Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel

Log In

A valid email is required.
Password is required.
Site Notices
Arrow Left Previous Page
Page / 2
Basic
Offline
  • Joined Nov 2009
  • Posts 1098
  • EE 100% (5)
USA USA
Posted: 2/22/2011 3:04:57 PM EST
It's a couple inches or so, right? I mean, forget about the carry handle for a moment. Even flat top uppers come with the front sight post so high up. Wouldn't the gun benefit from having low profile sights? I was thinking about this after seeing the Benelli MR1, which I don't like, but I do like the sights better than the AR.

The Funny Man
Avatar
Bronze
Offline
  • Joined Mar 2006
  • Posts 4331
  • EE 100% (3)
USA NC, USA
Military
Link Posted: 2/22/2011 3:06:35 PM EST
Buffer tube keeps you from aligning your eye right above the barrel. It acts like a high comb.
Pro Patria Vigilans-U.S. Army Signal Corps
30th BCT "Old Hickory"
Had anyone seen a pin?
Avatar
Lifetime Member
Offline
  • Joined Sep 2004
  • Posts 5142
  • EE 100% (206)
USA FL, USA
Link Posted: 2/22/2011 3:07:22 PM EST
Look at the position of the buffer tube.

You are limited on how low you can go with sights, and still comfortably use them.
LMT is a company with lousy QC. Buy from a company that cares about its products, like Bravo Company or LaRue.
Basic
Offline
  • Joined Nov 2004
  • Posts 5006
  • EE 100% (1)
USA MA, USA
Link Posted: 2/22/2011 3:08:13 PM EST
Originally Posted By widerstehe:
It's a couple inches or so, right? I mean, forget about the carry handle for a moment. Even flat top uppers come with the front sight post so high up. Wouldn't the gun benefit from having low profile sights? I was thinking about this after seeing the Benelli MR1, which I don't like, but I do like the sights better than the AR.


because of the straight line profile of the AR, the sights need to be higher in order for you to get a proper cheek weld

Basic
Offline
  • Joined May 2009
  • Posts 966
  • EE 0% (0)
USA WI, USA
Link Posted: 2/22/2011 3:08:14 PM EST
[Last Edit: 2/22/2011 3:10:13 PM EST by KRONIIK]
The buffer tube inside the stock requires that the stock have an unusually high comb.
The sights are high enough to be able to see through them.

Most shooters would be unable to get their head low enough if conventional iron sights were used.


Edited to add:
I hereby officially give up on attempting to give the first correct answer to an OP.

Can you sink a man?
Avatar
Bronze
Online
  • Joined Dec 2001
  • Posts 55769
  • EE 100% (21)
USA TX, USA
Military
Link Posted: 2/22/2011 3:08:22 PM EST
So, how do you propose you would get your head low enough to see the sights?
All the rivers run into the sea; yet the sea is not full.
Member
Avatar
Gold
Online
  • Joined Mar 2001
  • Posts 17808
  • EE 100% (58)
USA CA, USA
Link Posted: 2/22/2011 3:10:51 PM EST

Originally Posted By Combat_Jack:
So, how do you propose you would get your head low enough to see the sights?

A bolt and buffer system like the FAL would work. But I'm sure there's a reason why it wasn't used.
343
Never Forget
كافر
Basic
Offline
  • Joined Nov 2009
  • Posts 1099
  • EE 100% (5)
USA USA
Link Posted: 2/22/2011 3:12:14 PM EST
Originally Posted By Combat_Jack:
So, how do you propose you would get your head low enough to see the sights?


I really don't know. My original question has been answered, I didn't realize this was the reason for the high sights.

VBC
Biddy Biddy Biddy
Avatar
Bronze
Offline
  • Joined Feb 2005
  • Posts 9887
  • EE 0% (0)
USA VA, USA
Link Posted: 2/22/2011 3:13:04 PM EST
The straight buffer tube requiring the higher sights is actually beneficial for a battle rifle because higher sights will increase the maximum point blank range, or in other words, allows the implementation of an "improved battle sight" type of zeroing.


