User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 4/22/2014 8:05:15 PM EDT
[#1]
Quote HistoryQuoted: How well does that shoulder with the fake stock? |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/22/2014 8:10:46 PM EDT
[#2]
Cool, I wouldn't mind having one with the brace on.
But how is that not an SBR? Wouldn't the stock trump the brace, making it an SBR? |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/22/2014 8:11:38 PM EDT
[#3]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Pretty sure with the underfolder that is an SBR. I'm trying to figure out what the Sig Brace is mounted on however. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
That's what happens when you put an underfolder on a slant cut receiver, the stock moves forward and blocks the safety when it should let the safety pass through the clearance arch. Kharn Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile So is it a pistol or sbr? Pretty sure with the underfolder that is an SBR. I'm trying to figure out what the Sig Brace is mounted on however. Not if the underfolder is welded in the closed position, PPS-43c style.... |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/22/2014 8:13:10 PM EDT
[#4]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Not if the underfolder is welded in the closed position, PPS-43c style.... Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: That's what happens when you put an underfolder on a slant cut receiver, the stock moves forward and blocks the safety when it should let the safety pass through the clearance arch. Kharn Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile So is it a pistol or sbr? Pretty sure with the underfolder that is an SBR. I'm trying to figure out what the Sig Brace is mounted on however. Not if the underfolder is welded in the closed position, PPS-43c style....  |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/22/2014 8:16:35 PM EDT
[#5]
Lol. K
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/22/2014 8:17:43 PM EDT
[#6]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
But here is the problem, if the stock is closed, then the safety automatically engages. <a href="http://s247.photobucket.com/user/dab969/media/image_zps3b0b23f6.jpg.html" target="_blank">http://i247.photobucket.com/albums/gg141/dab969/image_zps3b0b23f6.jpg</a> Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
The SIG stock looks like it would prevent the extension of the under folder, therefore making the underfolder a non-stock and therefore not an SBR. Legal Jiu-Jitsu at it's finest! You say that like it's the only problem. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/22/2014 8:18:11 PM EDT
[#7]
Quote HistoryQuoted: You say that like it's the only problem. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: The SIG stock looks like it would prevent the extension of the under folder, therefore making the underfolder a non-stock and therefore not an SBR. Legal Jiu-Jitsu at it's finest! You say that like it's the only problem. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/22/2014 8:18:53 PM EDT
[#8]
Not sure if you should prepare your anus or hide your dag?
Get do both |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/22/2014 8:19:34 PM EDT
[#9]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Got it, you just laid the folding stock on the receiver. Its not apart of the gun. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/22/2014 8:22:41 PM EDT
[#10]
I think you fellas may have misunderstood what I have going on here. I'll spell it out for you:
1) ordered an M92 pistol with the not-a-stock 2) ordered a underfolder stock 3) made sure I wasn't breaking the law 4) had the stock installed 5) fixed the safety to work properly 6) posted pics 7) was questioned about a tax stamp 8) told yall I don't have a physical stamp 9) just remembered that most of you probably don't know the ATF won't issue a physical stamp if you used eforms 10) consider this me telling you I used eforms  Yes, it is installed. Yes it is nice. Yes, its a legal SBR. Yes, I got my Krink today and I'm happy!  |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/22/2014 8:24:18 PM EDT
[#11]
Quote HistoryQuoted: What else is wrong? Just your poor attempt at baiting people and trolling.
 |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/22/2014 8:26:08 PM EDT
[#12]
Now the not-a-stock can get moved to more important things...
