User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 8/20/2014 5:35:22 PM EDT
[#1]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
You should get your little tank icon! Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Man, if it's true, Ferguson owes respect to anyone who can do that. How hard would it be to hit someone 6/6 times when they're 7ft infront of you? I think you should do a test scientific. Have a buddy punch you in the face like he wants to kill you. It has to be hard enough to break your eye socket or it doesn't count. Then spin around a few times so you can be really disoriented, then shoot a moving target coming towards you. I've tested that theory before. In war. Still here. Thankx. Bye. You should get your little tank icon! how about fuck no. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/20/2014 5:36:53 PM EDT
[#2]
it is also being reported he had a broken jaw.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/20/2014 5:37:28 PM EDT
[#3]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
oh don't back peddle now hero Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
] To be honest I am not up to date on all details regarding what happened. Not to take away from the officer's suffering and situation. One thing is pretty clear; good shot. oh don't back peddle now hero |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/20/2014 5:37:31 PM EDT
[#4]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/20/2014 5:38:01 PM EDT
[#5]
great
INBTL
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/20/2014 5:38:04 PM EDT
[#6]
IBTL
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/20/2014 5:39:17 PM EDT
[#7]
wondering when a sanitation worker will file a grievance on the officer for taking out the trash
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/20/2014 5:41:17 PM EDT
[#8]
"hey man nice shot"
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/20/2014 5:41:30 PM EDT
[#9]
Quote HistoryQuoted: the perp attacked the officer inside the car at first then he ran away (perp), the officer chased after him, then he stopped and started talking shit then rushed the officer, that is when he popped him. his eye was busted during the struggle inside the vehicle. That is what I have gathered from Rush and other news outlets. That's pretty much what I've been able to glean from all the misinformation going around. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/20/2014 5:42:25 PM EDT
[#10]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Said like a true basement dweller. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Man, if it's true, Ferguson owes respect to anyone who can do that. How hard would it be to hit someone 6/6 times when they're 7ft infront of you? I'm guessing you've never had to do it. Ask someone who has. Watch a dash cam where two people shoot at each other from a few feet away and miss each other a dozen times. So, the other guy was shooting at the officer? My apologies then. He hates porn too. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/20/2014 5:42:42 PM EDT
[#11]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Who shoots with 1 eye I do. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/20/2014 5:44:09 PM EDT
[#12]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
at that point, according to the supreme court the first and the third options allow deadly force.....fleeing violent felons, and only one way to stop them? TN v gardner Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Thug was beating had beat the crap out of the cop, and then broke off the engagement. I would have fired more than six. What remains to be determined is after breaking off the engagement was he fleeing, surrendering, or coming back for round 2? Looks like the witness accounts coming out in the past few days, are leaning towards round 2, in which case good shoot. at that point, according to the supreme court the first and the third options allow deadly force.....fleeing violent felons, and only one way to stop them? TN v gardner Bull! TN v Gardner limited the police use of deadly force. Previous to it police could use lethal force to stop fleeing felons. "such force may not be used unless it is necessary to prevent the escape and the officer has probable cause to believe that the suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious physical injury to the officer or others." If the suspect was fleeing he no longer posed a significant threat. You CANNOT shoot someone because they committed a violent felony and are fleeing. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/20/2014 5:44:22 PM EDT
[#13]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
How hard would it be to hit someone 6/6 times when they're 7ft infront of you? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Man, if it's true, Ferguson owes respect to anyone who can do that. How hard would it be to hit someone 6/6 times when they're 7ft infront of you? Bless your heart. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/20/2014 5:45:06 PM EDT
[#14]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
So, the other guy was shooting at the officer? My apologies then. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Man, if it's true, Ferguson owes respect to anyone who can do that. How hard would it be to hit someone 6/6 times when they're 7ft infront of you? I'm guessing you've never had to do it. Ask someone who has. Watch a dash cam where two people shoot at each other from a few feet away and miss each other a dozen times. So, the other guy was shooting at the officer? My apologies then. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/20/2014 5:45:14 PM EDT
[#15]
I understood it s was 3 hits, 9 wounds, out of 7-9 shots.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/20/2014 5:46:30 PM EDT
[#16]
Back on track.
