User Panel
I read NOLOs post and got a Freedom Boner, yet have no use or desire for full auto, much less the means to feed it. Ill chip $100 anyway when this gets legs.
|
|
|
Quoted:
I have spent the better part of today on the telephone. Here is what we want, in a particular order: 1) if you received an approval and subsequent to that approval manufactured And then had a disapproval. 2) if you received an approval and then were denied. 3) if you filed a form 1 and were denied. Feel free to PM me which class you are in. Followed by paper or efile form and what state you are in. I don't want to go further than that on a public forum, but that's what we are trying to ascertain at the moment. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Where is Nolo? Surely he knows some people... Nolo is aware of this and involved. He is trying to get a hold of anyone who received a stamp I have spent the better part of today on the telephone. Here is what we want, in a particular order: 1) if you received an approval and subsequent to that approval manufactured And then had a disapproval. 2) if you received an approval and then were denied. 3) if you filed a form 1 and were denied. Feel free to PM me which class you are in. Followed by paper or efile form and what state you are in. I don't want to go further than that on a public forum, but that's what we are trying to ascertain at the moment. Nolo, For those that contact you, as a member of one of the defined groups, does that communication enjoy the benefit of attorney client privilege, even if they do not pursue further legal action? I imagine many are deeply concerned about their legal options and are reluctant to step forward in a public forum when the consequences could be grave. |
|
There is hope. I personally contributed to this campaign when it was going on. It will take time and a metric-shit-ton of money. I'm down for $200.
~J |
|
Quoted:
Reading some of the posts here makes me wonder... is this what the slaves went through during the Civil War? Freedom is within our sight. You can see it from here. You can smell it from here. Our fathers (or, in some of your cases, grandfathers) had that freedom and thought little of it. They didn't fight when it was taken away, and here we are acting like a bunch of cave dwellers taken into the light for the first time at the very notion that we might actually have freedom within our grasp. Guess what, if you're over 30 or 40, your Daddy had this very freedom available to him for a sum of $200. If not, and you are of American ancestory, your granddaddy had this freedom available to him. They didn't fight to keep it, but that doesn't mean we don't deserve it. 29 years ago you could buy an AR-15 and turn it into a full automatic M-16 clone by paying a $200 tax stamp. If you were good with machine work and tools, you could do the work yourself. If not, you could pay your favorite gunsmith a nominal fee to do the work. Either way - that freedom was yours to grab hold of and enjoy. Now it seems like the very notion of having such freedom again is as alien to us as a freedom is to a prisoner serving life. So many of our own say it can't be done, and that it will backfire, and that it was nothing more than a clerical error. The clerical error was allowing Hughes to make it into the final bill of FOPA. We've already been fucked, and our children fucked, and their unborn children fucked, up the ass without lube by a god damned clerical error. The reality is that our freedom was stolen, and at the thought of getting it back so many who claim to love freedom recoil in fear of what the government will do to them if they enjoy it. This whole thing disgusts me. We shouldn't have to thread a legal needle to enjoy the freedom that our ancestors fought to create and defend. We also shouldn't have to counsel each other and try to convince ourselves and others than our government, the same government that exists to serve us and to represent us, will not plant evidence or kill or maim those that try to legally comply with the law, as unjust and unconstitutional as it may be. View Quote We ALL want 922 and the NFA to go away. But simply blowing sunshine, rainbows, and gumdrops up each other asses about our chances here are not going to make it happen. A lot of people here don't understand the issues or the law, and have wildly unrealistic views of how this is most likely to play out. Some of us do know the issues and the law, know our chances aren't good, and are playing devil's advocate in hopes of hearing somethng we haven't thought of yet. Do we have a chance? Sure, but I think its more like a Powerball ticket than a flip of a coin. And where is this going to end up? In court? The same court system that tells us a government mandate to buy health insurance is a "tax"? The same courts that largely ignore the mass surveillance of millions of Americans? The courts that uphold the diminishment of the 4th Amendment's warrant requirement within 100 miles of the