XM8 Instigator and Hockey God. 4/9'er
Avatar
Bronze
Online
  • Joined Sep 2003
  • Posts 10010
  • EE 100% (2)
USA MT, USA
Link Posted: 2/22/2011 3:13:13 PM EST
Just poor design

Negative Goatrider, the pattern is full.
Can you sink a man?
Avatar
Bronze
Online
  • Joined Dec 2001
  • Posts 55770
  • EE 100% (21)
USA TX, USA
Military
Link Posted: 2/22/2011 3:16:19 PM EST
The AR was designed with a bolt carrier group that essentially floats in the upper receiver. The gas impulse is on-axis; that is to say that it pushes the bolt forward and out of the carrier, and which helps to push the carrier to the rear.

Because of this design, there is no need for receiver rails made of steel, which both makes the design cheaper and lighter.

The FAL is a great rifle, but it lacks the utterly simple design of the AR.

If you want to mount sights to the barrel you are going to have to make some compromises.
All the rivers run into the sea; yet the sea is not full.
Internet Celebrity
Avatar
Bronze
Offline
  • Joined Nov 2006
  • Posts 24618
  • EE 100% (4)
USA GA, USA
Link Posted: 2/22/2011 3:16:32 PM EST
[Last Edit: 2/22/2011 3:17:52 PM EST by kap_x]
Apart from the reasons mentioned in the post directly above me, the design of the AR-15 is brilliant in that the barrel, bolt, bolt carrier, and buffer are all along the same axis. This means that the recoil impulse is driven straight back against the body, instead of causing the weapon to "cam" or rotate along a decentralized axis.
This is one of the main contributors to the AR-15's low recoil characteristics, and thus faster follow-up shots and higher levels of accuracy in rapid fire.

However, in doing so, the sight had to be raised so the shooter could still acquire a suitable cheekweld on the weapon. The trajectory of the cartridge, and the modern zeros help off-set the impact of having such high sight height over bore, since the bullet will fly flat through most of its effective or used range.
Chief Xylopolist and forklift magician
Can you sink a man?
Avatar
Bronze
Online
  • Joined Dec 2001
  • Posts 55771
  • EE 100% (21)
USA TX, USA
Military
Link Posted: 2/22/2011 3:16:51 PM EST
Originally Posted By VBC:
The straight buffer tube requiring the higher sights is actually beneficial for a battle rifle because higher sights will increase the maximum point blank range, or in other words, allows the implementation of an "improved battle sight" type of zeroing.



And this.
All the rivers run into the sea; yet the sea is not full.
Member
Avatar
Bronze
Offline
  • Joined Mar 2005
  • Posts 14037
  • EE 0% (0)
USA TX, USA
Link Posted: 2/22/2011 3:17:40 PM EST
Design = compromise.

A bore in line with the shoulder helps the user handle recoil, but the eyes have trouble getting there.

A bore in line with a comfortable sight picture makes recoil more of a problem, even though it's easy on the eyes.

lurking since '04
Avatar
Bronze
Offline
  • Joined Feb 2007
  • Posts 3149
  • EE 100% (21)
USA VA, USA
Link Posted: 2/22/2011 3:19:06 PM EST
[Last Edit: 2/22/2011 3:22:22 PM EST by novaDAK]


not unique to the AR15.
Virginia gun owners, are you a VCDL member?
http://www.vcdl.org
Lost in a Roman... wilderness of pain
Avatar
Bronze
Offline
  • Joined Apr 2007
  • Posts 18623
  • EE 100% (27)
KHM KHM
Link Posted: 2/22/2011 3:20:00 PM EST
The sights aren't high, the bore is low.
Straight line design.
"If people insist on photoshops that have nothing to do with anything but racial stereotypes - like Obama dressed like a pimp, eating watermelon and asking where the white wimmenz are at - then that thread will be locked too."
DK-Prof
Basic
Offline
  • Joined Apr 2006
  • Posts 227
  • EE 0% (0)
USA PA, USA
Link Posted: 2/22/2011 3:22:55 PM EST
<mini-hijack>