 |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/22/2014 8:26:36 PM EDT
[#13]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
What else is wrong? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
The SIG stock looks like it would prevent the extension of the under folder, therefore making the underfolder a non-stock and therefore not an SBR. Legal Jiu-Jitsu at it's finest! You say that like it's the only problem. Well, we could just start with the whole idea of underfolding stocks, which have the worst cheek welds this side of a Frankenstein creation, but the good news is that because it's a pistol, you don't have to worry about that. And there's your safety problem, which isn't actually a problem with the safety. The safety works fine, it's just the whole "fire" think that was problematic. Even with the fix, it still looks awkward. Last, there's the goofy Sig brace. Yes, it checks the box, but it's still just plain goofy. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/22/2014 8:40:41 PM EDT
[#14]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/22/2014 8:44:16 PM EDT
[#15]
My LGS has one of these under the counter (complete with infinity round drum mag clip). It was interesting to watch the employees argue amongst each other (in front of customers) if it was SBR or not.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/22/2014 9:03:30 PM EDT
[#16]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
you guys are misunderstanding the purpose. leave Sig-not-a-stock on 99.99% of the time = legal .01% of the time? hehehe you essentially get an SBR without having to worry about being prosecuted. This should be a fireable offense. You really need to learn to control the trollability you have. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/23/2014 4:34:07 AM EDT
[#17]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I think you fellas may have misunderstood what I have going on here. I'll spell it out for you: 1) ordered an M92 pistol with the not-a-stock 2) ordered a underfolder stock 3) made sure I wasn't breaking the law 4) had the stock installed 5) fixed the safety to work properly 6) posted pics 7) was questioned about a tax stamp 8) told yall I don't have a physical stamp 9) just remembered that most of you probably don't know the ATF won't issue a physical stamp if you used eforms 10) consider this me telling you I used eforms
Yes, it is installed. Yes it is nice. Yes, its a legal SBR. Yes, I got my Krink today and I'm happy!
Something else new that I learned from this thread. That kindof sucks. I like the stamps. They're purty and say 200 dollars on them. Where else can you get a $200 stamp? 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/23/2014 4:39:37 AM EDT
[#18]
I thought OP had to pepper his angus
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/23/2014 4:46:08 AM EDT
[#19]
golf clap, for the troll post.  |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/23/2014 4:49:37 AM EDT
[#20]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
It's not really slant cut. Here is the pistol with the brace briefly un-installed. <a href="http://s247.photobucket.com/user/dab969/media/image_zpsaf236928.jpg.html" target="_blank">http://i247.photobucket.com/albums/gg141/dab969/image_zpsaf236928.jpg</a> Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
That's what happens when you put an underfolder on a slant cut receiver, the stock moves forward and blocks the safety when it should let the safety pass through the clearance arch. Kharn Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile I see an underfolder, how is this a pistol. What I'm looking at appears to be an SBR. Why do you need the sig arm brace? Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/23/2014 4:51:31 AM EDT
[#21]
Well, that interesting for a minute.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/23/2014 4:55:25 AM EDT
[#22]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I think you fellas may have misunderstood what I have going on here. I'll spell it out for you: 1) ordered an M92 pistol with the not-a-stock 2) ordered a underfolder stock 3) made sure I wasn't breaking the law 4) had the stock installed 5) fixed the safety to work properly 6) posted pics 7) was questioned about a tax stamp 8) told yall I don't have a physical stamp 9) just remembered that most of you probably don't know the ATF won't issue a physical stamp if you used eforms 10) consider this me telling you I used eforms
Yes, it is installed. Yes it is nice. Yes, its a legal SBR. Yes, I got my Krink today and I'm happy!