Officer was assaulted sitting in his car. The majority of people a right eye dominant. Likely, his left eyesocket was busted. Add in training and musclememory, with adrenaline dump... Good shooting, officer. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/20/2014 5:49:16 PM EDT
[#17]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
How hard would it be to hit someone 6/6 times when they're 7ft infront of you? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Man, if it's true, Ferguson owes respect to anyone who can do that. How hard would it be to hit someone 6/6 times when they're 7ft infront of you? You've never shot anyone have you? |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/20/2014 5:50:54 PM EDT
[#18]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Bull! TN v Gardner limited the police use of deadly force. Previous to it police could use lethal force to stop fleeing felons. "such force may not be used unless it is necessary to prevent the escape and the officer has probable cause to believe that the suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious physical injury to the officer or others." If the suspect was fleeing he no longer posed a significant threat. You CANNOT shoot someone because they committed a violent felony and are fleeing. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Thug was beating had beat the crap out of the cop, and then broke off the engagement. I would have fired more than six. What remains to be determined is after breaking off the engagement was he fleeing, surrendering, or coming back for round 2? Looks like the witness accounts coming out in the past few days, are leaning towards round 2, in which case good shoot. at that point, according to the supreme court the first and the third options allow deadly force.....fleeing violent felons, and only one way to stop them? TN v gardner Bull! TN v Gardner limited the police use of deadly force. Previous to it police could use lethal force to stop fleeing felons. "such force may not be used unless it is necessary to prevent the escape and the officer has probable cause to believe that the suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious physical injury to the officer or others." If the suspect was fleeing he no longer posed a significant threat. You CANNOT shoot someone because they committed a violent felony and are fleeing. yes, you can.........if he has done it already, he has the means to do it again, and he is now in a position (being free) and that is the only way to stop a violent felon...you can would you like me to post the case law on it? or.... eta tell you what this is an exert from the case " such force may not be used unless necessary to prevent the escape and the officer has probable cause to believe that the suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious physical injury to the officer or others" |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/20/2014 5:53:19 PM EDT
[#19]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
How hard would it be to hit someone 6/6 times when they're 7ft infront of you? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Man, if it's true, Ferguson owes respect to anyone who can do that. How hard would it be to hit someone 6/6 times when they're 7ft infront of you? Yeah. The target was 6'4" and 300 lbs.
Quoted:
Let me smash your face with my fist and blowout your eye socket. Then charge you while you are probably spitting up blood and trying to breath with blood all up in your sinuses. It's very possible that your eye will leave the socket also and be hanging somewhere around your cheek bone. Then we can see how many accurate hits you make. Or you could just continue to play call of duty and be a general dumbass. Your choice.  WTF is this herpy derp?!?
Quoted:
I understood it s was 3 hits, 9 wounds, out of 7-9 shots. Any truth to this? Anyone know a legitimate source for either 6/6 or 3/9? |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/20/2014 5:53:49 PM EDT
[#20]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Bull! TN v Gardner limited the police use of deadly force. Previous to it police could use lethal force to stop fleeing felons. "such force may not be used unless it is necessary to prevent the escape and the officer has probable cause to believe that the suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious physical injury to the officer or others." If the suspect was fleeing he no longer posed a significant threat. You CANNOT shoot someone because they committed a violent felony and are fleeing. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Thug was beating had beat the crap out of the cop, and then broke off the engagement. I would have fired more than six. What remains to be determined is after breaking off the engagement was he fleeing, surrendering, or coming back for round 2? Looks like the witness accounts coming out in the past few days, are leaning towards round 2, in which case good shoot. at that point, according to the supreme court the first and the third options allow deadly force.....fleeing violent felons, and only one way to stop them? TN v gardner Bull! TN v Gardner limited the police use of deadly force. Previous to it police could use lethal force to stop fleeing felons. "such force may not be used unless it is necessary to prevent the escape and the officer has probable cause to believe that the suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious physical injury to the officer or others." If the suspect was fleeing he no longer posed a significant threat. You CANNOT shoot someone because they committed a violent felony and are fleeing. Bullshit. He had just assaulted a cop, and tried to take his gun. Knowing there would be a large type manhunt for him, he would be extremely dangerous to ANYONE he encountered. I wish the cop got him twelve times.
