User Panel
Posted: 11/27/2014 10:28:20 PM EDT
Not talking the "you've been a naughty girl now put on this laytex corset" kind.
I mean the lash kind for the administration of public justice. Assuming we could rewrite and/or reinterpret some pesky constitutional provisions...would you be in favor of bringing it back? I'm not talking a Jim Caviezel's Jesus-like beating, just some Singaporean bamboo cane whacks...or something of that nature. DUI and nobody's hurt? 5 whacks and and hour in the stock. Repeat shop lifting? 10 whacks and two hours. As Arfcom's only admitted authoritarian, I think it is a fabulous idea. |
|
No, if you want bronze age policies move to the Middle East.
|
|
It would be more humane than a prison sentence. Cheaper, too.
|
|
Been thinking along these lines lately. People remember pain and avoid it....
Except those rare wonderful ladies that love a good spanking and being told they are bad girls! |
|
|
I think public shaming might work for minor misdemeanors and violations
|
|
|
We should bring back the stocks and gibbets and whatever else that holds people in place for a few days. This would be an excellent punishment in lieu of jail time or fines...
|
|
|
absolutely.
"Tag" a building or bridge or whatever with spray paint? Make them clean it off and then beat the little shit's bare ass in public until they can't sit down for a month. |
|
Quoted:
We should bring back the stocks and gibbets and whatever else that holds people in place for a few days. This would be an excellent punishment in lieu of jail time or fines... View Quote Being put in the stocks was essentially a death sentence. Or the occupant ended up maimed for life. |
|
I say bring back the stocks and public shaming.
Thievery? 5 days in the stocks in the public square per item stolen DUI? 2 weeks in the stocks |
|
True sociopaths don't give a shit about short lived pain or public shaming.
|
|
Most (think all) criminals are as impulsive as a toddler coupled with an absolute inability to cope an understanding of why they are being punished. Beating them to near death results in zero change.
I think you'd be wasting your time. Pograms would be better.
|
|
|
|
|
I've posted many times I think that caning thing done to that POS who vandalized a bunch of cars in Singapore is a GREAT idea. I can think of many applications for it. Clearly the probation and other hand-slapping accomplishes nothing. A long-overdue "spanking" with a cane would be a nice change, and no doubt more effective. We would have to import a number of skilled men to administer it, as Americans have obviously forgotten how it's done, but that kind of immigration would be highly beneficial to the country.
|
|
Tar and feather for corrupt politicians. Or anyone stealing tax dollars.
|
|
Quoted: Public shaming, maybe. They aren't immune to physical pain. Literally everything they do is to spare themselves inconvenience or disinterested effort. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: True sociopaths don't give a shit about short lived pain or public shaming. Public shaming, maybe. They aren't immune to physical pain. Literally everything they do is to spare themselves inconvenience or disinterested effort. Can't we just do mass pogroms for these kinds?
|
|
Quoted:
We would have to import a number of skilled men to administer it, as Americans have obviously forgotten how it's done, but that kind of immigration would be highly beneficial to the country. View Quote Bullshit. Hang out at some fetish sites and you'll find that the art of caning is alive and well in the USA. |
|
Quoted: It would be your equivalent of drinking water and pissing it out. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: True sociopaths don't give a shit about short lived pain or public shaming. Public shaming, maybe. They aren't immune to physical pain. Literally everything they do is to spare themselves inconvenience or disinterested effort. Can't we just do mass pogroms for these kinds? Pick a different word and we'll talk. That one's got too much 88 rolled up in it. |
|
|
Quoted:
Bullshit. Hang out at some fetish sites and you'll find that the art of caning is alive and well in the USA. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
We would have to import a number of skilled men to administer it, as Americans have obviously forgotten how it's done, but that kind of immigration would be highly beneficial to the country. Bullshit. Hang out at some fetish sites and you'll find that the art of caning is alive and well in the USA. No thanks. Ignorance is bliss. |
|
How about tattoos indicating the crime they committed?
