User Panel
Quoted:
Aren't the overwhelming majority of those by 120 year old women or drunks? Not really putting that officer into good company. Maybe he was just to busy typing on the computer and missed the building jumping out in front of him. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
That is nothing compared to all the videos on youtube that show random people driving into convenience stores, gas stations, and other stuff. Aren't the overwhelming majority of those by 120 year old women or drunks? Not really putting that officer into good company. Maybe he was just to busy typing on the computer and missed the building jumping out in front of him. Based on the number of blank stares I see drivers with on the road in my 1hr+ commute. I don't know that I would say its all old people and old women. |
|
|
Quoted:
Lol @ this troll. |
|
|
Quoted:
I'm not sure what your point is. People made the assertion "Group X would never ever ever do Y!" I pointed out that, on one of the only occasions I know of where Group X was called on to do Y, they did it without a second thought. I'm not positing scenarios, I'm not citing anything as an example. Merely pointing out that, so far as I am aware, there has never been a problem getting cops to go door to door confiscating firearms in the US. They're batting a thousand, so to speak. History is what it is, so argue and disclaim all you want but it doesn't change the facts. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
You mean the same place thats mayor got on the radio station and was calling for help to the radio host, the same place that told people to go to a stadium and forgot about them for a few days and on and on. No weapons should have been confiscated, but to cite Katrina as an example is pretty much citing an example of what not to do on so many levels. I'm not sure what your point is. People made the assertion "Group X would never ever ever do Y!" I pointed out that, on one of the only occasions I know of where Group X was called on to do Y, they did it without a second thought. I'm not positing scenarios, I'm not citing anything as an example. Merely pointing out that, so far as I am aware, there has never been a problem getting cops to go door to door confiscating firearms in the US. They're batting a thousand, so to speak. History is what it is, so argue and disclaim all you want but it doesn't change the facts. Where have any modern examples of door to door searches and confiscations taken place outside of Katrina? Did they sweep the whole city? The police superintendent made an illegal decision. Here's what came about because of theat: "Louisiana legislator Steve Scalise introduced Louisiana House Bill 760, which would prohibit confiscation of firearms in a state of emergency, unless the seizure is pursuant to the investigation of a crime, or if the seizure is necessary to prevent immediate harm to the officer or another individual. On June 8, 2006, HB 760 was signed into law.[89] 21 other states joined Louisiana in enacting similar laws. A federal law prohibiting seizure of lawfully held firearms during an emergency, the Disaster Recovery Personal Protection Act of 2006, passed in the House with a vote of 322 to 99, and in the Senate by 84-16. The bill was signed into law by President Bush on October 9, 2006.[90]" (source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_government_response_to_Hurricane_Katrina#Confiscation_of_civilian_firearms) My opinion and belief is no firearms should be confiscated or seized with the exception of those taken as evidence of a crime. I also realize that door to door gun searches and confiscation is a folly, a ruse and fools errand. You cannot confiscate every firearm in any city, county or state with out everyone agreeing to turn them in. It's that simple there is no amount of man power available that allow for a systematic and complete search of every public place, private space and all land in whatever area you decided to make gun free by confiscation. And since you will not get those firearms from those who do not want to surrender them, all you are doing is making criminals out of those who fail to comply and run the real risk of sparking multiple armed confrontations over what is an unconstitutional and impossible goal. |
|
|
|
Quoted:
Where have any modern examples of door to door searches and confiscations taken place outside of Katrina? Did they sweep the whole city? The police superintendent made an illegal decision. Here's what came about because of theat: "Louisiana legislator Steve Scalise introduced Louisiana House Bill 760, which would prohibit confiscation of firearms in a state of emergency, unless the seizure is pursuant to the investigation of a crime, or if the seizure is necessary to prevent immediate harm to the officer or another individual. On June 8, 2006, HB 760 was signed into law.[89] 21 other states joined Louisiana in enacting similar laws. A federal law prohibiting seizure of lawfully held firearms during an emergency, the Disaster Recovery Personal Protection Act of 2006, passed in the House with a vote of 322 to 99, and in the Senate by 84-16. The bill was signed into law by President Bush on October 9, 2006.[90]" (source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_government_response_to_Hurricane_Katrina#Confiscation_of_civilian_firearms) My opinion and belief is no firearms should be confiscated or seized with the exception of those taken as evidence of a crime. I also realize that door to door gun searches and confiscation is a folly, a ruse and fools errand. You cannot confiscate every firearm in any city, county or state with out everyone agreeing to turn them in. It's that simple there is no amount of man power available that allow for a systematic and complete search of every public place, private space and all land in whatever area you decided to make gun free by confiscation. And since you will not get those firearms from those who do not want to surrender them, all you are doing is making criminals out of those who fail to comply and run the real risk of sparking multiple armed confrontations over what is an unconstitutional and impossible goal. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