ETA Spelling. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/20/2014 5:57:16 PM EDT
[#21]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Bullshit. He had just assaulted a cop, and tried to take his gun. Knowing there would be a large type manhunt for him, he would be extremely dangerous to ANYONE he encountered. I wish the cop got him twelve times.
ETA Spelling. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Thug was beating had beat the crap out of the cop, and then broke off the engagement. I would have fired more than six. What remains to be determined is after breaking off the engagement was he fleeing, surrendering, or coming back for round 2? Looks like the witness accounts coming out in the past few days, are leaning towards round 2, in which case good shoot. at that point, according to the supreme court the first and the third options allow deadly force.....fleeing violent felons, and only one way to stop them? TN v gardner Bull! TN v Gardner limited the police use of deadly force. Previous to it police could use lethal force to stop fleeing felons. "such force may not be used unless it is necessary to prevent the escape and the officer has probable cause to believe that the suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious physical injury to the officer or others." If the suspect was fleeing he no longer posed a significant threat. You CANNOT shoot someone because they committed a violent felony and are fleeing. Bullshit. He had just assaulted a cop, and tried to take his gun. Knowing there would be a large type manhunt for him, he would be extremely dangerous to ANYONE he encountered. I wish the cop got him twelve times.
ETA Spelling. If he was fleeing *which I don't believe), you seriously believe it was still a good shoot? |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/20/2014 6:00:57 PM EDT
[#22]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
If he was fleeing *which I don't believe), you seriously believe it was still a good shoot? after what he had done, what he is capable of doing, and seeing there is no other way to stop him.....yes |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/20/2014 6:02:27 PM EDT
[#23]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
How hard would it be to hit someone 6/6 times when they're 7ft infront of you? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Man, if it's true, Ferguson owes respect to anyone who can do that. How hard would it be to hit someone 6/6 times when they're 7ft infront of you? What The Fuck 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/20/2014 6:04:17 PM EDT
[#24]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I was thinking when I heard about that, that it made sense he fired so many shots. He may not have been seeing well and shooting with an off eye, and it took him some trigger pulls to get it on target. Shoot to stop the threat. The perp was a big guy. I'm far from an expert, but I would think he could have taken quite a few body shots without stopping his advance on the PO. The threat didn't stop, and the PO continued to shoot until he dropped him. As big as the perp was, 6 or 7 shots seems pretty effective considering size, youth, fitness, adrenaline, pot and possibly other substances in his system. There's no conversation about how the PO continued to pump rounds into his dead body ------ yet! |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/20/2014 6:08:28 PM EDT
[#25]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I've tested that theory before. In war. Still here. Thankx. Bye. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Man, if it's true, Ferguson owes respect to anyone who can do that. How hard would it be to hit someone 6/6 times when they're 7ft infront of you? I think you should do a test scientific. Have a buddy punch you in the face like he wants to kill you. It has to be hard enough to break your eye socket or it doesn't count. Then spin around a few times so you can be really disoriented, then shoot a moving target coming towards you. I've tested that theory before. In war. Still here. Thankx. Bye. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/20/2014 6:09:22 PM EDT
[#26]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
What remains to be determined is after breaking off the engagement was he fleeing, surrendering, or coming back for round 2? Looks like the witness accounts coming out in the past few days, are leaning towards round 2, in which case good shoot. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Thug was beating had beat the crap out of the cop, and then broke off the engagement. I would have fired more than six. What remains to be determined is after breaking off the engagement was he fleeing, surrendering, or coming back for round 2? Looks like the witness accounts coming out in the past few days, are leaning towards round 2, in which case good shoot. If you're going to quote my post, make damn sure you quote the entire entire post. Do not change my words w / out a " < snip > ". Got it yet ? You're nothing but a F'n troll. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/20/2014 6:10:44 PM EDT
[#27]
how do you trust a big figure like that returning to you to surrender. That's my most recent thought after a couple.....