border? That allow the police to seize a citizen's cash under asset forfeiture and make the citizen prove they acquired it legally (at their own expense, of course)? That allow the government to take your property to give to a private developer and have the gall to call it " public use"? Those courts? You'll have to forgive me if I doubt our chances. The game is rigged. Government will get the result government wants. FWIW, I have quite a few MGs. I bought them because I enjoy them, like to shoot and because I wanted to keep them. I didn't buy them as an investment to sell or to make money. I would LOVE for the NFA and 922 to go down so I could get more, but I don't see it happening, and I don't see much of an argument thats convincing me otherwise. I hope I'm wrong here, I really do... |
|
Quoted:
Nolo, For those that contact you, as a member of one of the defined groups, does that communication enjoy the benefit of attorney client privilege, even if they do not pursue further legal action? I imagine many are deeply concerned about their legal options and are reluctant to step forward in a public forum when the consequences could be grave. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Where is Nolo? Surely he knows some people... Nolo is aware of this and involved. He is trying to get a hold of anyone who received a stamp I have spent the better part of today on the telephone. Here is what we want, in a particular order: 1) if you received an approval and subsequent to that approval manufactured And then had a disapproval. 2) if you received an approval and then were denied. 3) if you filed a form 1 and were denied. Feel free to PM me which class you are in. Followed by paper or efile form and what state you are in. I don't want to go further than that on a public forum, but that's what we are trying to ascertain at the moment. Nolo, For those that contact you, as a member of one of the defined groups, does that communication enjoy the benefit of attorney client privilege, even if they do not pursue further legal action? I imagine many are deeply concerned about their legal options and are reluctant to step forward in a public forum when the consequences could be grave. Privilege, maybe, attorney client relationship NO. I talk to lots of people that tell me things without retaining me. I keep those conversations to myself. An attorney client relationship starts when I am retained, not just because someone tells me something, however, that doesn't mean I repeat what I'm told. |
|
Quoted:
So let me get this straight.............. We have 1 first person account due to the audio recording which is proof of one. We have a member that said he saw two E approvals of other persons. And we have Prince that links this ARF thread and says "several" as posted in this thread. So are we saying 3? What justifies the speculation of many, many more than 3? Im just trying to cut thru some of the excitement and trying to get a scope on the "accident" that Jason claims. View Quote You have your retirement tied up in machine guns don't you? |
|
Quoted:
Privilege, maybe, attorney client relationship NO. I talk to lots of people that tell me things without retaining me. I keep those conversations to myself. An attorney client relationship starts when I am retained, not just because someone tells me something, however, that doesn't mean I repeat what I'm told. View Quote Not even a little joinder? Hold hands maybe? |
|
Quoted: NRA is unlikely to touch this with a 10 foot pole. It's been 28 years.... how much money has NRA spent trying to repeal Hughes? That's about how much I expect them to spend on this. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: This thread is way to long to read. But has anyone brought up getting the nra to help with the legal fees? NRA is unlikely to touch this with a 10 foot pole. It's been 28 years.... how much money has NRA spent trying to repeal Hughes? That's about how much I expect them to spend on this. Yeah. And they were involved in Rock Island vs US - which the Feds wisely (from the Fed's perspective) didn't appeal. http://articles.latimes.com/1991-01-15/news/mn-358_1_supreme-court |
|
Feel free to email me at [email protected]. I'm collecting forms, information, anything. PM me if you send an email, because for whatever reason, I could never load ar15 email on my phone and I'll only be checking it once a day.
|
|
Quoted:
Not even a little joinder? Hold hands maybe? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Privilege, maybe, attorney client relationship NO. I talk to lots of people that tell me things without retaining me. I keep those conversations to myself. An attorney client relationship starts when I am retained, not just because someone tells me something, however, that doesn't mean I repeat what I'm told. Not even a little joinder? Hold hands maybe? Come on baby light my fire! |
|
I don't have time to read 29 pages. Can someone give me the cliffs notes of whats going on with this?
