User Panel
Posted: 4/27/2014 6:56:15 AM EDT
Do you think she will try to push another AWB?
|
|
Quoted: Do you think she will try to push another AWB? View Quote |
|
within the first 100 days she will finish the job, if she wins you can imagine that she also won the house and senate, so there would be nothing to stop her. You name the ubber liberal, ubber commie idea, tyrannical, constitutional wrecking idea, bill and she will get way with it, but her crown jewel will be to push through single payer the rest will fall into place.
|
|
I would imagine being a lesbian already make a lot of friends ,find some ways to pass the time and learn from others about how thing work .that's what prison is like for a new fish......
|
|
Quoted:
within the first 100 days she will finish the job, if she wins you can imagine that she also won the house and senate, so there would be nothing to stop her. You name the ubber liberal, ubber commie idea, tyrannical, constitutional wrecking idea, bill and she will get way with it, but her crown jewel will be to push through single payer the rest will fall into place. View Quote And Bohner and McStain will be right beside her.... |
|
Quoted:
And Bohner and McStain will be right beside her.... View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
within the first 100 days she will finish the job, if she wins you can imagine that she also won the house and senate, so there would be nothing to stop her. You name the ubber liberal, ubber commie idea, tyrannical, constitutional wrecking idea, bill and she will get way with it, but her crown jewel will be to push through single payer the rest will fall into place. And Bohner and McStain will be right beside her.... |
|
Her first goal will be single payer. She will wait for another shooting to push an AWB.
|
|
|
She looks like the cryptkeeper and is unelectable. Too old and ugly! Why did Øbama defeat her? He is better looking and that was 8 years ago, time has not been her friend.
Progressives are really playing the race card again, or still. I suspect they will nominate a minority for POTUS. |
|
|
|
Quoted:
Why did Øbama defeat her? View Quote Because Democrats don't require identification to participate in a party caucus. Apparently you've forgotten that the Obama campaign packed the critical Iowa caucuses with Obama supporters who lived in Illinois. It's the Chicago way. That "win" gave him momentum - with a lot of help from the media. |
|
Quoted:
Do you think she will try to push another AWB? View Quote Right after the "horrendous shooting at another school" on Jan 22, 2017. |
|
In her first term in prison she will learn how to do the laundry.
This should not be difficult for her as I suspect she is quite expert in laundering campaign money already. |
|
The intelligentsia "Chess Players" will ensure that she, or someone just as evil as her, is the new overlord. They would rather lose to her than allow an unwashed Tea Party type or anything other than another RINO prick to rise. Embrace the horror.
|
|
Quoted:
Oops... why did I come in this thread? http://cdn2.cagepotato.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/1269337691_guy-walks-in-on-obamas-speech.gif View Quote Nails it |
|
Quoted:
within the first 100 days she will finish the job, if she wins you can imagine that she also won the house and senate, so there would be nothing to stop her. You name the ubber liberal, ubber commie idea, tyrannical, constitutional wrecking idea, bill and she will get way with it, but her crown jewel will be to push through single payer the rest will fall into place. View Quote This. Once we have single payer, socialism will be here to stay |
|
Attention defeatists... just kill yourselves right now and spare the rest of us from your sniveling posts.
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted: Attention defeatists... just kill yourselves right now and spare the rest of us from your sniveling posts. View Quote Play your chess, see what happens. Again. Recognizing inevitability is far less defeatist than ensuring that you put forth RINO after failed RINO with completely predictable results. Congratulations? Seek better.
|
|
Quoted:
Do you think she will try to push another AWB? View Quote Absolutely. 1) AWB v2.0 which will be like AWB v1.0 but no sunset provision, destruction after owner dies, no selling of "pre-ban" magazines, registration of all military-pattern rifles just like NFA. 2) Clean up Obamacare and get step 2 of 3 in the government take-over of all health care in the U.S. |
|
Quoted: Play your chess, see what happens. Again. Recognizing inevitability is far less defeatist than ensuring that you put forth RINO after failed RINO with completely predictable results. Congratulations? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Attention defeatists... just kill yourselves right now and spare the rest of us from your sniveling posts. Play your chess, see what happens. Again. Recognizing inevitability is far less defeatist than ensuring that you put forth RINO after failed RINO with completely predictable results. Congratulations? Seek better. I said nothing regarding the election of a RINO - just reveals how clueless "you people" are. Congratulations. |
|
Total ban on Lead Azide, Lead Styphnate, and all other compounds commonly OR OPTIONALLY used in percussion AND/OR electrically fired primers.