The neck would be a good place for them, and scumbags already have them there anyway. It would be nice to know that you are dealing with someone who has 3 DWIs and 2 posession charges just by looking at them. Child molesters should have tattoos put on their face, detailing what they did. It would make them the subject of scorn the rest of their lives and they might just "punch their own ticket", which would save society a lot of problems. |
|
Quoted:
I don't know if I'd go that far, but I do think consensual dueling should be legal. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
While we're at it, let's bring back trial by combat I don't know if I'd go that far, but I do think consensual dueling should be legal. Pistols or swords at dawn? Plus you could open a dueling school |
|
I am not at all sure that the Constitution bans such punishments. As plainly shown by the 5thAm, the Framers did not understand the Eighth Amendment to do so.
|
|
Quoted:
Being put in the stocks was essentially a death sentence. Or the occupant ended up maimed for life. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
We should bring back the stocks and gibbets and whatever else that holds people in place for a few days. This would be an excellent punishment in lieu of jail time or fines... Being put in the stocks was essentially a death sentence. Or the occupant ended up maimed for life. Explain please. I am ignorant. |
|
Nah, I don't think that kind of thing would deter the criminals that do the things you've mentioned and if we would be doing it just to get some kind of "satisfaction" than we've become a sick society.
Unfortunately, you can't beat stupid and desperation out of society. |
|
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
We should bring back the stocks and gibbets and whatever else that holds people in place for a few days. This would be an excellent punishment in lieu of jail time or fines... Being put in the stocks was essentially a death sentence. Or the occupant ended up maimed for life. Explain please. I am ignorant. Going on historical references. A man put in the stocks would be pelted with rocks, veggies, struck with objects, and beaten by the villagers. Also consider this... You are locked standing in these stocks for say 4 days... What happens when you are exhausted and try to rest? You strangle. It was also common that if the person wasn't killed they'd end up maimed by the same things that didn't kill him. Being locked in the stocks is a very cruel thing. Very cruel. |
|
For most things caning and no criminal record would be better than prison/jail and a criminal record. Less institutionalization and less of shadow looming over them for life, it would allow people to transition to being a productive citizen. It would also be cheaper than incarceration. Will never happen because a private prison makes more profit than a caning and the budget for government prison / jail is higher than paying some little Asian fucker to whoop civility into someones ass with a piece of rattan.
|
|
Quoted: Not talking the "you've been a naughty girl now put on this laytex corset" kind. I mean the lash kind for the administration of public justice. Assuming we could rewrite and/or reinterpret some pesky constitutional provisions...would you be in favor of bringing it back? I'm not talking a Jim Caviezel's Jesus-like beating, just some Singaporean bamboo cane whacks...or something of that nature. DUI and nobody's hurt? 5 whacks and and hour in the stock. Repeat shop lifting? 10 whacks and two hours. As Arfcom's only admitted authoritarian, I think it is a fabulous idea. View Quote I love it. Not only does it take away any notoriety from being a criminal, it eliminates profit motive from the state. The state must actually expend resources to punish minor violations. Lawmakers would have to consider the impact on the budget of stupid laws, and do a cost/benefit analysis. "Gee, guys, does it really make sense to hire a thousand more scourge masters to stop j-walking?" |
|
|
if you get this started can i be the one to provide all of the torture gear for it
|
|
|
Around 1998 or so I remember driving through a busy intersection at Rush hour in Gulfport, Mississippi.
There was a lady standing at the intersection with a giant sandwich board sign that stated "I WAS CONVICTED OF DRINKING AND DRIVING IN GULFPORT, MS" Always wondered if this was an option after she'd been convicted multiple times before. |
|
not to elaborate, just been in the business of making that type of gear for the past 20 years and know how to make it very uncomfortable for the wearer if need be
|
|
Shit never worked in the day, why would it work now? Criminal behavior is usually about low intelligence and poor impulse control. Jail/prison is more effective because it at least gives society a breather from the criminal.
|
|
Quoted: Shit never worked in the day, why would it work now? Criminal behavior is usually about low intelligence and poor impulse control. Jail/prison is more effective because it at least gives society a breather from the criminal. View Quote Criminal law exists to do three things: 1. Restrict the offender from society, 2. Retribution for the offense (which also provides deterrent against recidivism) and 3. rehabilitation of offenders. You are talking about "restriction". I am talking about Retribution and the rest be damned (for minor offenses). |
|
Someone liked mommy and daddy's firm hand a little too much. |
|
I think it should depend on the crime. If it is a crime with a clear victim, then sentences should be decided by said victim (or next of kin/whatever if victim is unable to sentence). All else? Sentence by jury with a majority decision (to prevent juries that couldn't agree). If the victim or jury decide the sentence should be nothing, then so be it. If the victim or jury decide the sentence should be to be strung up with a slipknot around your testicles until you fall or die, so be it. The check/balance is that there must be someone willing to carry out the punishment within the sentencing jury.
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.