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/20/2014 6:11:38 PM EDT
[#28]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
How hard would it be to hit someone 6/6 times when they're 7ft infront of you? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Man, if it's true, Ferguson owes respect to anyone who can do that. How hard would it be to hit someone 6/6 times when they're 7ft infront of you? FAIL |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/20/2014 6:19:55 PM EDT
[#29]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Bull! TN v Gardner limited the police use of deadly force. Previous to it police could use lethal force to stop fleeing felons. "such force may not be used unless it is necessary to prevent the escape and the officer has probable cause to believe that the suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious physical injury to the officer or others." If the suspect was fleeing he no longer posed a significant threat. You CANNOT shoot someone because they committed a violent felony and are fleeing. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Thug was beating had beat the crap out of the cop, and then broke off the engagement. I would have fired more than six. What remains to be determined is after breaking off the engagement was he fleeing, surrendering, or coming back for round 2? Looks like the witness accounts coming out in the past few days, are leaning towards round 2, in which case good shoot. at that point, according to the supreme court the first and the third options allow deadly force.....fleeing violent felons, and only one way to stop them? TN v gardner Bull! TN v Gardner limited the police use of deadly force. Previous to it police could use lethal force to stop fleeing felons. "such force may not be used unless it is necessary to prevent the escape and the officer has probable cause to believe that the suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious physical injury to the officer or others." If the suspect was fleeing he no longer posed a significant threat. You CANNOT shoot someone because they committed a violent felony and are fleeing. Disengage all posts w / ShooterPatriot in this thread that orbit around his intentional mis-quote of my post please. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/20/2014 6:23:19 PM EDT
[#30]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
If you're going to quote my post, make damn sure you quote the entire entire post. Do not change my words w / out a " < snip > ". Got it yet ? You're nothing but a F'n troll. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Thug was beating had beat the crap out of the cop, and then broke off the engagement. I would have fired more than six. What remains to be determined is after breaking off the engagement was he fleeing, surrendering, or coming back for round 2? Looks like the witness accounts coming out in the past few days, are leaning towards round 2, in which case good shoot. If you're going to quote my post, make damn sure you quote the entire entire post. Do not change my words w / out a " < snip > ". Got it yet ? You're nothing but a F'n troll. I think it is pretty clearly understood the red text is an edit. Interesting that while I'm agreeing it was most likely a good shoot, just because I question that there is a possibility it might not have been until all the evidence is presented I'm an F'n troll. How about engaging in discussion instead of calling someone who only slightly disagrees with you a troll. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/20/2014 6:31:38 PM EDT
[#31]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
the perp attacked the officer inside the car at first then he ran away (perp), the officer chased after him, then he stopped and started talking shit then rushed the officer, that is when he popped him. his eye was busted during the struggle inside the vehicle. That is what I have gathered from Rush and other news outlets. That is why the officer has true grit. Had he retreated and called for back-up, no one here would have faulted him. But he didn't. He followed through and got the job done taking out the sub-human trash. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/20/2014 6:33:53 PM EDT
[#32]
New information on the Megan Kelly show. There is hard evidence that the Goblin touched the officers pistol.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/20/2014 6:35:13 PM EDT
[#33]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I think it is pretty clearly understood the red text is an edit. Interesting that while I'm agreeing it was most likely a good shoot, just because I question that there is a possibility it might not have been until all the evidence is presented I'm an F'n troll. How about engaging in discussion instead of calling someone who only slightly disagrees with you a troll. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Thug was beating had beat the crap out of the cop, and then broke off the engagement. I would have fired more than six. What remains to be determined is after breaking off the engagement was he fleeing, surrendering, or coming back for round 2? Looks like the witness accounts coming out in the past few days, are leaning towards round 2, in which case good shoot. If you're going to quote my post, make damn sure you quote the entire entire post. Do not change my words w / out a " < snip > ". Got it yet ? You're nothing but a F'n troll. I think it is pretty clearly understood the red text is an edit. Interesting that while I'm agreeing it was most likely a good shoot, just because I question that there is a possibility it might not have been until all the evidence is presented I'm an F'n troll. How about engaging in discussion instead of calling someone who only slightly disagrees with you a troll. Repair your quote then. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/20/2014 6:36:22 PM EDT