OK...What stock/adjustable cheek would be best on an A2 config when using a scope that mounts to the carry handle? (Barska)

</mini-hijack> <sorry OP, just curious....>



Member
Avatar
Bronze
Offline
  • Joined Jan 2007
  • Posts 256
  • EE 0% (0)
USA GA, USA
Link Posted: 2/22/2011 3:27:00 PM EST
I always thought it was designed that way so that you could use a gas mask and still use the sights.


just a guess on my part.
-"No people in history have ever survived, who thought they could protect their freedom by making themselves inoffensive to their enemies."
Basic
Offline
  • Joined Oct 2008
  • Posts 4850
  • EE 0% (0)
USA IN, USA
Link Posted: 2/22/2011 3:27:27 PM EST
Also note the location of the charging handle on the first AR15's:


The "carry handle" was never meant for carrying, it's a protective structure around a charging handle that is no longer there, similar to the FAMAS.

I'm sure you could work out the recoil mechanism to drop the cheek weld some, but the first AR's also had a CH in the way, between the two it was best to leave well enough alone.

Internet Celebrity
Avatar
Bronze
Offline
  • Joined Nov 2006
  • Posts 24619
  • EE 100% (4)
USA GA, USA
Link Posted: 2/22/2011 3:28:59 PM EST

Originally Posted By Mal_means_bad:
Also note the location of the charging handle on the first AR15's:
http://t1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQBvAlo-lyxY8Q_dM_l_GCC7xhpxfBOP3HJ9wQstBs3o5b3LKhXLA&t=1

The "carry handle" was never meant for carrying, it's a protective structure around a charging handle that is no longer there, similar to the FAMAS.

I'm sure you could work out the recoil mechanism to drop the cheek weld some, but the first AR's also had a CH in the way, between the two it was best to leave well enough alone.

Excellent point!
Chief Xylopolist and forklift magician
Member
Avatar
Bronze
Offline
  • Joined Jun 2006
  • Posts 1933
  • EE 0% (0)
USA VA, USA
Link Posted: 2/22/2011 3:41:17 PM EST
Originally Posted By kap_x:

Originally Posted By Mal_means_bad:
Also note the location of the charging handle on the first AR15's:
http://t1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQBvAlo-lyxY8Q_dM_l_GCC7xhpxfBOP3HJ9wQstBs3o5b3LKhXLA&t=1

The "carry handle" was never meant for carrying, it's a protective structure around a charging handle that is no longer there, similar to the FAMAS.

I'm sure you could work out the recoil mechanism to drop the cheek weld some, but the first AR's also had a CH in the way, between the two it was best to leave well enough alone.

Excellent point!


Looks like you can reach the bolt catch when you pull back the charging handle without having to take your hand off the pistol grip! Stoner had it worked out after all.
"Fuck it I didn't sign for it"
Killin a man is a hell of a thing...
Avatar
Bronze
Offline
  • Joined Feb 2002
  • Posts 6603
  • EE 100% (4)
USA MO, USA
Link Posted: 2/22/2011 3:41:39 PM EST
I'll just leave this here....

"Deservins got nothin ta do with it."
Veteran of Reagan Era
Avatar
Platinum
Offline
  • Joined Jan 2001
  • Posts 58409
  • EE 100% (1)
USA TX, USA
Link Posted: 2/22/2011 3:48:51 PM EST
Muzzle climb reduction. Yes, it also helps extend the point blank range, this is incidental but worthy.

The M14 was unusable in full auto. The AR10 more so.

Sullivan just scaled down the AR10 to make the AR15.
GD: Too much Chicken Little, not enough Gene Kranz.
Basic
Offline
  • Joined Nov 2009
  • Posts 589
  • EE 0% (0)
USA VA, USA
Link Posted: 2/22/2011 3:53:04 PM EST
was never in the military but i have it on good authority that if you get caught carryng youre rifle by the carry handle in boot thats your ass and your getting smoked.