What is this nonsense? You mean I still get infringement, but I don't get an actual stamp? For $200, I expect some poor BATF employee to be licking these things and pressing them onto my Form 1 with a contemptible scowl. This is 1934 legal bullshit, with processing that moves at the speed of 1934 molasses, and I thereby demand a 1934 stamp! |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/23/2014 4:56:42 AM EDT
[#23]
Edit: so you've a troll. got it. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/23/2014 4:57:55 AM EDT
[#24]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Now the not-a-stock can get moved to more important things...<a href="http://s247.photobucket.com/user/dab969/media/imagejpg1_zps593bae20.jpg.html" target="_blank">http://i247.photobucket.com/albums/gg141/dab969/imagejpg1_zps593bae20.jpg</a> And that makes my skull hurt just from looking at it. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/23/2014 5:00:27 AM EDT
[#25]
Quote HistoryQuoted: What is this nonsense? You mean I still get infringement, but I don't get an actual stamp? For $200, I expect some poor BATF employee to be licking these things and pressing them onto my Form 1 with a contemptible scowl. This is 1934 legal bullshit, with processing that moves at the speed of 1934 molasses, and I thereby demand a 1934 stamp! Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: I think you fellas may have misunderstood what I have going on here. I'll spell it out for you: 1) ordered an M92 pistol with the not-a-stock 2) ordered a underfolder stock 3) made sure I wasn't breaking the law 4) had the stock installed 5) fixed the safety to work properly 6) posted pics 7) was questioned about a tax stamp 8) told yall I don't have a physical stamp 9) just remembered that most of you probably don't know the ATF won't issue a physical stamp if you used eforms 10) consider this me telling you I used eforms Yes, it is installed. Yes it is nice. Yes, its a legal SBR. Yes, I got my Krink today and I'm happy! What is this nonsense? You mean I still get infringement, but I don't get an actual stamp? For $200, I expect some poor BATF employee to be licking these things and pressing them onto my Form 1 with a contemptible scowl. This is 1934 legal bullshit, with processing that moves at the speed of 1934 molasses, and I thereby demand a 1934 stamp! |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/23/2014 5:02:36 AM EDT
[#26]
Quote HistoryQuoted: And that makes my skull hurt just from looking at it. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Now the not-a-stock can get moved to more important things...<a href="http://s247.photobucket.com/user/dab969/media/imagejpg1_zps593bae20.jpg.html" target="_blank">http://i247.photobucket.com/albums/gg141/dab969/imagejpg1_zps593bae20.jpg</a> And that makes my skull hurt just from looking at it. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/23/2014 5:19:02 AM EDT
[#27]
Thread reminds me that I need to get to the range and try out the Sig non-stock I just put on my AR pistol last week. It looks very fun !!
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/23/2014 5:30:36 AM EDT
[#28]
There were some RPKs with under folders that made it into the country just after one of the bans, the solution was to stick a wood stock on them in addition to the under folder, ATF allowed them to be sold as unrestricted rifles. I think they were NHM91s or something like that.
Kharn Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/23/2014 5:31:36 AM EDT
[#29]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Was it originally, or at any time since, transferred as a rifle? If so, hide your dag. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
everything is fair game, right?<a href="http://s247.photobucket.com/user/dab969/media/image_zpsb174c259.jpg.html" target="_blank">http://i247.photobucket.com/albums/gg141/dab969/image_zpsb174c259.jpg</a> Was it originally, or at any time since, transferred as a rifle? If so, hide your dag. This could be true...Im still learning though. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/23/2014 9:02:55 AM EDT
[#30]
Is eforms any faster than the paper method?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/23/2014 9:49:40 AM EDT
[#31]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Is eforms any faster than the paper method? |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/23/2014 10:15:15 AM EDT
[#32]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
You cannot deny that is fucking tits. Edit: just saw the folder. Prepare your anus. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
everything is fair game, right?<a href="http://s247.photobucket.com/user/dab969/media/image_zpsb174c259.jpg.html" target="_blank">http://i247.photobucket.com/albums/gg141/dab969/image_zpsb174c259.jpg</a> You cannot deny that is fucking tits. Edit: just saw the folder. Prepare your anus. Look man, I've seen tit fucking, and it looks *nothing* like this. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/23/2014 10:51:39 AM EDT
[#33]
Quoted:
everything is fair game, right?<a href="http://s247.photobucket.com/user/dab969/media/image_zpsb174c259.jpg.html" target="_blank">http://i247.photobucket.com/albums/gg141/dab969/image_zpsb174c259.jpg</a> I hope for your sake that you've got that thing SBR'd... If it's yours. Otherwise you might want to prepare your body. For anal rapage. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/23/2014 10:52:24 AM EDT
[#34]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
you guys are misunderstanding the purpose. leave Sig-not-a-stock on 99.99% of the time = legal .01% of the time? hehehe you essentially get an SBR without having to worry about being prosecuted. You *DO* understand what "Constructive Possession" is, right? |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/23/2014 11:07:50 AM EDT
[#35]
Quote HistoryQuoted: You *DO* understand what "Constructive Possession" is, right? Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: you guys are misunderstanding the purpose. leave Sig-not-a-stock on 99.99% of the time = legal .01% of the time? hehehe you essentially get an SBR without having to worry about being prosecuted. You *DO* understand what "Constructive Possession" is, right? |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/23/2014 11:30:56 AM EDT
[#36]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I think you fellas may have misunderstood what I have going on here. I'll spell it out for you: 1) ordered an M92 pistol with the not-a-stock 2) ordered a underfolder stock 3) made sure I wasn't breaking the law 4) had the stock installed 5) fixed the safety to work properly 6) posted pics 7) was questioned about a tax stamp 8) told yall I don't have a physical stamp 9) just remembered that most of you probably don't know the ATF won't issue a physical stamp if you used eforms 10) consider this me telling you I used eforms
Yes, it is installed. Yes it is nice. Yes, its a legal SBR. Yes, I got my Krink today and I'm happy!