You mean the same place thats mayor got on the radio station and was calling for help to the radio host, the same place that told people to go to a stadium and forgot about them for a few days and on and on. No weapons should have been confiscated, but to cite Katrina as an example is pretty much citing an example of what not to do on so many levels. I'm not sure what your point is. People made the assertion "Group X would never ever ever do Y!" I pointed out that, on one of the only occasions I know of where Group X was called on to do Y, they did it without a second thought. I'm not positing scenarios, I'm not citing anything as an example. Merely pointing out that, so far as I am aware, there has never been a problem getting cops to go door to door confiscating firearms in the US. They're batting a thousand, so to speak. History is what it is, so argue and disclaim all you want but it doesn't change the facts. Where have any modern examples of door to door searches and confiscations taken place outside of Katrina? Did they sweep the whole city? The police superintendent made an illegal decision. Here's what came about because of theat: "Louisiana legislator Steve Scalise introduced Louisiana House Bill 760, which would prohibit confiscation of firearms in a state of emergency, unless the seizure is pursuant to the investigation of a crime, or if the seizure is necessary to prevent immediate harm to the officer or another individual. On June 8, 2006, HB 760 was signed into law.[89] 21 other states joined Louisiana in enacting similar laws. A federal law prohibiting seizure of lawfully held firearms during an emergency, the Disaster Recovery Personal Protection Act of 2006, passed in the House with a vote of 322 to 99, and in the Senate by 84-16. The bill was signed into law by President Bush on October 9, 2006.[90]" (source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_government_response_to_Hurricane_Katrina#Confiscation_of_civilian_firearms) My opinion and belief is no firearms should be confiscated or seized with the exception of those taken as evidence of a crime. I also realize that door to door gun searches and confiscation is a folly, a ruse and fools errand. You cannot confiscate every firearm in any city, county or state with out everyone agreeing to turn them in. It's that simple there is no amount of man power available that allow for a systematic and complete search of every public place, private space and all land in whatever area you decided to make gun free by confiscation. And since you will not get those firearms from those who do not want to surrender them, all you are doing is making criminals out of those who fail to comply and run the real risk of sparking multiple armed confrontations over what is an unconstitutional and impossible goal. Only other example I know of would be CA after their DOJ changed their mind on whether or not some gun or other was legal. Damned if I can remember the details on that one though, it was years ago. I'm not saying door to door confiscation on a large scale is practical, or that it will happen. You're rebutting arguments I am not making. I was merely pointing out that the contention that cops would never go door to door to confiscate guns was not born out by the actual record of what actually happens when actual cops are actually called on to do so. |
|
Quoted:
Only other example I know of would be CA after their DOJ changed their mind on whether or not some gun or other was legal. Damned if I can remember the details on that one though, it was years ago. I'm not saying door to door confiscation on a large scale is practical, or that it will happen. You're rebutting arguments I am not making. I was merely pointing out that the contention that cops would never go door to door to confiscate guns was not born out by the actual record of what actually happens when actual cops are actually called on to do so. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
You mean the same place thats mayor got on the radio station and was calling for help to the radio host, the same place that told people to go to a stadium and forgot about them for a few days and on and on. No weapons should have been confiscated, but to cite Katrina as an example is pretty much citing an example of what not to do on so many levels. I'm not sure what your point is. People made the assertion "Group X would never ever ever do Y!" I pointed out that, on one of the only occasions I know of where Group X was called on to do Y, they did it without a second thought. I'm not positing scenarios, I'm not citing anything as an example. Merely pointing out that, so far as I am aware, there has never been a problem getting cops to go door to door confiscating firearms in the US. They're batting a thousand, so to speak. History is what it is, so argue and disclaim all you want but it doesn't change the facts. Where have any modern examples of door to door searches and confiscations taken place outside of Katrina? Did they sweep the whole city? The police superintendent made an illegal decision. Here's what came about because of theat: "Louisiana legislator Steve Scalise introduced Louisiana House Bill 760, which would prohibit confiscation of firearms in a state of emergency, unless the seizure is pursuant to the investigation of a crime, or if the seizure is necessary to prevent immediate harm to the officer or another individual. On June 8, 2006, HB 760 was signed into law.