Basic
Offline
  • Joined Sep 2007
  • Posts 369
  • EE 0% (0)
USA ID, USA
Link Posted: 2/22/2011 3:55:28 PM EST
Originally Posted By widerstehe:
It's a couple inches or so, right? I mean, forget about the carry handle for a moment. Even flat top uppers come with the front sight post so high up. Wouldn't the gun benefit from having low profile sights? I was thinking about this after seeing the Benelli MR1, which I don't like, but I do like the sights better than the AR.


It was explained to me (during BRM) that the barrel is actually slightly tilted upward and thus the bullet arcs. The point of aim matches at 25 meters and 300 meters.
I have the latest FM on the M16/M4 and it mentions that somewhere in the technical section also.

Member
Avatar
Bronze
Offline
  • Joined Jan 2006
  • Posts 14727
  • EE 100% (12)
USA NY, USA
Link Posted: 2/22/2011 3:56:00 PM EST
Originally Posted By SevenMMmag:
Originally Posted By widerstehe:
It's a couple inches or so, right? I mean, forget about the carry handle for a moment. Even flat top uppers come with the front sight post so high up. Wouldn't the gun benefit from having low profile sights? I was thinking about this after seeing the Benelli MR1, which I don't like, but I do like the sights better than the AR.

because of the straight line profile of the AR, the sights need to be higher in order for you to get a proper cheek weld

This.



Notice how your cheek rests below the line of the barrel.

Compare that with this:



Notice how your cheek is above the line of the barrel. That's where the extra inch or two of sight offset comes from.
Cool storm video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w6yotg3rw2M
Basic
Offline
  • Joined Feb 2001
  • Posts 14383
  • EE 0% (0)
USA CA, USA
Link Posted: 2/22/2011 3:57:15 PM EST
Originally Posted By kap_x:
Apart from the reasons mentioned in the post directly above me, the design of the AR-15 is brilliant in that the barrel, bolt, bolt carrier, and buffer are all along the same axis. This means that the recoil impulse is driven straight back against the body, instead of causing the weapon to "cam" or rotate along a decentralized axis.
This is one of the main contributors to the AR-15's low recoil characteristics, and thus faster follow-up shots and higher levels of accuracy in rapid fire.

However, in doing so, the sight had to be raised so the shooter could still acquire a suitable cheekweld on the weapon. The trajectory of the cartridge, and the modern zeros help off-set the impact of having such high sight height over bore, since the bullet will fly flat through most of its effective or used range.


This is also the reason for the pistol grip.

Veteran of Reagan Era
Avatar
Platinum
Offline
  • Joined Jan 2001
  • Posts 58411
  • EE 100% (1)
USA TX, USA
Link Posted: 2/22/2011 4:00:13 PM EST

Originally Posted By Pokernut:
was never in the military but i have it on good authority that if you get caught carryng youre rifle by the carry handle in boot thats your ass and your getting smoked.

Never with the A1 or A2.
GD: Too much Chicken Little, not enough Gene Kranz.
Basic
Offline
  • Joined Jan 2002
  • Posts 4411
  • EE 100% (19)
USA AR, USA
Link Posted: 2/22/2011 4:01:56 PM EST
Originally Posted By Rem700PSS:
Just poor design





I don't think I have ever seen you post anything that would cause me to believe you are over the age of twelve.

I got nothin
Avatar
Bronze
Offline
  • Joined May 2006
  • Posts 8710
  • EE 100% (38)
USA USA
Military
Link Posted: 2/22/2011 4:06:08 PM EST
[Last Edit: 2/22/2011 4:09:04 PM EST by Mach]
Originally Posted By novaDAK:
http://www.proxibid.com/AuctionImages/4103/31795/Detail/405.jpg

not unique to the AR15.


What?