[#34]
I might add that reports claim that the officer's weapon discharged in his vehicle, that means "flash/bang" quality noise, plus the head trauma. I'm impressed. Also, good shoot.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/20/2014 6:47:01 PM EDT
[#35]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Repair your quote then. FIFY |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/20/2014 6:47:30 PM EDT
[#36]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I've tested that theory before. In war. Still here. Thankx. Bye. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Man, if it's true, Ferguson owes respect to anyone who can do that. How hard would it be to hit someone 6/6 times when they're 7ft infront of you? I think you should do a test scientific. Have a buddy punch you in the face like he wants to kill you. It has to be hard enough to break your eye socket or it doesn't count. Then spin around a few times so you can be really disoriented, then shoot a moving target coming towards you. I've tested that theory before. In war. Still here. Thankx. Bye. Cool. You are a bad ass. Much more accurate than ther rest of the military that averages something like 250,000 rounds fired per kill. You should teach a class. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/20/2014 6:49:14 PM EDT
[#37]
Quote HistoryQuoted: The cop was being charged by a man who outweighed him by 50 pounds, who had just tried to kill him with a blow to the head. Just how stupid are you? Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Man, if it's true, Ferguson owes respect to anyone who can do that. How hard would it be to hit someone 6/6 times when they're 7ft infront of you? I'm guessing you've never had to do it. Ask someone who has. Watch a dash cam where two people shoot at each other from a few feet away and miss each other a dozen times. So, the other guy was shooting at the officer? My apologies then. The cop was being charged by a man who outweighed him by 50 pounds, who had just tried to kill him with a blow to the head. Just how stupid are you? Pretty fucking stupid, apparently. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/20/2014 6:49:48 PM EDT
[#38]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Bull! TN v Gardner limited the police use of deadly force. Previous to it police could use lethal force to stop fleeing felons. "such force may not be used unless it is necessary to prevent the escape and the officer has probable cause to believe that the suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious physical injury to the officer or others." If the suspect was fleeing he no longer posed a significant threat. You CANNOT shoot someone because they committed a violent felony and are fleeing. Bull indeed. A violent felon suspected of a strong arm robbery beat the hell out a police officer, and attempted to steal the officers service pistol. A reasonable police officer would believe that suspect was a threat to anyone who attempted to apprehend him thereafter. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/20/2014 6:53:41 PM EDT
[#39]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
FIFY Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Repair your quote then. FIFY Thank you. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/20/2014 6:58:12 PM EDT
[#40]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I've tested that theory before. In war. Still here. Thankx. Bye. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Man, if it's true, Ferguson owes respect to anyone who can do that. How hard would it be to hit someone 6/6 times when they're 7ft infront of you? I think you should do a test scientific. Have a buddy punch you in the face like he wants to kill you. It has to be hard enough to break your eye socket or it doesn't count. Then spin around a few times so you can be really disoriented, then shoot a moving target coming towards you. I've tested that theory before. In war. Still here. Thankx. Bye. If interpreting right you tested that theory in war and are still here only because the US saved your ungrateful ass from the impending slaughter coming across the Drina river. I've been to the fuck and chuck dam and watched the women of Sreb march. You impress no one. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/20/2014 7:04:09 PM EDT
[#41]
Based on the info available today, the officer performed admirably after being severely injured by the turd. Good shoot.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/20/2014 7:15:47 PM EDT
[#42]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I think you should do a scientific test. Have a buddy punch you in the face like he wants to kill you. It has to be hard enough to break your eye socket or it doesn't count. Then spin around a few times so you can be really disoriented, then shoot a moving target coming towards you. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Man, if it's true, Ferguson owes respect to anyone who can do that. How hard would it be to hit someone 6/6 times when they're 7ft infront of you? I think you should do a scientific test. Have a buddy punch you in the face like he wants to kill you. It has to be hard enough to break your eye socket or it doesn't count. Then spin around a few times so you can be really disoriented, then shoot a moving target coming towards you. Sounds like a good stage for IDPA Nationals.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/20/2014 7:39:41 PM EDT
[#43]
Over the years I have, on multiple occasions, exclaimed that most cops couldn't hit the broad side of a barn if they were locked inside it. But, in my opinion, this cop performed admirably under extremely adverse circumstances. I'd hate to have my head beat that hard, have my body running on pure adrenaline, blind in one eye and the world spinning round in the other, and still have to put rounds on target or lose my life.