Exceptions made for military and law enforcement, and trade in such items is highly regulated, on the order of trade in Schedule 1 narcotics. With no workable primers, that's the end of modern ammunition. Unless you can make black powder assault rifles, that ends the game. Want to shoot? Black powder matchlocks would still be GTG. For now. Eventually, black powder would be banned by banning essential chemical components. They could then say "You can have any gun you want. We are not violating 2nd Amendment in any way and you can't argue that we are. You DO have the right to keep and bear these arms. We are not even TRYING to ban your handguns or assault rifles. Have all you want. But where does it say that we have to allow the sort of ammo that modern firearms need?" |
|
Quoted:
Total ban on Lead Azide, Lead Styphnate, and all other compounds commonly OR OPTIONALLY used in percussion AND/OR electrically fired primers. Exceptions made for military and law enforcement, and trade in such items is highly regulated, on the order of trade in Schedule 1 narcotics. With no workable primers, that's the end of modern ammunition. Unless you can make black powder assault rifles, that ends the game. Want to shoot? Black powder matchlocks would still be GTG. For now. Eventually, black powder would be banned by banning essential chemical components. They could then say "You can have any gun you want. We are not violating 2nd Amendment in any way and you can't argue that we are. You DO have the right to keep and bear these arms. We are not even TRYING to ban your handguns or assault rifles. Have all you want. But where does it say that we have to allow the sort of ammo that modern firearms need?" View Quote Hell, if some first century Chinese guys could invent it, and keep it going for the next 12 or 13 centuries, and we still have the formula, farms, with pigs, we still have charcoal, and are able to mine sulphur, I guess we can make Black Powder. The trick is not getting backed into that corner, and knowing to FO when needed. |
|
Well, I guess technically she will be old enough to run in 2016. And she is pretty hot, but I got no idea what her politics are…
Wait, we are talking about Hillary Fisher, right? Cause Mrs. Bill Clinton is hated and feared by too many people in her own party to get the nomination. Plus, she’s unlikable to anyone that isn’t some kind of hard core, man hating, feminist kook. And she’s got so many scandals (both scandals of corruption and scandals of incompetence) that she would be an easy target for any candidate. It might help to review the political situation over the last few decades… Back in late 91 and early 92, George Bush the elder seemed like a shoe in for reelection. As a result, the Democrats trotted out the B list of candidates… See, if you actually want to be President some day, what you don’t want to do is lose badly in a general election. That sort of kills your chances for getting the nomination the next time. It’s ok to lose in the primaries, but not ok to win the primaries and lose the big game. (Yes, there have been exceptions, but this is the general rule.) So, Bill Clinton wins. He probably never planned on winning, but, let’s face it, you can probably score a lot of chicks, even with a failed campaign. Bill Clinton gets the nomination, the economy sours a bit, and Clinton manages to win… somehow. While in office, the Clintons used their power to dig up all kinds of dirt on everyone in Washington. This includes illegally accessing at least hundreds, and maybe thousands, of FBI background files. (Filegate) And this is just what is known as fact, not what is speculated about. You can see the fingerprints of this in much of what happened politically since then. Key Republicans going soft or resigning. Investigators mysteriously closing investigations… And the Clintons didn’t just blackmail Republicans with this information, they likely used it to secure power in the Democrat Party as well. But nobody likes to be threatened or blackmailed, least of all a bunch of narcissistic politicians. Many of them couldn’t act openly against Mrs. Clinton. But they would do anything in their power to destroy her behind the scenes. Then, in 2000, The Democrats essentially christened Al Gore as their nominee. Bill Bradley just ran to give Gore an excuse to get out on the campaign trail. And Gore lost to Bush. Democrats thought they had a chance in 2004 because they trotted out three of their big guns, John F Kerry, John Edwards, and Howard Dean… (yea, those were their big guns.) Mrs. Clinton probably saw the writing on the wall and decided to sit out until 2008. Bush won, and political analysts considered it a done deal that Mrs. Clinton would win in 2008. After all, she is so awesome and wonderful, and shit. But that didn’t happen, did it? Political newcomer Barack Hussein Obama ran… Why? Because he knew he couldn’t win. But by running he could make himself a household name and start to build a national organization. He might even manage to get the VP spot on the Democrat ticket. But there was no way he was going to win… yet he did, why? Part of the reason is that Clinton did not have the FBI background files on him. If she had, we know she would have used them. The other big part of the reason is that she is an unlikable witch and many in her party wanted her to lose. So, Obama wins and that brings us to current times. Now, in 2016 the primaries are going to be wide open again. Any Democrat who wants to be President will need to run then. If Clinton does not face any serious opposition it really just shows how weak the Democrats are as a party. And her information is not only outdated, it is superseded by Obama’s access to the dirt on everyone thanks to things like his domestic spying program and Obamacare. I don’t think Obama and Clinton like each other very much, so the odds are pretty good that it will be Obama sabotaging her run for the nomination. Clinton is a failure, she is old, she is tired, and she is completely unlikable. I’m sorry, I may be taking this back in two and a half years, but I can’t see Clinton even getting the Democrat nomination. |
|
Quoted:
Expect a massive make over in the offing. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
She looks like the cryptkeeper and is unelectable. Too old and ugly! Why did Øbama defeat her? He is better looking and that was 8 years ago, time has not been her friend. Expect a massive make over in the offing. They're already doing a mea culpa on Benghazi. Then they can say it's old news and ignore it. |
|
Quoted:
They're already doing a mea culpa on Benghazi. Then they can say it's old news and ignore it. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
She looks like the cryptkeeper and is unelectable. Too old and ugly! Why did Øbama defeat her? He is better looking and that was 8 years ago, time has not been her friend. Expect a massive make over in the offing. They're already doing a mea culpa on Benghazi. Then they can say it's old news and ignore it. I was thinking that they'd try to feminize her again. But then there is only so much you can do with a sow's ear. |
|
Quoted:
within the first 100 days she will finish the job, if she wins you can imagine that she also won the house and senate, so there would be nothing to stop her. You name the ubber liberal, ubber commie idea, tyrannical, constitutional wrecking idea, bill and she will get way with it, but her crown jewel will be to push through single payer the rest will fall into place. View Quote Single payer healthcare was the plan all along. Obama institutes mandatory health insurance, which, predictably fails miserably. It will fail so bad that when Hillary introduces her single payer "Hillarycare" system, even conservatives will be begging for it. |
|
She'll die of a brain aneurysm and leave us with a worthless replacement.
If we're lucky. |
|
|
|
nothing that anyone can remember when asked about.....oh wait, that was for Secretary of State. My bad.
|
|
She will announce she has terminal cancer and push every agenda she has ever wanted with total disregard of the Constitution. It will takes years to undo the damage she caused in that short period of time.
|
|
|
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.