The piston, BCG are not in line with the bore on the AK, they sit above it and add to the muzzle rise during fire. It is completely different than what is talked about in this thread

ETA And the BCG does not extend into the stock which is why the stock on the AK is bent down so a good cheek weld can be used with the sights very close to the bore.
“Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is argument of tyrants. It is the creed of slaves.”
William Pitt, 1783:
on a Rhodetrip
Avatar
Bronze
Offline
  • Joined Oct 2008
  • Posts 7609
  • EE 100% (4)
USA CT, USA
Link Posted: 2/22/2011 4:07:47 PM EST
It is amazing just how much awesome info, yet how much crap info has come up in only one page of this thread!


The good info has been REALLY good. The bad info has been really
[NO TEXT]
Basic
Offline
  • Joined Jan 2002
  • Posts 4413
  • EE 100% (19)
USA AR, USA
Link Posted: 2/22/2011 4:09:03 PM EST
Originally Posted By Mach:
Originally Posted By novaDAK:
http://www.proxibid.com/AuctionImages/4103/31795/Detail/405.jpg

not unique to the AR15.


What?

The piston, BCG are not in line with the bore on the AK, they sit above it and add to the muzzle rise during fire. It is completely different than what is talked about in this thread


well, it still has a roughly similar bore offset to the AR-15 and does benefit from the same principle of linear recoil transfer due to the low bore axis. the main reason that AKs recoil more than ARs is they are typically way over gassed.


Member
Avatar
Bronze
Offline
  • Joined Oct 2002
  • Posts 3318
  • EE 100% (22)
USA RI, USA
Link Posted: 2/22/2011 4:09:25 PM EST

Originally Posted By Badger66:
Originally Posted By kap_x:

Originally Posted By Mal_means_bad:
Also note the location of the charging handle on the first AR15's:
http://t1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQBvAlo-lyxY8Q_dM_l_GCC7xhpxfBOP3HJ9wQstBs3o5b3LKhXLA&t=1

The "carry handle" was never meant for carrying, it's a protective structure around a charging handle that is no longer there, similar to the FAMAS.

I'm sure you could work out the recoil mechanism to drop the cheek weld some, but the first AR's also had a CH in the way, between the two it was best to leave well enough alone.

Excellent point!


Looks like you can reach the bolt catch when you pull back the charging handle without having to take your hand off the pistol grip! Stoner had it worked out after all.
If memory serves me correctly they had to move the charging handle cause it got too hot to touch after sustained firing.


Member
Avatar
Bronze
Offline
  • Joined May 2007
  • Posts 1833
  • EE 100% (2)
USA NH, USA
Link Posted: 2/22/2011 4:11:52 PM EST
Originally Posted By Badger66:
Originally Posted By kap_x:

Originally Posted By Mal_means_bad:
Also note the location of the charging handle on the first AR15's:
http://t1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQBvAlo-lyxY8Q_dM_l_GCC7xhpxfBOP3HJ9wQstBs3o5b3LKhXLA&t=1

The "carry handle" was never meant for carrying, it's a protective structure around a charging handle that is no longer there, similar to the FAMAS.

I'm sure you could work out the recoil mechanism to drop the cheek weld some, but the first AR's also had a CH in the way, between the two it was best to leave well enough alone.

Excellent point!


Looks like you can reach the bolt catch when you pull back the charging handle without having to take your hand off the pistol grip! Stoner had it worked out after all.


That's actually a good point. Was the original charging handle reciprocating too? That would eliminate the need for a forward assist too...

I got nothin
Avatar
Bronze
Offline
  • Joined May 2006
  • Posts 8711
  • EE 100% (38)
USA USA
Military
Link Posted: 2/22/2011 4:13:25 PM EST
Originally Posted By SpacemanSpiff:
Originally Posted By Mach:
Originally Posted By novaDAK:
http://www.proxibid.com/AuctionImages/4103/31795/Detail/405.jpg

not unique to the AR15.


What?

The piston, BCG are not in line with the bore on the AK, they sit above it and add to the muzzle rise during fire. It is completely different than what is talked about in this thread


well, it still has a roughly similar bore offset to the AR-15 and does benefit from the same principle of linear recoil transfer due to the low bore axis. the main reason that AKs recoil more than ARs is they are typically way over gassed.



while both bolts are obviously in line with the bore, there is much more mass above the bore on the bolt carier in the AK than there is on the AR. Pluse there is a huge honkin piston moving above the bore in the AK and there is none in the AR. That makes a big difference, plus the mass difference of the bullet.