[89] 21 other states joined Louisiana in enacting similar laws. A federal law prohibiting seizure of lawfully held firearms during an emergency, the Disaster Recovery Personal Protection Act of 2006, passed in the House with a vote of 322 to 99, and in the Senate by 84-16. The bill was signed into law by President Bush on October 9, 2006.[90]" (source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_government_response_to_Hurricane_Katrina#Confiscation_of_civilian_firearms) My opinion and belief is no firearms should be confiscated or seized with the exception of those taken as evidence of a crime. I also realize that door to door gun searches and confiscation is a folly, a ruse and fools errand. You cannot confiscate every firearm in any city, county or state with out everyone agreeing to turn them in. It's that simple there is no amount of man power available that allow for a systematic and complete search of every public place, private space and all land in whatever area you decided to make gun free by confiscation. And since you will not get those firearms from those who do not want to surrender them, all you are doing is making criminals out of those who fail to comply and run the real risk of sparking multiple armed confrontations over what is an unconstitutional and impossible goal. Only other example I know of would be CA after their DOJ changed their mind on whether or not some gun or other was legal. Damned if I can remember the details on that one though, it was years ago. I'm not saying door to door confiscation on a large scale is practical, or that it will happen. You're rebutting arguments I am not making. I was merely pointing out that the contention that cops would never go door to door to confiscate guns was not born out by the actual record of what actually happens when actual cops are actually called on to do so. I worry about small scale more than large scale. |
|
Quoted:
Only other example I know of would be CA after their DOJ changed their mind on whether or not some gun or other was legal. Damned if I can remember the details on that one though, it was years ago. I'm not saying door to door confiscation on a large scale is practical, or that it will happen. You're rebutting arguments I am not making. I was merely pointing out that the contention that cops would never go door to door to confiscate guns was not born out by the actual record of what actually happens when actual cops are actually called on to do so. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
You mean the same place thats mayor got on the radio station and was calling for help to the radio host, the same place that told people to go to a stadium and forgot about them for a few days and on and on. No weapons should have been confiscated, but to cite Katrina as an example is pretty much citing an example of what not to do on so many levels. I'm not sure what your point is. People made the assertion "Group X would never ever ever do Y!" I pointed out that, on one of the only occasions I know of where Group X was called on to do Y, they did it without a second thought. I'm not positing scenarios, I'm not citing anything as an example. Merely pointing out that, so far as I am aware, there has never been a problem getting cops to go door to door confiscating firearms in the US. They're batting a thousand, so to speak. History is what it is, so argue and disclaim all you want but it doesn't change the facts. Where have any modern examples of door to door searches and confiscations taken place outside of Katrina? Did they sweep the whole city? The police superintendent made an illegal decision. Here's what came about because of theat: "Louisiana legislator Steve Scalise introduced Louisiana House Bill 760, which would prohibit confiscation of firearms in a state of emergency, unless the seizure is pursuant to the investigation of a crime, or if the seizure is necessary to prevent immediate harm to the officer or another individual. On June 8, 2006, HB 760 was signed into law.[89] 21 other states joined Louisiana in enacting similar laws. A federal law prohibiting seizure of lawfully held firearms during an emergency, the Disaster Recovery Personal Protection Act of 2006, passed in the House with a vote of 322 to 99, and in the Senate by 84-16. The bill was signed into law by President Bush on October 9, 2006.[90]" (source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_government_response_to_Hurricane_Katrina#Confiscation_of_civilian_firearms) My opinion and belief is no firearms should be confiscated or seized with the exception of those taken as evidence of a crime. I also realize that door to door gun searches and confiscation is a folly, a ruse and fools errand. You cannot confiscate every firearm in any city, county or state with out everyone agreeing to turn them in. It's that simple there is no amount of man power available that allow for a systematic and complete search of every public place, private space and all land in whatever area you decided to make gun free by confiscation. And since you will not get those firearms from those who do not want to surrender them, all you are doing is making criminals out of those who fail to comply and run the real risk of sparking multiple armed confrontations over what is an unconstitutional and impossible goal. Only other example I know of would be CA after their DOJ changed their mind on whether or not some gun or other was legal. Damned if I can remember the details on that one though, it was years ago. I'm not saying door to door confiscation on a large scale is practical, or that it will happen. You're rebutting arguments I am not making. I was merely pointing out that the contention that cops would never go door to door to confiscate guns was not born out by the actual record of what actually happens when actual cops are actually called on to do so. What the superintendent ordered was without any legal authority, without a warrant, and unconstitutional. That's pretty good grounds as a cop to say nope, not doing it. Let them fire me for refusing, that will also force them to justify in writing how I failed to uphold my obligation to perform my legal duties. Why the various cops and national guardsmen did it is beyond me. |