|
|
|
Quoted:
I don't have time to read 29 pages. Can someone give me the cliffs notes of whats going on with this? View Quote ATF ruled Trusts are not people persons Only people persons are prohibited from making/possessing post 1986 MGs Multiple Trustees submitted Form 1s for MGs ATF approved some Form 1s and issued stamps ATF recinded approval and demanded stamps back ??? Profit... Did I miss anything? Edit: people to persons. |
|
Quoted:
I don't have time to read 29 pages. Can someone give me the cliffs notes of whats going on with this? View Quote The ATF said trusts aren't "persons". The MG ban prohibits "persons" from possession of an MG. Since trusts aren't "persons", logic dictates that the MG ban doesn't apply to trusts. Trusts are now filing Form 1s to manufacture new, post 86 machine guns. Some got approved, now BATFE is back peddling. |
|
Quoted:
Reading some of the posts here makes me wonder... is this what the slaves went through during the Civil War? Freedom is within our sight. You can see it from here. You can smell it from here. Our fathers (or, in some of your cases, grandfathers) had that freedom and thought little of it. They didn't fight when it was taken away, and here we are acting like a bunch of cave dwellers taken into the light for the first time at the very notion that we might actually have freedom within our grasp. Guess what, if you're over 30 or 40, your Daddy had this very freedom available to him for a sum of $200. If not, and you are of American ancestory, your granddaddy had this freedom available to him. They didn't fight to keep it, but that doesn't mean we don't deserve it. 29 years ago you could buy an AR-15 and turn it into a full automatic M-16 clone by paying a $200 tax stamp. If you were good with machine work and tools, you could do the work yourself. If not, you could pay your favorite gunsmith a nominal fee to do the work. Either way - that freedom was yours to grab hold of and enjoy. Now it seems like the very notion of having such freedom again is as alien to us as a freedom is to a prisoner serving life. So many of our own say it can't be done, and that it will backfire, and that it was nothing more than a clerical error. The clerical error was allowing Hughes to make it into the final bill of FOPA. We've already been fucked, and our children fucked, and their unborn children fucked, up the ass without lube by a god damned clerical error. The reality is that our freedom was stolen, and at the thought of getting it back so many who claim to love freedom recoil in fear of what the government will do to them if they enjoy it. This whole thing disgusts me. We shouldn't have to thread a legal needle to enjoy the freedom that our ancestors fought to create and defend. We also shouldn't have to counsel each other and try to convince ourselves and others than our government, the same government that exists to serve us and to represent us, will not plant evidence or kill or maim those that try to legally comply with the law, as unjust and unconstitutional as it may be. View Quote I was 16 years old in May of 1986 and living in NYC, the son of Irish Immigrants. My dad still wasn't a citizen. I was old enough to know I was fucked. I want this bullshit to end. When Hughes and Rangel die I want to shit on their gravesites. |
|
Quoted:
Audio is up. I'm not going to say I handled this phone call the best, but here it is. http://youtu.be/4s9GKoxnGcM http://youtu.be/4s9GKoxnGcM View Quote You did fine. That phone call blew my mind. |
|
Quoted:
ATF ruled Trusts are not people persons Only people persons are prohibited from making/possessing post 1986 MGs Multiple Trustees submitted Form 1s for MGs ATF approved some Form 1s and issued stamps ATF recinded approval and demanded stamps back ??? Profit... Did I miss anything? Edit: people to persons. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
I don't have time to read 29 pages. Can someone give me the cliffs notes of whats going on with this? ATF ruled Trusts are not people persons Only people persons are prohibited from making/possessing post 1986 MGs Multiple Trustees submitted Form 1s for MGs ATF approved some Form 1s and issued stamps ATF recinded approval and demanded stamps back ??? Profit... Did I miss anything? Edit: people to persons. This was news to me!! Holy shit! Whats next? |
|
|
Quoted:
This was news to me!! Holy shit! Whats next? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I don't have time to read 29 pages. Can someone give me the cliffs notes of whats going on with this? ATF ruled Trusts are not people persons Only people persons are prohibited from making/possessing post 1986 MGs Multiple Trustees submitted Form 1s for MGs ATF approved some Form 1s and issued stamps ATF recinded approval and demanded stamps back ??? Profit... Did I miss anything? Edit: people to persons. This was news to me!! Holy shit! Whats next? That is what Nolo and the other guys/lawyers in the know are working on. ETA: also, I'm not clear on the order of approve/disapprove for jaqufrost, the guy in this thread with a "approved" form 1 |
|
We should get the big and small gun manufactures on board the Pain Train, which will head for Station BATF as well.
