a fictional and well acted and written TV show that points out the redeeming qualities of a group of Islamic terrorists who kill Americans because they need the money to finance their family's middle class life in Kileen or Assholeistan after they shoot up the local US Army base. Or a fictional series that points out the redeeming qualities of Usama bin Laden, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, Pablo Escobar, or Nidal Malik Hasan? How about a TV show that points out the redeeming qualities of pedophiliic porn merchants? They have families who need money too. How about one on Supreme Court Justices that sell out conservative values on issues like the plain meaning of words like "states" or homosexual marriage? You'd get the SJW liberals to go for that one too. I need to copyright that idea - it might be an Emmy winning idea! I guess anything goes on TV if it is well written and well acted, and the characters redeeming qualities overshadow everything else they do. As for what I like, in fiction I like crime shows where a police officer or detective, though doing his job well, catches the criminal. For example, I am currently watching Foyle's War and Inspector Morse. I also have a fondness for almost every version of Sherlock Holmes ever done (Jeremy Brett being my favorite). I also like very non-PC cop movies like Charlie Chan. A good intelligence thriller is also something i enjoy. Last night I fell asleep watching Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy. Gary Oldham nailed the character of George Smiley. I also enjoy non-fiction documentaries on almost every topic known, if the liberal herp isn't too strong. I am currently watching a series about the hunt for Nazi war criminals that was done by BBC. I was surprised to learn how many involved in the mass extermination of humans were not even tried (about 90%) and how few were given their just reward - a hangman's noose. The History and Discovery channels were once my favorite cable stations, but they went too far into the antireality bullshit, so much so, I dropped cable altogether and now just watch NetFlix View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
That's a lot of words just to say "I don't know anything about the characters" and "I can't separate fiction from reality." So what shows and movies do you like? So, you'd be okay with watching a fictional and well acted and written TV show that points out the redeeming qualities of a group of Islamic terrorists who kill Americans because they need the money to finance their family's middle class life in Kileen or Assholeistan after they shoot up the local US Army base. Or a fictional series that points out the redeeming qualities of Usama bin Laden, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, Pablo Escobar, or Nidal Malik Hasan? How about a TV show that points out the redeeming qualities of pedophiliic porn merchants? They have families who need money too. How about one on Supreme Court Justices that sell out conservative values on issues like the plain meaning of words like "states" or homosexual marriage? You'd get the SJW liberals to go for that one too. I need to copyright that idea - it might be an Emmy winning idea! I guess anything goes on TV if it is well written and well acted, and the characters redeeming qualities overshadow everything else they do. As for what I like, in fiction I like crime shows where a police officer or detective, though doing his job well, catches the criminal. For example, I am currently watching Foyle's War and Inspector Morse. I also have a fondness for almost every version of Sherlock Holmes ever done (Jeremy Brett being my favorite). I also like very non-PC cop movies like Charlie Chan. A good intelligence thriller is also something i enjoy. Last night I fell asleep watching Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy. Gary Oldham nailed the character of George Smiley. I also enjoy non-fiction documentaries on almost every topic known, if the liberal herp isn't too strong. I am currently watching a series about the hunt for Nazi war criminals that was done by BBC. I was surprised to learn how many involved in the mass extermination of humans were not even tried (about 90%) and how few were given their just reward - a hangman's noose. The History and Discovery channels were once my favorite cable stations, but they went too far into the antireality bullshit, so much so, I dropped cable altogether and now just watch NetFlix So you don't watch any movie, or show with an anti-hero? Always has to be cut and dry and super simple for you? Don't watch arfcom's favorite movie: Heat. |
|
[#44]
Quoted:
This thread needs photos of Walter's wife. http://spanish.fansshare.com/photos/annagunn/anna-gunn-premiere-amc-breaking-bad-arrivals-kyju-kiaep-breaking-bad-1741712377.jpg View Quote This thread needs less photos of Walter's wife, she's ugly and that character was terrible. |
|
[#45]
|
|
[#46]
|
|
[#47]
|
|
[#48]
I think a great show would be about Gus and his history with the Mexican drug cartels.
|
|
[#49]
Quoted:
This thread needs less photos of Walter's wife, she's ugly and that character was terrible. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
This thread needs photos of Walter's wife. http://spanish.fansshare.com/photos/annagunn/anna-gunn-premiere-amc-breaking-bad-arrivals-kyju-kiaep-breaking-bad-1741712377.jpg This thread needs less photos of Walter's wife, she's ugly and that character was terrible. Not to mention her weight fluctuating each season |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.