|
Quoted:
What the superintendent ordered was without any legal authority, without a warrant, and unconstitutional. That's pretty good grounds as a cop to say nope, not doing it. Let them fire me for refusing, that will also force them to justify in writing how I failed to uphold my obligation to perform my legal duties. Why the various cops and national guardsmen did it is beyond me. View Quote You keep bringing the "it wasn't legal!" thing up like it bolsters your argument. It really doesn't. Cops are just normal people. And most normal people, when put into stressful situations, just follow their orders. Humans are amazing rationalization machines, and there's always a reason. I think a lot of folks would be surprised how many people would do Clearly Wrong Things if pressed to do so. |
|
Quoted: You keep bringing the "it wasn't legal!" thing up like it bolsters your argument. It really doesn't. Cops are just normal people. And most normal people, when put into stressful situations, just follow their orders. Humans are amazing rationalization machines, and there's always a reason. I think a lot of folks would be surprised how many people would do Clearly Wrong Things if pressed to do so. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: What the superintendent ordered was without any legal authority, without a warrant, and unconstitutional. That's pretty good grounds as a cop to say nope, not doing it. Let them fire me for refusing, that will also force them to justify in writing how I failed to uphold my obligation to perform my legal duties. Why the various cops and national guardsmen did it is beyond me. You keep bringing the "it wasn't legal!" thing up like it bolsters your argument. It really doesn't. Cops are just normal people. And most normal people, when put into stressful situations, just follow their orders. Humans are amazing rationalization machines, and there's always a reason. I think a lot of folks would be surprised how many people would do Clearly Wrong Things if pressed to do so. *cough* Stanford Prison Experiment *cough* |
|
|
Quoted:
Based on the number of blank stares I see drivers with on the road in my 1hr+ commute. I don't know that I would say its all old people and old women. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
That is nothing compared to all the videos on youtube that show random people driving into convenience stores, gas stations, and other stuff. Aren't the overwhelming majority of those by 120 year old women or drunks? Not really putting that officer into good company. Maybe he was just to busy typing on the computer and missed the building jumping out in front of him. Based on the number of blank stares I see drivers with on the road in my 1hr+ commute. I don't know that I would say its all old people and old women. I've worked two "drive into a building" fatalties. One a Chinese restaurant where an Expedition took out the cashier inside. Both were 30 YO white males that fell asleep. |
|
Quoted:
Book recommendation: Rise of the Warrior Cop http://s16.postimg.org/f56dehrlh/riseo_of_the_warrior_cop_radley_balko_copblock.png View Quote Balko is a slobbering idiot. You actually gave that goober money? |
|
Quoted:
speaking of..how is yours working? didn't you have a problem with it? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
OP drives an IROC. That should tell us all we need to know about his troll thread. TRG speaking of..how is yours working? didn't you have a problem with it? Transmission mount (something to do with controlling torque) broke, again. Not too bad to get it fixed. Rear suspension bushing all gone, not too pricey either. Radiator was leaking (this is the second one in 4 years). Little stuff, but, nothing major. It tends to be about a grand a year in maintenance, but, fun to drive every day and still cheaper than a car payment. TRG |
|
Quoted:
Transmission mount (something to do with controlling torque) broke, again. Not too bad to get it fixed. Rear suspension bushing all gone, not too pricey either. Radiator was leaking (this is the second one in 4 years). Little stuff, but, nothing major. It tends to be about a grand a year in maintenance, but, fun to drive every day and still cheaper than a car payment. TRG View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
OP drives an IROC. That should tell us all we need to know about his troll thread. TRG speaking of..how is yours working? didn't you have a problem with it? Transmission mount (something to do with controlling torque) broke, again. Not too bad to get it fixed. Rear suspension bushing all gone, not too pricey either. Radiator was leaking (this is the second one in 4 years). Little stuff, but, nothing major. It tends to be about a grand a year in maintenance, but, fun to drive every day and still cheaper than a car payment. TRG Plus it makes your mullet look amazing. |
|
Quoted:
Plus it makes your mullet look amazing. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
OP drives an IROC. That should tell us all we need to know about his troll thread. TRG speaking of..how is yours working? didn't you have a problem with it? Transmission mount (something to do with controlling torque) broke, again. Not too bad to get it fixed. Rear suspension bushing all gone, not too pricey either. Radiator was leaking (this is the second one in 4 years). Little stuff, but, nothing major. It tends to be about a grand a year in maintenance, but, fun to drive every day and still cheaper than a car payment. TRG Plus it makes your mullet look amazing. No, my ass-less chaps make my mullet look amazing. The IROC makes my gold chains look sexy. TRG |