Tens of millions of potential donation money right there. Maybe Nestle could make money off bottled Liberal Tears once this is all over? I would love to see the Sig 522 Commando come with a real suppressor from the manufacture. |
|
Well all I can say is it was a lot easier to submit an eform 1 than I ever would have thought
|
|
Quoted:
I would love to see the Sig 522 Commando come with a real suppressor from the manufacture. View Quote As mentioned earlier in the thread, assuming a court agrees with our interpretation of 922(o) and the applicable definition of "person", effectively the only way for a trust to gain possession of a post-86 machine gun would be to manufacture it. Transferring a factory-built machine gun to a trust would still be illegal. An FFL/SOT must be some legal entity other than a trust, because trusts can't get FFL/SOTs. Even in our interpretation, a trust is the only non-GCA-defined person, so any GCA-defined person (all FFL/SOTs) would be in violation of 922(o) if they transferred a post-86 machine gun to anyone other than the government or another FFL/SOT. So in your example, a trust could convert a semi-auto SIG to full-auto, but not have a post-86 factory machine gun. |
|
Quoted:
And? Wouldn't be hard for those dip shits to insert or delete language to screw us all. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
The most likely outcome of this is we will not be allowed to use a trust anymore.... That will require Congress to rewrite the NFA. And? Wouldn't be hard for those dip shits to insert or delete language to screw us all. Life is full of risk. |
|
Quoted:
Nolo, For those that contact you, as a member of one of the defined groups, does that communication enjoy the benefit of attorney client privilege, even if they do not pursue further legal action? I imagine many are deeply concerned about their legal options and are reluctant to step forward in a public forum when the consequences could be grave. View Quote Privileged communication, but no A/C relationship. If the conversation was between privileged parties and made with the purpose of securing legal advice. It would be protected in an PM so long as nobody discloses what was said. |
|
Quoted:
We should get the big and small gun manufactures on board the Pain Train, which will head for Station BATF as well. Tens of millions of potential donation money right there. Maybe Nestle could make money off bottled Liberal Tears once this is all over? I would love to see the Sig 522 Commando come with a real suppressor from the manufacture. View Quote I'd gladly buy a case of bottled Liberal Tears, but I wouldn't drink it from fear that it could be contagious. I'm mostly certain they can be used as hi-octane fuel additive in a V-8 though. |
|
Well now that I've read it all, I must say,
There are some fine gentlemen in this thread, on this site, and in our community. We are really trying to do this the right way, using every resource we have, pledging fortunes, and our precious time to get back rights we have been denied. It should never have been this way, but we rise to the occasion anyway. I am proud to be a part of this. When the time comes that I can assist, I will do everything I can. This is going to take more than luck. It's going to take more than skill and money. Its going to take all of this, and "a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence". I will be following this issue, and this thread, closely. Best regards, Matt |
|
Quoted: Right now I'm fairly confident if you fed the examiners a bag of charcoal they'd be shitting diamonds by morning. This issue is catching a lot of attention. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: I think before an official statement is released from the atf about this it might be a good idea to send in a form 1 because what if we are allowed to make or have what we form 1 after a lawsuit is done with. Been done (as recently as today). Rejections are coming in now within 24 hours. The door is closed. Now we try to pry it open again. so they CAN process forms quickly when they want to..... Right now I'm fairly confident if you fed the examiners a bag of charcoal they'd be shitting diamonds by morning. This issue is catching a lot of attention. So if I submit a new eForm1 for a DD, will it be approved in 24 hours? Ben |
|
|
Is it too late to start up a trust and file a Form 1 for standing(if there is a court case)?