What do you mean by over gassed?
“Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is argument of tyrants. It is the creed of slaves.”
William Pitt, 1783:
Member
Avatar
Bronze
Offline
  • Joined Nov 2008
  • Posts 1520
  • EE 100% (2)
USA TX, USA
Link Posted: 2/22/2011 4:13:27 PM EST
Originally Posted By SpacemanSpiff:
Originally Posted By Rem700PSS:
Just poor design





I don't think I have ever seen you post anything that would cause me to believe you are over the age of twelve.


LOL he is pretty funny if he is 12.

I got nothin
Avatar
Bronze
Offline
  • Joined May 2006
  • Posts 8712
  • EE 100% (38)
USA USA
Military
Link Posted: 2/22/2011 4:14:40 PM EST
Originally Posted By Capt-Planet:
Originally Posted By Badger66:
Originally Posted By kap_x:

Originally Posted By Mal_means_bad:
Also note the location of the charging handle on the first AR15's:
http://t1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQBvAlo-lyxY8Q_dM_l_GCC7xhpxfBOP3HJ9wQstBs3o5b3LKhXLA&t=1

The "carry handle" was never meant for carrying, it's a protective structure around a charging handle that is no longer there, similar to the FAMAS.

I'm sure you could work out the recoil mechanism to drop the cheek weld some, but the first AR's also had a CH in the way, between the two it was best to leave well enough alone.

Excellent point!


Looks like you can reach the bolt catch when you pull back the charging handle without having to take your hand off the pistol grip! Stoner had it worked out after all.


That's actually a good point. Was the original charging handle reciprocating too? That would eliminate the need for a forward assist too...


I didn't know that. Interesting.
“Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is argument of tyrants. It is the creed of slaves.”
William Pitt, 1783:
Basic
Offline
  • Joined Dec 2001
  • Posts 1512
  • EE 100% (87)
USA WV, USA
Link Posted: 2/22/2011 4:15:31 PM EST
Originally Posted By Frank_Castle:
Originally Posted By widerstehe:
It's a couple inches or so, right? I mean, forget about the carry handle for a moment. Even flat top uppers come with the front sight post so high up. Wouldn't the gun benefit from having low profile sights? I was thinking about this after seeing the Benelli MR1, which I don't like, but I do like the sights better than the AR.


It was explained to me (during BRM) that the barrel is actually slightly tilted upward and thus the bullet arcs. The point of aim matches at 25 meters and 300 meters.
I have the latest FM on the M16/M4 and it mentions that somewhere in the technical section also.


The barrel is only tilted up in relation to the line of sight, the same as with every other rifle,sporting or military.

Can you sink a man?
Avatar
Bronze
Online
  • Joined Dec 2001
  • Posts 55772
  • EE 100% (21)
USA TX, USA
Military
Link Posted: 2/22/2011 4:16:10 PM EST
The AK uses a lot of gas. Some is vented out after the piston begins to move to the rear. In order to lower rate of fire, the trigger is controlled rather than the bolt, as in the AR.

Basically, the bolt on an AK is fast, and ROF is slowed by a cable rather than weight as in an AR.

It helps with reliability, but has some costs.
All the rivers run into the sea; yet the sea is not full.
I got nothin
Avatar
Bronze
Offline
  • Joined May 2006
  • Posts 8713
  • EE 100% (38)
USA USA
Military
Link Posted: 2/22/2011 4:16:14 PM EST
Originally Posted By David4327:
Originally Posted By SpacemanSpiff:
Originally Posted By Rem700PSS:
Just poor design





I don't think I have ever seen you post anything that would cause me to believe you are over the age of twelve.