|
|
Quoted: Well by that mentality so will the military because some of them participated in it as well during Katrina. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: You seem a little tense. Check Paul Howes article on his thoughts concerning LEO's and Mil enforcing any type of long term scenerio hat you describe. I'm not describing any scenario, merely responding to the oft quoted assertion that the majority of cops would never go door to door by pointing out that, when they were actually tasked to do so, they did. That being said, I don't think we'll ever see a nation wide occurrence of that. But it is a bit silly to keep vociferously insisting that it's absurd to think cops would do it, when history shows that they will. Well by that mentality so will the military because some of them participated in it as well during Katrina. |
|
Quoted: What the superintendent ordered was without any legal authority, without a warrant, and unconstitutional. That's pretty good grounds as a cop to say nope, not doing it. Let them fire me for refusing, that will also force them to justify in writing how I failed to uphold my obligation to perform my legal duties. Why the various cops and national guardsmen did it is beyond me. View Quote Then You have the Propaganda Machine of the Government.... When it gets done, the people that don't turn in their Guns will be the 2nd coming of Al Qaeda or ISIS........ |
|
Quoted:
No, my ass-less chaps make my mullet look amazing. The IROC makes my gold chains look sexy. TRG View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
OP drives an IROC. That should tell us all we need to know about his troll thread. TRG speaking of..how is yours working? didn't you have a problem with it? Transmission mount (something to do with controlling torque) broke, again. Not too bad to get it fixed. Rear suspension bushing all gone, not too pricey either. Radiator was leaking (this is the second one in 4 years). Little stuff, but, nothing major. It tends to be about a grand a year in maintenance, but, fun to drive every day and still cheaper than a car payment. TRG Plus it makes your mullet look amazing. No, my ass-less chaps make my mullet look amazing. The IROC makes my gold chains look sexy. TRG What makes your chest hair look sexy? |
|
Quoted:
Most cops pay for their own gear. Also, see my point in red. Obviously there couldn't be anything wrong with society, it's gotta be the police. Here we are, yet again, not taking personal responsibility. It's someone else's fault! View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
When he can learn the difference between Calvary and Cavalry his writing might have some merit. When I was a kid cops walked around in pressed uniforms with shiny badges and belts (to include MPs). They passed out baseball cards and knew the people they worked for. Now they drive around in 5.11's with sewn on badges and have no idea who they work for. I wonder how come kids respected them when I was young and the kids today don't. Must be a coincidence. Because parents are shit, and raise little fucktrophys to be douchebags. Can you read? If so, then click the red letters in the opening post on page 1. Interestingly, there are two things about duty uniforms that you ignore: 1) street gear now is tougher and longer-lasting. That means it doesn't have to be replaced as often as the polyester knit stuff. 2) street gear is CHEAPER than that fancy polyester stuff. These two reasons means a saving of tax dollars. A LOT of tax dollars. Same goes for the "web" type duty gear... cheaper up front, and longer-lasting. As to the whole "respect" thing, society as a whole now demonizes and rejects anything and anyone that restricts an individual's personal wants and desires. Rule of law is now simply becoming a joke, a novel concept not suited to our new corporate society. Most cops pay for their own gear. Also, see my point in red. Obviously there couldn't be anything wrong with society, it's gotta be the police. Here we are, yet again, not taking personal responsibility. It's someone else's fault! ...........It's always the cops fault |
|
Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: speaking of..how is yours working? didn't you have a problem with it? Transmission mount (something to do with controlling torque) broke, again. Not too bad to get it fixed. Rear suspension bushing all gone, not too pricey either. Radiator was leaking (this is the second one in 4 years). Little stuff, but, nothing major. It tends to be about a grand a year in maintenance, but, fun to drive every day and still cheaper than a car payment. TRG Plus it makes your mullet look amazing. No, my ass-less chaps make my mullet look amazing. The IROC makes my gold chains look sexy. TRG What makes your chest hair look sexy? |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
http://www.breachbangclear.com/why-i-hate-cops/ An excellent read. I will warn the anti-cop members here..keep your posts with in the CoC or you will be shown the door. Argue the merits of this article all you want. Attack cops (including our LEO members here) because they are cops and you will be gone from the site. What an incendiary post from Staff. ie, " everyone important here is in the enforcer class. Don't complain aboutyour god cops". Well, no respect for you, Mr. "Cop haters , Gtfo Cops are respectable peace officers until they start violating rights, regardless of officer safety. then, they're pos. You seem ... familiar. Another one... |
|
|
Quoted:
Every time officers fuck up bad around here, they get thrown under the bus, post haste. One guy is in jail, and the other was prosecuted, IIRC. (of the two fuckups at my dept) You guys keep harping about unions. The majority of cops aren't unionized. number wise I bet-er or maybe I'll go with "I suspect"-most cops have union representation. Sure a lot of cops here chime in that they aren't union, but the police on here, or at least the guys who post in GD a lot, are mostly Southern and mostly not working in a big city. Meanwhile there are libtard cities like Boston, NY and Chicago who have armies of union cops. Most of the southern LEOs aren't pulling down a huge paycheck either. I have a friend who is now a Lt. with the sheriff's department in a fairly large county. After 25 years in he's making around $110kish. We don't have rank n file officers making a lot of money. A lot of the young guys have to take second jobs to support themselves and their families. I don't mean to be insulting to LEOs here, but to be honest if you see a neighborhood with a patrol car parked in the driveway (as in the officer lives there), it's probably a fairly economically modest neighborhood, condo, or apartment complex. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I know for me personally, the problem is that these "few bad apples" rarely if ever receive any type of punishment for their crimes. Too often a cop who commits one or more felonies will at worst get fired, and then a year after the headlines move on his union appeal will come through and he's back out on the street with full back pay. I see it happen both ways. Good cops get fucked because the public is irked about some shit. One guy is in jail, and the other was prosecuted, IIRC. (of the two fuckups at my dept) You guys keep harping about unions. The majority of cops aren't unionized. number wise I bet-er or maybe I'll go with "I suspect"-most cops have union representation. Sure a lot of cops here chime in that they aren't union, but the police on here, or at least the guys who post in GD a lot, are mostly Southern and mostly not working in a big city. Meanwhile there are libtard cities like Boston, NY and Chicago who have armies of union cops. Most of the southern LEOs aren't pulling down a huge paycheck either. I have a friend who is now a Lt. with the sheriff's department in a fairly large county. After 25 years in he's making around $110kish. We don't have rank n file officers making a lot of money. A lot of the young guys have to take second jobs to support themselves and their families. I don't mean to be insulting to LEOs here, but to be honest if you see a neighborhood with a patrol car parked in the driveway (as in the officer lives there), it's probably a fairly economically modest neighborhood, condo, or apartment complex. As a Lt. with over 19 years of service I wish I made $110kish........my salary is $80,000.................Our Chief doesn't even make that........ |
|
Quoted:
You keep bringing the "it wasn't legal!" thing up like it bolsters your argument. It really doesn't. Cops are just normal people. And most normal people, when put into stressful situations, just follow their orders. Humans are amazing rationalization machines, and there's always a reason. I think a lot of folks would be surprised how many people would do Clearly Wrong Things if pressed to do so. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
What the superintendent ordered was without any legal authority, without a warrant, and unconstitutional. That's pretty good grounds as a cop to say nope, not doing it. Let them fire me for refusing, that will also force them to justify in writing how I failed to uphold my obligation to perform my legal duties. Why the various cops and national guardsmen did it is beyond me. You keep bringing the "it wasn't legal!" thing up like it bolsters your argument. It really doesn't. Cops are just normal people. And most normal people, when put into stressful situations, just follow their orders. Humans are amazing rationalization machines, and there's always a reason. I think a lot of folks would be surprised how many people would do Clearly Wrong Things if pressed to do so. In this case, I think it does bolster the argument somewhat. It goes addressing legal duties and the performance of legal process. When you are dealing with door to door confiscation, that is a action way beyond the norm and should trigger the question by anyone involved where is this order coming from and what legal authority or precedent gives us such authority? I have enforced emergency laws or orders under similar circumstances (a direct hit by a hurricane). The example I will use is the establishment of a dusk to dawn curfew. That only came about after a state of emergency was declared and the local government voted to place the curfew into effect. That did restrict people's freedom of movement. But, the local conditions were such that there were unsafe streets (debris, some streets damaged or impassible, no street lighting, no functional traffic control, traffic signals, dead power lines and cable /phone lines hanging in the road way), no power and no open businesses. Add to that limited cases of property theft from damaged homes and businesses. So while the restriction on travel was put in place, the argument could be made that liberties were restricted. On the other hand what was the effect in light of the conditions and actual dangers present. And again this was based on a decision made by elected representatives of the citizens under emergency conditions which was lifted within a week of the initial order. I am in no way implying that a similar scenario should be used to execute gun confiscation, my point is every officer (and a few days later guardsman) knew what they were enforcing, had a copy of the curfew and knew where it came from. The public were being advised of the same thing on radios and television. I agree "cops are just normal people" and the statements that followed that sentence. But, trying to rationalize something that you are about to do is often a sign that you are pushing the envelope in regards to what you are doing or are about to do. It sucks, but as a cop you have to know what you are justified in doing. For a cop, you would be expected, even when pressed, to act in a manner that is justified. Sometimes that decision will have to be made immediately or in a few seconds. Should a cop, or anyone else for that matter, be judged on the action they took in light of how much time they had to observe/detect what was going on and what was their action or re-action given that time frame? Absolutely. But in the Katrina gun confiscation incident, I cannot understand where the senior command staff/front line supervisors and the military chain of command were at between when this came down and was actually executed. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