I'm not expecting approval, but I am willing to go through the motions to get standing on the lawsuit that may be coming. If not, i will hold onto my money for legal donations. I have limited funds and don't want to waste it on the trust and form 1 if i am too late to gain standing. |
|
Quoted: Is it too late to start up a trust and file a Form 1 for standing(if there is a court case)? I'm not expecting approval, but I am willing to go through the motions to get standing on the lawsuit that may be coming. If not, i will hold onto my money for legal donations. I have limited funds and don't want to waste it on the trust and form 1 if i am too late to gain standing. View Quote No. In fact as it has been stated, EVERYONE should be filing. I filed last night... |
|
Quoted:
No. In fact as it has been stated, EVERYONE should be filing. I filed last night... View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Is it too late to start up a trust and file a Form 1 for standing(if there is a court case)? I'm not expecting approval, but I am willing to go through the motions to get standing on the lawsuit that may be coming. If not, i will hold onto my money for legal donations. I have limited funds and don't want to waste it on the trust and form 1 if i am too late to gain standing. No. In fact as it has been stated, EVERYONE should be filing. I filed last night... Can someone post a link to how to make an appropriate trust and what is required? |
|
Quoted: Can someone post a link to how to make an appropriate trust and what is required? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Is it too late to start up a trust and file a Form 1 for standing(if there is a court case)? I'm not expecting approval, but I am willing to go through the motions to get standing on the lawsuit that may be coming. If not, i will hold onto my money for legal donations. I have limited funds and don't want to waste it on the trust and form 1 if i am too late to gain standing. No. In fact as it has been stated, EVERYONE should be filing. I filed last night... Can someone post a link to how to make an appropriate trust and what is required? |
|
Quoted:
Well now that I've read it all, I must say, There are some fine gentlemen in this thread, on this site, and in our community. We are really trying to do this the right way, using every resource we have, pledging fortunes, and our precious time to get back rights we have been denied. It should never have been this way, but we rise to the occasion anyway. I am proud to be a part of this. When the time comes that I can assist, I will do everything I can. This is going to take more than luck. It's going to take more than skill and money. Its going to take all of this, and "a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence". I will be following this issue, and this thread, closely. Best regards, Matt View Quote Yes. A thousand times, yes. When you look at the rights that we are fighting to restore, and compare it to the "rights" that the left tries to manufacture, I doubt you will find many who move forward with a reliance on what is right, just, and having the blessing of our creator from which we were given our natural rights. I am thankful to be in such good company. The right to bear arms was not granted to us by our government, it's ours, our birth right, from our creator. The constitution only guarantees that right and our politicians have done their best to dillude that guarantee over the last century. The GCA, Hughes, Brady, and the NFA won't be rolled back over night. Some of it may never get rolled back. Even if I live to see the demise of Hughes, I doubt I'll live long enough to see the NFA crumble (and I'm in my late 20's). But every great journey starts with a single step. It took a century to construct the golem of federal gun laws, and it may take a century or more to roll it back..... but that's what lies at the heart of this fight. It's not just about Machine Guns, it's about Freedom. It's about taking back our natural rights and spitting in the eyes of the would-be feudal lords of the federal government. We have to be the ones to take the first step, so that future Americans may once again enjoy their rights, unhindered by the approval of men in far off capitols. God speed, gentlemen. This is going to be a long war, waged over generations. We have to keep the fire lit, and pass a brighter torch to the next generation than the one we received. |
|
Quoted:
Well said. If anything, machine guns are exactly the type of weapons protected by the 2nd Amendment. Hunting rifles, shotguns, and "sporting" firearms have fuck all to do with the intent, meaning and wording of the 2nd Amendment. NFA of 1934, GCA '68, 922, Hughes amendment etc etc etc. are all explicitly un-Constitutional. I want my fucking cake back, ALL OF IT http://www.guns.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/compromise.jpg View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Reading some of the posts here makes me wonder... is this what the slaves went through during the Civil War? Freedom is within our sight. You can see it from here. You can smell it from here. Our fathers (or, in some of your cases, grandfathers) had that freedom and thought little of it. They didn't fight when it was taken away, and here we are acting like a bunch of cave dwellers taken into the light for the first time at the very notion that we might actually have freedom within our grasp. Guess what, if you're over 30 or 40, your Daddy had this very freedom available to him for a sum of $200. If not, and you are of American ancestory, your granddaddy had this freedom available to him. They didn't fight to keep it, but that doesn't mean we don't deserve it. 29 years ago you could buy an AR-15 and turn it into a full automatic M-16 clone by paying a $200 tax stamp. If you were good with machine work and tools, you could do the work yourself. If not, you could pay your favorite gunsmith a nominal fee to do the work. Either way - that freedom was yours to grab hold of and enjoy. Now it seems like the very notion of having such freedom again is as alien to us as a freedom is to a prisoner serving life. So many of our own say it can't be done, and that it will backfire, and that it was nothing more than a clerical error. The clerical error was allowing Hughes to make it into the final bill of FOPA. We've already been fucked, and our children fucked, and their unborn children fucked, up the ass without lube by a god damned clerical error. The reality is that our freedom was stolen, and at the thought of getting it back so many who claim to love freedom recoil in fear of what the government will do to them if they enjoy it. This whole thing disgusts me. We shouldn't have to thread a legal needle to enjoy the freedom that our ancestors fought to create and defend. We also shouldn't have to counsel each other and try to convince ourselves and others than our government, the same government that exists to serve us and to represent us, will not plant evidence or kill or maim those that try to legally comply with the law, as unjust and unconstitutional as it may be. Well said. If anything, machine guns are exactly the type of weapons protected by the 2nd Amendment. Hunting rifles, shotguns, and "sporting" firearms have fuck all to do with the intent, meaning and wording of the 2nd Amendment. NFA of 1934, GCA '68, 922, Hughes amendment etc etc etc. are all explicitly un-Constitutional. I want my fucking cake back, ALL OF IT http://www.guns.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/compromise.jpg First, Undefined, again I what you have written. B_A, you are on the right track, but it's even bigger than machine guns. I humbly ask if you have read Patriot Pirates by Robert H. Patton? If not, get a copy from Amazon, read it, think about the facts of where a lot of our Navy came from, and pass it on to others to read. |
|
The past day and a half have been simply amazing. The posts in this thread, the IMs, the texts, and the phone conversations, have me truly excited. If you had asked me in February of 09 if I thought that we would see the fall of any type of gun bans during Obamas term, I wouldn't have believed you. At the beginning of 2014 things looked bleak, we were dealing from tragedy and political fallout, and for many the sky was falling. But we stood and we fought, and we won. When bans were actually passed in Colorado, a small group of arfcommers got mad. 2 of those guys are my friends and they weren't political animals, or crusaders, they were regular gun guys with regular jobs and families and obligations and they built a movement that extracted blood. They dealt a blow that reminded our opposition of the fallout from the AWB. We have not just weathered this storm, we have claimed victories, we have gained ground. And where we have lost battles, we have made them pay well enough to turn those into Pyrrhic victory's for the left. I have spoken with guys that have approved stamps in hand, guys that have approvals and denials. I have spoken with lawyers, and board members of 2nd ammendment groups, and guys with real political juice, and regular arfcommers that want to see this happen. The general consensus is that we not only have hope, but we have a serious chance. People are watching us right now. Our enemies and friends in politics, and at the ATF. We are on the heels of several major victories that we never thought would come in our lifetimes. And before us is an opportunity to fight. It doesn't matter that our chances are really good. It doesn't matter that there are groups who are willing to lend a hand. It doest matter that our movement has been gaining ground and picking up steam. Because even if there was only a glimmer of hope. Even if our cause was little more than tilting at windmills. We still have to fight it, because its the right thing to do. Because freedom is worth dying for. Because the idea of what this nation is supposed to be is so profound that it must be defended at every opportunity. We have chosen battles, and we have fought a guerrilla war, and we are winning. Look, I'm just an filthy inky, scumbag punk rocker, who has a problem with authority, and a gift for causing trouble. I'm no one special, but I believe in this, and I will fight for this. And I have heard not just the words of hope, but the sound of it in the voices of men that I have spoken with, men that have been fighting this fight for years, men who no better than anyone what our chances are. This is our opportunity to effect nationwide change, and to reframe parts of the gun rights debate. And if we don't take it, then we don't deserve to call ourselves Americans. This is an important fight, and we need to do it right. So while we talk, we also need to listen to the legal minds at the helm of this issue. We need to support them, and support those with the balls big enough to actually file for these stamps at issue. |