LOL he is pretty funny if he is 12.


wow so he joined when he was 4. That is awesome.
“Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is argument of tyrants. It is the creed of slaves.”
William Pitt, 1783:
Basic
Offline
  • Joined Nov 2008
  • Posts 382
  • EE 100% (68)
USA IN, USA
Link Posted: 2/22/2011 4:16:44 PM EST
[Last Edit: 2/22/2011 4:17:15 PM EST by jblomenberg16]
Originally Posted By Frank_Castle:
Originally Posted By widerstehe:
It's a couple inches or so, right? I mean, forget about the carry handle for a moment. Even flat top uppers come with the front sight post so high up. Wouldn't the gun benefit from having low profile sights? I was thinking about this after seeing the Benelli MR1, which I don't like, but I do like the sights better than the AR.


It was explained to me (during BRM) that the barrel is actually slightly tilted upward and thus the bullet arcs. The point of aim matches at 25 meters and 300 meters.
I have the latest FM on the M16/M4 and it mentions that somewhere in the technical section also.


The barrel is in a straight line, but when you line up the front and rear sights they do not form a line parallel to the bore. They actually form a line that slopes slightly from rear to front. That will intersect the trajectory of the bullet at 25m if that is your "zero" distance, 50m if that is your zero etc.

The same phenomenon is true on just about any gun with the sights above the bore, irons or optics. The bullet rises up to meat the sight line because you end up pointing the barrel at a slight up-angle relative to the sight line.


I got nothin
Avatar
Bronze
Offline
  • Joined May 2006
  • Posts 8714
  • EE 100% (38)
USA USA
Military
Link Posted: 2/22/2011 4:17:09 PM EST
Originally Posted By Combat_Jack:
The AK uses a lot of gas. Some is vented out after the piston begins to move to the rear. In order to lower rate of fire, the trigger is controlled rather than the bolt, as in the AR.

Basically, the bolt on an AK is fast, and ROF is slowed by a cable rather than weight as in an AR.

It helps with reliability, but has some costs.


Didn't know that thanks
“Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is argument of tyrants. It is the creed of slaves.”
William Pitt, 1783:
Member
Avatar
Bronze
Offline
  • Joined Oct 2001
  • Posts 22464
  • EE 100% (1)
USA USA
Link Posted: 2/22/2011 4:19:59 PM EST
Originally Posted By ColonelHurtz:
The sights aren't high, the bore is low.
Straight line design.


Yes, and who decided that sights have to be low to the bore? What makes that better?

Fact is, it doesn't.
"To my mind it is wholly irresponsible to go into the world incapable of preventing violence, injury, crime, and death. How feeble is the mindset to accept defenselessness. How unnatural. How cheap. How cowardly. How pathetic." --Ted Nugent
Member
Avatar
Bronze
Offline
  • Joined May 2007
  • Posts 6119
  • EE 100% (4)
USA FL, USA
Link Posted: 2/22/2011 4:20:27 PM EST

Originally Posted By operatorerror:

Originally Posted By Combat_Jack:
So, how do you propose you would get your head low enough to see the sights?

A bolt and buffer system like the FAL would work. But I'm sure there's a reason why it wasn't used.

That is why I sold my nice FAL. It literally bruised my cheek when I shot it

Let us never forget, government has no resources of its own. Government can only give to us what it has previously taken from us.
XM8 Instigator and Hockey God. 4/9'er
Avatar
Bronze
Online
  • Joined Sep 2003
  • Posts 10011
  • EE 100% (2)
USA MT, USA
Link Posted: 2/22/2011 4:32:44 PM EST

Originally Posted By Mach:
Originally Posted By David4327:
Originally Posted By SpacemanSpiff:
Originally Posted By Rem700PSS:
Just poor design





I don't think I have ever seen you post anything that would cause me to believe you are over the age of twelve.


LOL he is pretty funny if he is 12.


wow so he joined when he was 4. That is awesome.
And I was only smarter than about half of the people here at that time.