When he can learn the difference between Calvary and Cavalry his writing might have some merit. When I was a kid cops walked around in pressed uniforms with shiny badges and belts (to include MPs). They passed out baseball cards and knew the people they worked for. Now they drive around in 5.11's with sewn on badges and have no idea who they work for. I wonder how come kids respected them when I was young and the kids today don't. Must be a coincidence. Because parents are shit, and raise little fucktrophys to be douchebags. Can you read? If so, then click the red letters in the opening post on page 1. Interestingly, there are two things about duty uniforms that you ignore: 1) street gear now is tougher and longer-lasting. That means it doesn't have to be replaced as often as the polyester knit stuff. 2) street gear is CHEAPER than that fancy polyester stuff. These two reasons means a saving of tax dollars. A LOT of tax dollars. Same goes for the "web" type duty gear... cheaper up front, and longer-lasting. As to the whole "respect" thing, society as a whole now demonizes and rejects anything and anyone that restricts an individual's personal wants and desires. Rule of law is now simply becoming a joke, a novel concept not suited to our new corporate society. Most cops pay for their own gear. Also, see my point in red. Obviously there couldn't be anything wrong with society, it's gotta be the police. Here we are, yet again, not taking personal responsibility. It's someone else's fault! ...........It's always the cops fault or, it's never the cops fault... |
|
Quoted: Transmission mount (something to do with controlling torque) broke, again. Not too bad to get it fixed. Rear suspension bushing all gone, not too pricey either. Radiator was leaking (this is the second one in 4 years). Little stuff, but, nothing major. It tends to be about a grand a year in maintenance, but, fun to drive every day and still cheaper than a car payment. TRG ya..the torque arm fastens to the rear of the transmission. Order up a spohn's replacement... http://www.spohn.net/shop/1982-1992-GM-F-Body/Suspension/Torque-Arms/Standard-Duty-Crossmember-Mounted-Torque-Arms/Tubular-Adjustable-Torque-Arm-700R4T-5-Transmission.html they have just about everything suspension related for f bodies. |
|
Quoted:
I cant seem to find that information in your links. the other story in your link shows a malicious, intentional act that one could reasonably believe would (and did) result in death. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Really, it shows one state in 1 year had 173 felony violations and 2935 misdemeanor charges against mechanics/ shop owners versus less then 900 total civil violations..doesnt sound to me like criminal charges never happen unless someone purposely cuts a brake line...whatever, there was a reason the dealer put us thru the training they did, yet somehow you never see us towing some ideology that every mechanic is above the line, that until you stand up and grab the wrench you have no right to judge , or any of that other horeshit spewed.. And you won't see us defending shit mechanics..I can't stand them and will do every thing in my power to get them out of the shops I work in.....I love and respect good cops, have known many personally including my brother who made a career of it. can't stand the ones who think they are above the law.. leave the honest joe taxpayer alone, and go spend your time nailing the bangers/rapiest/murderers/ robbers and society will love you even more.. I cant seem to find that information in your links. the other story in your link shows a malicious, intentional act that one could reasonably believe would (and did) result in death. It's there, I copied part of it above....you just wish to ignore it..which is fine..but that is the difference between leo and other professions..we can and have been held both criminally and civilly accountable for our actions..Every vehicle I touch is done with an eye toward legal exposure for a reason, and I am sure many others here do the same in their field as well...... |
|
Quoted:
As a Lt. with over 19 years of service I wish I made $110kish........my salary is $80,000.................Our Chief doesn't even make that........ View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I know for me personally, the problem is that these "few bad apples" rarely if ever receive any type of punishment for their crimes. Too often a cop who commits one or more felonies will at worst get fired, and then a year after the headlines move on his union appeal will come through and he's back out on the street with full back pay. I see it happen both ways. Good cops get fucked because the public is irked about some shit. One guy is in jail, and the other was prosecuted, IIRC. (of the two fuckups at my dept) You guys keep harping about unions. The majority of cops aren't unionized. number wise I bet-er or maybe I'll go with "I suspect"-most cops have union representation. Sure a lot of cops here chime in that they aren't union, but the police on here, or at least the guys who post in GD a lot, are mostly Southern and mostly not working in a big city. Meanwhile there are libtard cities like Boston, NY and Chicago who have armies of union cops. Most of the southern LEOs aren't pulling down a huge paycheck either. I have a friend who is now a Lt. with the sheriff's department in a fairly large county. After 25 years in he's making around $110kish. We don't have rank n file officers making a lot of money. A lot of the young guys have to take second jobs to support themselves and their families. I don't mean to be insulting to LEOs here, but to be honest if you see a neighborhood with a patrol car parked in the driveway (as in the officer lives there), it's probably a fairly economically modest neighborhood, condo, or apartment complex. As a Lt. with over 19 years of service I wish I made $110kish........my salary is $80,000.................Our Chief doesn't even make that........ Lt here with over 19 years and I make under 50k. |
|
|
Quoted:
not really considering the currency exchange rate and our funny accent! View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Site staff throws out a troll thread and the threatens people. Pft. It's a great way to cull out the impulsive idiots who can't stick to the rules.... But the OP is from Canada so does any of this mean anything? You have a funny accent. never heard aboot that. Eh? |
|
|
Quoted:
Book recommendation: Rise of the Warrior Cop http://s16.postimg.org/f56dehrlh/riseo_of_the_warrior_cop_radley_balko_copblock.png View Quote Because, RADLEY BALKO. LULZ |
|
Quoted:
When he drives it he keeps yelling "sorry" down the road. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
OP drives an IROC. That should tell us all we need to know about his troll thread. TRG When he drives it he keeps yelling "sorry" down the road. "Soory" |
|
|
|
|
Quoted:
We don't have rights, we have powers, which you granted us. You, the citizen, have rights. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
I just want what the cops get. I want my rights back We don't have rights, we have powers, which you granted us. You, the citizen, have rights. Which the politicians are taking away, right by right. We try to vote them out, but they give free stuff to jackasses that don't care about anything except their free meal ticket. So they get re-elected. Rather depressing, really. |
|
|
Quoted:
Which the politicians are taking away, right by right. We try to vote them out, but they give free stuff to jackasses that don't care about anything except their free meal ticket. So they get re-elected. Rather depressing, really. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I just want what the cops get. I want my rights back We don't have rights, we have powers, which you granted us. You, the citizen, have rights. Which the politicians are taking away, right by right. We try to vote them out, but they give free stuff to jackasses that don't care about anything except their free meal ticket. So they get re-elected. Rather depressing, really. Aye. |
|
Quoted:
It's there, I copied part of it above....you just wish to ignore it..which is fine..but that is the difference between leo and other professions..we can and have been held both criminally and civilly accountable for our actions..Every vehicle I touch is done with an eye toward legal exposure for a reason, and I am sure many others here do the same in their field as well...... View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Really, it shows one state in 1 year had 173 felony violations and 2935 misdemeanor charges against mechanics/ shop owners versus less then 900 total civil violations..doesnt sound to me like criminal charges never happen unless someone purposely cuts a brake line...whatever, there was a reason the dealer put us thru the training they did, yet somehow you never see us towing some ideology that every mechanic is above the line, that until you stand up and grab the wrench you have no right to judge , or any of that other horeshit spewed.. And you won't see us defending shit mechanics..I can't stand them and will do every thing in my power to get them out of the shops I work in.....I love and respect good cops, have known many personally including my brother who made a career of it. can't stand the ones who think they are above the law.. leave the honest joe taxpayer alone, and go spend your time nailing the bangers/rapiest/murderers/ robbers and society will love you even more.. I cant seem to find that information in your links. the other story in your link shows a malicious, intentional act that one could reasonably believe would (and did) result in death. It's there, I copied part of it above....you just wish to ignore it..which is fine..but that is the difference between leo and other professions..we can and have been held both criminally and civilly accountable for our actions..Every vehicle I touch is done with an eye toward legal exposure for a reason, and I am sure many others here do the same in their field as well...... sure thing. whatever you say |
|
Quoted: We don't have rights, we have powers, which you granted us. You, the citizen, have rights. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: I just want what the cops get. I want my rights back We don't have rights, we have powers, which you granted us. You, the citizen, have rights. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I just want what the cops get. I want my rights back We don't have rights, we have powers, which you granted us. You, the citizen, have rights. Which the politicians are taking away, right by right. We try to vote them out, but they give free stuff to jackasses that don't care about anything except their free meal ticket. So they get re-elected. Rather depressing, really. Aye. You guys, the LEOs on this site do give me hope, however. Well, except for maybe one in DC and one in Austin. |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.