Because I highly suspect that had he lost consciousness, or lost his weapon, he'd have lost his life. He's either damn good, damn lucky or a mix of both. There but for the grace of God...
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/20/2014 8:18:13 PM EDT
[#44]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
The cop was being charged by a man who outweighed him by 50 pounds, who had just tried to kill him with a blow to the head. Just how stupid are you? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Man, if it's true, Ferguson owes respect to anyone who can do that. How hard would it be to hit someone 6/6 times when they're 7ft infront of you? I'm guessing you've never had to do it. Ask someone who has. Watch a dash cam where two people shoot at each other from a few feet away and miss each other a dozen times. So, the other guy was shooting at the officer? My apologies then. The cop was being charged by a man who outweighed him by 50 pounds, who had just tried to kill him with a blow to the head. Just how stupid are you? You mean 100 pounds right? |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/20/2014 8:28:54 PM EDT
[#45]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
If interpreting right you tested that theory in war and are still here only because the US saved your ungrateful ass from the impending slaughter coming across the Drina river. I've been to the fuck and chuck dam and watched the women of Sreb march. You impress no one. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Man, if it's true, Ferguson owes respect to anyone who can do that. How hard would it be to hit someone 6/6 times when they're 7ft infront of you? I think you should do a test scientific. Have a buddy punch you in the face like he wants to kill you. It has to be hard enough to break your eye socket or it doesn't count. Then spin around a few times so you can be really disoriented, then shoot a moving target coming towards you. I've tested that theory before. In war. Still here. Thankx. Bye. If interpreting right you tested that theory in war and are still here only because the US saved your ungrateful ass from the impending slaughter coming across the Drina river. I've been to the fuck and chuck dam and watched the women of Sreb march. You impress no one. b&g, you're not from Wisconsin are you? |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/20/2014 9:23:01 PM EDT
[#46]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I might add that reports claim that the officer's weapon discharged in his vehicle, that means "flash/bang" quality noise, plus the head trauma. I'm impressed. Also, good shoot. Between that and the eye trauma, the officer was in a bad place. With the adrenalin rush, he probably didn't feel much pain. 5 minutes after the shooting stopped, I bet he was in a world of hurt though.... |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/21/2014 5:06:14 AM EDT
[#47]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
b&g, you're not from Wisconsin are you? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Man, if it's true, Ferguson owes respect to anyone who can do that. How hard would it be to hit someone 6/6 times when they're 7ft infront of you? I've tested that theory before. In war. Still here. Thankx. Bye. If interpreting right you tested that theory in war and are still here only because the US saved your ungrateful ass from the impending slaughter coming across the Drina river. I've been to the fuck and chuck dam and watched the women of Sreb march. You impress no one. b&g, you're not from Wisconsin are you? No, why? |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/21/2014 5:14:39 AM EDT
[#48]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
The real question....9 or 40? And I agree, nice shooting. Shoulda been a .45 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/21/2014 5:16:05 AM EDT
[#49]
I would consider that officer very disabled when he shot Brown. No sympathy for Phat Albertz.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/21/2014 5:30:51 AM EDT
[#50]
It's amazing what fear for your life can help you focus on...
|
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