Negative Goatrider, the pattern is full.
Member
Avatar
Bronze
Offline
  • Joined Feb 2005
  • Posts 23151
  • EE 0% (0)
USA USA
Link Posted: 2/22/2011 4:34:04 PM EST
The originators of the concept:





A Swiss rifle using this layout:



One of our early uses of this layout:



Another American weapon using a straight line layout:



The purpose of a straight-line layout is to offer better recoil control by transferring the recoil energy directly into the firer's shoulder, reducing muzzle climb in the process. This is particularly important in automatic weapons. Many grenade launchers also use a straight-line layout for the same reason:







The beatings will continue until morale improves.
USN 1969-1973
Avatar
Gold
Offline
  • Joined Feb 2001
  • Posts 45906
  • EE 100% (24)
USA GA, USA
Link Posted: 2/22/2011 4:44:26 PM EST
Originally Posted By Bob1984:
Another American weapon using a straight line layout:






Sorry, the M14 was not a straight line layout.

That's why the AR10 was more controllable on full auto.

If it's a Colt, it's a copy of an original ArmaLite.

I am not LARRYG36.

Racing is life. Anything that happens before or after is just waiting.

If your AR10 is marked Geneseo, IL, it's still an AR10 no matter what some people say.
Veteran of Reagan Era
Avatar
Platinum
Offline
  • Joined Jan 2001
  • Posts 58413
  • EE 100% (1)
USA TX, USA
Link Posted: 2/22/2011 5:14:59 PM EST

Originally Posted By LARRYG:
Originally Posted By Bob1984:
Another American weapon using a straight line layout:

http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/land/M14A1.JPG




Sorry, the M14 was not a straight line layout.

That's why the AR10 was more controllable on full auto.


They TRIED to make it so with the funky stock. It still didn't work. Same problem with the BAR which despite the hype, was far less effective a SAW than the M60.

Yes, the AR10 was far better in full auto but with 20 round magazines, it still pales to the M60 with hundred round belt.

GD: Too much Chicken Little, not enough Gene Kranz.
USN 1969-1973
Avatar
Gold
Offline
  • Joined Feb 2001
  • Posts 45911
  • EE 100% (24)
USA GA, USA
Link Posted: 2/22/2011 5:21:44 PM EST
Originally Posted By Rem700PSS:

Originally Posted By Mach:
Originally Posted By David4327:
Originally Posted By SpacemanSpiff:
Originally Posted By Rem700PSS:
Just poor design





I don't think I have ever seen you post anything that would cause me to believe you are over the age of twelve.


LOL he is pretty funny if he is 12.


wow so he joined when he was 4. That is awesome.
And I was only smarter than about half of the people here at that time.



And it's been a downhill slide for you ever since.
If it's a Colt, it's a copy of an original ArmaLite.

I am not LARRYG36.

Racing is life. Anything that happens before or after is just waiting.

If your AR10 is marked Geneseo, IL, it's still an AR10 no matter what some people say.
Master Guns
Avatar
Bronze
Offline
  • Joined Jan 2005
  • Posts 9289
  • EE 100% (2)
USA CA, USA
Military
Link Posted: 2/22/2011 5:29:11 PM EST
Originally Posted By Combat_Jack:
So, how do you propose you would get your head low enough to see the sights?

Especially with a fucking brain bucket on.

USN 1969-1973
Avatar
Gold
Offline
  • Joined Feb 2001
  • Posts 45914
  • EE 100% (24)
USA GA, USA
Link Posted: 2/22/2011 5:38:44 PM EST
Originally Posted By 0699TeufelHnd:
Originally Posted By Combat_Jack:
So, how do you propose you would get your head low enough to see the sights?

Especially with a fucking brain bucket on.


That always brings to mind a video of when we first went into Iraq. A camera crew was with what appeared to be a squad or Marines and in the background, you hear "put your fucking brain bucket back on".

If it's a Colt, it's a copy of an original ArmaLite.

I am not LARRYG36.

Racing is life. Anything that happens before or after is just waiting.

If your AR10 is marked Geneseo, IL, it's still an AR10 no matter what some people say.
Arrow Left Previous Page
Page / 2
Top