|
Quoted:
First, Undefined, again I what you have written. B_A, you are on the right track, but it's even bigger than machine guns. I humbly ask if you have read Patriot Pirates by Robert H. Patton? If not, get a copy from Amazon, read it, think about the facts of where a lot of our Navy came from, and pass it on to others to read. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Reading some of the posts here makes me wonder... is this what the slaves went through during the Civil War? Freedom is within our sight. You can see it from here. You can smell it from here. Our fathers (or, in some of your cases, grandfathers) had that freedom and thought little of it. They didn't fight when it was taken away, and here we are acting like a bunch of cave dwellers taken into the light for the first time at the very notion that we might actually have freedom within our grasp. Guess what, if you're over 30 or 40, your Daddy had this very freedom available to him for a sum of $200. If not, and you are of American ancestory, your granddaddy had this freedom available to him. They didn't fight to keep it, but that doesn't mean we don't deserve it. 29 years ago you could buy an AR-15 and turn it into a full automatic M-16 clone by paying a $200 tax stamp. If you were good with machine work and tools, you could do the work yourself. If not, you could pay your favorite gunsmith a nominal fee to do the work. Either way - that freedom was yours to grab hold of and enjoy. Now it seems like the very notion of having such freedom again is as alien to us as a freedom is to a prisoner serving life. So many of our own say it can't be done, and that it will backfire, and that it was nothing more than a clerical error. The clerical error was allowing Hughes to make it into the final bill of FOPA. We've already been fucked, and our children fucked, and their unborn children fucked, up the ass without lube by a god damned clerical error. The reality is that our freedom was stolen, and at the thought of getting it back so many who claim to love freedom recoil in fear of what the government will do to them if they enjoy it. This whole thing disgusts me. We shouldn't have to thread a legal needle to enjoy the freedom that our ancestors fought to create and defend. We also shouldn't have to counsel each other and try to convince ourselves and others than our government, the same government that exists to serve us and to represent us, will not plant evidence or kill or maim those that try to legally comply with the law, as unjust and unconstitutional as it may be. Well said. If anything, machine guns are exactly the type of weapons protected by the 2nd Amendment. Hunting rifles, shotguns, and "sporting" firearms have fuck all to do with the intent, meaning and wording of the 2nd Amendment. NFA of 1934, GCA '68, 922, Hughes amendment etc etc etc. are all explicitly un-Constitutional. I want my fucking cake back, ALL OF IT http://www.guns.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/compromise.jpg First, Undefined, again I what you have written. B_A, you are on the right track, but it's even bigger than machine guns. I humbly ask if you have read Patriot Pirates by Robert H. Patton? If not, get a copy from Amazon, read it, think about the facts of where a lot of our Navy came from, and pass it on to others to read. I won't be happy until I can get a fully armed and operational Abrams through the mail |
|
I submitted a paper form 1 to MG one of my AR lowers back in March when that lawyer with the blog first started talking about the possibility of this. I've never received it back or heard from the ATF about it, and after just checking my bank statements I see that the ATF cashed the check but hasn't refunded it.
When I get to my layover this afternoon I'll call the ATF and ask for a status. |
|
Keep up the momentum. Internet is a powerful thing. I will throw some money at this once it goes hot and fire missioed. I want to thank the lawyers (yes the lawywers) who are freedom loving and pushing back. VERY rare individuals.
|
|
Quoted:
I submitted a paper form 1 to MG one of my AR lowers back in March when that lawyer with the blog first started talking about the possibility of this. I've never received it back or heard from the ATF about it, and after just checking my bank statements I see that the ATF cashed the check but hasn't refunded it. When I get to my layover this afternoon I'll call the ATF and ask for a status. View Quote Email your info to Nolo |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.