Looks good. Thanks for trolling GD. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/23/2014 11:37:36 AM EDT
[#37]
Troll thread is dildo thread.
And I'm happy to see via another member quoting him, that putting LibertarianYankee on Ignore was still a damn fine decision. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/23/2014 11:41:23 AM EDT
[#38]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
You *DO* understand what "Constructive Possession" is, right? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
you guys are misunderstanding the purpose. leave Sig-not-a-stock on 99.99% of the time = legal .01% of the time? hehehe you essentially get an SBR without having to worry about being prosecuted. You *DO* understand what "Constructive Possession" is, right? Receiver is not even drilled for the stock. Chill. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/23/2014 12:11:12 PM EDT
[#39]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Receiver is not even drilled for the stock. Chill. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: you guys are misunderstanding the purpose. leave Sig-not-a-stock on 99.99% of the time = legal .01% of the time? hehehe you essentially get an SBR without having to worry about being prosecuted. You *DO* understand what "Constructive Possession" is, right? Receiver is not even drilled for the stock. Chill. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/23/2014 12:16:27 PM EDT
[#40]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
It's actually not so bad. Believe it or not, the M92 had more recoil than the MicroDraco when fired with the not-a-stock attached. I think the booster on the M92 enhances the felt recoil or something. Now that the M92 is a krink short barreled rifle, it should be more pleasurable to shoot. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Now the not-a-stock can get moved to more important things...<a href="http://s247.photobucket.com/user/dab969/media/imagejpg1_zps593bae20.jpg.html" target="_blank">http://i247.photobucket.com/albums/gg141/dab969/imagejpg1_zps593bae20.jpg</a> And that makes my skull hurt just from looking at it. Have you ever chrono'd rounds out of that pistol? I'm betting factory loads are subsonic ... and don't suppress well, either. Still makes my head hurt just looking at it. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/23/2014 1:10:53 PM EDT
[#41]
My Krink had to be assembled as a pistol. No SBR's here. I had NDS, mark it Pistol on the bottom. Brand new unfired kit, with the receiver numbered the same.
You don't need that booster. That's just for FA fire from what I understand. Try one of the 3 piece flash hiders. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/23/2014 1:24:55 PM EDT
[#42]
Nice trolling.
I love my ARM BRACE.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/23/2014 3:10:56 PM EDT
[#43]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
My receiver is drilled and fitted with the stock. This is an available option for me since I received my electronic approval of my Form 1. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
you guys are misunderstanding the purpose. leave Sig-not-a-stock on 99.99% of the time = legal .01% of the time? hehehe you essentially get an SBR without having to worry about being prosecuted. You *DO* understand what "Constructive Possession" is, right? Receiver is not even drilled for the stock. Chill. Well, that's definitely a game changa |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/23/2014 3:13:26 PM EDT
[#44]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
The SIG stock looks like it would prevent the extension of the under folder, therefore making the underfolder a non-stock and therefore not an SBR. Legal Jiu-Jitsu at it's finest! Are you a wizard? |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/23/2014 5:02:47 PM EDT
[#45]
On an SBR AK this stock should be and probably is perfectly legal. However according to the letter of the law I don't know for sure how you could mount it to an ordinary AK pistol without doing some modifications which would then make it not legal. This is not referring to anything the OP has going on. I am jealous of the OP's Krink
|
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
